Implantable Loop Recorder Versus Conventional Ambulatory Monitoring in Detecting Atrial Fibrillation After Pulmonary Vein Isolation

NCT ID: NCT00697359

Last Updated: 2016-09-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

57 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-06-30

Study Completion Date

2016-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary aim of the study is to assess the efficacy of continuous rhythm monitoring with an implantable loop recorder (ILR) compared to conventional ambulatory electrocardiography in detecting episodes of atrial fibrillation after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). The secondary aim is to assess the efficacy of PVI during a two years follow-up and to assess the reliability of the implantable loop recorder in detecting atrial fibrillation.

50 patients will be enrolled into the study. After enrollment an implantable loop recorder will be implanted at least 6 weeks before scheduled PVI. All patients will be followed for 24 months after PVI. During the follow-up period a 72-hours ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring will be performed at 1, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. Transthoracic echocardiography will be performed at enrollment, 3, 12, and 24 months after PVI. Moreover, quality of life will be assessed at baseline, and 6 and 12 months after PVI.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Atrial Fibrillation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

There is only one group in this cohort study.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Implantable loop recorder (ILR)

Intervention Type DEVICE

The ILR will be implanted subcutaneous following standard surgical procedure.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Implantable loop recorder (ILR)

The ILR will be implanted subcutaneous following standard surgical procedure.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

All patients in the group get an ILR implanted.

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age =\> 30 to =\< 70 years
* Documentation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
* Documentation of persistent atrial fibrillation of \< 3 months duration termination either spontaneously or by DC cardioversion
* Scheduled pulmonary vein isolation
* Treatment with at least one class IC or class III antiarrhythmic drug tried

Exclusion Criteria

* Atrial fibrillation episodes \> 3 months or permanent atrial fibrillation
* No indication for pulmonary vein isolation
* Contraindications for anticoagulation treatment
* No informed consent
Minimum Eligible Age

30 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Odense University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Axel Brandes

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Axel Brandes, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Odense University Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Odense University Hospital

Odense, , Denmark

Site Status

Academician E. N. Meshalkin

Novosibirsk, , Russia

Site Status

Örebro University Hospital

Örebro, , Sweden

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark Russia Sweden

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bjorkenheim A, Brandes A, Magnuson A, Chemnitz A, Edvardsson N, Poci D. Patient-Reported Outcomes in Relation to Continuously Monitored Rhythm Before and During 2 Years After Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Using a Disease-Specific and a Generic Instrument. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Feb 24;7(5):e008362. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.008362.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29478027 (View on PubMed)

Bjorkenheim A, Brandes A, Chemnitz A, Magnuson A, Edvardsson N, Poci D. Rhythm Control and Its Relation to Symptoms during the First Two Years after Radiofrequency Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2016 Sep;39(9):914-25. doi: 10.1111/pace.12916. Epub 2016 Aug 5.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 27418324 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

S-20080066

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

AF-ABL-R-001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.