Trial Outcomes & Findings for Randomized Control Trial to Assess Postoperative Pain After Sling Placement (NCT NCT00746863)
NCT ID: NCT00746863
Last Updated: 2010-06-22
Results Overview
At approximately two hours postoperatively patients completed a visual analog scale (VAS), which was a 10-cm numeric scale on which 0 represented "no pain" and 10 represented the" worst pain ever".
COMPLETED
NA
42 participants
2 hours postoperative from mid-urethral sling placement
2010-06-22
Participant Flow
From January 2008 to September of 2009, all female patients planning to undergo a sling with or without an anterior or posterior repair at the University of North Carolina (UNC) Hospital were approached for participation.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Intervention Group - Received Marcaine
Patients randomized to this arm will receive 60 cc of 0.125% Marcaine injected into the retropubic space along the tract that the suprapubic mid-urethral trocar will follow (one on each side) for a total of 120 cc of 0.125% Marcaine, prior to the placement of the mid-urethral sling via the suprapubic approach.
|
Control Group - No Marcaine
Patients assigned to this arm will have the mid-urethral sling placed via the suprapubic approach in the standard fashion with no injection of Marcaine into the retropubic space.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
21
|
21
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
21
|
21
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Randomized Control Trial to Assess Postoperative Pain After Sling Placement
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Intervention Group - Received Marcaine
n=21 Participants
Patients randomized to this arm will receive 60 cc of 0.125% Marcaine injected into the retropubic space along the tract that the suprapubic mid-urethral trocar will follow (one on each side) for a total of 120 cc of 0.125% Marcaine, prior to the placement of the mid-urethral sling via the suprapubic approach.
|
Control Group - No Marcaine
n=21 Participants
Patients assigned to this arm will have the mid-urethral sling placed via the suprapubic approach in the standard fashion with no injection of Marcaine into the retropubic space.
|
Total
n=42 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
37 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age Continuous
|
49.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.5 • n=5 Participants
|
52.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.7 • n=7 Participants
|
52 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
21 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
21 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
42 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
21 participants
n=5 Participants
|
21 participants
n=7 Participants
|
42 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 hours postoperative from mid-urethral sling placementPopulation: Analysis was intention to treat. One patient in the intervention did not have a 2 hour VAS collected.
At approximately two hours postoperatively patients completed a visual analog scale (VAS), which was a 10-cm numeric scale on which 0 represented "no pain" and 10 represented the" worst pain ever".
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Intervention Group - Received Marcaine
n=20 Participants
Patients randomized to this arm will receive 60 cc of 0.125% Marcaine injected into the retropubic space along the tract that the suprapubic mid-urethral trocar will follow (one on each side) for a total of 120 cc of 0.125% Marcaine, prior to the placement of the mid-urethral sling via the suprapubic approach.
|
Control Group - No Marcaine
n=21 Participants
Patients assigned to this arm will have the mid-urethral sling placed via the suprapubic approach in the standard fashion with no injection of Marcaine into the retropubic space.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Difference in Postoperative Pain Using a Visual Analog Scale at 2 Hours.
|
1.9 cm
Standard Deviation 2.38
|
2.6 cm
Standard Deviation 1.78
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 hours postoperative from mid-urethral sling placementPopulation: Intention to treat
At approximately six hours postoperatively patients completed a visual analog scale (VAS), which was a 10-cm numeric scale on which 0 represented "no pain" and 10 represented the" worst pain ever".
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Intervention Group - Received Marcaine
n=21 Participants
Patients randomized to this arm will receive 60 cc of 0.125% Marcaine injected into the retropubic space along the tract that the suprapubic mid-urethral trocar will follow (one on each side) for a total of 120 cc of 0.125% Marcaine, prior to the placement of the mid-urethral sling via the suprapubic approach.
|
Control Group - No Marcaine
n=21 Participants
Patients assigned to this arm will have the mid-urethral sling placed via the suprapubic approach in the standard fashion with no injection of Marcaine into the retropubic space.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Difference in Postoperative Pain Using a Visual Analog Scale at 6 Hours.
|
2.1 cm
Standard Deviation 2.46
|
2.3 cm
Standard Deviation 2.0
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 hours postoperative from mid-urethral sling placementPopulation: Analysis was intention to treat. One patient in the control group was discharged before her 24 hour VAS was collected.
At approximately twenty-four hours postoperatively patients completed a visual analog scale (VAS), which was a 10-cm numeric scale on which 0 represented "no pain" and 10 represented the" worst pain ever".
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Intervention Group - Received Marcaine
n=21 Participants
Patients randomized to this arm will receive 60 cc of 0.125% Marcaine injected into the retropubic space along the tract that the suprapubic mid-urethral trocar will follow (one on each side) for a total of 120 cc of 0.125% Marcaine, prior to the placement of the mid-urethral sling via the suprapubic approach.
|
Control Group - No Marcaine
n=20 Participants
Patients assigned to this arm will have the mid-urethral sling placed via the suprapubic approach in the standard fashion with no injection of Marcaine into the retropubic space.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Difference in Postoperative Pain Using a Visual Analog Scale at 24 Hours.
|
2.0 cm
Standard Deviation 2.37
|
2.3 cm
Standard Deviation 2.22
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From surgery until discharge, averageSecondary outcome included differences in amount of pain medication used in the hospital. This was assessed by comparing the number of pills of oral narcotics the patient took while hospitalized.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Intervention Group - Received Marcaine
n=21 Participants
Patients randomized to this arm will receive 60 cc of 0.125% Marcaine injected into the retropubic space along the tract that the suprapubic mid-urethral trocar will follow (one on each side) for a total of 120 cc of 0.125% Marcaine, prior to the placement of the mid-urethral sling via the suprapubic approach.
|
Control Group - No Marcaine
n=21 Participants
Patients assigned to this arm will have the mid-urethral sling placed via the suprapubic approach in the standard fashion with no injection of Marcaine into the retropubic space.
|
|---|---|---|
|
In-hospital Medication Amounts
|
4 number of pills
Standard Deviation 3.83
|
6 number of pills
Standard Deviation 4.32
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From after surgery to discharge from hospital.Prior to discharge, patients underwent voiding trials. At our institution, in order to pass the voiding trial, they must void at least 200 cc spontaneously and have less than 100 cc as a post void residual two times in a row.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Intervention Group - Received Marcaine
n=21 Participants
Patients randomized to this arm will receive 60 cc of 0.125% Marcaine injected into the retropubic space along the tract that the suprapubic mid-urethral trocar will follow (one on each side) for a total of 120 cc of 0.125% Marcaine, prior to the placement of the mid-urethral sling via the suprapubic approach.
|
Control Group - No Marcaine
n=21 Participants
Patients assigned to this arm will have the mid-urethral sling placed via the suprapubic approach in the standard fashion with no injection of Marcaine into the retropubic space.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Difference in Successful Voiding Trial Prior to Discharge Following Placement of Mid-urethral Sling Via the Suprapubic Approach.
|
4 participants w/sucessful voiding trial
|
7 participants w/sucessful voiding trial
|
Adverse Events
Intervention Group - Received Marcaine
Control Group - No Marcaine
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Intervention Group - Received Marcaine
n=21 participants at risk
Patients randomized to this arm will receive 60 cc of 0.125% Marcaine injected into the retropubic space along the tract that the suprapubic mid-urethral trocar will follow (one on each side) for a total of 120 cc of 0.125% Marcaine, prior to the placement of the mid-urethral sling via the suprapubic approach.
|
Control Group - No Marcaine
n=21 participants at risk
Patients assigned to this arm will have the mid-urethral sling placed via the suprapubic approach in the standard fashion with no injection of Marcaine into the retropubic space.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Blood transfusion
|
4.8%
1/21 • Number of events 1 • From time of surgery to 6 weeks after surgery
A total of 4 adverse events were documented, 3 in the intervention group and one in the control group. These included right hip pain, a right labial hematoma, a patient with prolonged urinary retention requiring sling release and one blood transfusion. However, these were felt to be related to the surgery itself.
|
0.00%
0/21 • From time of surgery to 6 weeks after surgery
A total of 4 adverse events were documented, 3 in the intervention group and one in the control group. These included right hip pain, a right labial hematoma, a patient with prolonged urinary retention requiring sling release and one blood transfusion. However, these were felt to be related to the surgery itself.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Labial hematoma
|
4.8%
1/21 • Number of events 1 • From time of surgery to 6 weeks after surgery
A total of 4 adverse events were documented, 3 in the intervention group and one in the control group. These included right hip pain, a right labial hematoma, a patient with prolonged urinary retention requiring sling release and one blood transfusion. However, these were felt to be related to the surgery itself.
|
0.00%
0/21 • From time of surgery to 6 weeks after surgery
A total of 4 adverse events were documented, 3 in the intervention group and one in the control group. These included right hip pain, a right labial hematoma, a patient with prolonged urinary retention requiring sling release and one blood transfusion. However, these were felt to be related to the surgery itself.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Hip pain
|
4.8%
1/21 • Number of events 1 • From time of surgery to 6 weeks after surgery
A total of 4 adverse events were documented, 3 in the intervention group and one in the control group. These included right hip pain, a right labial hematoma, a patient with prolonged urinary retention requiring sling release and one blood transfusion. However, these were felt to be related to the surgery itself.
|
0.00%
0/21 • From time of surgery to 6 weeks after surgery
A total of 4 adverse events were documented, 3 in the intervention group and one in the control group. These included right hip pain, a right labial hematoma, a patient with prolonged urinary retention requiring sling release and one blood transfusion. However, these were felt to be related to the surgery itself.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Prolonged voiding dysfunction
|
0.00%
0/21 • From time of surgery to 6 weeks after surgery
A total of 4 adverse events were documented, 3 in the intervention group and one in the control group. These included right hip pain, a right labial hematoma, a patient with prolonged urinary retention requiring sling release and one blood transfusion. However, these were felt to be related to the surgery itself.
|
4.8%
1/21 • Number of events 1 • From time of surgery to 6 weeks after surgery
A total of 4 adverse events were documented, 3 in the intervention group and one in the control group. These included right hip pain, a right labial hematoma, a patient with prolonged urinary retention requiring sling release and one blood transfusion. However, these were felt to be related to the surgery itself.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place