Four Models of Telephone Support for Stimulant Recovery
NCT ID: NCT00744068
Last Updated: 2016-11-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
302 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2006-04-30
2011-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
\*Farabee, D., Rawson, R.A., \& McCann, M. (2002). Adoption of drug avoidance activities among patients in contingency management and cognitive-behavioral treatments. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 23, 343-350.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1
Structured Directive Telephone Support Calls
Continuing Care Telephone Support
Counselor-provided telephone support as strategies to promote patient aftercare attendance and sustained abstinence from stimulant use. To this end, we will develop and compare the efficacy of four low-cost telephone support protocols for patients who have completed the intensive phase of a structured, outpatient stimulant abuse treatment program.
2
Structured Non-Directive Telephone Continuing Care Support
Continuing Care Telephone Support
Counselor-provided telephone support as strategies to promote patient aftercare attendance and sustained abstinence from stimulant use. To this end, we will develop and compare the efficacy of four low-cost telephone support protocols for patients who have completed the intensive phase of a structured, outpatient stimulant abuse treatment program.
3
Unstructured Directive Telephone Support
Continuing Care Telephone Support
Counselor-provided telephone support as strategies to promote patient aftercare attendance and sustained abstinence from stimulant use. To this end, we will develop and compare the efficacy of four low-cost telephone support protocols for patients who have completed the intensive phase of a structured, outpatient stimulant abuse treatment program.
4
Unstructured Non-Directive Telephone Support
Continuing Care Telephone Support
Counselor-provided telephone support as strategies to promote patient aftercare attendance and sustained abstinence from stimulant use. To this end, we will develop and compare the efficacy of four low-cost telephone support protocols for patients who have completed the intensive phase of a structured, outpatient stimulant abuse treatment program.
5
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Continuing Care Telephone Support
Counselor-provided telephone support as strategies to promote patient aftercare attendance and sustained abstinence from stimulant use. To this end, we will develop and compare the efficacy of four low-cost telephone support protocols for patients who have completed the intensive phase of a structured, outpatient stimulant abuse treatment program.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Meet DSM-IV criteria (at the time of treatment admission) for cocaine or methamphetamine abuse/dependence.
* Have completed the primary phase of treatment at a Matrix outpatient clinic.
* Have telephone access throughout the study procedures.
* Be able to understand and complete rating scales and to follow instructions.
* Be willing to sign an informed consent form.
Exclusion Criteria
* Have any medical, legal, housing or transportation problem which would preclude either safe or consistent participation.
* Have dropped out of the primary phase of treatment prior to completion.
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
NIH
University of California, Los Angeles
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
David Farabee, Ph.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse Programs
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Twin Town Treatment Center
Los Alamitos, California, United States
Matrix Institute on Addictions
Los Angeles, California, United States
UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse Programs
Los Angeles, California, United States
Matrix Institute on Addictions
Rancho Cucamonga, California, United States
Twin Town Treatment Center
West Hollywood, California, United States
Matrix Institute on Addicitions
Woodland Hills, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ahles TA, Schlundt DG, Prue DM, Rychtarik RG. Impact of aftercare arrangements on the maintenance of treatment success in abusive drinkers. Addict Behav. 1983;8(1):53-8. doi: 10.1016/0306-4603(83)90056-4.
Allen K. Barriers to treatment for addicted African-American women. J Natl Med Assoc. 1995 Oct;87(10):751-6.
Ashery RS, Carlson RG, Falck RS, Siegal HA. Injection drug users, crack-cocaine users, and human services utilization: an exploratory study. Soc Work. 1995 Jan;40(1):75-82.
Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986 Dec;51(6):1173-82. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173.
Battjes RJ, Onken LS, Delany PJ. Drug abuse treatment entry and engagement: report of a meeting on treatment readiness. J Clin Psychol. 1999 May;55(5):643-57. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4679(199905)55:53.0.co;2-s.
Brown BS, O'Grady KE, Battjes RJ, Farrell EE, Smith NP, Nurco DN. Effectiveness of a stand-alone aftercare program for drug-involved offenders. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2001 Dec;21(4):185-92. doi: 10.1016/s0740-5472(01)00201-x.
Burton P, Gurrin L, Sly P. Extending the simple linear regression model to account for correlated responses: an introduction to generalized estimating equations and multi-level mixed modelling. Stat Med. 1998 Jun 15;17(11):1261-91. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19980615)17:113.0.co;2-z.
De Leon G, Melnick G, Kressel D, Jainchill N. Circumstances, motivation, readiness, and suitability (the CMRS scales): predicting retention in therapeutic community treatment. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1994 Nov;20(4):495-515. doi: 10.3109/00952999409109186.
De Leon G, Melnick G, Thomas G, Kressel D, Wexler HK. Motivation for treatment in a prison-based therapeutic community. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2000 Feb;26(1):33-46. doi: 10.1081/ada-100100589.
Dees SM, Dansereau DF, Peel JL, Boatler JG, Knight K. Using conceptual matrices, knowledge maps, and scripted cooperation to improve personal management strategies. J Drug Educ. 1991;21(3):211-30. doi: 10.2190/KJKM-F0UR-RDPH-8NUK.
Diez-Roux AV. Multilevel analysis in public health research. Annu Rev Public Health. 2000;21:171-92. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.21.1.171.
Farabee D, Rawson R, McCann M. Adoption of drug avoidance activities among patients in contingency management and cognitive-behavioral treatments. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2002 Dec;23(4):343-50. doi: 10.1016/s0740-5472(02)00297-0.
Fischer B, Chin AT, Kuo I, Kirst M, Vlahov D. Canadian illicit opiate users' views on methadone and other opiate prescription treatment: an exploratory qualitative study. Subst Use Misuse. 2002 Mar;37(4):495-522. doi: 10.1081/ja-120002807.
Fitzgerald JL, Mulford HA. An experimental test of telephone aftercare contacts with alcoholics. J Stud Alcohol. 1985 Sep;46(5):418-24. doi: 10.15288/jsa.1985.46.418.
Fortney JC, Booth BM, Blow FC, Bunn JY. The effects of travel barriers and age on the utilization of alcoholism treatment aftercare. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1995 Aug;21(3):391-406. doi: 10.3109/00952999509002705.
Haynes RB, McDonald HP, Garg AX. Helping patients follow prescribed treatment: clinical applications. JAMA. 2002 Dec 11;288(22):2880-3. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.22.2880.
Huber A, Lord RH, Gulati V, Marinelli-Casey P, Rawson R, Ling W. The CSAT methamphetamine treatment program: research design accommodations for "real world" application. J Psychoactive Drugs. 2000 Apr-Jun;32(2):149-56. doi: 10.1080/02791072.2000.10400223.
Huber A, Ling W, Shoptaw S, Gulati V, Brethen P, Rawson R. Integrating treatments for methamphetamine abuse: a psychosocial perspective. J Addict Dis. 1997;16(4):41-50. doi: 10.1080/10550889709511142.
Hunt WA, Barnett LW, Branch LG. Relapse rates in addiction programs. J Clin Psychol. 1971 Oct;27(4):455-6. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(197110)27:43.0.co;2-r. No abstract available.
Hser YI, Anglin D, Powers K. A 24-year follow-up of California narcotics addicts. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1993 Jul;50(7):577-84. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1993.01820190079008.
Hser YI, Hoffman V, Grella CE, Anglin MD. A 33-year follow-up of narcotics addicts. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2001 May;58(5):503-8. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.58.5.503.
Iguchi MY, Belding MA, Morral AR, Lamb RJ, Husband SD. Reinforcing operants other than abstinence in drug abuse treatment: an effective alternative for reducing drug use. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1997 Jun;65(3):421-8. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.65.3.421.
Intagliata J. A telephone follow-up procedure for increasing the effectiveness of a treatment program for alcoholics. J Stud Alcohol. 1976 Sep;37(9):1330-5. doi: 10.15288/jsa.1976.37.1330.
Karno MP, Beutler LE, Harwood TM. Interactions between psychotherapy procedures and patient attributes that predict alcohol treatment effectiveness: a preliminary report. Addict Behav. 2002 Sep-Oct;27(5):779-97. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4603(01)00209-x.
Koumans AJ, Muller JJ, Miller CF. Use of telephone calls to increase motivation for treatment in alcoholics. Psychol Rep. 1967 Aug;21(1):327-8. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1967.21.1.327. No abstract available.
Lash SJ, Blosser SL. Increasing adherence to substance abuse aftercare group therapy. J Subst Abuse Treat. 1999 Jan;16(1):55-60. doi: 10.1016/s0740-5472(98)00015-4.
Lash SJ, Dillard W. Encouraging participation in aftercare group therapy among substance-dependent men. Psychol Rep. 1996 Oct;79(2):585-6. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1996.79.2.585.
Lovejoy M, Rosenblum A, Magura S, Foote J, Handelsman L, Stimmel B. Patients' perspective on the process of change in substance abuse treatment. J Subst Abuse Treat. 1995 Jul-Aug;12(4):269-82. doi: 10.1016/0740-5472(95)00027-3.
MacKinnon DP, Lockwood CM, Hoffman JM, West SG, Sheets V. A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychol Methods. 2002 Mar;7(1):83-104. doi: 10.1037/1082-989x.7.1.83.
McDonald HP, Garg AX, Haynes RB. Interventions to enhance patient adherence to medication prescriptions: scientific review. JAMA. 2002 Dec 11;288(22):2868-79. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.22.2868.
McKay JR. Effectiveness of continuing care interventions for substance abusers. Implications for the study of long-term treatment effects. Eval Rev. 2001 Apr;25(2):211-32. doi: 10.1177/0193841X0102500205.
McKay JR, McLellan AT, Alterman AI, Cacciola JS, Rutherford MJ, O'Brien CP. Predictors of participation in aftercare sessions and self-help groups following completion of intensive outpatient treatment for substance abuse. J Stud Alcohol. 1998 Mar;59(2):152-62. doi: 10.15288/jsa.1998.59.152.
Pan W. Sample size and power calculations with correlated binary data. Control Clin Trials. 2001 Jun;22(3):211-27. doi: 10.1016/s0197-2456(01)00131-3.
Peterson KA, Swindle RW, Phibbs CS, Recine B, Moos RH. Determinants of readmission following inpatient substance abuse treatment: a national study of VA programs. Med Care. 1994 Jun;32(6):535-50. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199406000-00001.
Ouimette PC, Moos RH, Finney JW. Influence of outpatient treatment and 12-step group involvement on one-year substance abuse treatment outcomes. J Stud Alcohol. 1998 Sep;59(5):513-22. doi: 10.15288/jsa.1998.59.513.
Rawson RA, Shoptaw SJ, Obert JL, McCann MJ, Hasson AL, Marinelli-Casey PJ, Brethen PR, Ling W. An intensive outpatient approach for cocaine abuse treatment. The Matrix model. J Subst Abuse Treat. 1995 Mar-Apr;12(2):117-27. doi: 10.1016/0740-5472(94)00080-b.
Rawson RA, Marinelli-Casey P, Anglin MD, Dickow A, Frazier Y, Gallagher C, Galloway GP, Herrell J, Huber A, McCann MJ, Obert J, Pennell S, Reiber C, Vandersloot D, Zweben J; Methamphetamine Treatment Project Corporate Authors. A multi-site comparison of psychosocial approaches for the treatment of methamphetamine dependence. Addiction. 2004 Jun;99(6):708-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2004.00707.x.
Rawson RA, Obert JL, McCann MJ, Ling W. Neurobehavioral treatment for cocaine dependency: a preliminary evaluation. NIDA Res Monogr. 1993;135:92-115.
Richter KP, Bammer G. A hierarchy of strategies heroin-using mothers employ to reduce harm to their children. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2000 Dec;19(4):403-13. doi: 10.1016/s0740-5472(00)00137-9.
Rochon J. Application of GEE procedures for sample size calculations in repeated measures experiments. Stat Med. 1998 Jul 30;17(14):1643-58. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19980730)17:143.0.co;2-3.
Shoptaw S, Rawson RA, McCann MJ, Obert JL. The Matrix model of outpatient stimulant abuse treatment: evidence of efficacy. J Addict Dis. 1994;13(4):129-41. doi: 10.1300/j069v13n04_02.
Shrout PE, Bolger N. Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations. Psychol Methods. 2002 Dec;7(4):422-45.
Silverman K, Higgins ST, Brooner RK, Montoya ID, Cone EJ, Schuster CR, Preston KL. Sustained cocaine abstinence in methadone maintenance patients through voucher-based reinforcement therapy. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1996 May;53(5):409-15. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1996.01830050045007.
Sobell LC, Maisto SA, Sobell MB, Cooper AM. Reliability of alcohol abusers' self-reports of drinking behavior. Behav Res Ther. 1979;17(2):157-60. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(79)90025-1. No abstract available.
Spitzer RL, Williams JB, Gibbon M, First MB. The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R (SCID). I: History, rationale, and description. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1992 Aug;49(8):624-9. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1992.01820080032005.
Stahler GJ, Cohen E. Using ethnographic methodology in substance abuse treatment outcome research. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2000 Jan;18(1):1-8. doi: 10.1016/s0740-5472(99)00029-x.
Stout RL, Wirtz PW, Carbonari JP, Del Boca FK. Ensuring balanced distribution of prognostic factors in treatment outcome research. J Stud Alcohol Suppl. 1994 Dec;12:70-5. doi: 10.15288/jsas.1994.s12.70.
Farabee D, Cousins SJ, Brecht ML, Antonini VP, Lee AB, Brummer J, Hemberg J, Karno M, Rawson RA. A comparison of four telephone-based counseling styles for recovering stimulant users. Psychol Addict Behav. 2013 Mar;27(1):223-9. doi: 10.1037/a0029572. Epub 2012 Aug 6.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Related Info