Trial Outcomes & Findings for Efficacy Study of Vortioxetine (Lu AA21004) in Adults With Major Depressive Disorder (NCT NCT00735709)
NCT ID: NCT00735709
Last Updated: 2013-12-18
Results Overview
The 24-item Hamilton Depression Scale (HAM-D24) is a clinician-rated 24-item scale for assessing the severity of depression symptoms. The scores for each item range from 0 to 4 or 0 to 2, where 0 represents no symptoms. The rating is based on the past 7 days prior to the time of assessment. The total score range is from 0 to 74 where a higher score indicates a greater depressive state. Least squares (LS) means are from a mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) with Baseline-by-week, center, week, and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
560 participants
Baseline to Week 8
2013-12-18
Participant Flow
Participants took part in the study at 51 investigative sites in Australia, Croatia, France, Germany, Latvia, Lithuania, Malaysia, Netherlands, Poland, Republic of Korea, Russia, South Africa, Taiwan, and Ukraine from 14 August 2008 to 13 August 2009.
Participants with a diagnosis of major depressive disorder were randomized equally in 1 of 4 treatment groups, once daily placebo, 1 mg, 5 mg, or 10 mg vortioxetine.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Placebo
Vortioxetine placebo-matching capsules, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 1 mg
Vortioxetine 1 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 5 mg
Vortioxetine 5 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 10 mg
Vortioxetine 10 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
140
|
140
|
140
|
140
|
|
Overall Study
Treated
|
140
|
140
|
140
|
139
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
127
|
127
|
129
|
122
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
13
|
13
|
11
|
18
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Placebo
Vortioxetine placebo-matching capsules, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 1 mg
Vortioxetine 1 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 5 mg
Vortioxetine 5 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 10 mg
Vortioxetine 10 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
5
|
|
Overall Study
Lack of Efficacy
|
8
|
4
|
2
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Noncompliance
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Protocol deviations
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Voluntary Withdrawal
|
1
|
3
|
5
|
7
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Excluded medication
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Efficacy Study of Vortioxetine (Lu AA21004) in Adults With Major Depressive Disorder
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Placebo
n=140 Participants
Vortioxetine placebo-matching capsules, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 1 mg
n=140 Participants
Vortioxetine 1 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 5 mg
n=140 Participants
Vortioxetine 5 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 10 mg
n=140 Participants
Vortioxetine 10 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
Total
n=560 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age Continuous
|
46.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.26 • n=5 Participants
|
45.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.89 • n=7 Participants
|
47.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.95 • n=5 Participants
|
46.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.27 • n=4 Participants
|
46.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.08 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
≤55 years
|
103 participants
n=5 Participants
|
110 participants
n=7 Participants
|
102 participants
n=5 Participants
|
107 participants
n=4 Participants
|
422 participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
>55 years
|
37 participants
n=5 Participants
|
30 participants
n=7 Participants
|
38 participants
n=5 Participants
|
33 participants
n=4 Participants
|
138 participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
86 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
93 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
87 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
85 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
351 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
54 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
47 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
53 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
55 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
209 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
|
120 participants
n=5 Participants
|
129 participants
n=7 Participants
|
120 participants
n=5 Participants
|
114 participants
n=4 Participants
|
483 participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
|
5 participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 participants
n=4 Participants
|
10 participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
|
14 participants
n=5 Participants
|
8 participants
n=7 Participants
|
17 participants
n=5 Participants
|
23 participants
n=4 Participants
|
62 participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 participants
n=4 Participants
|
5 participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic/Latino
|
3 participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 participants
n=4 Participants
|
4 participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Non-Hispanic/Non-Latino
|
137 participants
n=5 Participants
|
140 participants
n=7 Participants
|
140 participants
n=5 Participants
|
139 participants
n=4 Participants
|
556 participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Australia
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 participants
n=4 Participants
|
4 participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Croatia
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 participants
n=7 Participants
|
5 participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 participants
n=4 Participants
|
13 participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
France
|
5 participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 participants
n=4 Participants
|
13 participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Germany
|
63 participants
n=5 Participants
|
50 participants
n=7 Participants
|
64 participants
n=5 Participants
|
56 participants
n=4 Participants
|
233 participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Latvia
|
5 participants
n=5 Participants
|
8 participants
n=7 Participants
|
9 participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 participants
n=4 Participants
|
27 participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Lithuania
|
4 participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 participants
n=4 Participants
|
13 participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Malaysia
|
7 participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 participants
n=7 Participants
|
6 participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 participants
n=4 Participants
|
22 participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Netherlands
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 participants
n=4 Participants
|
7 participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Poland
|
20 participants
n=5 Participants
|
16 participants
n=7 Participants
|
15 participants
n=5 Participants
|
11 participants
n=4 Participants
|
62 participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Republic of Korea
|
7 participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 participants
n=7 Participants
|
9 participants
n=5 Participants
|
14 participants
n=4 Participants
|
35 participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Russia
|
12 participants
n=5 Participants
|
20 participants
n=7 Participants
|
9 participants
n=5 Participants
|
20 participants
n=4 Participants
|
61 participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
South Africa
|
5 participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 participants
n=7 Participants
|
5 participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 participants
n=4 Participants
|
19 participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Taiwan
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 participants
n=4 Participants
|
4 participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Ukraine
|
10 participants
n=5 Participants
|
15 participants
n=7 Participants
|
11 participants
n=5 Participants
|
11 participants
n=4 Participants
|
47 participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Weight
|
75.18 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.924 • n=5 Participants
|
75.63 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.276 • n=7 Participants
|
75.41 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.022 • n=5 Participants
|
74.58 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.190 • n=4 Participants
|
75.20 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.099 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Height
|
168.70 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.907 • n=5 Participants
|
168.56 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.264 • n=7 Participants
|
168.56 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.126 • n=5 Participants
|
168.70 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.209 • n=4 Participants
|
168.63 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.129 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Body Mass Index (BMI)
|
26.36 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.615 • n=5 Participants
|
26.53 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.380 • n=7 Participants
|
26.41 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.065 • n=5 Participants
|
26.16 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.612 • n=4 Participants
|
26.36 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.917 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Smoking Classification
Never smoked
|
88 participants
n=5 Participants
|
74 participants
n=7 Participants
|
88 participants
n=5 Participants
|
79 participants
n=4 Participants
|
329 participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Smoking Classification
Current smoker
|
34 participants
n=5 Participants
|
54 participants
n=7 Participants
|
33 participants
n=5 Participants
|
41 participants
n=4 Participants
|
162 participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Smoking Classification
Ex-smoker
|
18 participants
n=5 Participants
|
12 participants
n=7 Participants
|
19 participants
n=5 Participants
|
20 participants
n=4 Participants
|
69 participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Alcohol Consumption
Never
|
53 participants
n=5 Participants
|
51 participants
n=7 Participants
|
56 participants
n=5 Participants
|
54 participants
n=4 Participants
|
214 participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Alcohol Consumption
Once monthly or less often
|
57 participants
n=5 Participants
|
60 participants
n=7 Participants
|
59 participants
n=5 Participants
|
51 participants
n=4 Participants
|
227 participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Alcohol Consumption
Once per week
|
16 participants
n=5 Participants
|
13 participants
n=7 Participants
|
9 participants
n=5 Participants
|
16 participants
n=4 Participants
|
54 participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Alcohol Consumption
2-to-6 times/week
|
5 participants
n=5 Participants
|
11 participants
n=7 Participants
|
7 participants
n=5 Participants
|
12 participants
n=4 Participants
|
35 participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Alcohol Consumption
Daily
|
9 participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 participants
n=7 Participants
|
9 participants
n=5 Participants
|
7 participants
n=4 Participants
|
30 participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
24-item Hamilton Depression Scale total score
|
32.7 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.40 • n=5 Participants
|
32.5 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.13 • n=7 Participants
|
32.1 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.04 • n=5 Participants
|
33.1 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.77 • n=4 Participants
|
32.6 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.84 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score
|
30.6 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.89 • n=5 Participants
|
30.4 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.01 • n=7 Participants
|
30.6 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.83 • n=5 Participants
|
31.6 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.83 • n=4 Participants
|
30.8 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.19 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Hamilton Anxiety Scale total score
|
19.7 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.07 • n=5 Participants
|
20.0 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.41 • n=7 Participants
|
19.4 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.77 • n=5 Participants
|
21.1 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.39 • n=4 Participants
|
20.0 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.93 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Clinical Global Impression - Severity scale score
|
4.8 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.80 • n=5 Participants
|
4.7 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.73 • n=7 Participants
|
4.8 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.73 • n=5 Participants
|
4.9 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.76 • n=4 Participants
|
4.8 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.76 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) - Anxiety subscale
|
11.2 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.99 • n=5 Participants
|
11.2 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.83 • n=7 Participants
|
11.6 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.02 • n=5 Participants
|
11.7 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.97 • n=4 Participants
|
11.4 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.95 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Hospital Anxiety and Depression - Depression subscale
|
13.7 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.33 • n=5 Participants
|
13.8 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.88 • n=7 Participants
|
13.4 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.02 • n=5 Participants
|
13.8 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.71 • n=4 Participants
|
13.7 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.99 • n=21 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 8Population: The full analysis set (FAS) included all patients who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug, and had at least 1 post-baseline value for assessment of primary efficacy. A mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) based on observed cases was used.
The 24-item Hamilton Depression Scale (HAM-D24) is a clinician-rated 24-item scale for assessing the severity of depression symptoms. The scores for each item range from 0 to 4 or 0 to 2, where 0 represents no symptoms. The rating is based on the past 7 days prior to the time of assessment. The total score range is from 0 to 74 where a higher score indicates a greater depressive state. Least squares (LS) means are from a mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) with Baseline-by-week, center, week, and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=128 Participants
Vortioxetine placebo-matching capsules, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 1 mg
n=124 Participants
Vortioxetine 1 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 5 mg
n=129 Participants
Vortioxetine 5 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 10 mg
n=122 Participants
Vortioxetine 10 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the 24-item Hamilton Depression Scale Total Score At Week 8
|
-11.30 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.738
|
-14.82 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.745
|
-15.42 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.743
|
-16.23 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.755
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 8Population: Full analysis set. A mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) based on observed cases was used.
The Sheehan Disability Scale assesses functional impairment in 3 domains: work/school, social life or leisure activities, and home life or family responsibilities. The participant rates the extent to which each aspect is impaired on a 10-point visual analog scale, from 0 (not at all) to 10 (extremely). The 3 scores are added together to calculate the total score, which ranges from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating more impairment. LS means are from a mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) with Baseline-by-week, center, week, and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=94 Participants
Vortioxetine placebo-matching capsules, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 1 mg
n=90 Participants
Vortioxetine 1 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 5 mg
n=97 Participants
Vortioxetine 5 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 10 mg
n=83 Participants
Vortioxetine 10 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score at Week 8
|
-6.54 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.716
|
-6.58 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.729
|
-7.65 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.713
|
-8.08 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.756
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 8Population: Full analysis set. A mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) based on observed cases was used.
The Clinical Global Impression - Global Improvement scale assesses the participant's improvement (or worsening) as assessed by the clinician relative to Baseline on a 7-point scale: 1, very much improved; 2, much improved; 3, minimally improved; 4, no change; 5, minimally worse; 6, much worse; or 7, very much worse. LS means are from a mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) with Baseline-by-week, center, week, and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=128 Participants
Vortioxetine placebo-matching capsules, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 1 mg
n=124 Participants
Vortioxetine 1 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 5 mg
n=129 Participants
Vortioxetine 5 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 10 mg
n=122 Participants
Vortioxetine 10 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Clinical Global Impression Scale-Global Improvement at Week 8
|
2.84 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.089
|
2.37 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.090
|
2.37 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.089
|
2.29 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.091
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8Population: Full analysis set; last observation carried forward (LOCF) was used.
A responder is defined as a participant with a ≥50% decrease from Baseline in HAM-D24 total score. The HAM-D24 is a clinician-rated 24-item scale for assessing the severity of depression symptoms. The scores for each item range from 0 to 4 or 0 to 2, where 0 represents no symptoms. The rating is based on the past 7 days prior to the time of assessment. The total score ranges from 0 to 74, where a higher score indicates a greater depressive state.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=139 Participants
Vortioxetine placebo-matching capsules, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 1 mg
n=139 Participants
Vortioxetine 1 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 5 mg
n=139 Participants
Vortioxetine 5 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 10 mg
n=139 Participants
Vortioxetine 10 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Responders in HAM-D24 Total Score at Week 8
|
23.0 percentage of participants
|
47.5 percentage of participants
|
45.3 percentage of participants
|
49.6 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 8Population: Full analysis set patients with a HAM-A Baseline score ≥ 20. A mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) based on observed cases was used.
The HAM-D24 is a clinician-rated 24-item scale for assessing the severity of depression symptoms. The scores for each item range from 0 to 4 or 0 to 2, where 0 represents no symptoms. The rating is based on the past 7 days prior to the time of assessment. The total score ranges from 0 to 74 where a higher score indicates a greater depressive state. The Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) is an anxiety rating scale consisting of 14 items that assess anxious mood, tension, fear, insomnia, intellectual (cognitive) symptoms, depressed mood, behavior at interview, somatic (sensory), cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, autonomic and somatic (muscular) symptoms. Each symptom is rated from 0 (absent) to 4 (maximum severity). Total scores range from 0 (symptoms absent) to 56 (severe symptoms). LS means are from a mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) with Baseline-by-week, center, week, and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=62 Participants
Vortioxetine placebo-matching capsules, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 1 mg
n=65 Participants
Vortioxetine 1 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 5 mg
n=57 Participants
Vortioxetine 5 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 10 mg
n=65 Participants
Vortioxetine 10 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in HAM-D24 Total Score at Week 8 in Participants With Baseline HAM-A Score ≥20
|
-11.02 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.017
|
-15.16 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.991
|
-15.50 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.063
|
-15.61 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.984
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 8Population: Full analysis set; LOCF was used.
Remission is defined as a participant with a Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score ≤10. The MADRS is a depression rating scale consisting of 10 items, each rated 0 to 6. The 10 items represent the core symptoms of depressive illness. The overall score ranges from 0 (symptoms absent) to 60 (severe depression). Decrease in the total score or on individual items indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=139 Participants
Vortioxetine placebo-matching capsules, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 1 mg
n=139 Participants
Vortioxetine 1 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 5 mg
n=139 Participants
Vortioxetine 5 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 10 mg
n=139 Participants
Vortioxetine 10 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants in MADRS Remission at Week 8
|
16.5 percentage of participants
|
25.9 percentage of participants
|
28.8 percentage of participants
|
26.6 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 4 and 6Population: Full analysis set with available data at Baseline. A mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) based on observed cases was used; "n" indicates the number of patients included in the analysis at each time point.
The HAM-D24 is a clinician-rated 24-item scale for assessing the severity of depression symptoms. The scores for each item range from 0 to 4 or 0 to 2, where 0 represents no symptoms. The rating is based on the past 7 days prior to the time of assessment. The total score range is from 0 to 74 where a higher score indicates a greater depressive state. LS means are from a mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) with Baseline-by-week, center, week, and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=139 Participants
Vortioxetine placebo-matching capsules, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 1 mg
n=139 Participants
Vortioxetine 1 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 5 mg
n=139 Participants
Vortioxetine 5 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 10 mg
n=139 Participants
Vortioxetine 10 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the 24-item Hamilton Depression Scale Total Score at Other Weeks Assessed
Week 6 (n=134, 130, 129, 126)
|
-10.23 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.690
|
-13.35 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.695
|
-13.67 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.697
|
-15.22 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.705
|
|
Change From Baseline in the 24-item Hamilton Depression Scale Total Score at Other Weeks Assessed
Week 1 (n=139, 137, 138, 138)
|
-3.47 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.321
|
-2.81 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.323
|
-3.20 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.322
|
-3.20 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.321
|
|
Change From Baseline in the 24-item Hamilton Depression Scale Total Score at Other Weeks Assessed
Week 2 (n=138, 138, 135, 135)
|
-5.66 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.485
|
-7.27 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.485
|
-7.27 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.490
|
-7.42 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.489
|
|
Change From Baseline in the 24-item Hamilton Depression Scale Total Score at Other Weeks Assessed
Week 4 (n=135, 133, 135, 127)
|
-8.42 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.634
|
-11.09 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.637
|
-11.00 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.639
|
-11.88 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.646
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2 and 6Population: Full analysis set with available SDS Total Score data at Baseline. A mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) based on observed cases was used; "n" indicates the number of patients included in the analysis at each time point.
The Sheehan Disability Scale assesses functional impairment in 3 domains: work/school, social life or leisure activities, and home life or family responsibilities. The participant rates the extent to which each aspect is impaired on a 10-point visual analog scale, from 0 (not at all) to 10 (extremely). The 3 scores are added together to calculate the total score, which ranges from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating more impairment. LS means are from a mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) with Baseline-by-week, center, week, and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=104 Participants
Vortioxetine placebo-matching capsules, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 1 mg
n=103 Participants
Vortioxetine 1 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 5 mg
n=106 Participants
Vortioxetine 5 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 10 mg
n=99 Participants
Vortioxetine 10 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score at Other Weeks Assessed
Week 1 (n=104, 101, 105, 97)
|
-1.22 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.392
|
-1.13 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.399
|
-1.78 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.393
|
-1.43 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.403
|
|
Change From Baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score at Other Weeks Assessed
Week 2 (n=102, 101, 100, 96)
|
-2.53 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.507
|
-3.44 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.511
|
-4.14 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.512
|
-3.40 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.521
|
|
Change From Baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score at Other Weeks Assessed
Week 6 (n=99, 97, 97, 88)
|
-5.95 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.672
|
-5.69 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.681
|
-6.92 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.678
|
-8.27 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.707
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 4 and 6Population: Full analysis set with available CGI-S data at Baseline. A mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) based on observed cases was used; "n" indicates the number of patients included in the analysis at each time point.
The Clinical Global Impression - global improvement assesses the participant's improvement (or worsening) as assessed by the clinician relative to Baseline on a 7-point scale: 1, very much improved; 2, much improved; 3, minimally improved; 4, no change; 5, minimally worse; 6, much worse; or 7, very much worse. LS means are from a mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) with Baseline-by-week, center, week, and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=139 Participants
Vortioxetine placebo-matching capsules, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 1 mg
n=139 Participants
Vortioxetine 1 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 5 mg
n=139 Participants
Vortioxetine 5 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 10 mg
n=139 Participants
Vortioxetine 10 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Clinical Global Impression Scale-Global Improvement at Other Weeks Assessed
Week 1 (n=139, 137, 138, 138)
|
3.65 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.053
|
3.71 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.054
|
3.67 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.053
|
3.64 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.053
|
|
Clinical Global Impression Scale-Global Improvement at Other Weeks Assessed
Week 4 (n=135, 133, 135, 127)
|
3.03 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.082
|
2.69 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.083
|
2.82 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.083
|
2.78 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.084
|
|
Clinical Global Impression Scale-Global Improvement at Other Weeks Assessed
Week 2 (n=138, 138, 135, 135)
|
3.40 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.069
|
3.16 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.070
|
3.19 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.070
|
3.23 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.070
|
|
Clinical Global Impression Scale-Global Improvement at Other Weeks Assessed
Week 6 (n=134, 130, 129, 126)
|
2.95 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.087
|
2.48 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.088
|
2.50 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.088
|
2.37 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.089
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 4 and 6Population: Full analysis set with available data at Week 1; Last observation carried forward (LOCF) was used for other time points. "n" indicates the number of patients included in the analysis at each time point.
A responder is defined as a participant with a ≥50% decrease from Baseline in HAM-D24 total score. The HAM-D24 is a clinician-rated 24-item scale for assessing the severity of depression symptoms. The scores for each item range from 0 to 4 or 0 to 2, where 0 represents no symptoms. The rating is based on the past 7 days prior to the time of assessment. The total score ranges from 0 to 74, where a higher score indicates a greater depressive state.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=139 Participants
Vortioxetine placebo-matching capsules, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 1 mg
n=139 Participants
Vortioxetine 1 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 5 mg
n=139 Participants
Vortioxetine 5 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 10 mg
n=139 Participants
Vortioxetine 10 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Responders in HAM-D24 Total Score at Other Weeks Assessed
Week 4 (n=139, 139, 139, 139)
|
18.0 percentage of participants
|
27.3 percentage of participants
|
24.5 percentage of participants
|
26.6 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Responders in HAM-D24 Total Score at Other Weeks Assessed
Week 6 (n=139, 139, 139, 139)
|
23.7 percentage of participants
|
38.1 percentage of participants
|
36.0 percentage of participants
|
43.9 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Responders in HAM-D24 Total Score at Other Weeks Assessed
Week 1 (n=139, 137, 138, 138)
|
0.7 percentage of participants
|
0.7 percentage of participants
|
0.7 percentage of participants
|
1.4 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Responders in HAM-D24 Total Score at Other Weeks Assessed
Week 2 (n=139, 139, 139, 139)
|
5.0 percentage of participants
|
7.9 percentage of participants
|
7.2 percentage of participants
|
8.6 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 4 and 6Population: Full analysis set patients with a HAM-A Baseline score ≥20 and with available data at Baseline. A mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) based on observed cases was used; "n" indicates the number of patients included in the analysis at each time point.
The HAM-D24 is a clinician-rated 24-item scale for assessing the severity of depression symptoms. The scores for each item range from 0 to 4 or 0 to 2, where 0 represents no symptoms. The rating is based on the past 7 days prior to the time of assessment. The total score range from 0 to 74 where a higher score indicates a greater depressive state. The Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) is an anxiety rating scale consisting of 14 items that assess anxious mood, tension, fear, insomnia, intellectual (cognitive) symptoms, depressed mood, behavior at interview, somatic (sensory), cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, autonomic and somatic (muscular) symptoms. Each symptom is rated from 0 (absent) to 4 (maximum severity). Total scores range from 0 (symptoms absent) to 56 (symptoms severe). LS means are from a mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) with Baseline-by-week, center, week, and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=66 Participants
Vortioxetine placebo-matching capsules, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 1 mg
n=70 Participants
Vortioxetine 1 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 5 mg
n=62 Participants
Vortioxetine 5 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 10 mg
n=75 Participants
Vortioxetine 10 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in HAM-D24 Total Score at Other Weeks Assessed in Participants With a Baseline HAM-A Score ≥20
Week 1 (n=66, 70, 62, 75)
|
-3.79 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.473
|
-2.94 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.463
|
-3.55 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.491
|
-3.19 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.447
|
|
Change From Baseline in HAM-D24 Total Score at Other Weeks Assessed in Participants With a Baseline HAM-A Score ≥20
Week 2 (n=65, 70, 59, 72)
|
-5.76 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.637
|
-7.21 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.618
|
-6.58 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.667
|
-7.74 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.607
|
|
Change From Baseline in HAM-D24 Total Score at Other Weeks Assessed in Participants With a Baseline HAM-A Score ≥20
Week 4 (n=64, 68, 60, 69)
|
-8.56 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.874
|
-11.41 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.850
|
-10.20 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.910
|
-12.06 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.841
|
|
Change From Baseline in HAM-D24 Total Score at Other Weeks Assessed in Participants With a Baseline HAM-A Score ≥20
Week 6 (n=64, 67, 57, 68)
|
-10.25 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.958
|
-13.68 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.932
|
-13.23 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.002
|
-15.10 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.923
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 1, 2, 4 and 6Population: Full analysis set with available data at Week 1; Last observation carried forward was used for other time points.
Remission is defined as a participant with a Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score ≤10. The MADRS is a depression rating scale consisting of 10 items, each rated 0 to 6. The 10 items represent the core symptoms of depressive illness. The overall score ranges from 0 (symptoms absent) to 60 (severe depression). Decrease in the total score or on individual items indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=139 Participants
Vortioxetine placebo-matching capsules, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 1 mg
n=139 Participants
Vortioxetine 1 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 5 mg
n=139 Participants
Vortioxetine 5 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 10 mg
n=139 Participants
Vortioxetine 10 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants in MADRS Remission at Other Weeks Assessed
Week 1 (n=139, 137, 138, 138)
|
0.7 percentage of participants
|
0.7 percentage of participants
|
0 percentage of participants
|
0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in MADRS Remission at Other Weeks Assessed
Week 2 (n=139, 139, 139, 139)
|
2.2 percentage of participants
|
2.2 percentage of participants
|
1.4 percentage of participants
|
1.4 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in MADRS Remission at Other Weeks Assessed
Week 4 (n=139, 139, 139, 139)
|
6.5 percentage of participants
|
11.5 percentage of participants
|
11.5 percentage of participants
|
10.8 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in MADRS Remission at Other Weeks Assessed
Week 6 (n=139, 139, 139, 139)
|
10.1 percentage of participants
|
20.1 percentage of participants
|
20.9 percentage of participants
|
22.3 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline through Week 8Population: Full analysis set
A sustained response is defined as a ≥20% decrease from Baseline in HAM-D24 total score obtained at Week 1 and sustained through Week 7 and at least 50% decrease from Baseline at Week 8.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=139 Participants
Vortioxetine placebo-matching capsules, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 1 mg
n=139 Participants
Vortioxetine 1 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 5 mg
n=139 Participants
Vortioxetine 5 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 10 mg
n=139 Participants
Vortioxetine 10 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Sustained Response in HAM-D24 Total Score
|
10.1 percentage of participants
|
9.4 percentage of participants
|
10.1 percentage of participants
|
10.8 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8Population: Full analysis set with available data at Baseline. A mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) based on observed cases was used; "n" indicates the number of patients included in the analysis at each time point.
The MADRS is a depression rating scale consisting of 10 items, each rated 0 to 6. The 10 items represent the core symptoms of depressive illness. The overall score ranges from 0 (symptoms absent) to 60 (severe depression). A decrease in the total score or on individual items indicates improvement. LS means are from a mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) with Baseline-by-week, center, week, and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=139 Participants
Vortioxetine placebo-matching capsules, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 1 mg
n=139 Participants
Vortioxetine 1 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 5 mg
n=139 Participants
Vortioxetine 5 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 10 mg
n=139 Participants
Vortioxetine 10 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score at Each Week
Week 8 (n=128, 124, 129, 122)
|
-10.91 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.708
|
-14.89 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.715
|
-15.09 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.712
|
-15.65 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.728
|
|
Change From Baseline in Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score at Each Week
Week 1 (n=139, 137, 138, 138)
|
-2.90 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.324
|
-2.55 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.326
|
-2.66 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.324
|
-2.57 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.328
|
|
Change From Baseline in Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score at Each Week
Week 2 (n=138, 138, 135, 135)
|
-4.92 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.463
|
-6.65 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.463
|
-6.40 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.467
|
-6.51 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.472
|
|
Change From Baseline in Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score at Each Week
Week 4 (n=135, 133, 135, 127)
|
-7.85 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.619
|
-10.79 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.622
|
-10.30 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.622
|
-10.89 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.635
|
|
Change From Baseline in Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score at Each Week
Week 6 (n=134, 130, 129, 126)
|
-9.72 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.675
|
-13.16 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.680
|
-13.10 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.680
|
-14.19 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.694
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8Population: Full analysis set with available data at Baseline. A mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) based on observed cases was used; "n" indicates the number of patients included in the analysis at each time point.
The HAM-A is an anxiety rating scale consisting of 14 items that assess anxious mood, tension, fear, insomnia, intellectual (cognitive) symptoms, depressed mood, behavior at interview, somatic (sensory), cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, autonomic and somatic (muscular) symptoms. Each symptom is rated from 0 (absent) to 4 (maximum severity). Total scores range from 0 to 56, where \<17 indicates mild severity, 18-24 mild to moderate severity and 25-30 moderate to severe. Total scores above 30 are rare, but indicate very severe anxiety. LS means are from a mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) with Baseline-by-week, center, week, and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=139 Participants
Vortioxetine placebo-matching capsules, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 1 mg
n=139 Participants
Vortioxetine 1 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 5 mg
n=139 Participants
Vortioxetine 5 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 10 mg
n=139 Participants
Vortioxetine 10 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) Total Score at Each Week Assessed
Week 6 (n=134, 130, 129, 126)
|
-5.44 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.471
|
-7.29 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.475
|
-7.21 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.476
|
-8.33 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.483
|
|
Change From Baseline in Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) Total Score at Each Week Assessed
Week 8 (n=128, 124, 129, 122)
|
-5.98 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.498
|
-8.08 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.503
|
-8.11 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.501
|
-8.86 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.511
|
|
Change From Baseline in Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) Total Score at Each Week Assessed
Week 1 (n=139, 137, 138, 138)
|
-1.58 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.260
|
-1.27 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.261
|
-1.41 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.261
|
-1.56 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.261
|
|
Change From Baseline in Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) Total Score at Each Week Assessed
Week 2 (n=138, 138, 135, 135)
|
-3.06 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.343
|
-3.72 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.343
|
-3.09 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.346
|
-3.77 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.347
|
|
Change From Baseline in Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) Total Score at Each Week Assessed
Week 4 (n=135, 133, 135, 127)
|
-4.54 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.416
|
-5.95 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.418
|
-5.60 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.418
|
-6.11 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.425
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8Population: Full analysis set with available data at Baseline. A mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) based on observed cases was used; "n" indicates the number of patients included in the analysis at each time point.
The Clinical Global Impression - Severity scale (CGI-S) is a 7-point scale that requires the clinician to rate the severity of the participant's illness at the time of assessment, relative to the clinician's past experience with patients who have the same diagnosis. Considering total clinical experience, a patient is assessed on severity of mental illness on the following scale: 1, normal, not at all ill; 2, borderline mentally ill; 3, mildly ill; 4, moderately ill; 5, markedly ill; 6, severely ill; or 7, extremely ill. LS means are from a mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) with Baseline-by-week, center, week, and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=139 Participants
Vortioxetine placebo-matching capsules, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 1 mg
n=139 Participants
Vortioxetine 1 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 5 mg
n=139 Participants
Vortioxetine 5 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 10 mg
n=139 Participants
Vortioxetine 10 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression Scale-Severity of Illness at Each Week Assessed
Week 1 (n=139, 137, 138, 138)
|
-0.24 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.044
|
-0.20 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.045
|
-0.22 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.044
|
-0.24 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.044
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression Scale-Severity of Illness at Each Week Assessed
Week 8 (n=128, 124, 129, 122)
|
-1.12 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.101
|
-1.50 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.102
|
-1.63 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.101
|
-1.74 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.103
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression Scale-Severity of Illness at Each Week Assessed
Week 2 (n=138, 138, 135, 135)
|
-0.46 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.062
|
-0.58 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.062
|
-0.61 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.062
|
-0.60 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.062
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression Scale-Severity of Illness at Each Week Assessed
Week 4 (n=135, 133, 135, 127)
|
-0.75 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.080
|
-1.07 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.081
|
-1.10 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.081
|
-1.06 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.082
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression Scale-Severity of Illness at Each Week Assessed
Week 6 (n=134, 130, 129, 126)
|
-0.96 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.092
|
-1.41 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.093
|
-1.38 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.093
|
-1.55 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.094
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 1, 4, and 8Population: Full analysis set with available data at Baseline. A mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) based on observed cases was used; "n" indicates the number of patients included in the analysis at each time point.
The HAD scale is completed by the participant and comprises two subscales, one measuring depression (focusing on the state of lost interest and diminished pleasure response) and one measuring anxiety (including anxious mood, restlessness, anxious thoughts, panic attacks). Each subscale is made up of 7 items that are assessed on a scale of 0 = no anxiety/depression to 3 = severe feeling of anxiety/depression. Participants are required to indicate the response which most accurately reflects the way they have felt over the last few days. Scores for the depression and anxiety subscales are summed separately and not combined, with each score ranging from 0 to 21 (maximal severity). LS means are from a mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) with Baseline-by-week, center, week, and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=139 Participants
Vortioxetine placebo-matching capsules, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 1 mg
n=139 Participants
Vortioxetine 1 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 5 mg
n=139 Participants
Vortioxetine 5 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 10 mg
n=138 Participants
Vortioxetine 10 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) Scales at Each Week Assessed
Anxiety Scale at Week 8 (n=129, 129, 127, 122)
|
-2.55 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.315
|
-3.79 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.315
|
-3.70 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.317
|
-4.38 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.321
|
|
Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) Scales at Each Week Assessed
Depression Scale at Week 1 (n=139, 137, 138, 137)
|
-0.32 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.217
|
-0.90 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.217
|
-0.74 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.216
|
-0.92 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.218
|
|
Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) Scales at Each Week Assessed
Depression Scale at Week 4 (n=137, 138, 135, 134)
|
-2.32 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.348
|
-3.45 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.347
|
-3.32 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.350
|
-3.80 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.352
|
|
Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) Scales at Each Week Assessed
Depression Scale at Week 8 (n=129, 129, 127, 122)
|
-3.19 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.392
|
-4.67 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.393
|
-5.02 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.396
|
-5.49 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.401
|
|
Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) Scales at Each Week Assessed
Anxiety Scale at Week 1 (n=139, 137, 138, 137)
|
-0.46 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.190
|
-1.14 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.190
|
-0.87 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.189
|
-0.91 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.190
|
|
Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) Scales at Each Week Assessed
Anxiety Scale at Week 4 (n=137, 138, 135, 134)
|
-1.95 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.277
|
-2.83 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.276
|
-2.81 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.278
|
-2.80 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.279
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4 and 8Population: Full analysis set with available SF-36 Subscore data at Baseline. A mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) based on observed cases was used; "n" indicates the number of patients included in the analysis at each time point.
The Medical Outcomes Study SF-36 is a participant self-rated questionnaire that is a general measure of perceived health status comprising 36 questions, which yields an 8-scale health profile. The physical functioning subscale assesses limitations in physical activities because of health problems. The sub-score scale ranges from 0 (best) - 100 (worst). LS means are from a mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) with Baseline-by-week, center, week, and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=139 Participants
Vortioxetine placebo-matching capsules, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 1 mg
n=139 Participants
Vortioxetine 1 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 5 mg
n=137 Participants
Vortioxetine 5 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 10 mg
n=136 Participants
Vortioxetine 10 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Functioning Subscore at All Weeks Assessed
Week 2 (n=138,139,136,136)
|
2.24 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.279
|
5.39 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.273
|
7.55 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.285
|
3.34 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.289
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Functioning Subscore at All Weeks Assessed
Week 4 (n=135,132,135,128)
|
5.10 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.354
|
7.77 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.364
|
9.35 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.356
|
6.92 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.385
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Functioning Subscore at All Weeks Assessed
Week 8 (n=129,129,128,122)
|
8.77 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.407
|
9.59 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.408
|
12.31 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.411
|
11.28 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.441
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4 and 8Population: Full analysis set with available SF-36 Subscore data at Baseline. A mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) based on observed cases was used; "n" indicates the number of patients included in the analysis at each time point.
The Medical Outcomes Study SF-36 is a participant self-rated questionnaire that is a general measure of perceived health status comprising 36 questions, which yields an 8-scale health profile. The role-physical subscale assesses limitations in usual role activities because of physical health problems. The sub-score scale ranges from 0 (best) - 100 (worst). LS means are from a mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) with Baseline-by-week, center, week, and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=139 Participants
Vortioxetine placebo-matching capsules, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 1 mg
n=139 Participants
Vortioxetine 1 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 5 mg
n=137 Participants
Vortioxetine 5 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 10 mg
n=136 Participants
Vortioxetine 10 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Role-Physical Subscore at All Weeks Assessed
Week 2 (n=138, 139, 136, 136)
|
0.74 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.511
|
6.09 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.505
|
7.38 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.520
|
5.00 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.525
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Role-Physical Subscore at All Weeks Assessed
Week 4 (n=135, 132, 135, 128)
|
4.53 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.706
|
10.62 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.721
|
12.97 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.709
|
8.28 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.748
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Role-Physical Subscore at All Weeks Assessed
Week 8 (n=129, 129, 128, 122)
|
8.46 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.830
|
14.09 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.833
|
15.64 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.835
|
15.76 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.878
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4 and 8Population: Full analysis set with available SF-36 Subscore data at Baseline. A mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) based on observed cases was used; "n" indicates the number of patients included in the analysis at each time point.
The Medical Outcomes Study SF-36 is a participant self-rated questionnaire that is a general measure of perceived health status comprising 36 questions, which yields an 8-scale health profile. The bodily pain sub-score scale ranges from 0 (best) - 100 (worst). LS means are from a mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) with Baseline-by-week, center, week, and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=139 Participants
Vortioxetine placebo-matching capsules, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 1 mg
n=139 Participants
Vortioxetine 1 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 5 mg
n=137 Participants
Vortioxetine 5 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 10 mg
n=136 Participants
Vortioxetine 10 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Bodily Pain Subscore at All Weeks Assessed
Week 8 (n=129, 129, 128, 122)
|
7.17 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.920
|
11.99 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.920
|
9.63 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.928
|
12.89 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.970
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Bodily Pain Subscore at All Weeks Assessed
Week 2 (n=138, 139, 136, 136)
|
2.99 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.630
|
5.06 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.624
|
4.52 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.644
|
7.22 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.644
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Bodily Pain Subscore at All Weeks Assessed
Week 4 (n=135, 132, 135, 128)
|
4.45 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.738
|
5.33 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.752
|
7.75 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.744
|
10.66 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.778
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4 and 8Population: Full analysis set with available SF-36 Subscore data at Baseline. A mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) based on observed cases was used; "n" indicates the number of patients included in the analysis at each time point.
The Medical Outcomes Study SF-36 is a participant self-rated questionnaire that is a general measure of perceived health status comprising 36 questions, which yields an 8-scale health profile. The general health sub-score scale ranges from 0 (best) - 100 (worst). LS means are from a mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) with Baseline-by-week, center, week, and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=139 Participants
Vortioxetine placebo-matching capsules, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 1 mg
n=139 Participants
Vortioxetine 1 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 5 mg
n=137 Participants
Vortioxetine 5 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 10 mg
n=136 Participants
Vortioxetine 10 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) General Health Subscore at All Weeks Assessed
Week 2 (n=138, 139, 136, 136)
|
2.83 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.048
|
5.54 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.044
|
5.64 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.054
|
5.47 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.056
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) General Health Subscore at All Weeks Assessed
Week 4 (n=135, 132, 135, 128)
|
6.51 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.235
|
8.98 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.245
|
9.96 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.238
|
10.99 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.263
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) General Health Subscore at All Weeks Assessed
Week 8 (n=129, 129, 128, 121)
|
8.68 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.392
|
12.46 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.395
|
13.67 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.396
|
13.87 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.429
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4 and 8Population: Full analysis set with available SF-36 Subscore data at Baseline. A mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) based on observed cases was used; "n" indicates the number of patients included in the analysis at each time point.
The Medical Outcomes Study SF-36 is a participant self-rated questionnaire that is a general measure of perceived health status comprising 36 questions, which yields an 8-scale health profile. The vitality sub-score assesses energy and fatigue, and ranges from 0 (best) - 100 (worst). LS means are from a mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) with Baseline-by-week, center, week, and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=139 Participants
Vortioxetine placebo-matching capsules, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 1 mg
n=139 Participants
Vortioxetine 1 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 5 mg
n=137 Participants
Vortioxetine 5 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 10 mg
n=136 Participants
Vortioxetine 10 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Vitality Subscore at All Weeks Assessed
Week 2 (n=138, 139, 136, 136)
|
5.97 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.199
|
10.39 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.193
|
8.83 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.205
|
8.03 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.208
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Vitality Subscore at All Weeks Assessed
Week 4 (n=135, 132, 135, 128)
|
12.06 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.523
|
16.69 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.536
|
16.04 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.526
|
16.07 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.560
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Vitality Subscore at All Weeks Assessed
Week 8 (n=129, 129, 128, 122)
|
16.14 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.748
|
22.34 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.752
|
21.21 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.753
|
24.17 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.793
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 2 and 4Population: Full analysis set with available SF-36 Subscore data at Baseline. A mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) based on observed cases was used; "n" indicates the number of patients included in the analysis at each time point.
The Medical Outcomes Study SF-36 is a participant self-rated questionnaire that is a general measure of perceived health status comprising 36 questions, which yields an 8-scale health profile. The social functioning subscale assesses limitations in social activities because of physical or emotional problems. The sub-score scale ranges from 0 (best) - 100 (worst). LS means are from a mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) with Baseline-by-week, center, week, and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=139 Participants
Vortioxetine placebo-matching capsules, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 1 mg
n=139 Participants
Vortioxetine 1 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 5 mg
n=137 Participants
Vortioxetine 5 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 10 mg
n=136 Participants
Vortioxetine 10 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Social Functioning Subscore at Other Weeks Assessed
Week 2 (n=138, 139, 136, 136)
|
6.38 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.479
|
9.71 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.473
|
12.02 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.486
|
10.03 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.491
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Social Functioning Subscore at Other Weeks Assessed
Week 4 (n=135, 132, 135, 128)
|
12.34 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.760
|
15.71 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.775
|
18.57 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.762
|
15.84 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.804
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Social Functioning Subscore at Other Weeks Assessed
Week 8 (n=129, 129, 128, 122)
|
15.60 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.989
|
21.71 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.991
|
21.87 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.993
|
24.94 scores on a scale
Standard Error 2.040
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4 and 8Population: Full analysis set with available SF-36 Subscore data at Baseline. A mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) based on observed cases was used; "n" indicates the number of patients included in the analysis at each time point.
The Medical Outcomes Study SF-36 is a participant self-rated questionnaire that is a general measure of perceived health status comprising 36 questions, which yields an 8-scale health profile. The role-emotional subscale assesses limitations in usual role activities because of emotional problems. The sub-score scale ranges from 0 (best) - 100 (worst). LS means are from a mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) with Baseline-by-week, center, week, and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=139 Participants
Vortioxetine placebo-matching capsules, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 1 mg
n=139 Participants
Vortioxetine 1 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 5 mg
n=137 Participants
Vortioxetine 5 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 10 mg
n=136 Participants
Vortioxetine 10 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Role-Emotional Subscore at All Weeks Assessed
Week 2 (n=138, 139, 136, 136)
|
6.84 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.570
|
8.78 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.563
|
10.87 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.579
|
9.93 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.581
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Role-Emotional Subscore at All Weeks Assessed
Week 4 (n=135, 132, 135, 128)
|
12.05 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.755
|
17.01 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.772
|
18.08 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.758
|
14.58 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.797
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Role-Emotional Subscore at All Weeks Assessed
Week 8 (n=129, 129, 128, 122)
|
15.96 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.941
|
23.06 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.946
|
22.89 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.947
|
24.71 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.990
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4 and 8Population: Full analysis set with available SF-36 Subscore data at Baseline. A mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) based on observed cases was used; "n" indicates the number of patients included in the analysis at each time point.
The Medical Outcomes Study SF-36 is a participant self-rated questionnaire that is a general measure of perceived health status comprising 36 questions, which yields an 8-scale health profile. The mental health sub-score assesses general mental health (psychological distress and well-being) and ranges from 0 (best) - 100 (worst). LS means are from a mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) with Baseline-by-week, center, week, and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=139 Participants
Vortioxetine placebo-matching capsules, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 1 mg
n=139 Participants
Vortioxetine 1 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 5 mg
n=137 Participants
Vortioxetine 5 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 10 mg
n=136 Participants
Vortioxetine 10 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Mental Health Subscore at All Weeks Assessed
Week 2 (n=138, 139, 136, 136)
|
6.98 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.199
|
10.62 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.192
|
9.56 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.205
|
10.26 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.207
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Mental Health Subscore at All Weeks Assessed
Week 4 (n= 135, 132, 135, 128)
|
13.06 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.418
|
16.78 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.429
|
16.56 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.421
|
16.38 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.451
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Mental Health Subscore at All Weeks Assessed
Week 8 (n=129, 129, 128, 122)
|
16.28 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.625
|
23.61 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.628
|
22.24 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.631
|
24.89 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.667
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8Population: Full analysis set
Healthcare resource utilization was assessed by the Health Economic Assessment (HEA) questionnaire, which monitors the participants' absenteeism from work, as well as resource use such as visits to a general practitioner, outpatient and inpatient services, hospitalization, medications, and other relevant services over the past 8 weeks.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=139 Participants
Vortioxetine placebo-matching capsules, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 1 mg
n=139 Participants
Vortioxetine 1 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 5 mg
n=139 Participants
Vortioxetine 5 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 10 mg
n=139 Participants
Vortioxetine 10 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Healthcare Resource Utilization as Assessed by the Health Economic Assessment Questionnaire.
Baseline: Any resource use
|
62 participants
|
64 participants
|
71 participants
|
61 participants
|
|
Healthcare Resource Utilization as Assessed by the Health Economic Assessment Questionnaire.
Baseline: Hospitalization related to depression
|
3 participants
|
3 participants
|
4 participants
|
2 participants
|
|
Healthcare Resource Utilization as Assessed by the Health Economic Assessment Questionnaire.
Week 8: Any resource use
|
31 participants
|
13 participants
|
25 participants
|
25 participants
|
|
Healthcare Resource Utilization as Assessed by the Health Economic Assessment Questionnaire.
Week 8: Any sick leave
|
16 participants
|
6 participants
|
11 participants
|
18 participants
|
|
Healthcare Resource Utilization as Assessed by the Health Economic Assessment Questionnaire.
Baseline: Any hospitalization-related services
|
4 participants
|
3 participants
|
6 participants
|
4 participants
|
|
Healthcare Resource Utilization as Assessed by the Health Economic Assessment Questionnaire.
Baseline: Any sick leave
|
17 participants
|
7 participants
|
14 participants
|
21 participants
|
|
Healthcare Resource Utilization as Assessed by the Health Economic Assessment Questionnaire.
Baseline: Sick leave related to depression
|
12 participants
|
6 participants
|
10 participants
|
18 participants
|
|
Healthcare Resource Utilization as Assessed by the Health Economic Assessment Questionnaire.
Week 8: Any hospitalization-related service
|
3 participants
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
2 participants
|
|
Healthcare Resource Utilization as Assessed by the Health Economic Assessment Questionnaire.
Week 8: Hospitalization related to depression
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Healthcare Resource Utilization as Assessed by the Health Economic Assessment Questionnaire.
Week 8: Sick leave related to depression
|
13 participants
|
6 participants
|
9 participants
|
14 participants
|
Adverse Events
Placebo
Vortioxetine 1 mg
Vortioxetine 5 mg
Vortioxetine 10 mg
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo
n=140 participants at risk
Vortioxetine placebo-matching capsules, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 1 mg
n=140 participants at risk
Vortioxetine 1 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 5 mg
n=140 participants at risk
Vortioxetine 5 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 10 mg
n=139 participants at risk
Vortioxetine 10 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Tachycardia
|
0.00%
0/140 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/140 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
0.71%
1/140 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/139 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Pancreatitis
|
0.71%
1/140 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/140 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/140 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
0.72%
1/139 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
0.71%
1/140 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/140 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/140 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/139 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Suicide attempt
|
0.00%
0/140 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/140 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/140 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
0.72%
1/139 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertensive crisis
|
0.00%
0/140 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
0.71%
1/140 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/140 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/139 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo
n=140 participants at risk
Vortioxetine placebo-matching capsules, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 1 mg
n=140 participants at risk
Vortioxetine 1 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 5 mg
n=140 participants at risk
Vortioxetine 5 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
Vortioxetine 10 mg
n=139 participants at risk
Vortioxetine 10 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Tachycardia
|
2.1%
3/140 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/140 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/140 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
0.72%
1/139 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Vertigo
|
0.71%
1/140 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
2.1%
3/140 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
2.9%
4/140 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
2.2%
3/139 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
4.3%
6/140 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
7.9%
11/140 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
15.7%
22/140 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
12.9%
18/139 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
3.6%
5/140 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
1.4%
2/140 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
0.71%
1/140 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
0.72%
1/139 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
1.4%
2/140 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
1.4%
2/140 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
2.1%
3/140 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
2.9%
4/139 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dry mouth
|
2.1%
3/140 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
1.4%
2/140 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
2.1%
3/140 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
2.2%
3/139 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
0.71%
1/140 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
1.4%
2/140 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
2.1%
3/140 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
0.72%
1/139 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
0.00%
0/140 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
2.1%
3/140 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
3.6%
5/140 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
0.72%
1/139 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
5.7%
8/140 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
3.6%
5/140 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
5.0%
7/140 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
2.2%
3/139 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
1.4%
2/140 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
1.4%
2/140 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
3.6%
5/140 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
1.4%
2/139 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
3.6%
5/140 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
1.4%
2/140 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
2.1%
3/140 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
0.72%
1/139 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
7.9%
11/140 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
6.4%
9/140 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
11.4%
16/140 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
5.0%
7/139 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
2.1%
3/140 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
0.71%
1/140 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
3.6%
5/140 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
6.5%
9/139 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Somnolence
|
1.4%
2/140 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
0.71%
1/140 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
2.1%
3/140 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
2.2%
3/139 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Sedation
|
0.00%
0/140 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/140 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
2.1%
3/140 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/139 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Restlessness
|
0.71%
1/140 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
0.71%
1/140 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
2.1%
3/140 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
1.4%
2/139 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Hyperhidrosis
|
0.71%
1/140 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/140 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
2.1%
3/140 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
1.4%
2/139 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
2.1%
3/140 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/140 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
0.71%
1/140 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
0.72%
1/139 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events whose onset occurred or intensity increased after the first dose of double-blind study drug through 30 days after permanent discontinuation of double-blind study drug.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The first study related publication will be a multi-center publication submitted within 24 months after conclusion or termination of a study at all sites. After such multi site publication, all proposed site publications and presentations will be submitted to sponsor for review 60 days in advance of publication. Site will remove Sponsor confidential information unrelated to study results. Sponsor can delay a proposed publication for another 60 days to preserve intellectual property.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER