Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of a Nasal Spray to Treat Perennial Allergies (NCT NCT00712920)

NCT ID: NCT00712920

Last Updated: 2011-06-08

Results Overview

Reflective total nasal symptom score consisting of Runny nose, itchy nose, nasal Congestion, and Sneezing was assessed twice daily. Each symptom is rated on a scale from 0-3: 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, and 3=severe. Total possible score is 24 per day Least square means (LS Mean) was controlled for study day as the within-patient effect, treatment group and site as the between-patient effects, treatment by-study day interaction, and basline as a covariate.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE3

Target enrollment

581 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

baseline and 28 days

Results posted on

2011-06-08

Participant Flow

First Observation: February 5, 2007 Last Observation: October 8, 2007

Subjects participated in a 7 day screening period to Identify appropriate subjects based on symptom scores.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Placebo
Placebo nasal Spray/2 sprays per nostril 2 times a day for 4 weeks
Astepro 0.1%
0.10% azelastine hydrochloride 1096 mcg nasal Spray/2 sprays per nostril 2 times a day for 4 weeks
Astepro 0.15%
0.15% azelastine hydrochloride 1644 mcg nasal Spray/2 sprays per nostril 2 times a day for 4 weeks
Overall Study
STARTED
192
197
192
Overall Study
COMPLETED
175
180
180
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
17
17
12

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Placebo
Placebo nasal Spray/2 sprays per nostril 2 times a day for 4 weeks
Astepro 0.1%
0.10% azelastine hydrochloride 1096 mcg nasal Spray/2 sprays per nostril 2 times a day for 4 weeks
Astepro 0.15%
0.15% azelastine hydrochloride 1644 mcg nasal Spray/2 sprays per nostril 2 times a day for 4 weeks
Overall Study
Adverse Event
3
4
7
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
4
2
1
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
1
4
0
Overall Study
Lack of Efficacy
1
0
1
Overall Study
Other
5
7
3
Overall Study
Non-compliance
3
0
0

Baseline Characteristics

A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of a Nasal Spray to Treat Perennial Allergies

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Placebo
n=192 Participants
Placebo nasal Spray/2 sprays per nostril 2 times a day for 4 weeks
Astepro 0.1%
n=194 Participants
0.10% azelastine hydrochloride 1096 mcg nasal Spray/2 sprays per nostril 2 times a day for 4 weeks
Astepro 0.15%
n=192 Participants
0.15% azelastine hydrochloride 1644 mcg nasal Spray/2 sprays per nostril 2 times a day for 4 weeks
Total
n=578 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
21 Participants
n=5 Participants
11 Participants
n=7 Participants
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
50 Participants
n=4 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
161 Participants
n=5 Participants
183 Participants
n=7 Participants
170 Participants
n=5 Participants
514 Participants
n=4 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
14 Participants
n=4 Participants
Age Continuous
38.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.37 • n=5 Participants
36.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.09 • n=7 Participants
35.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.31 • n=5 Participants
36.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.97 • n=4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
130 Participants
n=5 Participants
136 Participants
n=7 Participants
127 Participants
n=5 Participants
393 Participants
n=4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
62 Participants
n=5 Participants
58 Participants
n=7 Participants
65 Participants
n=5 Participants
185 Participants
n=4 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
192 participants
n=5 Participants
194 participants
n=7 Participants
192 participants
n=5 Participants
578 participants
n=4 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: baseline and 28 days

Population: ITT

Reflective total nasal symptom score consisting of Runny nose, itchy nose, nasal Congestion, and Sneezing was assessed twice daily. Each symptom is rated on a scale from 0-3: 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, and 3=severe. Total possible score is 24 per day Least square means (LS Mean) was controlled for study day as the within-patient effect, treatment group and site as the between-patient effects, treatment by-study day interaction, and basline as a covariate.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=192 Participants
Placebo nasal Spray/2 sprays per nostril 2 times a day for 4 weeks
Astepro 0.1%
n=194 Participants
0.10% azelastine hydrochloride 1096 mcg nasal Spray/2 sprays per nostril 2 times a day for 4 weeks
Astepro 0.15%
n=192 Participants
0.15% azelastine hydrochloride 1644 mcg nasal Spray/2 sprays per nostril 2 times a day for 4 weeks
Change From Baseline in 12-hour Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (AM and PM Combined) at 28 Days.
Baseline Least Squares Mean Symptom Score
14.7 Scores on a Scale
0.0
15.5 Scores on a Scale
0.0
15.8 Scores on a Scale
0.0
Change From Baseline in 12-hour Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (AM and PM Combined) at 28 Days.
Change from baseline LS Mean symptom score
-3.1 Scores on a Scale
0.0
-3.8 Scores on a Scale
0.0
-4.0 Scores on a Scale
0.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: baseline and 28 days

Population: ITT

instantaneous (subjects rate how they feel "right now") total nasal symptom score consisting of runny nose, itchy nose, nasal congestion, and sneezing was assessed twice daily. Each symptom is rated on a scale from 0-3: 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, and 3=severe. Total possible score is 24 per day.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=192 Participants
Placebo nasal Spray/2 sprays per nostril 2 times a day for 4 weeks
Astepro 0.1%
n=194 Participants
0.10% azelastine hydrochloride 1096 mcg nasal Spray/2 sprays per nostril 2 times a day for 4 weeks
Astepro 0.15%
n=192 Participants
0.15% azelastine hydrochloride 1644 mcg nasal Spray/2 sprays per nostril 2 times a day for 4 weeks
Change From Baseline in Instantaneous Total Nasal Symprom scoreS Compared to Placebo (AM and PM Combined)and 28 Days
Baseline Symptom score
13.28 Scores on a Scale
Standard Deviation 4.614
13.91 Scores on a Scale
Standard Deviation 4.616
14.30 Scores on a Scale
Standard Deviation 4.572
Change From Baseline in Instantaneous Total Nasal Symprom scoreS Compared to Placebo (AM and PM Combined)and 28 Days
Overall Change from baseline
-2.72 Scores on a Scale
Standard Deviation 4.129
-3.36 Scores on a Scale
Standard Deviation 3.898
-3.51 Scores on a Scale
Standard Deviation 4.166

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: baseline and 28 days

Population: ITT

Reflective secondary symptom complex scores (SSCS) (post-nasal drip, itchy eyes, cough and headacdhe) were assessed twice daily. Each symptom is rated on a scale from 0-3: 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, and 3=severe. Total possible SSCS score is 24 per day.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=192 Participants
Placebo nasal Spray/2 sprays per nostril 2 times a day for 4 weeks
Astepro 0.1%
n=194 Participants
0.10% azelastine hydrochloride 1096 mcg nasal Spray/2 sprays per nostril 2 times a day for 4 weeks
Astepro 0.15%
n=192 Participants
0.15% azelastine hydrochloride 1644 mcg nasal Spray/2 sprays per nostril 2 times a day for 4 weeks
Change From Baseline in 12-hour Reflective Secondary Symptom Complex Score Compared to Placebo (AM and PM Combined)and 28 Days
Baseline SSCS
11.20 Scores on a Scale
Standard Deviation 4.936
11.77 Scores on a Scale
Standard Deviation 5.036
12.39 Scores on a Scale
Standard Deviation 4.885
Change From Baseline in 12-hour Reflective Secondary Symptom Complex Score Compared to Placebo (AM and PM Combined)and 28 Days
Change in baseline to Day 28
-1.79 Scores on a Scale
Standard Deviation 3.420
-2.23 Scores on a Scale
Standard Deviation 3.865
-2.92 Scores on a Scale
Standard Deviation 4.053

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: baseline and 28 Days

Population: ITT

A 28-item RQLQ was completed on Day 1 and Day 28 or Early temination. The RQLQ consists of 7 domains rated on a 7 point scale with 0 being not troubled by the allergy symptoms, and 6 being extremely troubled/all of the time. Domain score will be calculated from the mean score of all items in the domain. Overall score will be calculated from the mean score of all items.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=192 Participants
Placebo nasal Spray/2 sprays per nostril 2 times a day for 4 weeks
Astepro 0.1%
n=194 Participants
0.10% azelastine hydrochloride 1096 mcg nasal Spray/2 sprays per nostril 2 times a day for 4 weeks
Astepro 0.15%
n=192 Participants
0.15% azelastine hydrochloride 1644 mcg nasal Spray/2 sprays per nostril 2 times a day for 4 weeks
Change From Baseline in Rinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire and 28 Days
Baseline: Overall
2.98 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 1.047
3.18 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 1.048
3.29 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 1.091
Change From Baseline in Rinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire and 28 Days
Change from Baseline:Overall
-0.81 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 1.112
-1.05 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 1.088
-0.94 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 1.096

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: baseline and 28 days

Population: ITT

Examination of head and neck (scale: None, Mild, Moderate, Severe) for Epistaxis, Mucosal Edema, Nasal Discharge, Mucosal erythema, Mucosal Bleeding, and Crusting of mucosa. Nasal irratation was rated: 0 = None, Grade 1A = focal irritation, Grade 1B = superficial mucosal erosion, Grade 2 = moderate mucosal erosion, Grade 3 = ulceration, Grade 4 = septal perforation

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=192 Participants
Placebo nasal Spray/2 sprays per nostril 2 times a day for 4 weeks
Astepro 0.1%
n=194 Participants
0.10% azelastine hydrochloride 1096 mcg nasal Spray/2 sprays per nostril 2 times a day for 4 weeks
Astepro 0.15%
n=192 Participants
0.15% azelastine hydrochloride 1644 mcg nasal Spray/2 sprays per nostril 2 times a day for 4 weeks
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Lymphadenopathy:screening Moderate (n=192,197,192)
1 Participants
2 Participants
1 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Lymphadenopathy:screening Severe (n=192,197,192)
1 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Lymphadenopathy: Day 28/ET None (n=190,192, 192)
184 Participants
190 Participants
188 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Lymphadenopathy: Day 28/ET Mild (n=190,192, 192)
5 Participants
1 Participants
3 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Epistaxis: screening - None (n=192,197,192)
189 Participants
194 Participants
185 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Epistaxis: screening - Mild (n=192,197,192)
3 Participants
3 Participants
7 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Epistaxis: screening - Moderate (n=192,197,192)
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Epistaxis: screening - Severe (n=192,197,192)
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Epistaxis: Day 28/ET - None (n=190,192,192)
188 Participants
189 Participants
188 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Epistaxis: Day 28/ET - Mild (n=190,192,192)
2 Participants
3 Participants
4 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Epistaxis: Day 28/ET - Moderate (n=190,192,192)
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Epistaxis: Day 28/ET - Severe (n=190,192,192)
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Nasal Irritation: screening - None (n=192,197,192)
180 Participants
183 Participants
170 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Nasal Irritationscreening Grade 1A (n=192,197,192)
8 Participants
12 Participants
21 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Nasal Irritation screening Grade1B (n=192,197,192)
3 Participants
2 Participants
1 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Nasal Irritationscreening Grade 2 (n=192,197,192)
1 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Nasal Irritation screening Grade 3 (n=192,197,192)
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Nasal Irritation screening Grade 4 (n=192,197,192)
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Nasal Irritation Day 28/ET None (n=190,192,192)
182 Participants
178 Participants
175 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Nasal Irritation Day 28/ETGrade 1A (n=190,192,192)
7 Participants
12 Participants
16 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Nasal Irritation Day 28/ETGrade 1B (n=190,192,192)
1 Participants
1 Participants
1 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Nasal Irritation Day 28/ETGrade 2 (n=190,192,192)
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Nasal Irritation Day 28/ETGrade 3 (n=190,192,192)
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Nasal Irritation Day 28/ETGrade 4 (n=190,192,192)
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Mucosal Edema: screening - None (n=192,197,192)
25 Participants
30 Participants
23 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Mucosal Edema: screening - Mild (n=192,197,192)
50 Participants
54 Participants
50 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Mucosal Edema: screening Moderate (n=192,197,192)
98 Participants
84 Participants
95 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Mucosal Edema: screening - Severe (n=192,197,192)
19 Participants
29 Participants
24 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Mucosal Edema: Day 28/ET None (n=190,192,192)
38 Participants
44 Participants
30 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Mucosal Edema: Day 28/ET Mild (n=190,192,192)
69 Participants
71 Participants
71 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Mucosal Edema: Day 28/ET Moderate (n=190,192,192)
70 Participants
60 Participants
72 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Mucosal Edema: Day 28/ET Severe (n=190,192,192)
13 Participants
17 Participants
19 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Nasal Discharge: screening - None (n=192,197,192)
55 Participants
51 Participants
49 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Nasal Discharge: screening - Mild (n=192,197,192)
79 Participants
82 Participants
83 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Nasal Discharge:screening Moderate (n=192,197,192)
48 Participants
51 Participants
49 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Nasal Discharge: screening Severe (n=192,197,192)
10 Participants
13 Participants
11 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Nasal Discharge:Day 28/ET None (n=190,192,192)
77 Participants
76 Participants
81 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Nasal Discharge:Day 28/ET Mild (n=190,192,192)
75 Participants
85 Participants
72 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Nasal Discharge:Day 28/ET Moderate (n=190,192,192)
31 Participants
24 Participants
35 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Nasal Discharge:Day 28/ET Severe (n=190,192,192)
7 Participants
7 Participants
4 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Mucosal Erythema screening None (n=192,197,192)
91 Participants
108 Participants
106 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Mucosal Erythema screening Mild (n=192,197,192)
61 Participants
58 Participants
54 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Mucosal Erythema screeningModerate (n=192,197,192)
37 Participants
28 Participants
30 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Mucosal Erythema screening Severe (n=192,197,192)
3 Participants
3 Participants
2 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Mucosal Erythema Day 28/ET None (n=190,192,192)
101 Participants
124 Participants
111 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Mucosal Erythema Day 28/ET Mild (n=190,192,192)
64 Participants
46 Participants
51 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Mucosal Erythema Day 28/ET Moderate (n=190,192,192
23 Participants
20 Participants
26 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Mucosal Erythema Day 28/ET Severe (n=190,192,192)
2 Participants
2 Participants
4 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Mucosal Bleeding: screening None (n=192,197,192)
185 Participants
192 Participants
183 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Mucosal Bleeding: screening Mild (n=192,197,192)
7 Participants
5 Participants
9 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Mucosal Bleedingscreening Moderate (n=192,197,192)
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Mucosal Bleeding screening Severe (n=192,197,192)
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Mucosal Bleeding: Day 28/ET None (n=190,192,192)
189 Participants
189 Participants
184 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Mucosal Bleeding: Day 28/ET Mild (n=190,192,192)
1 Participants
3 Participants
7 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Mucosal Bleeding Day 28/ETModerate (n=190,192,192)
0 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Mucosal Bleeding: Day 28/ET Severe (n=190,192,192)
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Crusting of Mucosa: screening None (n=192,197,192)
173 Participants
178 Participants
173 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Crusting of Mucosa: screening Mild (n=192,197,192)
15 Participants
13 Participants
13 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
CrustingofMucosa screening Moderate(n=192,197,192)
4 Participants
6 Participants
6 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Crusting of Mucosa screening Severe(n=192,197,192)
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Crusting of Mucosa:Day 28/ET None (n=190,192,192)
176 Participants
178 Participants
175 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Crusting of Mucosa:Day 28/ET Mild (n=190,192,192)
14 Participants
12 Participants
16 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
CrustingofMucosaDay 28/ET Moderate (n=190,192,192)
0 Participants
2 Participants
1 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Crusting of Mucosa:Day 28/ET Severe(n=190,192,192)
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Conjuntival screening None (n=192,197,192)
126 Participants
145 Participants
134 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Conjuntival screening Mild (n=192,197,192)
56 Participants
43 Participants
48 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Conjuntival screening Moderate n=(192,192, 192)
10 Participants
9 Participants
10 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Conjuntival screeningSevere(n=192,197,192)
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Conjuntival Day 28/ET None(n=190,192,192)
125 Participants
145 Participants
144 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Conjuntival Day 28/ET Mild(n=190,192,192)
57 Participants
34 Participants
36 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Conjuntival Day 28/ET Moderate(n=190,192)
6 Participants
10 Participants
11 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Conjuntival Day 28/ET Severe (n=190,192, 192)
2 Participants
3 Participants
1 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Erythmatous TM: screening None (n=192,197,192)
180 Participants
183 Participants
185 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Erythmatous TM: screening Mild (n=192,197,192)
9 Participants
8 Participants
5 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Erythmatous TM: screening Moderate(n=192,197,192)
2 Participants
6 Participants
1 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Erythmatous TM:screening Severe (n=192,197,192)
1 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Erythmatous TM: Day 28/ET None (n=190,192, 192)
179 Participants
189 Participants
187 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Erythmatous TM: Day 28/ET Mild (n=190,192, 192)
8 Participants
1 Participants
3 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Erythmatous TM: Day 28/ET Moderate (n=190,192,192)
2 Participants
2 Participants
1 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Erythmatous TM: Day 28/ET Severe (n=190,192, 192)
1 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Lymphadenopathy: screening None (n=192,197,192)
186 Participants
189 Participants
188 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Lymphadenopathy: screening Mild (n=192,197,192)
4 Participants
6 Participants
3 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Lymphadenopathy Day 28/ET Moderate (n=190,192,192)
1 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
Change From Baseline on Direct Visual Nasal Exams and 28 Days
Lymphadenopathy: Day 28/ET Severe ( n=190,192,192)
0 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants

Adverse Events

Placebo

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 21 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Astepro 0.1%

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 27 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Astepro 0.15%

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 32 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Placebo
n=192 participants at risk
Placebo nasal Spray/2 sprays per nostril 2 times a day for 4 weeks
Astepro 0.1%
n=194 participants at risk
0.10% azelastine hydrochloride 1096 mcg nasal Spray/2 sprays per nostril 2 times a day for 4 weeks
Astepro 0.15%
n=192 participants at risk
0.15% azelastine hydrochloride 1644 mcg nasal Spray/2 sprays per nostril 2 times a day for 4 weeks
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasal Discomfort
3.6%
7/192 • Number of events 7
0 participants were at risk for an SAE. No SAE's were observed
3.6%
7/194 • Number of events 7
0 participants were at risk for an SAE. No SAE's were observed
6.8%
13/192 • Number of events 13
0 participants were at risk for an SAE. No SAE's were observed
Nervous system disorders
Dysgesusia
0.52%
1/192 • Number of events 1
0 participants were at risk for an SAE. No SAE's were observed
5.7%
11/194 • Number of events 11
0 participants were at risk for an SAE. No SAE's were observed
4.7%
9/192 • Number of events 9
0 participants were at risk for an SAE. No SAE's were observed
Nervous system disorders
Headache
3.1%
6/192 • Number of events 6
0 participants were at risk for an SAE. No SAE's were observed
2.1%
4/194 • Number of events 4
0 participants were at risk for an SAE. No SAE's were observed
0.52%
1/192 • Number of events 1
0 participants were at risk for an SAE. No SAE's were observed
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Epistaxis
1.6%
3/192 • Number of events 3
0 participants were at risk for an SAE. No SAE's were observed
2.1%
4/194 • Number of events 4
0 participants were at risk for an SAE. No SAE's were observed
1.0%
2/192 • Number of events 2
0 participants were at risk for an SAE. No SAE's were observed
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Sneezing
0.00%
0/192
0 participants were at risk for an SAE. No SAE's were observed
0.00%
0/194
0 participants were at risk for an SAE. No SAE's were observed
2.6%
5/192 • Number of events 5
0 participants were at risk for an SAE. No SAE's were observed
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Upper Respiratory Tract Infection
2.1%
4/192 • Number of events 4
0 participants were at risk for an SAE. No SAE's were observed
0.52%
1/194 • Number of events 1
0 participants were at risk for an SAE. No SAE's were observed
1.0%
2/192 • Number of events 2
0 participants were at risk for an SAE. No SAE's were observed

Additional Information

William Wheeler, PhD

Meda Pharmaceuticals

Phone: 732-564-2393

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee For multicenter studies, joint publication is required to assure that the initial publication is based on all data from all sites and investigators participating in these studies agree not to present data gathered individually or by subgroup centers before the initial publication unless jointly agreed by all other investigators and the sponsor. authorship will be determined by mutual agreement.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER