Trial Outcomes & Findings for Evaluation of TachoSil® Application on a Colorectal Anastomosis (TC-029-IM) (NCT NCT00713661)
NCT ID: NCT00713661
Last Updated: 2012-05-08
Results Overview
Evaluation of feasibility was assessed by investigator after application of the TachoSil® sponge on the anastomosis. A feasible application implied that the entire TachoSil® adhered and covered at least 1cm beyond the margins of the anastomotic line and that if more than one sponge was used, they overlapped by at least 1 cm. The score was assisted by video recording. To ensure an independent assessment, the recording was assessed by an external, blinded assessor. In case of discrepancies between the assessment of the investigator and the assessor, the application was regarded as not feasible.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
25 participants
Day of surgery
2012-05-08
Participant Flow
Subjects were divided into * Surgery method: open or laparoscopic * Location of the anastomosis: * anastomotic line in the low segment (approx. 0-5 cm from the anal verge) * anastomotic line in the mid or upper segment (approx. 5-12 cm from the anal verge)
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Group 1: Open Surgery Lower
Open colorectal resection. The anastomotic line in the low segment approximately 0-5 cm from the anal verge.
|
Group 2: Open Surgery Middle/Upper
Open colorectal resection. The anastomotic line in the middle/upper segment 5-12 cm from the anal verge.
|
Group 3: Laparoscopic Surgery Lower
Laparoscopic colorectal resection. The anastomotic line in the low segment approximately 0-5 cm from the anal verge.
|
Group 4: Laparoscopic Surgery Middle/Upper
Laparasocopic colorectal resection. The anastomotic line in the mid/upper segment 5-12 cm from the anal verge.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
7
|
9
|
4
|
5
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
7
|
9
|
4
|
5
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Evaluation of TachoSil® Application on a Colorectal Anastomosis (TC-029-IM)
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Group 1: Open Surgery Lower
n=7 Participants
|
Group 2: Open Surgery Middle/Upper
n=9 Participants
|
Group 3: Laparoscopic Surgery Lower
n=4 Participants
|
Group 4: Laparoscopic Surgery Middle/Upper
n=5 Participants
|
Total
n=25 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age Continuous
|
63.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.5 • n=5 Participants
|
64.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.8 • n=7 Participants
|
68.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.9 • n=5 Participants
|
65.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.0 • n=4 Participants
|
65.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day of surgeryPopulation: ITT + Safety Analysis Set. All applications recorded as "not feasible" by external assessor was because he was not able to see it all the way around the anastomosis. The implication is that the primary endpoint was not really reporting the true feasibility, as it was hindered due to technical/practical problems recording the whole anastomosis.
Evaluation of feasibility was assessed by investigator after application of the TachoSil® sponge on the anastomosis. A feasible application implied that the entire TachoSil® adhered and covered at least 1cm beyond the margins of the anastomotic line and that if more than one sponge was used, they overlapped by at least 1 cm. The score was assisted by video recording. To ensure an independent assessment, the recording was assessed by an external, blinded assessor. In case of discrepancies between the assessment of the investigator and the assessor, the application was regarded as not feasible.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 1: Open Surgery Lower
n=7 Participants
|
Group 2: Open Surgery Middle/Upper
n=9 Participants
|
Group 3: Laparoscopic Surgery Lower
n=4 Participants
|
Group 4: Laparoscopic Surgery Middle/Upper
n=5 Participants
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
The Primary Endpoint is the Feasibility of the TachoSil® Application, Reported by the Combined Assessment of the Investigator and External Assessor
Video not available
|
1 participants
|
2 participants
|
1 participants
|
2 participants
|
|
The Primary Endpoint is the Feasibility of the TachoSil® Application, Reported by the Combined Assessment of the Investigator and External Assessor
Feasible
|
2 participants
|
5 participants
|
2 participants
|
3 participants
|
|
The Primary Endpoint is the Feasibility of the TachoSil® Application, Reported by the Combined Assessment of the Investigator and External Assessor
Not feasible
|
4 participants
|
2 participants
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day of surgeryPopulation: Data are presented for the 25 subjects treated with TachoSil®. They constitute the intention-to-treat (ITT) and the safety analysis set.
Evaluation of feasibility was assessed by investigator after application of the TachoSil® sponge on the anastomosis. A feasible application implied that the entire TachoSil® adhered and covered at least 1cm beyond the margins of the anastomotic line and that if more than one sponge was used, they overlapped by at least 1 cm. The score was assisted by video recording.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 1: Open Surgery Lower
n=7 Participants
|
Group 2: Open Surgery Middle/Upper
n=9 Participants
|
Group 3: Laparoscopic Surgery Lower
n=4 Participants
|
Group 4: Laparoscopic Surgery Middle/Upper
n=5 Participants
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
The Secondary Endpoint is the Feasibility of the TachoSil® Application, Assessed by the Investigator.
Feasible
|
6 participants
|
9 participants
|
4 participants
|
5 participants
|
|
The Secondary Endpoint is the Feasibility of the TachoSil® Application, Assessed by the Investigator.
Not feasible
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
Adverse Events
Group 1: Open Surgery Lower
Group 2: Open Surgery Middle/Upper
Group 3: Laparoscopic Surgery Lower
Group 4: Laparoscopic Surgery Middle/Upper
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Group 1: Open Surgery Lower
n=7 participants at risk
|
Group 2: Open Surgery Middle/Upper
n=9 participants at risk
|
Group 3: Laparoscopic Surgery Lower
n=4 participants at risk
|
Group 4: Laparoscopic Surgery Middle/Upper
n=5 participants at risk
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
|
0.00%
0/7
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
|
0.00%
0/9
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
|
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 1
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
|
0.00%
0/5
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Small bowel obstruction caused by adhesions requiring small bowel resection done open
|
0.00%
0/7
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
|
0.00%
0/9
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
|
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 1
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
|
0.00%
0/5
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
0.00%
0/7
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
|
0.00%
0/9
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
|
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 1
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
|
0.00%
0/5
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Anastomotic leakage
|
14.3%
1/7 • Number of events 1
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
|
0.00%
0/9
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
|
0.00%
0/4
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
|
0.00%
0/5
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Minor anastomotic leakage
|
14.3%
1/7 • Number of events 1
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
|
0.00%
0/9
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
|
0.00%
0/4
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
|
0.00%
0/5
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Stomaprolaps
|
14.3%
1/7 • Number of events 1
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
|
0.00%
0/9
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
|
0.00%
0/4
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
|
0.00%
0/5
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure
|
14.3%
1/7 • Number of events 1
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
|
0.00%
0/9
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
|
0.00%
0/4
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
|
0.00%
0/5
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Aspiration pneumonia
|
0.00%
0/7
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
|
0.00%
0/9
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
|
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 1
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
|
0.00%
0/5
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
|
|
Vascular disorders
Pelvic haematoma
|
0.00%
0/7
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
|
11.1%
1/9 • Number of events 1
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
|
0.00%
0/4
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
|
0.00%
0/5
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
|
|
Vascular disorders
Presacral haematoma
|
0.00%
0/7
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
|
0.00%
0/9
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
|
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 1
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
|
0.00%
0/5
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Group 1: Open Surgery Lower
n=7 participants at risk
|
Group 2: Open Surgery Middle/Upper
n=9 participants at risk
|
Group 3: Laparoscopic Surgery Lower
n=4 participants at risk
|
Group 4: Laparoscopic Surgery Middle/Upper
n=5 participants at risk
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
0.00%
0/7
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
|
22.2%
2/9 • Number of events 2
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
|
0.00%
0/4
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
|
0.00%
0/5
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
42.9%
3/7 • Number of events 3
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
|
11.1%
1/9 • Number of events 1
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
|
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 1
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
|
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee After publication of the results or 24 months after Clinical Trial Report has been finalised, whichever comes first, Nycomed acknowledge the Investigator's rights to publish results from this trial. Any such scientific paper, presentation, communication, or other information concerning the investigation described in this protocol, must be submitted to Nycomed prior to submission for publication/presentation for review. Review comments will be given within a month from receipt of the manuscript.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER