Trial Outcomes & Findings for Evaluation of Vitrectomy for Diabetic Macular Edema (NCT NCT00709319)

NCT ID: NCT00709319

Last Updated: 2019-10-07

Results Overview

Change in best correct visual acuity letter score from baseline to six months as measured by a certified tester using an electronic visual acuity testing machine based on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) method. A positive change denotes an improvement. Best value on the scale 97, worst 0.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Target enrollment

87 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Baseline to 6 months

Results posted on

2019-10-07

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Diabetic Macular Edema and Vitreomacular Traction
The primary cohort included 87 eyes (one eye per participant) with DME and vitreomacular traction based on investigator's evaluation, visual acuity 20/63-20/400, optical coherence tomography (OCT) central subfield greater than 300 microns and no concomitant cataract extraction at the time of vitrectomy.Surgery was performed according to the investigator's usual routine. Follow-up visits were performed after 3 months, 6 months (primary end point), and 1 year.
Overall Study
STARTED
87
Overall Study
COMPLETED
81
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
6

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Diabetic Macular Edema and Vitreomacular Traction
The primary cohort included 87 eyes (one eye per participant) with DME and vitreomacular traction based on investigator's evaluation, visual acuity 20/63-20/400, optical coherence tomography (OCT) central subfield greater than 300 microns and no concomitant cataract extraction at the time of vitrectomy.Surgery was performed according to the investigator's usual routine. Follow-up visits were performed after 3 months, 6 months (primary end point), and 1 year.
Overall Study
Death
4
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
2

Baseline Characteristics

Evaluation of Vitrectomy for Diabetic Macular Edema

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Diabetic Macular Edema and Vitreomacular Traction
n=87 Participants
The primary cohort included 87 eyes with DME and vitreomacular traction based on investigator's evaluation, visual acuity 20/63-20/400, optical coherence tomography (OCT) central subfield greater than 300 microns and no concomitant cataract extraction at the time of vitrectomy.Surgery was performed according to the investigator's usual routine. Follow-up visits were performed after 3 months, 6 months (primary end point), and 1 year. Only one eye per participant could be enrolled.
Age, Customized
66 Years
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
39 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
48 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
69 participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
African American
7 participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
5 participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
6 participants
n=5 Participants
Surgery characteristic: Focal/grid laser to diabetic macular edema used
Yes
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
Surgery characteristic: Focal/grid laser to diabetic macular edema used
No
83 Participants
n=5 Participants
Surgery characteristic: Panretinal photocoagulation, history of prior use
Yes
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
Surgery characteristic: Panretinal photocoagulation, history of prior use
No
71 Participants
n=5 Participants
Indocyanine green used to improve visualization
Yes
24 Participants
n=5 Participants
Indocyanine green used to improve visualization
No
63 Participants
n=5 Participants
Diabetes Type
Type 1
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
Diabetes Type
Type 2
73 Participants
n=5 Participants
Epiretinal Membranes Present
No
21 Participants
n=5 Participants
Epiretinal Membranes Present
Probable
19 Participants
n=5 Participants
Epiretinal Membranes Present
Definite
43 Participants
n=5 Participants
Epiretinal Membranes Present
Can not deterimine
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
Lens Status
Phakic
37 Participants
n=5 Participants
Lens Status
Pseudophakic/aphakic
50 Participants
n=5 Participants
Prior Scatter Photocoagulation
Yes
39 Participants
n=5 Participants
Prior Scatter Photocoagulation
No
48 Participants
n=5 Participants
Prior Treatment for Diabetic Macular Edema
Yes
51 Participants
n=5 Participants
Prior Treatment for Diabetic Macular Edema
No
36 Participants
n=5 Participants
Reasons for Vitrectomy: Vitreomacular interface abnormality
87 Participants
n=5 Participants
Retinopathy Severity
Microaneurysms only
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Retinopathy Severity
Mild/moderate nonproliferative diabetic retinopath
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
Retinopathy Severity
Moderate/severe nonproliferative diabetic retinopa
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
Retinopathy Severity
Severe nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
Retinopathy Severity
Proliferative diabetic retinopathy
51 Participants
n=5 Participants
Retinopathy Severity
Retinal volume not obtained
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
Status of the Vitreous
Attached
49 Participants
n=5 Participants
Status of the Vitreous
Partially Attached
28 Participants
n=5 Participants
Status of the Vitreous
Detached
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
Status of the Vitreous
Uncertain
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
Triamcinolone acetonide used to improve visualization
Yes
30 Participants
n=5 Participants
Triamcinolone acetonide used to improve visualization
No
57 Participants
n=5 Participants
Surgical Characteristic: Internal Limiting Membrane Removed
Yes
47 Participants
n=5 Participants
Surgical Characteristic: Internal Limiting Membrane Removed
No
40 Participants
n=5 Participants
Surgical Characteristic: Focal to grid breaks Laser Used
Yes
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
Surgical Characteristic: Focal to grid breaks Laser Used
No
73 Participants
n=5 Participants
Surgical Characteristic: Vitrectomy System
19/20 gauge
35 Participants
n=5 Participants
Surgical Characteristic: Vitrectomy System
25 gauge
43 Participants
n=5 Participants
Surgical Characteristic: Vitrectomy System
23 gauge
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
Surgical Charachteristic:Epiretinal membrane peeled
Yes
53 Participants
n=5 Participants
Surgical Charachteristic:Epiretinal membrane peeled
No
34 Participants
n=5 Participants
Central Subfield Thickness
491 Microns
n=5 Participants
Duration of Diabetes
20 Years
n=5 Participants
Electronic-Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Visual Acuity Letter Score
52 Number on a Scale
n=5 Participants
Hemoglobin A1c
7.1 Percent
n=5 Participants
Retinal Volume
9.2 mm3
n=5 Participants
Reasons for Vitrectomy: Unresponsive to other therapies
Yes
27 Participants
n=5 Participants
Reasons for Vitrectomy: Unresponsive to other therapies
No
60 Participants
n=5 Participants
Trypan blue used to improve visualization
Yes
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
Trypan blue used to improve visualization
No
85 Participants
n=5 Participants
Surgery characteristic: Panretinal photocoagulation, with none used prior
Yes
19 Participants
n=5 Participants
Surgery characteristic: Panretinal photocoagulation, with none used prior
No
68 Participants
n=5 Participants
Surgery characteristic: Laser used with endoprobe
Yes
21 Participants
n=5 Participants
Surgery characteristic: Laser used with endoprobe
No
66 Participants
n=5 Participants
Surgery characteristic: Laser used with indirect ophthalmoscope
Yes
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
Surgery characteristic: Laser used with indirect ophthalmoscope
No
80 Participants
n=5 Participants
Surgery characteristic: Scatter laser over peripheral schisis or barrier laser used
Yes
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
Surgery characteristic: Scatter laser over peripheral schisis or barrier laser used
No
83 Participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to 6 months

Change in best correct visual acuity letter score from baseline to six months as measured by a certified tester using an electronic visual acuity testing machine based on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) method. A positive change denotes an improvement. Best value on the scale 97, worst 0.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Diabetic Macular Edema and Vitreomacular Traction
n=87 Participants
The primary cohort included 87 eyes (one eye per participant) with DME and vitreomacular traction based on investigator's evaluation, visual acuity 20/63-20/400, optical coherence tomography (OCT) central subfield greater than 300 microns and no concomitant cataract extraction at the time of vitrectomy.Surgery was performed according to the investigator's usual routine. Follow-up visits were performed after 3 months, 6 months (primary end point), and 1 year.
Visual Acuity
52 Units on a scale
Interval 42.0 to 64.0

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to 6 Months

Change in central subfield thickness is followup central subfield retinal thickness minus baseline thickness.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Diabetic Macular Edema and Vitreomacular Traction
n=87 Participants
The primary cohort included 87 eyes (one eye per participant) with DME and vitreomacular traction based on investigator's evaluation, visual acuity 20/63-20/400, optical coherence tomography (OCT) central subfield greater than 300 microns and no concomitant cataract extraction at the time of vitrectomy.Surgery was performed according to the investigator's usual routine. Follow-up visits were performed after 3 months, 6 months (primary end point), and 1 year.
Change in Optical Coherence Tomography Measured Central Subfield Thickness From Baseline
-160 microns
Interval -258.0 to -87.0

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to 6 months

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Diabetic Macular Edema and Vitreomacular Traction
n=87 Participants
The primary cohort included 87 eyes (one eye per participant) with DME and vitreomacular traction based on investigator's evaluation, visual acuity 20/63-20/400, optical coherence tomography (OCT) central subfield greater than 300 microns and no concomitant cataract extraction at the time of vitrectomy.Surgery was performed according to the investigator's usual routine. Follow-up visits were performed after 3 months, 6 months (primary end point), and 1 year.
Percent of Participants With Change in Visual Acuity From Baseline to Six Months
Percent with 10 or more letter imporvement
38 Percentage of Participants
Interval 28.0 to 49.0
Percent of Participants With Change in Visual Acuity From Baseline to Six Months
Percent with 10 or more letters worsening
22 Percentage of Participants
Interval 13.0 to 31.0

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to 6 months

Change in thickness is followup thickness minus baseline thickness.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Diabetic Macular Edema and Vitreomacular Traction
n=87 Participants
The primary cohort included 87 eyes (one eye per participant) with DME and vitreomacular traction based on investigator's evaluation, visual acuity 20/63-20/400, optical coherence tomography (OCT) central subfield greater than 300 microns and no concomitant cataract extraction at the time of vitrectomy.Surgery was performed according to the investigator's usual routine. Follow-up visits were performed after 3 months, 6 months (primary end point), and 1 year.
Change in Optical Coherence Tomography Central Subfield Thickness From Baseline to 6 Months
Central subfield decrease of 100 microns or more
49 participants
Change in Optical Coherence Tomography Central Subfield Thickness From Baseline to 6 Months
Central subfield decrease of 50 microns or more
61 participants
Change in Optical Coherence Tomography Central Subfield Thickness From Baseline to 6 Months
Central subfield increase of 50 microns or more
3 participants
Change in Optical Coherence Tomography Central Subfield Thickness From Baseline to 6 Months
Central subfield thickening decrease of >=50%
50 participants
Change in Optical Coherence Tomography Central Subfield Thickness From Baseline to 6 Months
Central subfield less than 250 microns at 6 months
33 participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to 6 months

Including intraoperative and perioperative medical complications. Same subject could have more than one complication

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Diabetic Macular Edema and Vitreomacular Traction
n=87 Participants
The primary cohort included 87 eyes (one eye per participant) with DME and vitreomacular traction based on investigator's evaluation, visual acuity 20/63-20/400, optical coherence tomography (OCT) central subfield greater than 300 microns and no concomitant cataract extraction at the time of vitrectomy.Surgery was performed according to the investigator's usual routine. Follow-up visits were performed after 3 months, 6 months (primary end point), and 1 year.
Surgical Complications From Baseline to Six Months
Choroidal effusion
1 Participants
Surgical Complications From Baseline to Six Months
Total
16 Participants
Surgical Complications From Baseline to Six Months
Vitreous hemorrhage
5 Participants
Surgical Complications From Baseline to Six Months
Additional vitreomacular interface abnormalities
2 Participants
Surgical Complications From Baseline to Six Months
Elevated intraocular pressure requiring treatment
7 Participants
Surgical Complications From Baseline to Six Months
Retinal Detachment
3 Participants
Surgical Complications From Baseline to Six Months
Endophthalmitis
1 Participants
Surgical Complications From Baseline to Six Months
Double vision
2 Participants
Surgical Complications From Baseline to Six Months
Lamella hole
1 Participants
Surgical Complications From Baseline to Six Months
Other
2 Participants

Adverse Events

Diabetic Macular Edema and Vitreomacular Traction

Serious events: 4 serious events
Other events: 12 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Diabetic Macular Edema and Vitreomacular Traction
n=87 participants at risk
The primary cohort included 87 eyes with DME and vitreomacular traction based on investigator's evaluation, visual acuity 20/63-20/400, optical coherence tomography (OCT) central subfield greater than 300 microns and no concomitant cataract extraction at the time of vitrectomy.Surgery was performed according to the investigator's usual routine. Follow-up visits were performed after 3 months, 6 months (primary end point), and 1 year. Only one eye per participant could be enrolled.
Eye disorders
retinal detachment
3.4%
3/87
Eye disorders
Endophthalmitis
1.1%
1/87

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Diabetic Macular Edema and Vitreomacular Traction
n=87 participants at risk
The primary cohort included 87 eyes with DME and vitreomacular traction based on investigator's evaluation, visual acuity 20/63-20/400, optical coherence tomography (OCT) central subfield greater than 300 microns and no concomitant cataract extraction at the time of vitrectomy.Surgery was performed according to the investigator's usual routine. Follow-up visits were performed after 3 months, 6 months (primary end point), and 1 year. Only one eye per participant could be enrolled.
Eye disorders
Vitreous haemorrhage
5.7%
5/87
Eye disorders
Additional vitreomacular interface abnormalities
2.3%
2/87
Eye disorders
Elevated intraocular pressure requirering treatment
8.0%
7/87
Eye disorders
Double Vision
2.3%
2/87
Eye disorders
Lamella hole
1.1%
1/87
Eye disorders
Choroidal effusion
1.1%
1/87

Additional Information

Adam R. Glassman, Director DRCR.net Coordinating Center

Jaeb Center for Health Research

Phone: 813-975-8690

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place