Trial Outcomes & Findings for Polestriding Versus Walking for Subjects With Poor Leg Circulation (NCT NCT00719355)

NCT ID: NCT00719355

Last Updated: 2013-02-12

Results Overview

Patients walked on the CWR test at 85% of his/her peak VO2 on the baseline progressive treadmill test. Since the polewalking group was older than the walking group, subject age was entered into the analysis as a co-variate. Intent-to-treat (ITT) analyses were used. The last measurement taken for all subjects with at least one follow-up test was carried forward (n=97).

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE2

Target enrollment

146 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Baseline and 24 weeks

Results posted on

2013-02-12

Participant Flow

Patients were recruited at University of Illinois at Chicago, the Edward Hines Jr., VA Hospital, through radio and print advertising. 146 patients were enrolled in the study and 103 were randomized.

Patients were screened prior to randomization. Patients were disqualified from the study due to coronary arterial disease, they changed their mind, other medical reasons or it was found that they did not have periphaeral arterial disease.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Walking With Poles
Patients exercised using walking poles, 3 times weekly for 24 weeks.
Traditional Walking Group
Patients exercised for 24 weeks as part of a traditional walking training group.
Overall Study
STARTED
51
52
Overall Study
Completed 6 Weeks
49
48
Overall Study
Completed 12 Weeks
43
46
Overall Study
Completed 24 Weeks
34
43
Overall Study
Completed 32 Weeks
33
39
Overall Study
COMPLETED
33
39
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
18
13

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Walking With Poles
Patients exercised using walking poles, 3 times weekly for 24 weeks.
Traditional Walking Group
Patients exercised for 24 weeks as part of a traditional walking training group.
Overall Study
Death
0
1
Overall Study
Medical
14
5
Overall Study
Compliance
4
6
Overall Study
Moved
0
1

Baseline Characteristics

Polestriding Versus Walking for Subjects With Poor Leg Circulation

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Walking With Poles
n=51 Participants
Patients exercised using walking poles, 3 times weekly for 24 weeks.
Traditional Walking Group
n=52 Participants
Patients exercised for 24 weeks as part of a traditional walking training group.
Total
n=103 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
22 Participants
n=7 Participants
39 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
34 Participants
n=5 Participants
30 Participants
n=7 Participants
64 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age Continuous
71.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.1 • n=5 Participants
68.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.5 • n=7 Participants
69.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.9 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
47 Participants
n=5 Participants
49 Participants
n=7 Participants
96 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
51 participants
n=5 Participants
52 participants
n=7 Participants
103 participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and 24 weeks

Population: Data were analyzed on patients with at least 1 follow-up treadmill test from baseline.

Patients walked on the CWR test at 85% of his/her peak VO2 on the baseline progressive treadmill test. Since the polewalking group was older than the walking group, subject age was entered into the analysis as a co-variate. Intent-to-treat (ITT) analyses were used. The last measurement taken for all subjects with at least one follow-up test was carried forward (n=97).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Walking With Poles
n=49 Participants
Patients exercised using walking poles, 3 times weekly for 24 weeks.
Traditional Walking Group
n=48 Participants
Patients exercised for 24 weeks as part of a traditional walking training group.
Length of Exercise Duration on the Treadmill Constant Work Rate Exercise Test
15.15 minutes
Standard Deviation 12.31
21.40 minutes
Standard Deviation 16.46

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At 24 weeks

Population: Data were analyzed on all patients with at least 1 follow up constant workrate treadmill test.

Perceived pain onset was recorded during the constant workrate test using the Borg ratio scale. Patient rated their pain from 0-10. Time elapased on the treadmill (minutes) at the onset of pain was recorded.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Walking With Poles
n=49 Participants
Patients exercised using walking poles, 3 times weekly for 24 weeks.
Traditional Walking Group
n=48 Participants
Patients exercised for 24 weeks as part of a traditional walking training group.
Onset of Claudication Pain During Constant Work Rate Treadmill Test
9.3 minutes
Standard Deviation 12.1
6.8 minutes
Standard Deviation 4.8

Adverse Events

Walking With Poles

Serious events: 4 serious events
Other events: 2 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Traditional Walking Group

Serious events: 6 serious events
Other events: 3 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Walking With Poles
n=52 participants at risk;n=51 participants at risk
Patients exercised using walking poles, 3 times weekly for 24 weeks.
Traditional Walking Group
n=51 participants at risk;n=52 participants at risk
Patients exercised for 24 weeks as part of a traditional walking training group.
Vascular disorders
Death
0.00%
0/51 • Adverse events were collected for 32 weeks (the duration of the study).
1.9%
1/52 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected for 32 weeks (the duration of the study).
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Hospitalization respiratory
3.9%
2/51 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected for 32 weeks (the duration of the study).
1.9%
1/52 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected for 32 weeks (the duration of the study).
Renal and urinary disorders
Hospitalization renal disease
0.00%
0/51 • Adverse events were collected for 32 weeks (the duration of the study).
1.9%
1/52 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected for 32 weeks (the duration of the study).
Cardiac disorders
Hospitalization cardiac related
5.9%
3/51 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events were collected for 32 weeks (the duration of the study).
1.9%
1/52 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected for 32 weeks (the duration of the study).
Gastrointestinal disorders
Hospitalization bowel obstruction
0.00%
0/51 • Adverse events were collected for 32 weeks (the duration of the study).
1.9%
1/52 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected for 32 weeks (the duration of the study).
Endocrine disorders
Hospitalization low blood sugar
0.00%
0/51 • Adverse events were collected for 32 weeks (the duration of the study).
1.9%
1/52 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected for 32 weeks (the duration of the study).

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Walking With Poles
n=52 participants at risk;n=51 participants at risk
Patients exercised using walking poles, 3 times weekly for 24 weeks.
Traditional Walking Group
n=51 participants at risk;n=52 participants at risk
Patients exercised for 24 weeks as part of a traditional walking training group.
Social circumstances
Fall
3.8%
2/52 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected for 32 weeks (the duration of the study).
5.9%
3/51 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events were collected for 32 weeks (the duration of the study).

Additional Information

Eileen G. Collins PhD, RN

University of Illinois at Chicago

Phone: 312-413-5621

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place