Gemcitabine and Erlotinib Before and After Surgery in Treating Patients With Pancreatic Cancer That Can Be Removed by Surgery
NCT ID: NCT00733746
Last Updated: 2019-10-21
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
123 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-04-30
2019-06-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Erlotinib Combined With Gemcitabine in Treating Patients With Newly Diagnosed Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer or Other Solid Tumors
NCT00033241
Gemcitabine With/Out Erlotinib in Unresectable Locally Advanced/Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
NCT00026338
Erlotinib, Gemcitabine, and Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Locally Advanced Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer
NCT00063947
Gemcitabine and Oxaliplatin in Treating Patients With Pancreatic Cancer That Can Be Removed By Surgery
NCT00536874
Gemcitabine Hydrochloride With or Without Erlotinib Hydrochloride Followed by the Same Chemotherapy Regimen With or Without Radiation Therapy and Capecitabine or Fluorouracil in Treating Patients With Pancreatic Cancer That Has Been Removed by Surgery
NCT01013649
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Primary Objective:
To estimate the proportion of patients alive at two years from the date of registration
Secondary Objectives:
1. To determine the resection rate (defined as the fraction of patients who proceed to planned surgery with removal of primary tumor \[R0/R1\]) following induction treatment with gemcitabine plus erlotinib
2. To estimate the time to disease progression/relapse
3. To evaluate the rate of R0, R1, and R2 resections (defined as per the 6th edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual) in patients treated with preoperative gemcitabine plus erlotinib chemotherapy
4. To evaluate the toxicity profile of preoperative gemcitabine plus erlotinib and the feasibility of postoperative gemcitabine plus erlotinib
5. To evaluate response rates to preoperative chemotherapy for patients treated with preoperative gemcitabine and erlotinib
6. To identify molecular predictors of pancreatic cancer response to gemcitabine combined with erlotinib
7. To identify genetic profiles of pancreatic adenocarcinoma that may be associated with response to neoadjuvant therapy
After completion of postoperative chemotherapy treatment, patients are followed every 3 months for 2 years and then every 6 months for 2 years.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Neoadjuvant therapy + Surgery + Adjuvant therapy
As part of neoadjuvant therapy, patients receive gemcitabine hydrochloride IV over 30 minutes on days 1, 8, 15, 29, 36, and 43 and oral erlotinib hydrochloride once daily on days 1-43 in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Within 3-6 weeks after completion of neoadjuvant therapy, patients undergo pancreaticoduodenectomy and patients receive gemcitabine hydrochloride and erlotinib hydrochloride as in neoadjuvant therapy within 5-10 weeks post surgery.
erlotinib hydrochloride
oral administration
gemcitabine hydrochloride
Intravenous administration
therapeutic conventional surgery
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
erlotinib hydrochloride
oral administration
gemcitabine hydrochloride
Intravenous administration
therapeutic conventional surgery
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* No evidence of tumor extension to the celiac axis, hepatic artery, or superior mesenteric artery
* No evidence of tumor encasement or occlusion of the superior mesenteric vein (SMV) or the SMV/portal vein confluence
* No evidence of visceral or peritoneal metastases
NOTE: Patients with borderline resectable or marginally resectable pancreatic cancer are not eligible. Patients must meet all objective imaging criteria outlined above.
3. ≥ 18 years of age
4. ECOG/Zubrod performance status of 0 or 1
5. Baseline weight loss ≤ 15% of premorbid weight
6. Patient must have adequate hematologic, renal, and hepatic function as defined by:
* WBC ≥ 2,000 cells/mm³
* ANC ≥ 1,500 cells/mm³
* Platelets ≥ 100,000 cells/mm³
* Serum bilirubin ≤ 2.5 mg/dL
* Serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 mg/dL or a calculated creatinine clearance of ≥ 50 ml/min (24 hour urine collection)
* ALT \< 2.5 times upper limit of normal (ULN)
* AST \< 2.5 times ULN
* Albumin ≥ 3.2 g/dl
7. No history of the following:
* Prior EGFR targeted therapy or therapy for pancreatic cancer
* Active infection requiring intravenous antibiotics at the time of registration
8. Non-pregnant and non-breast feeding. Female participants of child bearing potential must have a negative urine or serum pregnancy test prior to registration. Perimenopausal participants must be amenorrheic ≥ 12 months to be considered not of childbearing potential. All patients of reproductive potential must agree to use an effective method of birth control while receiving study therapy.
9. No prior malignancy within 5 years of registration (Exceptions: non-melanoma skin cancer, in-situ cancers)
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
NIH
OSI Pharmaceuticals
INDUSTRY
Astellas Pharma Inc
INDUSTRY
Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Peter W.T. Pisters, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Rebecca and John Moores UCSD Cancer Center
La Jolla, California, United States
Kaiser Permanente Medical Center - Los Angeles
Los Angeles, California, United States
Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center at University of California Irvine Medical Center
Orange, California, United States
St. Vincent's Medical Center
Bridgeport, Connecticut, United States
Lakeland Regional Cancer Center at Lakeland Regional Medical Center
Lakeland, Florida, United States
St. Francis Hospital Cancer Care Services
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
Alvin and Lois Lapidus Cancer Institute at Sinai Hospital
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
St. Agnes Hospital Cancer Center
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
University of Mississippi Cancer Clinic
Jackson, Mississippi, United States
Methodist Estabrook Cancer Center
Omaha, Nebraska, United States
NYU Cancer Institute at New York University Medical Center
New York, New York, United States
Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center at University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
David L. Rike Cancer Center at Miami Valley Hospital
Dayton, Ohio, United States
Samaritan North Cancer Care Center
Dayton, Ohio, United States
CCOP - Dayton
Dayton, Ohio, United States
Charles F. Kettering Memorial Hospital
Kettering, Ohio, United States
UVMC Cancer Care Center at Upper Valley Medical Center
Troy, Ohio, United States
Natalie Warren Bryant Cancer Center at St. Francis Hospital
Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States
Providence Cancer Center at Providence Portland Medical Center
Portland, Oregon, United States
Gibbs Regional Cancer Center at Spartanburg Regional Medical Center
Spartanburg, South Carolina, United States
Surgical Oncology Associates
Newport News, Virginia, United States
Mary Babb Randolph Cancer Center at West Virginia University Hospitals
Morgantown, West Virginia, United States
University of Wisconsin Paul P. Carbone Comprehensive Cancer Center
Madison, Wisconsin, United States
Princess Margaret Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ACOSOG-Z5041
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
NCI-2009-00348
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
CDR0000609871
Identifier Type: REGISTRY
Identifier Source: secondary_id
ACOSOG-Z5041
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.