Training in Fever Case Management With Rapid Diagnostic Tests (RDTs) for Malaria in Uganda

NCT ID: NCT00716599

Last Updated: 2008-07-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

14000 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-01-31

Study Completion Date

2008-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Malaria remains one of the most devastating infectious diseases in the world. Despite the potential for serious adverse outcomes with each episode of malaria, most cases in endemic areas are diagnosed on clinical grounds alone. Even the simple technique of light microscopy, the gold standard for malaria diagnosis, is inaccessible to most individuals in resource-poor malarious areas. New diagnostic methods that are practical for limited health-care settings are urgently needed. Immunochromatographic rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for malaria are easy to use, require little infrastructure or expertise, show good accuracy, and are increasingly advocated for routine use in malaria-endemic areas. A major challenge now is to implement RDTs effectively in typical African clinical settings. We plan to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of a training curriculum incorporating RDT use in peripheral government health centers in Uganda. Results from this study will provide evidence for scale-up of RDT implementation in Uganda, as planned by the Uganda Ministry of Health from mid-2008, as well as in other sub-Saharan African countries.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of a basic training program incorporating RDTs, as compared with standard-of-care presumptive treatment, for the management of patients who present with suspected malaria at peripheral health centers in Uganda. Our hypothesis is that training in fever case management and RDT use will allow health center staff to reduce unnecessary antimalarial prescriptions without compromising patient outcomes, compared with the current practice of presumptive antimalarial therapy for all febrile patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Malaria Fever

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

malaria diagnosis rapid diagnostic test rapid diagnostic tests fever case management training fever case management in malaria-endemic areas

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control

Health centers continue with standard-of-care empiric case management

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

RDT training

Health centers randomly selected to receive training and RDTs, for use in routine patient case management

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

training in use of rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for malaria

Intervention Type DEVICE

training program and introduction of RDTs for use in case management of patients presenting for routine care at government health centers

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

training in use of rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for malaria

training program and introduction of RDTs for use in case management of patients presenting for routine care at government health centers

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* all outpatients at participating health centers

Exclusion Criteria

* patient refusal
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Exxon Mobil

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Makerere University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Uganda Malaria Surveillance Project

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

National Institutes of Health (NIH)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Doris Duke Charitable Foundation

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of California, San Francisco

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

University of California, San Francisco

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Heidi Hopkins, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of California, San Francisco

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Uganda Malaria Surveillance Project

Kampala, , Uganda

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Uganda

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.muucsf.org

research collaboration website

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

EM-036

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id