Trial Outcomes & Findings for Evaluation of TachoSil® Application on a Colorectal Anastomosis (TC-029-IM) (NCT NCT00713661)

NCT ID: NCT00713661

Last Updated: 2012-05-08

Results Overview

Evaluation of feasibility was assessed by investigator after application of the TachoSil® sponge on the anastomosis. A feasible application implied that the entire TachoSil® adhered and covered at least 1cm beyond the margins of the anastomotic line and that if more than one sponge was used, they overlapped by at least 1 cm. The score was assisted by video recording. To ensure an independent assessment, the recording was assessed by an external, blinded assessor. In case of discrepancies between the assessment of the investigator and the assessor, the application was regarded as not feasible.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE2

Target enrollment

25 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Day of surgery

Results posted on

2012-05-08

Participant Flow

Subjects were divided into * Surgery method: open or laparoscopic * Location of the anastomosis: * anastomotic line in the low segment (approx. 0-5 cm from the anal verge) * anastomotic line in the mid or upper segment (approx. 5-12 cm from the anal verge)

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Group 1: Open Surgery Lower
Open colorectal resection. The anastomotic line in the low segment approximately 0-5 cm from the anal verge.
Group 2: Open Surgery Middle/Upper
Open colorectal resection. The anastomotic line in the middle/upper segment 5-12 cm from the anal verge.
Group 3: Laparoscopic Surgery Lower
Laparoscopic colorectal resection. The anastomotic line in the low segment approximately 0-5 cm from the anal verge.
Group 4: Laparoscopic Surgery Middle/Upper
Laparasocopic colorectal resection. The anastomotic line in the mid/upper segment 5-12 cm from the anal verge.
Overall Study
STARTED
7
9
4
5
Overall Study
COMPLETED
7
9
4
5
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
0
0
0
0

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Evaluation of TachoSil® Application on a Colorectal Anastomosis (TC-029-IM)

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Group 1: Open Surgery Lower
n=7 Participants
Group 2: Open Surgery Middle/Upper
n=9 Participants
Group 3: Laparoscopic Surgery Lower
n=4 Participants
Group 4: Laparoscopic Surgery Middle/Upper
n=5 Participants
Total
n=25 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age Continuous
63.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.5 • n=5 Participants
64.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.8 • n=7 Participants
68.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.9 • n=5 Participants
65.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.0 • n=4 Participants
65.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6 • n=21 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
5 Participants
n=4 Participants
8 Participants
n=21 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
17 Participants
n=21 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Day of surgery

Population: ITT + Safety Analysis Set. All applications recorded as "not feasible" by external assessor was because he was not able to see it all the way around the anastomosis. The implication is that the primary endpoint was not really reporting the true feasibility, as it was hindered due to technical/practical problems recording the whole anastomosis.

Evaluation of feasibility was assessed by investigator after application of the TachoSil® sponge on the anastomosis. A feasible application implied that the entire TachoSil® adhered and covered at least 1cm beyond the margins of the anastomotic line and that if more than one sponge was used, they overlapped by at least 1 cm. The score was assisted by video recording. To ensure an independent assessment, the recording was assessed by an external, blinded assessor. In case of discrepancies between the assessment of the investigator and the assessor, the application was regarded as not feasible.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Group 1: Open Surgery Lower
n=7 Participants
Group 2: Open Surgery Middle/Upper
n=9 Participants
Group 3: Laparoscopic Surgery Lower
n=4 Participants
Group 4: Laparoscopic Surgery Middle/Upper
n=5 Participants
The Primary Endpoint is the Feasibility of the TachoSil® Application, Reported by the Combined Assessment of the Investigator and External Assessor
Video not available
1 participants
2 participants
1 participants
2 participants
The Primary Endpoint is the Feasibility of the TachoSil® Application, Reported by the Combined Assessment of the Investigator and External Assessor
Feasible
2 participants
5 participants
2 participants
3 participants
The Primary Endpoint is the Feasibility of the TachoSil® Application, Reported by the Combined Assessment of the Investigator and External Assessor
Not feasible
4 participants
2 participants
1 participants
0 participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Day of surgery

Population: Data are presented for the 25 subjects treated with TachoSil®. They constitute the intention-to-treat (ITT) and the safety analysis set.

Evaluation of feasibility was assessed by investigator after application of the TachoSil® sponge on the anastomosis. A feasible application implied that the entire TachoSil® adhered and covered at least 1cm beyond the margins of the anastomotic line and that if more than one sponge was used, they overlapped by at least 1 cm. The score was assisted by video recording.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Group 1: Open Surgery Lower
n=7 Participants
Group 2: Open Surgery Middle/Upper
n=9 Participants
Group 3: Laparoscopic Surgery Lower
n=4 Participants
Group 4: Laparoscopic Surgery Middle/Upper
n=5 Participants
The Secondary Endpoint is the Feasibility of the TachoSil® Application, Assessed by the Investigator.
Feasible
6 participants
9 participants
4 participants
5 participants
The Secondary Endpoint is the Feasibility of the TachoSil® Application, Assessed by the Investigator.
Not feasible
1 participants
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants

Adverse Events

Group 1: Open Surgery Lower

Serious events: 3 serious events
Other events: 3 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Group 2: Open Surgery Middle/Upper

Serious events: 1 serious events
Other events: 3 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Group 3: Laparoscopic Surgery Lower

Serious events: 3 serious events
Other events: 1 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Group 4: Laparoscopic Surgery Middle/Upper

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 1 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Group 1: Open Surgery Lower
n=7 participants at risk
Group 2: Open Surgery Middle/Upper
n=9 participants at risk
Group 3: Laparoscopic Surgery Lower
n=4 participants at risk
Group 4: Laparoscopic Surgery Middle/Upper
n=5 participants at risk
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
0.00%
0/7
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
0.00%
0/9
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 1
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
0.00%
0/5
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
Gastrointestinal disorders
Small bowel obstruction caused by adhesions requiring small bowel resection done open
0.00%
0/7
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
0.00%
0/9
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 1
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
0.00%
0/5
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
0.00%
0/7
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
0.00%
0/9
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 1
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
0.00%
0/5
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Anastomotic leakage
14.3%
1/7 • Number of events 1
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
0.00%
0/9
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
0.00%
0/4
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
0.00%
0/5
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Minor anastomotic leakage
14.3%
1/7 • Number of events 1
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
0.00%
0/9
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
0.00%
0/4
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
0.00%
0/5
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Stomaprolaps
14.3%
1/7 • Number of events 1
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
0.00%
0/9
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
0.00%
0/4
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
0.00%
0/5
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure
14.3%
1/7 • Number of events 1
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
0.00%
0/9
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
0.00%
0/4
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
0.00%
0/5
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Aspiration pneumonia
0.00%
0/7
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
0.00%
0/9
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 1
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
0.00%
0/5
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
Vascular disorders
Pelvic haematoma
0.00%
0/7
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
11.1%
1/9 • Number of events 1
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
0.00%
0/4
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
0.00%
0/5
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
Vascular disorders
Presacral haematoma
0.00%
0/7
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
0.00%
0/9
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 1
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
0.00%
0/5
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Group 1: Open Surgery Lower
n=7 participants at risk
Group 2: Open Surgery Middle/Upper
n=9 participants at risk
Group 3: Laparoscopic Surgery Lower
n=4 participants at risk
Group 4: Laparoscopic Surgery Middle/Upper
n=5 participants at risk
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
0.00%
0/7
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
22.2%
2/9 • Number of events 2
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
0.00%
0/4
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
0.00%
0/5
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
42.9%
3/7 • Number of events 3
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
11.1%
1/9 • Number of events 1
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 1
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1
The safety population consists of all 25 subjects that received trial treatment. SAE/AE assessment by neutral questioning "Have you experienced any health problems since the last contact?" by the investigator at each contact (visit or phone).

Additional Information

Clinical Trial Operations

Nycomed

Phone: +45 4677 1111

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee After publication of the results or 24 months after Clinical Trial Report has been finalised, whichever comes first, Nycomed acknowledge the Investigator's rights to publish results from this trial. Any such scientific paper, presentation, communication, or other information concerning the investigation described in this protocol, must be submitted to Nycomed prior to submission for publication/presentation for review. Review comments will be given within a month from receipt of the manuscript.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER