The Skin Savvy Study: A Behavioral Skin Cancer Prevention Intervention
NCT ID: NCT00709306
Last Updated: 2018-08-31
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
197 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2006-03-31
2010-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Motivational Enhancement Approach to Skin Cancer Prevention
NCT00705887
Hybrid Effectiveness-Implementation Trial to Integrate Precision Skin Cancer Risk Feedback in FQHCs
NCT07222995
UV Dosimetry Feedback in NMSC Patients
NCT03757663
Melanoma Risk-Reduction Among Patients and Family Members
NCT00510302
Facilitating Web-based Patient Decision Support: Decision About Medication to Lower Breast Cancer Risk
NCT00906321
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
FACTORIAL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Education
Participants were given a packet of standard skin cancer prevention educational brochures and handouts from major professional organizations to review independently for 10-15 minutes.
Education
Education
Motivational Interviewing
Participants met with a trained counselor who reviewed any personalized feedback of risk derived from the baseline assessments (e.g., history of sunburns, self-reported UV exposure, protective behaviors). Counselors utilized the basic motivational interviewing skills of open-ended questions, reflection of participant statements, affirmations/positive feedback, and summation of major points throughout the discussion. These sessions took about 22 minutes.
Motivational Interviewing
Motivational Interviewing
UV-detect photos
Participants were shown a regular black and white photo and a black and white UV-filtered photo of their face. Participants were told that "Any dark, spotted, freckled, wrinkled, uneven, or pitted areas indicate existing underlying skin damage that is difficult to reverse. However, protecting the skin from UV radiation can prevent future damage." Participants were asked what they noticed about the photos, what their reactions were, and how this might affect their behavior. These sessions took 12 minutes on average.
UV-Detect Photos
UV-Detect Photos
UV-detect photos & MI
Participants met with a trained counselor who reviewed any personalized feedback of risk derived from the baseline assessments (e.g., history of sunburns, self-reported UV exposure, protective behaviors). Counselors utilized the basic motivational interviewing skills of open-ended questions, reflection of participant statements, affirmations/positive feedback, and summation of major points throughout the discussion. In addition to baseline feedback, participants were also interviewed about the black \& white and UV-filtered photos of their faces. These sessions took about 25 minutes.
UV-Detect Photos
UV-Detect Photos
Motivational Interviewing
Motivational Interviewing
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
UV-Detect Photos
UV-Detect Photos
Motivational Interviewing
Motivational Interviewing
Education
Education
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
24 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
NIH
Fox Chase Cancer Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Carolyn Heckman
Associate Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Carolyn Heckman, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Fox Chase Cancer Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Fox Chase Cancer Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.