Trial Outcomes & Findings for Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection or Open Resection in Treating Patients With Rectal Cancer (NCT NCT00726622)
NCT ID: NCT00726622
Last Updated: 2020-05-07
Results Overview
The primary endpoint will be a composite endpoint of oncologic factors which are indicative of an adequate surgical resection based on pathologic evaluation. Primary endpoint parameters: * Circumferential margin \> 1 mm * Negative distal margin * Completeness of total mesorectal excision (TME) A complete TME is a rectal resection specimen that has an intact mesorectum and covering peritoneal envelope all the way to the level of rectal transection with no coning in of the mesorectum above the point of transection. The surface of the peritoneal covering should be smooth and shiny with no defects exposing the underlying fat. All three criteria must be met for a resection to be deemed adequate. Laparoscopic-assisted resection will be compared to Open rectal resection to determine if it is non-inferior.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
486 participants
At time of Surgery
2020-05-07
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Arm 1: Open Laparotomy and Rectal Resection
Patients undergo open laparotomy and rectal resection. The standard form of surgery is open laparotomy rectal resection. During open laparotomy, the surgeon makes a large incision or cut in the abdomen, and goes in through that cut to remove the tumor and lymph nodes from the rectum.
|
Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted Rectal Resection
Patients undergo laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection. Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection is performed using small instruments on long handles introduced into the abdomen through small ports called trocars in 3 - 6 positions on the abdomen through incisions measuring 5 -10 mm, under the guidance of a video camera. The abdominal wall is held up with carbon dioxide under pressure. The piece of bowel or intestine is removed through another incision (about 8 centimeters), and the ends of the intestine are reconnected to provide normal bowel function.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
243
|
243
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
225
|
240
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
18
|
3
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Arm 1: Open Laparotomy and Rectal Resection
Patients undergo open laparotomy and rectal resection. The standard form of surgery is open laparotomy rectal resection. During open laparotomy, the surgeon makes a large incision or cut in the abdomen, and goes in through that cut to remove the tumor and lymph nodes from the rectum.
|
Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted Rectal Resection
Patients undergo laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection. Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection is performed using small instruments on long handles introduced into the abdomen through small ports called trocars in 3 - 6 positions on the abdomen through incisions measuring 5 -10 mm, under the guidance of a video camera. The abdominal wall is held up with carbon dioxide under pressure. The piece of bowel or intestine is removed through another incision (about 8 centimeters), and the ends of the intestine are reconnected to provide normal bowel function.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
16
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Physician Decision
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Metastasis
|
2
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection or Open Resection in Treating Patients With Rectal Cancer
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Arm 1: Open Laparotomy and Rectal Resection
n=239 Participants
Patients undergo open laparotomy and rectal resection. The standard form of surgery is open laparotomy rectal resection. During open laparotomy, the surgeon makes a large incision or cut in the abdomen, and goes in through that cut to remove the tumor and lymph nodes from the rectum.
|
Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted Rectal Resection
n=242 Participants
Patients undergo laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection. Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection is performed using small instruments on long handles introduced into the abdomen through small ports called trocars in 3 - 6 positions on the abdomen through incisions measuring 5 -10 mm, under the guidance of a video camera. The abdominal wall is held up with carbon dioxide under pressure. The piece of bowel or intestine is removed through another incision (about 8 centimeters), and the ends of the intestine are reconnected to provide normal bowel function.
|
Total
n=481 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
57.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1 • n=93 Participants
|
57.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.5 • n=4 Participants
|
57.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.8 • n=27 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
81 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
86 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
167 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
158 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
156 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
314 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
239 participants
n=93 Participants
|
242 participants
n=4 Participants
|
481 participants
n=27 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: At time of SurgeryPopulation: Of the 225 patients that received intervention as randomized in Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection, 3 patients were excluded from the analysis due to improper consent. All 240 patients from Arm 2 that received intervention as randomized were included in the analysis.
The primary endpoint will be a composite endpoint of oncologic factors which are indicative of an adequate surgical resection based on pathologic evaluation. Primary endpoint parameters: * Circumferential margin \> 1 mm * Negative distal margin * Completeness of total mesorectal excision (TME) A complete TME is a rectal resection specimen that has an intact mesorectum and covering peritoneal envelope all the way to the level of rectal transection with no coning in of the mesorectum above the point of transection. The surface of the peritoneal covering should be smooth and shiny with no defects exposing the underlying fat. All three criteria must be met for a resection to be deemed adequate. Laparoscopic-assisted resection will be compared to Open rectal resection to determine if it is non-inferior.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: Open Laparotomy and Rectal Resection
n=222 Participants
Patients undergo open laparotomy and rectal resection. The standard form of surgery is open laparotomy rectal resection. During open laparotomy, the surgeon makes a large incision or cut in the abdomen, and goes in through that cut to remove the tumor and lymph nodes from the rectum.
|
Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted Rectal Resection
n=240 Participants
Patients undergo laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection. Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection is performed using small instruments on long handles introduced into the abdomen through small ports called trocars in 3 - 6 positions on the abdomen through incisions measuring 5 -10 mm, under the guidance of a video camera. The abdominal wall is held up with carbon dioxide under pressure. The piece of bowel or intestine is removed through another incision (about 8 centimeters), and the ends of the intestine are reconnected to provide normal bowel function.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Comparing Laparoscopic-assisted Resection to Open Rectal Resection for Rectal Cancer as Measured by the Percentage of Patients With Successful Resection Based on Pathological Evaluation.
|
86.9 percentage of participants
Interval 82.5 to 91.4
|
81.7 percentage of participants
Interval 76.5 to 86.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At time of surgeryPopulation: Of the 225 patients that received intervention as randomized in Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection, 3 patients were excluded from the analysis due to improper consent. All 240 patients from Arm 2 that received intervention as randomized were included in the analysis.
Complete total mesorectal excision was defined as a rectal resection specimen having smooth surface of mesorectal fascia with all fat contained in the enveloping fascia to a level 5 cm below the tumor for tumor-specific total mesorectal excision for upper rectal cancer, or the entire mesorectal envelope present for low rectal cancer. Nearly complete was defined as a rectal resection specimen having the mesorectal envelope intact except for defects no more than 5 mm deep, with no loss of mesorectal fat. The percentage of patients with complete or nearly complete mesorectal excision was calculated along with the binomial 95% CI.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: Open Laparotomy and Rectal Resection
n=222 Participants
Patients undergo open laparotomy and rectal resection. The standard form of surgery is open laparotomy rectal resection. During open laparotomy, the surgeon makes a large incision or cut in the abdomen, and goes in through that cut to remove the tumor and lymph nodes from the rectum.
|
Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted Rectal Resection
n=240 Participants
Patients undergo laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection. Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection is performed using small instruments on long handles introduced into the abdomen through small ports called trocars in 3 - 6 positions on the abdomen through incisions measuring 5 -10 mm, under the guidance of a video camera. The abdominal wall is held up with carbon dioxide under pressure. The piece of bowel or intestine is removed through another incision (about 8 centimeters), and the ends of the intestine are reconnected to provide normal bowel function.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Completeness of Total Mesorectal Excision (Complete or Nearly Complete)
|
95.1 percentage of participants
Interval 92.2 to 97.9
|
92.1 percentage of participants
Interval 88.7 to 95.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At time of surgeryPopulation: Of the 225 patients that received intervention as randomized in Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection, 3 patients were excluded from the analysis due to improper consent. All 240 patients from Arm 2 that received intervention as randomized were included in the analysis.
The percentage of patients with negative distal margin (\>1 mm between the closest tumor to the cut edge of the tissue) was calculated along with binomial 95% confidence intervals.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: Open Laparotomy and Rectal Resection
n=222 Participants
Patients undergo open laparotomy and rectal resection. The standard form of surgery is open laparotomy rectal resection. During open laparotomy, the surgeon makes a large incision or cut in the abdomen, and goes in through that cut to remove the tumor and lymph nodes from the rectum.
|
Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted Rectal Resection
n=240 Participants
Patients undergo laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection. Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection is performed using small instruments on long handles introduced into the abdomen through small ports called trocars in 3 - 6 positions on the abdomen through incisions measuring 5 -10 mm, under the guidance of a video camera. The abdominal wall is held up with carbon dioxide under pressure. The piece of bowel or intestine is removed through another incision (about 8 centimeters), and the ends of the intestine are reconnected to provide normal bowel function.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Negative Distal Resected Margin
|
98.2 percentage of participants
Interval 96.5 to 99.95
|
98.3 percentage of participants
Interval 96.7 to 99.95
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At time of surgeryPopulation: Of the 225 patients that received intervention as randomized in Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection, 3 patients were excluded from the analysis due to improper consent. All 240 patients from Arm 2 that received intervention as randomized were included in the analysis.
The distance between the closest tumor to the cut edge of the tissue was measure post-resection. The percentage of patients with \>1mm between the closest tumor to the cut edge of the tissue was calculated with a binomial 95% confidence interval.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: Open Laparotomy and Rectal Resection
n=222 Participants
Patients undergo open laparotomy and rectal resection. The standard form of surgery is open laparotomy rectal resection. During open laparotomy, the surgeon makes a large incision or cut in the abdomen, and goes in through that cut to remove the tumor and lymph nodes from the rectum.
|
Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted Rectal Resection
n=240 Participants
Patients undergo laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection. Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection is performed using small instruments on long handles introduced into the abdomen through small ports called trocars in 3 - 6 positions on the abdomen through incisions measuring 5 -10 mm, under the guidance of a video camera. The abdominal wall is held up with carbon dioxide under pressure. The piece of bowel or intestine is removed through another incision (about 8 centimeters), and the ends of the intestine are reconnected to provide normal bowel function.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Circumferential Margin > 1 mm
|
92.3 percentage of participants
Interval 88.8 to 95.8
|
87.9 percentage of participants
Interval 83.8 to 92.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Two weeks post-surgeryPopulation: Of the 225 patients that received intervention as randomized in Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection, 3 patients were excluded from the analysis due to improper consent. All 240 patients from Arm 2 that received intervention as randomized were included in the analysis.
The mean number of days required post-surgery to the when the patient was released from the hospital was calculated.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: Open Laparotomy and Rectal Resection
n=222 Participants
Patients undergo open laparotomy and rectal resection. The standard form of surgery is open laparotomy rectal resection. During open laparotomy, the surgeon makes a large incision or cut in the abdomen, and goes in through that cut to remove the tumor and lymph nodes from the rectum.
|
Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted Rectal Resection
n=240 Participants
Patients undergo laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection. Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection is performed using small instruments on long handles introduced into the abdomen through small ports called trocars in 3 - 6 positions on the abdomen through incisions measuring 5 -10 mm, under the guidance of a video camera. The abdominal wall is held up with carbon dioxide under pressure. The piece of bowel or intestine is removed through another incision (about 8 centimeters), and the ends of the intestine are reconnected to provide normal bowel function.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Length of Stay
|
7.0 days
Standard Deviation 3.4
|
7.3 days
Standard Deviation 5.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Two weeks post-surgeryPopulation: Of the 225 patients that received intervention as randomized in Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection, 3 patients were excluded from the analysis due to improper consent. All 240 patients from Arm 2 that received intervention as randomized were included in the analysis.
The number of days patients received parenteral narcotics post-surgery were counted.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: Open Laparotomy and Rectal Resection
n=222 Participants
Patients undergo open laparotomy and rectal resection. The standard form of surgery is open laparotomy rectal resection. During open laparotomy, the surgeon makes a large incision or cut in the abdomen, and goes in through that cut to remove the tumor and lymph nodes from the rectum.
|
Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted Rectal Resection
n=240 Participants
Patients undergo laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection. Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection is performed using small instruments on long handles introduced into the abdomen through small ports called trocars in 3 - 6 positions on the abdomen through incisions measuring 5 -10 mm, under the guidance of a video camera. The abdominal wall is held up with carbon dioxide under pressure. The piece of bowel or intestine is removed through another incision (about 8 centimeters), and the ends of the intestine are reconnected to provide normal bowel function.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Use of Pain Medication
|
4.2 days
Standard Deviation 2.8
|
4.2 days
Standard Deviation 3.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During surgeryPopulation: Of the 225 patients that received intervention as randomized in Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection, 3 patients were excluded from the analysis due to improper consent. All 240 patients from Arm 2 that received intervention as randomized were included in the analysis.
Open to close operative time.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: Open Laparotomy and Rectal Resection
n=222 Participants
Patients undergo open laparotomy and rectal resection. The standard form of surgery is open laparotomy rectal resection. During open laparotomy, the surgeon makes a large incision or cut in the abdomen, and goes in through that cut to remove the tumor and lymph nodes from the rectum.
|
Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted Rectal Resection
n=240 Participants
Patients undergo laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection. Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection is performed using small instruments on long handles introduced into the abdomen through small ports called trocars in 3 - 6 positions on the abdomen through incisions measuring 5 -10 mm, under the guidance of a video camera. The abdominal wall is held up with carbon dioxide under pressure. The piece of bowel or intestine is removed through another incision (about 8 centimeters), and the ends of the intestine are reconnected to provide normal bowel function.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Operative Times
|
220.6 minutes
Standard Deviation 92.4
|
266.2 minutes
Standard Deviation 101.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 2 years post surgeryOutcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 2 years post surgeryOutcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 5 years post surgeryOutcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 5 years post surgeryOutcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 5 years post surgeryOutcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 5 years post surgeryOutcome measures
Outcome data not reported
Adverse Events
Arm 1: Open Laparotomy and Rectal Resection
Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted Rectal Resection
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Arm 1: Open Laparotomy and Rectal Resection
n=239 participants at risk
Open laparotomy and rectal resection: Patients undergo open laparotomy and rectal resection.
|
Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted Rectal Resection
n=242 participants at risk
Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection: Patients undergo laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Hemoglobin decreased
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Arrhythmia supraventricular
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial flutter
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac valve disease
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Left ventricular dysfunction
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial ischemia
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Pericardial effusion
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Sinus tachycardia
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Ventricular tachycardia
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal distension
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.83%
2/242 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.83%
2/242 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhea
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Fecal incontinence
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.83%
2/242 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal disorder
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Ileus
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.83%
2/242 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Rectal fistula
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Rectal pain
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.83%
2/242 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Small intestinal obstruction
|
0.84%
2/239 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.83%
2/242 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
General disorders
Edema limbs
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
General disorders
Fever
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
General disorders
Multi-organ failure
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.00%
0/242 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
General disorders
Pain
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Abdominal infection
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Infection
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pelvic infection
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sepsis
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.00%
0/242 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.00%
0/242 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Intraoperative complications
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Intraoperative gastrointestinal injury - Pancreas
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Wound dehiscence
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Investigations
Activated partial thromboplastin time prolonged
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Investigations
Cardiac troponin T increased
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Investigations
Creatine phosphokinase increased
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Investigations
Creatinine increased
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Investigations
INR increased
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Investigations
Laboratory test abnormal
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.00%
0/242 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Investigations
Platelet count decreased
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Investigations
Weight loss
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.00%
0/242 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Acidosis
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Blood glucose increased
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
|
0.84%
2/239 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Serum albumin decreased
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Serum calcium decreased
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Serum magnesium decreased
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Serum magnesium increased
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Serum phosphate decreased
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Serum potassium decreased
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Serum potassium increased
|
0.84%
2/239 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Serum sodium decreased
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Serum triglycerides increased
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.00%
0/242 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Buttock pain
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Chest wall pain
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle weakness
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Neurological disorder NOS
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Confusion
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.00%
0/242 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Glomerular filtration rate decreased
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure
|
1.3%
3/239 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.00%
0/242 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Urinary retention
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.83%
2/242 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Urogenital disorder
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Erectile dysfunction
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.00%
0/242 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Perineal pain
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.00%
0/242 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Bronchospasm
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnea
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.00%
0/242 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Hypoxia
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.83%
2/242 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleural effusion
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumonitis
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.00%
0/242 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumothorax
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory disorder
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Decubitus ulcer
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin disorder
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Thrombosis
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Arm 1: Open Laparotomy and Rectal Resection
n=239 participants at risk
Open laparotomy and rectal resection: Patients undergo open laparotomy and rectal resection.
|
Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted Rectal Resection
n=242 participants at risk
Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection: Patients undergo laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Bladder hemorrhage
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Bladder spasm
|
0.84%
2/239 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Glomerular filtration rate decreased
|
0.84%
2/239 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.83%
2/242 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Hemoglobin urine positive
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Hemorrhage urinary tract
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure
|
2.9%
7/239 • Number of events 7 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
2.1%
5/242 • Number of events 5 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Ureteric obstruction
|
1.3%
3/239 • Number of events 5 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.83%
2/242 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Ureteric stenosis
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Urethral obstruction
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Urethral pain
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.00%
0/242 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Urinary frequency
|
2.9%
7/239 • Number of events 8 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
2.9%
7/242 • Number of events 12 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Urinary incontinence
|
1.7%
4/239 • Number of events 8 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
2.5%
6/242 • Number of events 6 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Urinary retention
|
10.9%
26/239 • Number of events 43 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
16.5%
40/242 • Number of events 54 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Urine discoloration
|
0.84%
2/239 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.00%
0/242 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Urogenital disorder
|
3.3%
8/239 • Number of events 11 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
1.7%
4/242 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Vesical fistula
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Blood disorder
|
1.3%
3/239 • Number of events 13 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
1.2%
3/242 • Number of events 6 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Disseminated intravascular coagulation
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.00%
0/242 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Febrile neutropenia
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.00%
0/242 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Hemoglobin decreased
|
13.8%
33/239 • Number of events 51 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
12.8%
31/242 • Number of events 46 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Hemolysis
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Lymphatic disorder
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombotic microangiopathy
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Arrhythmia
|
2.1%
5/239 • Number of events 9 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
2.1%
5/242 • Number of events 5 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
|
1.7%
4/239 • Number of events 5 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac disorder
|
0.84%
2/239 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac pain
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Left ventricular dysfunction
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.00%
0/242 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial ischemia
|
1.7%
4/239 • Number of events 5 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
1.7%
4/242 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Pericardial effusion
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Restrictive cardiomyopathy
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.00%
0/242 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Sinus bradycardia
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.00%
0/242 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Sinus tachycardia
|
2.9%
7/239 • Number of events 7 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
3.3%
8/242 • Number of events 8 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Ventricular arrhythmia
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Ventricular tachycardia
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
1.7%
4/242 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Tinnitus
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Endocrine disorders
Endocrine disorder
|
0.84%
2/239 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.00%
0/242 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Eye disorders
Extraocular muscle paresis
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Eye disorders
Vision blurred
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Eye disorders
Watering eyes
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.00%
0/242 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal distension
|
5.9%
14/239 • Number of events 19 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
5.0%
12/242 • Number of events 16 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
13.4%
32/239 • Number of events 57 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
18.6%
45/242 • Number of events 72 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Anal hemorrhage
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
1.2%
3/242 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Anal pain
|
1.7%
4/239 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
2.1%
5/242 • Number of events 7 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Ascites
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.83%
2/242 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Cecal obstruction
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.00%
0/242 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Colitis
|
0.84%
2/239 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.83%
2/242 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
7.5%
18/239 • Number of events 23 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
7.4%
18/242 • Number of events 20 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhea
|
18.0%
43/239 • Number of events 87 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
18.2%
44/242 • Number of events 74 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dry mouth
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dyspepsia
|
1.7%
4/239 • Number of events 5 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.83%
2/242 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dysphagia
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
1.2%
3/242 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Ear, nose and throat examination abnormal
|
1.7%
4/239 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.83%
2/242 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Enteritis
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Esophageal varices hemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Esophagitis
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Fecal incontinence
|
26.8%
64/239 • Number of events 117 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
21.9%
53/242 • Number of events 101 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Flatulence
|
2.5%
6/239 • Number of events 6 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
2.1%
5/242 • Number of events 7 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastritis
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.00%
0/242 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal disorder
|
10.0%
24/239 • Number of events 37 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
12.8%
31/242 • Number of events 43 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal fistula
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.00%
0/242 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal pain
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Hemorrhoids
|
2.1%
5/239 • Number of events 7 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Ileal hemorrhage
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.00%
0/242 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Ileus
|
16.3%
39/239 • Number of events 47 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
14.5%
35/242 • Number of events 40 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Intra-abdominal hemorrhage
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.00%
0/242 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Mucositis oral
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.00%
0/242 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
18.0%
43/239 • Number of events 70 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
22.3%
54/242 • Number of events 88 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Oral hemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Oral pain
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.00%
0/242 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Pancreatitis
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.00%
0/242 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Proctitis
|
0.84%
2/239 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.00%
0/242 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Proctoscopy abnormal
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Rectal fistula
|
6.7%
16/239 • Number of events 28 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
3.3%
8/242 • Number of events 12 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Rectal hemorrhage
|
2.1%
5/239 • Number of events 6 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
3.3%
8/242 • Number of events 8 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Rectal pain
|
33.1%
79/239 • Number of events 149 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
35.1%
85/242 • Number of events 153 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Rectal perforation
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Rectal stenosis
|
5.0%
12/239 • Number of events 21 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
5.8%
14/242 • Number of events 28 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Salivary gland disorder
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Small intestinal obstruction
|
10.0%
24/239 • Number of events 28 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
7.0%
17/242 • Number of events 19 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Stomach pain
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
1.2%
3/242 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage
|
0.84%
2/239 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.00%
0/242 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
9.2%
22/239 • Number of events 28 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
10.3%
25/242 • Number of events 36 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
General disorders
Chest pain
|
2.5%
6/239 • Number of events 7 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
1.7%
4/242 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
General disorders
Chills
|
1.7%
4/239 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
1.7%
4/242 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
General disorders
Disease progression
|
0.84%
2/239 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
General disorders
Edema limbs
|
4.2%
10/239 • Number of events 13 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
4.5%
11/242 • Number of events 12 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
General disorders
Facial pain
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.00%
0/242 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
20.5%
49/239 • Number of events 114 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
19.8%
48/242 • Number of events 73 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
General disorders
Fever
|
7.9%
19/239 • Number of events 23 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
11.2%
27/242 • Number of events 34 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
General disorders
Flu-like symptoms
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
General disorders
Gait abnormal
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.83%
2/242 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
General disorders
General symptom
|
1.3%
3/239 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
1.7%
4/242 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
General disorders
Localized edema
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
1.2%
3/242 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
General disorders
Pain
|
8.4%
20/239 • Number of events 31 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
7.9%
19/242 • Number of events 27 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
General disorders
Visceral edema
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystitis
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.00%
0/242 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatic failure
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatobiliary disease
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Hypersensitivity
|
1.3%
3/239 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.00%
0/242 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Immune system disorder
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Abdominal infection
|
2.5%
6/239 • Number of events 7 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
1.2%
3/242 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Anal infection
|
1.3%
3/239 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.83%
2/242 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Anorectal infection
|
2.1%
5/239 • Number of events 5 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Appendicitis perforated
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bladder infection
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
1.7%
4/242 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Colitis, infectious (e.g., Clostridium difficile)
|
1.3%
3/239 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
1.7%
4/242 • Number of events 6 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Device related infection
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Eye infection
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Ileal infection
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.00%
0/242 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Infection
|
5.4%
13/239 • Number of events 26 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
6.2%
15/242 • Number of events 23 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Infectious colitis
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.00%
0/242 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Kidney infection
|
0.84%
2/239 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.00%
0/242 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Lip infection
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Mucosal infection
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.00%
0/242 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nail infection
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pelvic infection
|
2.1%
5/239 • Number of events 7 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
1.2%
3/242 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Peritoneal infection
|
1.3%
3/239 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Phlebitis infective
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.00%
0/242 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
1.3%
3/239 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.00%
0/242 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Scrotal infection
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sepsis
|
2.5%
6/239 • Number of events 7 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
1.2%
3/242 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Skin infection
|
1.3%
3/239 • Number of events 5 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
2.1%
5/242 • Number of events 5 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Soft tissue infection
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.00%
0/242 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Stoma site infection
|
0.84%
2/239 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory infection
|
0.84%
2/239 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.83%
2/242 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
7.1%
17/239 • Number of events 21 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
6.6%
16/242 • Number of events 20 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Wound infection
|
7.1%
17/239 • Number of events 23 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
7.0%
17/242 • Number of events 21 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Bruising
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.83%
2/242 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fracture
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
1.2%
3/242 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Gastrointestinal anastomotic leak
|
0.84%
2/239 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.00%
0/242 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Intestinal stoma leak
|
1.3%
3/239 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Intestinal stoma obstruction
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.00%
0/242 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Intestinal stoma site bleeding
|
2.5%
6/239 • Number of events 6 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
1.2%
3/242 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Intraoperative complications
|
8.8%
21/239 • Number of events 29 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
5.8%
14/242 • Number of events 28 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Intraoperative neurological injury - NERVES: CN IX (glossopharyngeal) motor pharynx
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Large intestinal anastomotic leak
|
0.84%
2/239 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
1.2%
3/242 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Postoperative hemorrhage
|
2.1%
5/239 • Number of events 5 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
2.1%
5/242 • Number of events 6 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Prolapse of intestinal stoma
|
2.1%
5/239 • Number of events 6 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
1.2%
3/242 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Rectal anastomotic leak
|
3.3%
8/239 • Number of events 11 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
2.1%
5/242 • Number of events 6 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Seroma
|
2.5%
6/239 • Number of events 6 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.83%
2/242 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Small intestinal anastomotic leak
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Thermal burn
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Tracheostomy site bleeding
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Ureteric anastomotic leak
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.00%
0/242 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Urethral anastomotic leak
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.83%
2/242 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Urostomy leak
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Vascular access complication
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.00%
0/242 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Wound dehiscence
|
10.9%
26/239 • Number of events 37 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
7.4%
18/242 • Number of events 34 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
|
1.7%
4/239 • Number of events 8 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
1.2%
3/242 • Number of events 6 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Investigations
Alkaline phosphatase increased
|
1.7%
4/239 • Number of events 9 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.83%
2/242 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Investigations
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
|
1.7%
4/239 • Number of events 7 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
1.7%
4/242 • Number of events 7 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Investigations
Bilirubin increased
|
0.84%
2/239 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.83%
2/242 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Investigations
Cardiac troponin I increased
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.00%
0/242 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Investigations
Coagulopathy
|
0.84%
2/239 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
1.2%
3/242 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Investigations
Creatine phosphokinase increased
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.00%
0/242 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Investigations
Creatinine increased
|
2.9%
7/239 • Number of events 8 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
2.9%
7/242 • Number of events 8 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Investigations
INR increased
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.83%
2/242 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Investigations
Laboratory test abnormal
|
3.8%
9/239 • Number of events 17 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
2.5%
6/242 • Number of events 10 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Investigations
Leukocyte count decreased
|
2.1%
5/239 • Number of events 6 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
5.4%
13/242 • Number of events 18 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Investigations
Lymphocyte count decreased
|
0.84%
2/239 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
2.5%
6/242 • Number of events 8 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Investigations
Neutrophil count decreased
|
1.7%
4/239 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
2.9%
7/242 • Number of events 8 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Investigations
Platelet count decreased
|
4.2%
10/239 • Number of events 15 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
3.7%
9/242 • Number of events 12 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Investigations
Serum cholesterol increased
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Investigations
Weight gain
|
0.84%
2/239 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Investigations
Weight loss
|
6.7%
16/239 • Number of events 27 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
5.4%
13/242 • Number of events 21 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Acidosis
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.83%
2/242 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Anorexia
|
9.2%
22/239 • Number of events 29 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
5.8%
14/242 • Number of events 20 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Blood bicarbonate decreased
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Blood glucose increased
|
4.6%
11/239 • Number of events 17 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
4.5%
11/242 • Number of events 23 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
|
10.9%
26/239 • Number of events 32 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
5.8%
14/242 • Number of events 22 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Serum albumin decreased
|
3.3%
8/239 • Number of events 8 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
1.2%
3/242 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Serum calcium decreased
|
3.8%
9/239 • Number of events 10 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
2.1%
5/242 • Number of events 6 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Serum calcium increased
|
0.84%
2/239 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.00%
0/242 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Serum magnesium decreased
|
2.5%
6/239 • Number of events 8 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.83%
2/242 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Serum magnesium increased
|
0.84%
2/239 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.00%
0/242 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Serum phosphate decreased
|
1.3%
3/239 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
2.1%
5/242 • Number of events 5 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Serum potassium decreased
|
5.9%
14/239 • Number of events 18 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
4.5%
11/242 • Number of events 13 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Serum potassium increased
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
2.1%
5/242 • Number of events 5 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Serum sodium decreased
|
3.3%
8/239 • Number of events 9 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
2.5%
6/242 • Number of events 6 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Serum sodium increased
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Serum triglycerides increased
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthritis
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
1.2%
3/242 • Number of events 5 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
4.6%
11/239 • Number of events 23 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
3.3%
8/242 • Number of events 11 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Bone pain
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Buttock pain
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
1.2%
3/242 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Chest wall pain
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.83%
2/242 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Joint pain
|
2.9%
7/239 • Number of events 9 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.83%
2/242 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle weakness
|
2.1%
5/239 • Number of events 6 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
3.3%
8/242 • Number of events 10 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle weakness trunk
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.00%
0/242 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle weakness upper limb
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.00%
0/242 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal disorder
|
2.5%
6/239 • Number of events 10 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
3.3%
8/242 • Number of events 8 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
|
0.84%
2/239 • Number of events 7 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
2.1%
5/242 • Number of events 6 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Neck pain
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.83%
2/242 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
2.5%
6/239 • Number of events 9 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
2.9%
7/242 • Number of events 8 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Treatment related secondary malignancy
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.00%
0/242 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
4.2%
10/239 • Number of events 12 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
3.3%
8/242 • Number of events 9 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Encephalopathy
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
1.3%
3/239 • Number of events 6 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
3.3%
8/242 • Number of events 9 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Ischemia cerebrovascular
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
1.2%
3/242 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Memory impairment
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Myelitis
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Nervous system disorders - Other, specify
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.00%
0/242 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Neuralgia
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.83%
2/242 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Neurological disorder NOS
|
1.7%
4/239 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
2.1%
5/242 • Number of events 10 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Peripheral motor neuropathy
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 5 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
2.1%
5/242 • Number of events 7 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Peripheral sensory neuropathy
|
14.6%
35/239 • Number of events 72 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
16.1%
39/242 • Number of events 83 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Radiculitis brachial
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.00%
0/242 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Seizure
|
0.84%
2/239 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Syncope
|
0.84%
2/239 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
1.2%
3/242 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Taste alteration
|
1.3%
3/239 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.83%
2/242 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Agitation
|
0.84%
2/239 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.00%
0/242 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
|
3.3%
8/239 • Number of events 11 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
1.7%
4/242 • Number of events 12 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Confusion
|
1.7%
4/239 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
1.7%
4/242 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
|
4.2%
10/239 • Number of events 26 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
6.6%
16/242 • Number of events 30 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
3.8%
9/239 • Number of events 16 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
5.0%
12/242 • Number of events 20 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Libido decreased
|
1.3%
3/239 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Orgasm abnormal
|
20.9%
50/239 • Number of events 124 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
16.1%
39/242 • Number of events 95 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Psychosis
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Breast pain
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.00%
0/242 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Ejaculation disorder
|
1.3%
3/239 • Number of events 8 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.83%
2/242 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Erectile dysfunction
|
27.2%
65/239 • Number of events 177 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
26.4%
64/242 • Number of events 152 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Gynecomastia
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.00%
0/242 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Irregular menstruation
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Pelvic pain
|
1.7%
4/239 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
1.2%
3/242 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Penile pain
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Perineal pain
|
2.1%
5/239 • Number of events 11 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
4.5%
11/242 • Number of events 26 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Reproductive tract disorder
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.83%
2/242 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Vaginal atresia
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.83%
2/242 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Vaginal discharge
|
0.84%
2/239 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.00%
0/242 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Vaginal dryness
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
1.2%
3/242 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Vaginal hemorrhage
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Vaginal inflammation
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Vaginal pain
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.83%
2/242 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Vaginal stricture
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.00%
0/242 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Adult respiratory distress syndrome
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
1.2%
3/242 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Allergic rhinitis
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Aspiration
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.00%
0/242 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Atelectasis
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Bronchospasm
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.00%
0/242 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Chylothorax
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
2.5%
6/239 • Number of events 12 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
2.1%
5/242 • Number of events 5 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnea
|
3.8%
9/239 • Number of events 13 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
4.5%
11/242 • Number of events 14 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Hemorrhage nasal
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.00%
0/242 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Hiccough
|
0.84%
2/239 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.00%
0/242 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Hypoxia
|
2.1%
5/239 • Number of events 5 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
1.2%
3/242 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Laryngeal edema
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Mediastinal hemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasal congestion
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pharyngeal mucositis
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pharyngolaryngeal pain
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.00%
0/242 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleural effusion
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleuritic pain
|
0.84%
2/239 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.00%
0/242 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumonitis
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary hypertension
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory disorder
|
2.9%
7/239 • Number of events 7 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
2.1%
5/242 • Number of events 5 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Voice alteration
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Alopecia
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
2.5%
6/242 • Number of events 7 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Decubitus ulcer
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
2.5%
6/242 • Number of events 10 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dry skin
|
1.3%
3/239 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
1.7%
4/242 • Number of events 5 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Erythema multiforme
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.00%
0/242 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Hand-and-foot syndrome
|
1.3%
3/239 • Number of events 5 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
1.2%
3/242 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pain of skin
|
0.84%
2/239 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Petechiae
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
|
3.3%
8/239 • Number of events 11 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
2.5%
6/242 • Number of events 6 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash acneiform
|
0.84%
2/239 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash desquamating
|
4.6%
11/239 • Number of events 15 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
2.1%
5/242 • Number of events 7 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin disorder
|
5.0%
12/239 • Number of events 18 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
7.9%
19/242 • Number of events 29 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin induration
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.00%
0/242 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin ulceration
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
1.7%
4/242 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Sweating
|
0.84%
2/239 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
1.7%
4/242 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hematoma
|
2.5%
6/239 • Number of events 7 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
2.1%
5/242 • Number of events 5 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.83%
2/242 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hot flashes
|
1.3%
3/239 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.83%
2/242 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
1.3%
3/239 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
2.9%
7/242 • Number of events 9 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
|
5.0%
12/239 • Number of events 13 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
3.3%
8/242 • Number of events 9 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Lymph leakage
|
0.00%
0/239 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Thrombosis
|
4.2%
10/239 • Number of events 14 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
3.7%
9/242 • Number of events 10 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Vascular disorder
|
0.42%
1/239 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
0.41%
1/242 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were collected after surgery and were collected up to 30 days after surgery.
All patients that were randomized to a treatment arm were available for adverse event analysis. Four patients from Arm 1: Open laparotomy and rectal resection and one patient from Arm 2: Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection are not shown because of patient refusal or improper consent. Therefore, this analysis is based on 239 patients on Arm 1 and 242 Patients on Arm 2.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place