Circuit Training and Motivational Interviewing to Reduce Type 2 Diabetes in Youth
NCT ID: NCT00693511
Last Updated: 2017-09-25
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
45 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2007-10-31
2012-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
* Control group (delayed circuit training intervention; n=15)
* Circuit training group (strength + aerobic training; 2 times per week; n=15)
* Circuit training (same as above) + weekly motivational interviewing sessions (n=15)
Specific Aim 1: To examine the effects of a 16-week circuit training program on adiposity, insulin dynamics, other associated hormones and adipocytokines, cardiorespiratory fitness, and muscular strength in overweight Latina adolescent girls. Hypothesis 1: Participation in the circuit-training program will result in significant improvements in both physiological and metabolic outcomes, including: a) body composition as measured by DEXA, b) fat distribution as measured by MRI, c) adipose tissue hormones (e.g. leptin, adiponectin, TNF-α) as measured by fasting blood samples, d) insulin sensitivity and secretion as measured by frequently sampled intravenous tolerance test, e) aerobic fitness as measured by the single stage submaximal treadmill test, and f) increase muscular strength as measured by repetition maximums.
Specific Aim 2: To examine the incremental effects of adding the motivational interviewing sessions to the circuit training on self-selected ad libitum physical activity during a 5-hour observational period, habitual physical activity levels using 7 day accelerometry, and the meanings and motivation to exercise using questionnaires before and after the intervention. Hypothesis 2: The addition of motivational interviewing will encourage and empower participants to be more active outside of the intervention and foster healthy physical activity behaviors in daily life. Improvements in physical activity behaviors will lead to greater improvements in all other health outcomes listed in specific aim 1 compared to circuit training alone and control group.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Circuit Training
Participants received CT exercise training two times per week for approximately 60-90 min per session for 16 wk
Circuit Training
Circuit Training (aerobic + strength training 2 times per week for 16 weeks)
Circuit training + motivational interviewing
Participants in the CT + MI group received the same CT classes but also received four individual MI and four group MI sessions throughout the 16-wk program by two trained research staff
Circuit training + motivational interviewing
Circuit training (aerobic + strength training 2 times per week for 16 weeks) + motivational interviewing (4 individual + 4 group sessions)
Control
No intervention
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Circuit Training
Circuit Training (aerobic + strength training 2 times per week for 16 weeks)
Circuit training + motivational interviewing
Circuit training (aerobic + strength training 2 times per week for 16 weeks) + motivational interviewing (4 individual + 4 group sessions)
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Gender \& Age: Females from grades 9th to 12th (approximately 14-18 years of age). We chose to study adolescents because pubertal youth will likely possess the requisite hormonal milieu needed to elicit physiologically and metabolic changes in response to resistance and aerobic training. In addition physical activity declines are more pronounced in minority females. By limiting the study to just females, we will retain a more homogenous group. This will eliminate sensitive gender issues related to exercise such as body image concerns, goal setting, and motivations for behavioral changes. To reduce effects of the menstrual cycle, all females will be tested during the follicular phase, while those with irregular/unpredictable menses will be studied at random times.
* Latino origin all four grandparents must be of Hispanic heritage (reported on screening forms). This approach is consistent with all of our previous and ongoing work.
Exclusion Criteria
* Previously diagnosed with any major illness since birth (e.g. chronic birth asphyxia, cancer, etc.).
* Children with type 1 and/or type 2 diabetes will be excluded and referred to a physician. Children with impaired glucose tolerance (fasting glucose \>100 mg/dL during a fasting blood draw) and/or conditions associated with insulin resistance (e.g. acanthosis nigricans, hypertension, dyslipidemia) will be eligible, as long as they are not receiving treatment and meet other eligibility criteria.
* Children who have any physical, cognitive, or psychological disabilities that would prevent them from participating in an exercise program.
* Currently, or in the past 6 months, involved with any dietary, physical activity or weight loss program.
* Children who live farther than 20 miles away from the GCRC.
14 Years
18 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
NIH
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jaimie N Davis, PhD, RD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Southern California
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Veronica Atkins Lifestyle Intervention Laboratory
Los Angeles, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.