Trial Outcomes & Findings for Evaluation of the Coloplast Titan® IPP for Maintaining Penile Length While Treating Erectile Dysfunction (ED) (NCT NCT00731666)
NCT ID: NCT00731666
Last Updated: 2013-11-28
Results Overview
Recruitment status
COMPLETED
Study phase
NA
Target enrollment
40 participants
Primary outcome timeframe
12 months
Results posted on
2013-11-28
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Titan® IPP
Subjects implanted with Titan® IPP
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
40
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
28
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
12
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Titan® IPP
Subjects implanted with Titan® IPP
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
8
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
2
|
Baseline Characteristics
Evaluation of the Coloplast Titan® IPP for Maintaining Penile Length While Treating Erectile Dysfunction (ED)
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Titan® IPP
n=40 Participants
Subjects implanted with Titan® IPP
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age Continuous
|
66.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.4 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
40 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
40 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsOutcome measures
| Measure |
Titan® IPP
n=31 Participants
Subjects implanted with Titan® IPP
|
|---|---|
|
The Study's Primary Objective Will Assess the Change in Penile Length.
Pubic bone to meatus - erect
|
1.14 cm
Standard Deviation 1.94
|
|
The Study's Primary Objective Will Assess the Change in Penile Length.
Pubic bone to meatus - flaccid
|
0.99 cm
Standard Deviation 1.64
|
|
The Study's Primary Objective Will Assess the Change in Penile Length.
Pubic bone to meatus - stretched
|
1.04 cm
Standard Deviation 1.94
|
|
The Study's Primary Objective Will Assess the Change in Penile Length.
Pubic bone to proximal end of corona - erect
|
0.94 cm
Standard Deviation 1.41
|
|
The Study's Primary Objective Will Assess the Change in Penile Length.
Pubic bone to proximal end of corona - flaccid
|
0.69 cm
Standard Deviation 1.69
|
|
The Study's Primary Objective Will Assess the Change in Penile Length.
Pubic bone to proximal end of corona - stretched
|
0.59 cm
Standard Deviation 1.59
|
|
The Study's Primary Objective Will Assess the Change in Penile Length.
Pubopenile skin junction to meatus - erect
|
0.93 cm
Standard Deviation 1.41
|
|
The Study's Primary Objective Will Assess the Change in Penile Length.
Pubopenile skin junction to meatus - flaccid
|
0.71 cm
Standard Deviation 1.48
|
|
The Study's Primary Objective Will Assess the Change in Penile Length.
Pubopenile skin junction to meatus - stretched
|
0.95 cm
Standard Deviation 1.98
|
|
The Study's Primary Objective Will Assess the Change in Penile Length.
Pubopenile skin junct to prox end of corona-erect
|
0.93 cm
Standard Deviation 1.5
|
|
The Study's Primary Objective Will Assess the Change in Penile Length.
Pubopenile skin junct to prox end of corona-flacci
|
0.75 cm
Standard Deviation 1.58
|
|
The Study's Primary Objective Will Assess the Change in Penile Length.
Pubopenile skin junct to prox end of corona-stretc
|
0.64 cm
Standard Deviation 2.00
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 and 24 monthsPopulation: Subjects implanted with Titan IPP
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Titan® IPP
n=31 Participants
Subjects implanted with Titan® IPP
|
|---|---|
|
Assess Participant Satisfaction With the Penile Length at Baseline, 12 and 24 Months Post Implantation Via Participant Questionaire.
At 12 mo: Over past 4 wks, completely satisfied
|
48.4 percentage of participants
|
|
Assess Participant Satisfaction With the Penile Length at Baseline, 12 and 24 Months Post Implantation Via Participant Questionaire.
At 12 mo: Over past 4 wks, mostly satisfied
|
16.1 percentage of participants
|
|
Assess Participant Satisfaction With the Penile Length at Baseline, 12 and 24 Months Post Implantation Via Participant Questionaire.
At 12 mo: Over past 4 weeks, somewhat dissatisfied
|
22.6 percentage of participants
|
|
Assess Participant Satisfaction With the Penile Length at Baseline, 12 and 24 Months Post Implantation Via Participant Questionaire.
At 12 mo: Over past 4 wks, completely dissatisfied
|
12.9 percentage of participants
|
|
Assess Participant Satisfaction With the Penile Length at Baseline, 12 and 24 Months Post Implantation Via Participant Questionaire.
At 24 mo: Over past 4 wks, completely satisfied
|
57.1 percentage of participants
|
|
Assess Participant Satisfaction With the Penile Length at Baseline, 12 and 24 Months Post Implantation Via Participant Questionaire.
At 24 mo: Over past 4 wks, mostly satisfied
|
10.7 percentage of participants
|
|
Assess Participant Satisfaction With the Penile Length at Baseline, 12 and 24 Months Post Implantation Via Participant Questionaire.
At 24 mo: Neutral
|
3.6 percentage of participants
|
|
Assess Participant Satisfaction With the Penile Length at Baseline, 12 and 24 Months Post Implantation Via Participant Questionaire.
At 24 mo: Over past 4 weeks, somewhat dissatisfied
|
7.1 percentage of participants
|
|
Assess Participant Satisfaction With the Penile Length at Baseline, 12 and 24 Months Post Implantation Via Participant Questionaire.
At 24 mo: Over past 4 weeks, completely dissatisfi
|
21.4 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsSubject responses to 3 questions were evaluated: 1. On average, how many of these (pads, tissues, disposable undergarments) would you use to protect against wetness during the day? 2. Overall, how often have you needed to change your daily activities because of urinary incontinence? 3. Overall, how big of a social problem has urinary incontinence been for you during the past month?
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Titan® IPP
n=31 Participants
Subjects implanted with Titan® IPP
|
|---|---|
|
The Rate of Change in Male Stress Urinary Incontinence(SUI).
Question 1: Improved
|
16.7 percentage of participants
|
|
The Rate of Change in Male Stress Urinary Incontinence(SUI).
Question 1: Unchanged (Satisfactory)
|
66.7 percentage of participants
|
|
The Rate of Change in Male Stress Urinary Incontinence(SUI).
Question 1: Worsened
|
16.7 percentage of participants
|
|
The Rate of Change in Male Stress Urinary Incontinence(SUI).
Question 2: Improved
|
12.9 percentage of participants
|
|
The Rate of Change in Male Stress Urinary Incontinence(SUI).
Question 2: Unchanged (Satisfactory)
|
61.3 percentage of participants
|
|
The Rate of Change in Male Stress Urinary Incontinence(SUI).
Question 2: Worsened
|
25.8 percentage of participants
|
|
The Rate of Change in Male Stress Urinary Incontinence(SUI).
Question 3: Improved
|
19.4 percentage of participants
|
|
The Rate of Change in Male Stress Urinary Incontinence(SUI).
Question 3: Unchanged (Satisfactory)
|
67.7 percentage of participants
|
|
The Rate of Change in Male Stress Urinary Incontinence(SUI).
Question 3: Unchanged (Unsatisfactory)
|
3.2 percentage of participants
|
|
The Rate of Change in Male Stress Urinary Incontinence(SUI).
Question 3: Worsened
|
9.7 percentage of participants
|
Adverse Events
Titan® IPP
Serious events: 1 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Titan® IPP
n=40 participants at risk
Subjects implanted with Titan® IPP
|
|---|---|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Infection
|
2.5%
1/40 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected for 24 months.
|
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place