TIPS Versus Portacaval Shunt for Acute Bleeding Varices in Cirrhosis
NCT ID: NCT00734227
Last Updated: 2008-08-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
153 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
1996-07-31
2006-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
A
Randomization: By the blind card method to TIPS or emergency portacaval shunt. Diagnostic Workup: Completed within 6hr. Rapidity of Therapy: Within 24 hr. Failure of Therapy: Bleeding requiring \>6u PRBC in first 7 days, or 8 units PRBC during 12 months.
Rescue Crossover Therapy: When primary therapy has failed. Followup: Lifelong data collection on line, analysis by biostatistician Florin Vaida, PhD. External Advisory, Data Monitoring and Safety Committee by 3 senior academicians.
Procedure: Emergency portacaval shunt.
Emergency portacaval shunt
B
Procedure: Emergency TIPS.
Emergency TIPS
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Emergency portacaval shunt
Emergency TIPS
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of California, San Diego
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
University of California, San Diego
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Marshall J. Orloff, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
UCSD Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
UCSD Medical Center
San Diego, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Orloff MJ. Fifty-three years' experience with randomized clinical trials of emergency portacaval shunt for bleeding esophageal varices in Cirrhosis: 1958-2011. JAMA Surg. 2014 Feb;149(2):155-69. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.4045.
Orloff MJ, Vaida F, Haynes KS, Hye RJ, Isenberg JI, Jinich-Brook H. Randomized controlled trial of emergency transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt versus emergency portacaval shunt treatment of acute bleeding esophageal varices in cirrhosis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012 Nov;16(11):2094-111. doi: 10.1007/s11605-012-2003-6. Epub 2012 Sep 25.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
TvSSTUDY
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id