Trial Outcomes & Findings for Efficacy and Cost Analysis of Plastic Stent Compare to Metallic Stent in Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma (NCT NCT00721175)

NCT ID: NCT00721175

Last Updated: 2011-12-23

Results Overview

Successful drainage was defined as a decrease in total bilirubin level to less than 30% or 50% of pretreatment level within two and four weeks respectively in each patient.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE4

Target enrollment

108 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

at 2 weeks and 4 weeks after stent insertion

Results posted on

2011-12-23

Participant Flow

Between November 2007 and March 2010, one hundred and eight patients who visited medical clinic at Srinagarind hospital, Khon Kaen University were randomized into the study

the patients were excluded from trial after enrollment if CBD canulation is failed.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
SEMS
self-expandable metal stent group
Plastic Stent
plastic stent group
Overall Study
STARTED
54
54
Overall Study
COMPLETED
54
54
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
0
0

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Efficacy and Cost Analysis of Plastic Stent Compare to Metallic Stent in Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
SEMS
n=54 Participants
self-expandable metal stent group
Plastic Stent
n=54 Participants
plastic stent group
Total
n=108 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
49 Participants
n=5 Participants
49 Participants
n=7 Participants
98 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age Continuous
62.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.3 • n=5 Participants
57.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.7 • n=7 Participants
60.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
11 Participants
n=7 Participants
22 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
43 Participants
n=5 Participants
43 Participants
n=7 Participants
86 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Thailand
54 participants
n=5 Participants
54 participants
n=7 Participants
108 participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: at 2 weeks and 4 weeks after stent insertion

Population: All 108 participants enrolled into the study were analyzed based on ITT analysis basis.(54 participants in each group)

Successful drainage was defined as a decrease in total bilirubin level to less than 30% or 50% of pretreatment level within two and four weeks respectively in each patient.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
SEMS
n=54 Participants
SEMS (Self-expandable metal stent group)
Plastic Stent
n=54 Participants
Plastic stent group
Proportion of Patients With Adequate Biliary Drainage in Metallic Stent and Plastic Stent Group.(ITT Analysis)
.7037037 proportion of participants
Interval 0.5819144 to 0.825493
.46296 proportion of participants
Interval 0.3299707 to 0.5959553

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: at 2 weeks and 4 weeks after stent insertion

Population: 91 participants who had successful stent insertion were analyzed based on per protocol analysis.

Successful drainage was defined as a decrease in total bilirubin level to less than 30% or 50% of pretreatment level within two and four weeks respectively.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
SEMS
n=45 Participants
SEMS (Self-expandable metal stent group)
Plastic Stent
n=46 Participants
Plastic stent group
Proportion of Patients With Adequate Biliary Drainage in Metallic Stent and Plastic Stent Group.(Per Protocol Analysis)
0.822 proportion of participants
Interval 0.711 to 0.934
0.543 proportion of participants
Interval 0.4 to 0.687

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: until patient died or 6 months after the last patient was enrolled

survival times of the patients after the first stent insertion

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
SEMS
n=54 Participants
SEMS (Self-expandable metal stent group)
Plastic Stent
n=54 Participants
Plastic stent group
Patients Survival Times
126 days
Interval 42.0 to 290.0
49 days
Interval 21.0 to 97.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: until the patients expire (Markov model)

Population: Simulation cohort of any number of the patients (1, 100 or 1,000 patients) enter the Markov model using transitional probabilities, cost data, utility data from this study and available literature to calculate the cost effectiveness ratio of metallic stent and plastic stent in unresectable complex hilar cholangiocarcinoma

cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY)of metallic stent and plastic stent calculated from Markov model using transitional probabilities, cost and utilities from this study and the available literature

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
SEMS
n=1 Participants
SEMS (Self-expandable metal stent group)
Plastic Stent
n=1 Participants
Plastic stent group
Cost Effective Ratio of Metallic and Plastic Stent
10742 cost (US$) per QALY
19085 cost (US$) per QALY

Adverse Events

SEMS

Serious events: 14 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Plastic Stent

Serious events: 21 serious events
Other events: 1 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
SEMS
n=54 participants at risk
self-expandable metal stent group
Plastic Stent
n=54 participants at risk
plastic stent group
Hepatobiliary disorders
cholangitis
14.8%
8/54 • Number of events 8
24.1%
13/54 • Number of events 13
Hepatobiliary disorders
pancreatitis
14.8%
8/54
14.8%
8/54

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
SEMS
n=54 participants at risk
self-expandable metal stent group
Plastic Stent
n=54 participants at risk
plastic stent group
Hepatobiliary disorders
sphicterotomy bleeding
0.00%
0/54
1.9%
1/54

Additional Information

Assist. Prof. Apichat Sangchan

Khon Kaen University

Phone: 66850004651

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place