Trial Outcomes & Findings for Polestriding Versus Walking for Subjects With Poor Leg Circulation (NCT NCT00719355)
NCT ID: NCT00719355
Last Updated: 2013-02-12
Results Overview
Patients walked on the CWR test at 85% of his/her peak VO2 on the baseline progressive treadmill test. Since the polewalking group was older than the walking group, subject age was entered into the analysis as a co-variate. Intent-to-treat (ITT) analyses were used. The last measurement taken for all subjects with at least one follow-up test was carried forward (n=97).
COMPLETED
PHASE2
146 participants
Baseline and 24 weeks
2013-02-12
Participant Flow
Patients were recruited at University of Illinois at Chicago, the Edward Hines Jr., VA Hospital, through radio and print advertising. 146 patients were enrolled in the study and 103 were randomized.
Patients were screened prior to randomization. Patients were disqualified from the study due to coronary arterial disease, they changed their mind, other medical reasons or it was found that they did not have periphaeral arterial disease.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Walking With Poles
Patients exercised using walking poles, 3 times weekly for 24 weeks.
|
Traditional Walking Group
Patients exercised for 24 weeks as part of a traditional walking training group.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
51
|
52
|
|
Overall Study
Completed 6 Weeks
|
49
|
48
|
|
Overall Study
Completed 12 Weeks
|
43
|
46
|
|
Overall Study
Completed 24 Weeks
|
34
|
43
|
|
Overall Study
Completed 32 Weeks
|
33
|
39
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
33
|
39
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
18
|
13
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Walking With Poles
Patients exercised using walking poles, 3 times weekly for 24 weeks.
|
Traditional Walking Group
Patients exercised for 24 weeks as part of a traditional walking training group.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Medical
|
14
|
5
|
|
Overall Study
Compliance
|
4
|
6
|
|
Overall Study
Moved
|
0
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Polestriding Versus Walking for Subjects With Poor Leg Circulation
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Walking With Poles
n=51 Participants
Patients exercised using walking poles, 3 times weekly for 24 weeks.
|
Traditional Walking Group
n=52 Participants
Patients exercised for 24 weeks as part of a traditional walking training group.
|
Total
n=103 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
22 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
39 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
34 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
30 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
64 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age Continuous
|
71.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.1 • n=5 Participants
|
68.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.5 • n=7 Participants
|
69.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.9 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
47 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
49 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
96 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
51 participants
n=5 Participants
|
52 participants
n=7 Participants
|
103 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 24 weeksPopulation: Data were analyzed on patients with at least 1 follow-up treadmill test from baseline.
Patients walked on the CWR test at 85% of his/her peak VO2 on the baseline progressive treadmill test. Since the polewalking group was older than the walking group, subject age was entered into the analysis as a co-variate. Intent-to-treat (ITT) analyses were used. The last measurement taken for all subjects with at least one follow-up test was carried forward (n=97).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Walking With Poles
n=49 Participants
Patients exercised using walking poles, 3 times weekly for 24 weeks.
|
Traditional Walking Group
n=48 Participants
Patients exercised for 24 weeks as part of a traditional walking training group.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Length of Exercise Duration on the Treadmill Constant Work Rate Exercise Test
|
15.15 minutes
Standard Deviation 12.31
|
21.40 minutes
Standard Deviation 16.46
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At 24 weeksPopulation: Data were analyzed on all patients with at least 1 follow up constant workrate treadmill test.
Perceived pain onset was recorded during the constant workrate test using the Borg ratio scale. Patient rated their pain from 0-10. Time elapased on the treadmill (minutes) at the onset of pain was recorded.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Walking With Poles
n=49 Participants
Patients exercised using walking poles, 3 times weekly for 24 weeks.
|
Traditional Walking Group
n=48 Participants
Patients exercised for 24 weeks as part of a traditional walking training group.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Onset of Claudication Pain During Constant Work Rate Treadmill Test
|
9.3 minutes
Standard Deviation 12.1
|
6.8 minutes
Standard Deviation 4.8
|
Adverse Events
Walking With Poles
Traditional Walking Group
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Walking With Poles
n=52 participants at risk;n=51 participants at risk
Patients exercised using walking poles, 3 times weekly for 24 weeks.
|
Traditional Walking Group
n=51 participants at risk;n=52 participants at risk
Patients exercised for 24 weeks as part of a traditional walking training group.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Vascular disorders
Death
|
0.00%
0/51 • Adverse events were collected for 32 weeks (the duration of the study).
|
1.9%
1/52 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected for 32 weeks (the duration of the study).
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Hospitalization respiratory
|
3.9%
2/51 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected for 32 weeks (the duration of the study).
|
1.9%
1/52 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected for 32 weeks (the duration of the study).
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Hospitalization renal disease
|
0.00%
0/51 • Adverse events were collected for 32 weeks (the duration of the study).
|
1.9%
1/52 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected for 32 weeks (the duration of the study).
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Hospitalization cardiac related
|
5.9%
3/51 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events were collected for 32 weeks (the duration of the study).
|
1.9%
1/52 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected for 32 weeks (the duration of the study).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Hospitalization bowel obstruction
|
0.00%
0/51 • Adverse events were collected for 32 weeks (the duration of the study).
|
1.9%
1/52 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected for 32 weeks (the duration of the study).
|
|
Endocrine disorders
Hospitalization low blood sugar
|
0.00%
0/51 • Adverse events were collected for 32 weeks (the duration of the study).
|
1.9%
1/52 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected for 32 weeks (the duration of the study).
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Walking With Poles
n=52 participants at risk;n=51 participants at risk
Patients exercised using walking poles, 3 times weekly for 24 weeks.
|
Traditional Walking Group
n=51 participants at risk;n=52 participants at risk
Patients exercised for 24 weeks as part of a traditional walking training group.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Social circumstances
Fall
|
3.8%
2/52 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected for 32 weeks (the duration of the study).
|
5.9%
3/51 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events were collected for 32 weeks (the duration of the study).
|
Additional Information
Eileen G. Collins PhD, RN
University of Illinois at Chicago
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place