Effects of Different Vasodilators on Coronary No-reflow During primAry percuTaneous Coronary intErvention in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction

NCT ID: NCT00712894

Last Updated: 2012-09-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

102 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-12-31

Study Completion Date

2009-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of three different vasodilators including diltiazem, verapamil and nitroglycerin for reversal of no-reflow/slow-flow during direct percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

No-reflow/slow-flow is a frequent observation during direct PCI for AMI and associated with a poor clinical outcome. The present pharmacological management involves the use of different vasodilators including nitrates, verapamil, adenosine and nicorandil. But no randomized trial has been conducted to assess any of these agents, or to determine the appropriate dosage. This prospective randomized study aimed to confirm favorable effects of diltiazem on no-reflow/slow-flow during direct PCI for AMI compared with verapamil and nitroglycerin.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Myocardial Infarction Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Acute myocardial infarction Percutaneous coronary intervention No-reflow phenomenon Vasodilator agents

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

D

If no-reflow/slow-flow phenomenon was observed post-PCI, intracoronary infusion of diltiazem via an infusion microcatheter distal to the angioplasty site was performed.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Diltiazem

Intervention Type DRUG

Intracoronary Infusion 400-2000ug

V

If no-reflow/slow-flow phenomenon was observed post-PCI, intracoronary infusion of verapamil via an infusion microcatheter distal to the angioplasty site was performed.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Verapamil

Intervention Type DRUG

Intracoronary Infusion 200-1000ug

N

If no-reflow/slow-flow phenomenon was observed post-PCI, intracoronary infusion of nitroglycerin via an infusion microcatheter distal to the angioplasty site was performed.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Nitroglycerin

Intervention Type DRUG

Intracoronary Infusion 200-1000ug

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Diltiazem

Intracoronary Infusion 400-2000ug

Intervention Type DRUG

Verapamil

Intracoronary Infusion 200-1000ug

Intervention Type DRUG

Nitroglycerin

Intracoronary Infusion 200-1000ug

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Clinical diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction
* Vessel TIMI flow \< grade Ⅲ post-PCI

Exclusion Criteria

* Heart failure of New York Heart Association (NYHA) class Ⅲ to class Ⅳ
* Sick sinus syndrome
* Atrioventricular block (grade Ⅱ and above)
* SBP ≤ 90mmHg or cardiogenic shock
* Heart Rate ≤60 bpm
* Pregnancy
* Renal or hepatic failure
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Fudan University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ge Junbo

Director of Cardiology Department

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Junbo Ge, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Fudan University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University

Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Huang D, Qian J, Ge L, Jin X, Jin H, Ma J, Liu Z, Zhang F, Dong L, Wang X, Yao K, Ge J. REstoration of COronary flow in patients with no-reflow after primary coronary interVEntion of acute myocaRdial infarction (RECOVER). Am Heart J. 2012 Sep;164(3):394-401. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.06.015.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 22980307 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Zhongshan 2006-70

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id