FDG-Positron Emission Tomography (PET)/CT In the Evaluation of Persistent Febrile Neutropenia in Cancer Patients
NCT ID: NCT00707213
Last Updated: 2022-04-27
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE1
19 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2007-08-21
2010-08-11
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Although there have been many advances in the assessment and treatment of infections responsible for febrile neutropenia in cancer patients, it still remains a common complication of cancer therapy and accounts for the majority of chemotherapy-associated deaths. This National Cancer Institute (NCI) funded proposal using the R-21 Quick-Trials Exploratory Grant mechanism is to conduct an exploratory/pilot project in a group of patients with persistent febrile neutropenia to provide critical information that will support the concept, and aid in the design, of a larger multi-center clinical trial. The ultimate goal of our interdisciplinary team of oncologists, infectious diseases experts, imagers, and biostatisticians is to conduct a prospective, multi-center trial to establish the utility and cost-effectiveness of PET/CT using the widely available glucose analogue \[18F\]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) in identifying sites of infection in cancer patients with persistent febrile neutropenia without an obvious identifiable source thus improving targeted therapy.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
PET/CT and Bacterial/Fungal PCR in High Risk Febrile Neutropenia
NCT03429387
Multi-Tracer Positron Emission Tomography in Patients With Solid Tumors
NCT01243333
Assessment of Hematopoietic Recovery Following Chemotherapy for Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma
NCT00775957
Positron Emission Tomography Using Fludeoxyglucose F 18 in Predicting Response to Treatment in Patients Who Are Receiving Rituximab and Combination Chemotherapy for Newly Diagnosed Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma
NCT00110006
Predictive Value of FDG-PET-CT Scans for Patients With Lung Cancer Receiving Concurrent Chemo-Radiation
NCT00522639
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Because white cell number is severely reduced, the use of labeled white cell scans is often precluded. If FDG-PET/CT can provide a likely anatomic site for targeted antibiotic therapy in this specific high risk population, it is possible that morbidity/mortality from infection and antibiotic side effects may be minimized, hospitalization days may be reduced, and effective anti-cancer therapy may be continued without interruption. Although FDG-PET/CT is not cheap, the ultimate result may be highly cost-effective.
Our oncologist and infectious diseases co-investigators predict that a tissue diagnosis can be obtained in at least 80% of all FDG-PET/CT or CT findings that are suspicious for infection in children and 50% in adults. This confirmatory tissue diagnosis will serve as the "gold standard" to assess the effectiveness of FDG-PET/CT in finding a source of infection.
Additional confirmatory factors will include clinical response to targeted therapy and resolution of associated radiographic or CT findings. The data will be evaluated to address the following questions, which are the sub-aims of the funded proposal:
1. How effective is FDG-PET/CT in identifying sites of infection in patients with febrile neutropenia without an obvious cause?
2. To what degree does FDG-PET/CT improve detection of sites of infection over CT alone?
3. What FDG-PET/CT imaging variables best predict the presence of infection at a specific site (e.g. standardized uptake value (SUV), concomitant abnormality on CT)?
4. Can the magnitude of uptake of FDG measured by an SUV at sites of infection predict the identity of the infective agent (bacterial vs. fungal vs. viral)?
5. Does magnitude of uptake at sites of infection correlate with absolute neutrophil count (ANC)?
6. Can a clinical scoring system be developed to identify a population of patients in whom FDG-PET/CT is likely to be most efficacious in identifying sites of infection?
This pilot data will be used to determine whether there is sufficient support for, and to aid in the design of, a large, prospective, multi-center clinical trial to establish the cost-effectiveness and efficacy of FDG-PET/CT in evaluation of febrile neutropenia, compared to patients who are managed by conventional methods.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
All Participants
All Participants will be assessed by FDG-PET to identify possible sites of infection
[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG)
FDG-PET/CT scan-The scans that will be done with a radioactive sugar (\[18F\]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose) and positron emission tomography (FDG-PET/CT). These scans will help to identify areas of possible infection.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG)
FDG-PET/CT scan-The scans that will be done with a radioactive sugar (\[18F\]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose) and positron emission tomography (FDG-PET/CT). These scans will help to identify areas of possible infection.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Exclusion Criteria
All adult subjects will be recruited from the Huntsman Cancer Hospital, patients will be recruited from the general oncology service. As for the pediatric patients, those considered eligible will include those with a documented fever \> 5 days despite IV antibiotics, an ANC \< 500 cells/mm3, and in patient treatment as a high risk patient. We will also study patients that do not meet the older definition of persistent (\> 5 days) fever who for medical reasons an advanced imaging study (typically CT scans) is now medically indicated for localization of a possible site of infection. These patients will have a fever and be neutropenic, however they may not have been febrile for \> 5 days. Medical imaging is indicated sooner than the typical 5 days due to the patients condition and need to localize a site of infection. On average, 5-6 patients per week are admitted to the Huntsman Cancer Hospital with the diagnosis of high risk persistent febrile neutropenia. At any one time, there are typically 3-4 adult in patients on the ward with the diagnosis of persistent febrile neutropenia. Of these, approximately 2-3 patients per week will be eligible for inclusion in this study (having persistent febrile neutropenia without an obvious cause). The target for this study is to recruit a minimum of 1-2 adult patients per month to the protocol. Therefore, the eligible adult patient population should be more than sufficient to meet this goal. As with the pediatric population, the majority of these patients have leukemia and lymphoma (50:50). Adult patients may also have multiple myeloma. In these patients, the typical duration of neutropenia is 3-4 weeks. Typically, the initial workup of the adult patients with febrile neutropenia is a chest X-ray, complete blood count (CBC), urinalysis, peripheral and central line blood culture, and additional studies only as directed by symptoms. Initial in-patient treatment for high risk patients is typically with IV meropenem and ceftazidime. If fever persists beyond 5 days without specific localizing signs or symptoms, antibacterials may be changed or added, and antifungals are started (typically amphotericin B or caspofungin), typically persisting until the white count returns to 1000 cell/mm3. Additional imaging studies are not done on a consistent basis for the adults with persistent high-risk febrile neutropenia. Extended imaging is typically done only as symptoms dictate. Typically, a source of infection is found in only 40-50% of patients with febrile neutropenia at our institutions as well as from the literature (Chaimberlain 2005; Hughes 2002; Roguin 1996). In the persistent febrile neutropenia patient despite further and more comprehensive evaluation and assessment a source is identified in only about an additional 10% of these patients.
Of note, patients from the bone marrow transplant unit will be eligible to participate in this pilot study,. Many of these patients are placed on prophylactic antifungal agents at the time of presentation of neutropenia and fever. This may cause a drug-induced fever in a certain percentage of recipients. For this reason, the clinical picture is clouded however the patients may still have an occult infection. Bone marrow transplant patients will be included in the study as this is an exploratory study and the information gained from assessing the ability of FDG-PET/CT to localize sites of infection in neutropenic, febrile bone marrow transplant patients will be valuable.
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
NIH
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
NIH
University of Utah
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
John M Hoffman, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Huntsman Cancer Institute
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Huntsman Cancer Institute
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HCI22418
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.