Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study for Safety and Effectiveness of IMC-A12 by Itself or Combined With Antiestrogens to Treat Breast Cancer (NCT NCT00728949)
NCT ID: NCT00728949
Last Updated: 2018-06-06
Results Overview
PFS is defined as the time from the date of randomization until date of objectively determined progressive disease (PD) or death due to any cause. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a ≥20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions unequivocal progression of non-target lesions. Participants without documentation of progression or death will be censored at the date of last tumor assessment. The PFS will be estimated following the Kaplan-Meier method.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
93 participants
From randomization up to 35.1 Months
2018-06-06
Participant Flow
Participants who had progressive disease (PD) were considered to complete the study
Participant milestones
| Measure |
IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen Therapy
Participants will receive intravenous IMC-A12 10 mg/kg over 1 hour every 2 weeks, as well as the same dose and schedule of the last antiestrogen therapy to which their disease became refractory.
|
IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab)
Participants will receive only IMC-A12 (10 mg/kg over 1 hour every 2 weeks).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
62
|
31
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
51
|
27
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
11
|
4
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen Therapy
Participants will receive intravenous IMC-A12 10 mg/kg over 1 hour every 2 weeks, as well as the same dose and schedule of the last antiestrogen therapy to which their disease became refractory.
|
IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab)
Participants will receive only IMC-A12 (10 mg/kg over 1 hour every 2 weeks).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
8
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
2
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Abnormal Lab Results
|
0
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
On treatment at cutoff date
|
1
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Study for Safety and Effectiveness of IMC-A12 by Itself or Combined With Antiestrogens to Treat Breast Cancer
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen Therapy
n=62 Participants
Participants will receive intravenous IMC-A12 10 mg/kg over 1 hour every 2 weeks, as well as the same dose and schedule of the last antiestrogen therapy to which their disease became refractory.
|
IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab)
n=31 Participants
Participants will receive only IMC-A12 (10 mg/kg over 1 hour every 2 weeks).
|
Total
n=93 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
37 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
24 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
61 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
25 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
32 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
62 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
31 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
93 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
61 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
30 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
91 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
55 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
26 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
81 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
62 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
31 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
93 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From randomization up to 35.1 MonthsPopulation: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population: All randomized participants who were randomized regardless of actual treatment.
PFS is defined as the time from the date of randomization until date of objectively determined progressive disease (PD) or death due to any cause. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a ≥20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions unequivocal progression of non-target lesions. Participants without documentation of progression or death will be censored at the date of last tumor assessment. The PFS will be estimated following the Kaplan-Meier method.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen Therapy
n=62 Participants
Participants will receive intravenous IMC-A12 10 mg/kg over 1 hour every 2 weeks, as well as the same dose and schedule of the last antiestrogen therapy to which their disease became refractory.
|
IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab)
n=31 Participants
Participants will receive only IMC-A12 (10 mg/kg over 1 hour every 2 weeks).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
|
2.0 months
Interval 1.9 to 3.4
|
3.1 months
Interval 1.9 to 4.2
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From randomization up to 36.5 MonthsPopulation: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population: All randomized participants who were randomized regardless of actual treatment.
OS is defined as the interval between date of randomization and the date of death due to any cause. Participants who are alive at the time of study completion will be censored at the time the participants was last known to be alive.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen Therapy
n=62 Participants
Participants will receive intravenous IMC-A12 10 mg/kg over 1 hour every 2 weeks, as well as the same dose and schedule of the last antiestrogen therapy to which their disease became refractory.
|
IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab)
n=31 Participants
Participants will receive only IMC-A12 (10 mg/kg over 1 hour every 2 weeks).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Survival (OS)
|
20.3 months
Interval 11.5 to
Below the level of detection, due to small survival data.
|
NA months
Interval 17.8 to
Below the level of detection, due to small survival data.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Randomization to PD up to 35.1 MonthsPopulation: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population: All randomized participants who were randomized regardless of actual treatment.
Best overall response of CR or PR was defined using RECIST v 1.0 criteria. CR was defined as the disappearance of all lesions, pathological lymph node reduction in short axis to \<10 mm, and normalization of tumor marker levels of non-target lesions. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in sum of longest diameter (SOD) of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum diameter. PD was defined as ≥20% increase in SOD of target lesions and short axes of target lymph nodes, taking as reference the smallest sum of the longest diameters recorded since treatment started and an absolute increase in sum diameter of ≥5 mm; appearance of ≥1 new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Participants who had no post baseline tumor assessments were considered non-responders and included in the denominator when calculating response rate. Percentage of participants=(number of participants with CR+PR/total number of participants)\*100.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen Therapy
n=62 Participants
Participants will receive intravenous IMC-A12 10 mg/kg over 1 hour every 2 weeks, as well as the same dose and schedule of the last antiestrogen therapy to which their disease became refractory.
|
IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab)
n=31 Participants
Participants will receive only IMC-A12 (10 mg/kg over 1 hour every 2 weeks).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) and Partial Response (PR) (Objective Response Rate [ORR])
|
1.6 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 8.7
|
0 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 11.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From randomization to until the date of first documented date of death from any cause within 12 months, assessed up to 35.1 monthsPopulation: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population: All randomized participants who receive any drug.
The 12-month survival rate is defined as the percentage of participants who have not died 12 months after the date of randomization.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen Therapy
n=62 Participants
Participants will receive intravenous IMC-A12 10 mg/kg over 1 hour every 2 weeks, as well as the same dose and schedule of the last antiestrogen therapy to which their disease became refractory.
|
IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab)
n=31 Participants
Participants will receive only IMC-A12 (10 mg/kg over 1 hour every 2 weeks).
|
|---|---|---|
|
12-Month Survival Rate
|
15 percentage of participants
Interval 7.5 to 25.0
|
7.6 percentage of participants
Interval 1.9 to 18.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Randomization to PD up to 35.1 MonthsPopulation: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population: All randomized participants who were randomized regardless of actual treatment. Number of participants censored = 15 Cixutumumab + antiestrogen, 5 Cixutumumab only
DCR is defined as percentage of participants with CR, PR, or SD using RECIST v 1.0 criteria. CR: disappearance of all lesions, pathological lymph node reduction in short axis to \<10 mm, and normalization of tumor marker levels of non-target lesions. PR: ≥30% decrease in SOD of target lesions taking as reference baseline sum diameter. PD: ≥20% increase in SOD of target lesions and short axes of target lymph nodes, taking as reference smallest sum of longest diameters recorded since treatment started and an absolute increase in sum diameter ≥5 mm; appearance of ≥1 new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. SD: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor increase to qualify for PD. Participants who had no post baseline tumor assessments were considered non-responders and included in the denominator when calculating response rate. Percentage of participants=(number of participants with CR+PR+SD/total number of participants)\*100.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen Therapy
n=62 Participants
Participants will receive intravenous IMC-A12 10 mg/kg over 1 hour every 2 weeks, as well as the same dose and schedule of the last antiestrogen therapy to which their disease became refractory.
|
IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab)
n=31 Participants
Participants will receive only IMC-A12 (10 mg/kg over 1 hour every 2 weeks).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) and Partial Response (PR) or Stable Disease (SD) Disease Control Rate [DCR])
|
40.3 percentage of participants
Interval 28.1 to 53.6
|
51.6 percentage of participants
Interval 33.1 to 69.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Randomization to End of Study up to 36.5 MonthsPopulation: Safety population: All participants who received actual treatment of any drug. There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
The NCI-CTCAE provides descriptive terminology for adverse event reporting. A grading (severity) scale is provided for each adverse event term. Severity will be graded as mild (grade 1), moderate (grade 2), severe (grade 3), or very severe (life threatening - grade 4). Clinically significant events were defined as serious and other non-serious adverse events related to study drug regardless of causality. A summary of serious and other non-serious adverse events is located in the Reported Adverse Event module.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen Therapy
n=56 Participants
Participants will receive intravenous IMC-A12 10 mg/kg over 1 hour every 2 weeks, as well as the same dose and schedule of the last antiestrogen therapy to which their disease became refractory.
|
IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab)
n=37 Participants
Participants will receive only IMC-A12 (10 mg/kg over 1 hour every 2 weeks).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events (AEs) in National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for AE's (NCI-CTCAE) Version 3.0 Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE)
Participants with SAE's
|
16 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events (AEs) in National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for AE's (NCI-CTCAE) Version 3.0 Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE)
AE of greater than Grade 3
|
22 Participants
|
19 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events (AEs) in National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for AE's (NCI-CTCAE) Version 3.0 Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE)
AE with outcome of Death
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events (AEs) in National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for AE's (NCI-CTCAE) Version 3.0 Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE)
Study drug-related AE
|
48 Participants
|
31 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events (AEs) in National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for AE's (NCI-CTCAE) Version 3.0 Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE)
Study drug-related SAE's
|
5 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events (AEs) in National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for AE's (NCI-CTCAE) Version 3.0 Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE)
Study drug-related AE of greater than Grade 3
|
10 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events (AEs) in National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for AE's (NCI-CTCAE) Version 3.0 Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE)
AE leading to discontinuation of any study drug
|
6 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events (AEs) in National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for AE's (NCI-CTCAE) Version 3.0 Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE)
Participants with any AE
|
55 Participants
|
36 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Approximately 24 monthsPopulation: Zero participants analyzed. Circulating tumor cell counts were not collected for analysis.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
Adverse Events
IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen Therapy
IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab)
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen Therapy
n=56 participants at risk
Participants will receive intravenous IMC-A12 10 mg/kg over 1 hour every 2 weeks, as well as the same dose and schedule of the last antiestrogen therapy to which their disease became refractory.
|
IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab)
n=37 participants at risk
Participants will receive only IMC-A12 (10 mg/kg over 1 hour every 2 weeks).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Pancytopenia
|
0.00%
0/56
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 2
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Pericarditis
|
0.00%
0/56
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
1.8%
1/56 • Number of events 1
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Anal fissure
|
1.8%
1/56 • Number of events 1
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
0.00%
0/37
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Ascites
|
1.8%
1/56 • Number of events 1
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
0.00%
0/37
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
0.00%
0/56
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
1.8%
1/56 • Number of events 1
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
0.00%
0/56
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Oesophageal pain
|
0.00%
0/56
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
0.00%
0/56
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
General disorders
Disease progression
|
3.6%
2/56 • Number of events 2
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
General disorders
Infusion related reaction
|
1.8%
1/56 • Number of events 1
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
0.00%
0/37
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
General disorders
Pain
|
0.00%
0/56
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatic cirrhosis
|
1.8%
1/56 • Number of events 1
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
0.00%
0/37
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
0.00%
0/56
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis viral
|
1.8%
1/56 • Number of events 1
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
0.00%
0/37
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
1.8%
1/56 • Number of events 1
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
0.00%
0/37
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Wrong drug administered
|
1.8%
1/56 • Number of events 1
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
0.00%
0/37
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Anorexia
|
0.00%
0/56
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
|
3.6%
2/56 • Number of events 2
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
0.00%
0/37
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycaemia
|
3.6%
2/56 • Number of events 2
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
0.00%
0/56
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 2
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
0.00%
0/56
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pathological fracture
|
1.8%
1/56 • Number of events 1
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Malignant pleural effusion
|
1.8%
1/56 • Number of events 1
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
0.00%
0/37
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Syncope
|
1.8%
1/56 • Number of events 1
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
0.00%
0/37
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
1.8%
1/56 • Number of events 1
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary embolism
|
1.8%
1/56 • Number of events 1
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
0.00%
0/37
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen Therapy
n=56 participants at risk
Participants will receive intravenous IMC-A12 10 mg/kg over 1 hour every 2 weeks, as well as the same dose and schedule of the last antiestrogen therapy to which their disease became refractory.
|
IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab)
n=37 participants at risk
Participants will receive only IMC-A12 (10 mg/kg over 1 hour every 2 weeks).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
5.4%
3/56 • Number of events 3
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutropenia
|
0.00%
0/56
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombocytopenia
|
0.00%
0/56
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Eye disorders
Photopsia
|
7.1%
4/56 • Number of events 4
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Eye disorders
Vision blurred
|
0.00%
0/56
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
10.8%
4/37 • Number of events 5
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
16.1%
9/56 • Number of events 9
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
10.8%
4/37 • Number of events 6
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
0.00%
0/56
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
17.9%
10/56 • Number of events 11
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
10.8%
4/37 • Number of events 8
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
21.4%
12/56 • Number of events 14
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
37.8%
14/37 • Number of events 16
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dry mouth
|
5.4%
3/56 • Number of events 3
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
8.1%
3/37 • Number of events 3
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dysphagia
|
1.8%
1/56 • Number of events 1
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Eructation
|
0.00%
0/56
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrooesophageal reflux disease
|
1.8%
1/56 • Number of events 1
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
8.1%
3/37 • Number of events 3
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
32.1%
18/56 • Number of events 23
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
29.7%
11/37 • Number of events 11
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Oral pain
|
0.00%
0/56
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
8.1%
3/37 • Number of events 3
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Stomatitis
|
5.4%
3/56 • Number of events 3
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
8.1%
3/37 • Number of events 3
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
17.9%
10/56 • Number of events 14
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
24.3%
9/37 • Number of events 12
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
General disorders
Asthenia
|
3.6%
2/56 • Number of events 2
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
General disorders
Chills
|
0.00%
0/56
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
39.3%
22/56 • Number of events 32
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
54.1%
20/37 • Number of events 28
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
General disorders
Infusion related reaction
|
7.1%
4/56 • Number of events 4
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
General disorders
Mucosal inflammation
|
1.8%
1/56 • Number of events 1
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
8.1%
3/37 • Number of events 3
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
|
8.9%
5/56 • Number of events 5
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
5.4%
3/56 • Number of events 3
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
8.1%
3/37 • Number of events 3
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
General disorders
Thirst
|
0.00%
0/56
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
8.1%
3/37 • Number of events 4
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis viral
|
0.00%
0/56
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
3.6%
2/56 • Number of events 2
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
8.1%
3/37 • Number of events 3
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
3.6%
2/56 • Number of events 2
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
|
5.4%
3/56 • Number of events 3
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
8.1%
3/37 • Number of events 7
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Investigations
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
|
3.6%
2/56 • Number of events 2
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
8.1%
3/37 • Number of events 8
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Investigations
Blood creatinine increased
|
0.00%
0/56
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Investigations
Weight decreased
|
42.9%
24/56 • Number of events 32
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
48.6%
18/37 • Number of events 26
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Anorexia
|
16.1%
9/56 • Number of events 10
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
27.0%
10/37 • Number of events 13
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased appetite
|
3.6%
2/56 • Number of events 2
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
13.5%
5/37 • Number of events 5
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycaemia
|
10.7%
6/56 • Number of events 10
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
21.6%
8/37 • Number of events 11
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalaemia
|
3.6%
2/56 • Number of events 3
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
16.1%
9/56 • Number of events 12
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
8.1%
3/37 • Number of events 4
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
19.6%
11/56 • Number of events 11
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
16.2%
6/37 • Number of events 6
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Bone pain
|
3.6%
2/56 • Number of events 2
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
8.1%
3/37 • Number of events 4
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle spasms
|
12.5%
7/56 • Number of events 11
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
10.8%
4/37 • Number of events 7
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal chest pain
|
7.1%
4/56 • Number of events 4
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
8.1%
3/37 • Number of events 3
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal pain
|
7.1%
4/56 • Number of events 4
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
13.5%
5/37 • Number of events 5
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
7.1%
4/56 • Number of events 4
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 2
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
14.3%
8/56 • Number of events 9
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
8.1%
3/37 • Number of events 3
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dysgeusia
|
0.00%
0/56
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
13.5%
5/37 • Number of events 10
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
5.4%
3/56 • Number of events 3
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
8.1%
3/37 • Number of events 3
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Peripheral sensory neuropathy
|
0.00%
0/56
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 3
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
|
1.8%
1/56 • Number of events 1
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
|
7.1%
4/56 • Number of events 4
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
8.9%
5/56 • Number of events 5
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
0.00%
0/37
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Pollakiuria
|
1.8%
1/56 • Number of events 1
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
7.1%
4/56 • Number of events 4
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
13.5%
5/37 • Number of events 5
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
12.5%
7/56 • Number of events 7
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
13.5%
5/37 • Number of events 6
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Epistaxis
|
1.8%
1/56 • Number of events 1
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
8.1%
3/37 • Number of events 3
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasal congestion
|
1.8%
1/56 • Number of events 1
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Rhinorrhoea
|
5.4%
3/56 • Number of events 3
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Sneezing
|
0.00%
0/56
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dry skin
|
3.6%
2/56 • Number of events 2
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Erythema
|
5.4%
3/56 • Number of events 3
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Nail disorder
|
5.4%
3/56 • Number of events 3
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
8.1%
3/37 • Number of events 3
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
|
3.6%
2/56 • Number of events 3
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
10.8%
4/37 • Number of events 7
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus generalised
|
5.4%
3/56 • Number of events 3
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
14.3%
8/56 • Number of events 10
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
10.8%
4/37 • Number of events 5
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
7.1%
4/56 • Number of events 4
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1
There is a difference of 6 participants for treatment groups of IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) + Antiestrogen and IMC-A12 (Cixutumumab) of ITT population and Safety population due to planned treatment (based on randomization) differed from actual treatment.
|
Additional Information
Chief Medical Officer
Eli Lilly and Company
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: GT60