Trial Outcomes & Findings for Efficacy Study of Strattera for Treating Attention Disorders in Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) (NCT NCT00702364)
NCT ID: NCT00702364
Last Updated: 2014-09-15
Results Overview
Cognitive Drug Research (CDR) Computerized Cognitive Assessment System \[19\] is comprised of a battery of computer-controlled tasks administered on a laptop computer with parallel forms of the tests being presented on each testing session. The Power of Attention factor of the CDR was selected as the primary outcome measure because of its strong psychometric properties in other drug studies with cognitively compromised populations. Instead of utilizing a t-test to compare treatment and control groups, treatment and control groups for both primary and secondary outcomes were compared utilizing an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model in which repeat baseline measures taken on each respective outcome served as a covariate. This method controls for any differences that may exist between the groups at baseline. Model assumptions for conducting an ANCOVA were investigated for all primary and secondary analyses, where no violations of model assumptions were detected. Additionally,
COMPLETED
NA
60 participants
Post treatment
2014-09-15
Participant Flow
175 people responded to recruitment flier in the Denver area and were screened for eligibility from April 2008 through December 2011. 60 of these enrolled in the study.
60 enrolled participants completed study training; 2 of these withdrew prior to Baseline Assessment. 58 completed baseline assessment and began Placebo Run-in; 3 withdrew prior to randomization. 55 total were randomized.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Atomoxetine
40mg atomoxetine twice a day for 2 weeks
atomoxetine :
|
Placebo
Placebo twice a day for two weeks
placebo :
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
26
|
29
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
24
|
25
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
2
|
4
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Efficacy Study of Strattera for Treating Attention Disorders in Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Atomoxetine
n=26 Participants
40mg atomoxetine twice a day for 2 weeks
atomoxetine :
|
Placebo
n=29 Participants
Placebo twice a day for two weeks
placebo :
|
Total
n=55 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
26 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
29 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
55 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
8 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
18 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
23 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
41 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Post treatmentCognitive Drug Research (CDR) Computerized Cognitive Assessment System \[19\] is comprised of a battery of computer-controlled tasks administered on a laptop computer with parallel forms of the tests being presented on each testing session. The Power of Attention factor of the CDR was selected as the primary outcome measure because of its strong psychometric properties in other drug studies with cognitively compromised populations. Instead of utilizing a t-test to compare treatment and control groups, treatment and control groups for both primary and secondary outcomes were compared utilizing an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model in which repeat baseline measures taken on each respective outcome served as a covariate. This method controls for any differences that may exist between the groups at baseline. Model assumptions for conducting an ANCOVA were investigated for all primary and secondary analyses, where no violations of model assumptions were detected. Additionally,
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atomoxetine
n=25 Participants
40mg atomoxetine twice a day for 2 weeks
atomoxetine :
|
Placebo
n=28 Participants
Placebo twice a day for two weeks
placebo :
|
|---|---|---|
|
CDR Power of Attention
|
1262.1744 msec
Interval 1209.8949 to 1314.4539
|
1252.9510 msec
Interval 1203.6002 to 1302.3019
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Post treatmentThe Stroop Color and Word Test is frequently used to study deficits of attention and executive function in individuals with TBI, and has adequate test-retest reliability. At each administration, the following scores were obtained, Word Reading, Colour Naming and Interference. Raw scores were converted to demographically-adjusted T-scores using Golden and Freshwater norm.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atomoxetine
n=25 Participants
40mg atomoxetine twice a day for 2 weeks
atomoxetine :
|
Placebo
n=28 Participants
Placebo twice a day for two weeks
placebo :
|
|---|---|---|
|
Stroop Test Interference T-score
|
56.50 T-score
Interval 54.7 to 58.3
|
55.44 T-score
Interval 53.74 to 57.14
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Post treatmentThe Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS-v1.1) is a self-report questionnaire that consists of questions involving the 18-items of the The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)-IV- Text Revision (TR) criteria for ADHD that rate symptoms on a Likert scale ranging from 0-4 based on the frequency of symptoms ("never", "rarely", "sometimes", "often", and "very often"). A previous study of the ASRS found the self-report to be both valid (Cronbach's alpha =.88) and reliable (ICC=.84). Scores on the 18 items were summed for a total ASRS score.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atomoxetine
n=25 Participants
40mg atomoxetine twice a day for 2 weeks
atomoxetine :
|
Placebo
n=28 Participants
Placebo twice a day for two weeks
placebo :
|
|---|---|---|
|
Adult Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Self-Report Scale Summary Score
|
28.883 units on a scale
Interval 25.746 to 32.021
|
30.997 units on a scale
Interval 28.033 to 33.959
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Post treatmentNeurobehavioral Functioning Inventory (NFI) was developed as a clinical and research tool to quantify a variety of post-injury behaviours and symptoms characteristic of neurologic disability and encountered in daily life. The inventory is comprised of 76 items organized into six analytically derived factor scales: Depression, Somatic, Memory/Attention, Communication, Aggression, and Motor. Respondents are asked to rate items as occurring "never", "rarely", "sometimes", "often", or "always". Using the standardized scoring procedures outlined in the NFI Manual, T-scores were calculated for the Depression sub-scale. Lower T-score indicates less depressive symptomotology.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atomoxetine
n=25 Participants
40mg atomoxetine twice a day for 2 weeks
atomoxetine :
|
Placebo
n=28 Participants
Placebo twice a day for two weeks
placebo :
|
|---|---|---|
|
Neurobehavioral Functioning Inventory Depression Subscale
|
27.53 T-score
Interval 24.87 to 30.18
|
29.47 T-score
Interval 26.92 to 32.02
|
Adverse Events
Atomoxetine
Placebo
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place