Trial Outcomes & Findings for Study In Patients With Overactive Bladder Treated With Toviaz® After Failure Of Previous Therapy (NCT NCT00691093)
NCT ID: NCT00691093
Last Updated: 2018-11-02
Results Overview
Micturition frequency: mean number of 'day time' (i.e., the time the participant was awake) micturitions per 24 hours and calculated as the total number of 'day time' urinations, divided by the total diary days collected at that visit.
COMPLETED
823 participants
Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3 or Early Termination (ET)
2018-11-02
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Fesoterodine 4 mg or 8 mg
The recommended starting dose was 4 mg once daily. Based upon individual response, the dose was increased to 8 mg once daily.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
823
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
816
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
7
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Fesoterodine 4 mg or 8 mg
The recommended starting dose was 4 mg once daily. Based upon individual response, the dose was increased to 8 mg once daily.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Lack of Efficacy
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Ongoing at Date of Cut-Off
|
4
|
Baseline Characteristics
Study In Patients With Overactive Bladder Treated With Toviaz® After Failure Of Previous Therapy
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=823 Participants
The recommended starting dose was 4 mg once daily. Based upon individual response, the dose was increased to 8 mg once daily.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Customized
<18 years
|
11 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
18-44 years
|
102 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
44-64
|
497 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
>=65 years
|
213 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
574 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
249 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3 or Early Termination (ET)Population: The full analysis set (FAS) included all patients who received at least one dose of the study medication and who had at least one post baseline efficacy measurement.
Micturition frequency: mean number of 'day time' (i.e., the time the participant was awake) micturitions per 24 hours and calculated as the total number of 'day time' urinations, divided by the total diary days collected at that visit.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=754 Participants
|
Fesoterodine 8 mg
n=11 Participants
|
Increase of Dose From 4 mg to 8 mg Due to Lack of Efficacy
n=57 Participants
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Micturition Frequency Per 24 Hours at Each Visit
Baseline
|
11.661 episodes
Standard Deviation 2.8565
|
10.636 episodes
Standard Deviation 3.4269
|
12.664 episodes
Standard Deviation 2.7612
|
|
Change From Baseline in Micturition Frequency Per 24 Hours at Each Visit
Visit 2 (Month 1)
|
-2.306 episodes
Standard Deviation 1.5773
|
-2.303 episodes
Standard Deviation 1.2863
|
-1.566 episodes
Standard Deviation 1.4241
|
|
Change From Baseline in Micturition Frequency Per 24 Hours at Each Visit
Visit 3 (Month 2)
|
-3.482 episodes
Standard Deviation 1.9022
|
-2.848 episodes
Standard Deviation 1.1772
|
-3.160 episodes
Standard Deviation 1.7571
|
|
Change From Baseline in Micturition Frequency Per 24 Hours at Each Visit
Visit 4 (Month 3 or ET)
|
-4.180 episodes
Standard Deviation 2.1018
|
-4.000 episodes
Standard Deviation 1.2293
|
-4.031 episodes
Standard Deviation 1.8995
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3 or ETPopulation: FAS
Nocturnal frequency: mean number of 'night time' (the time the participant was asleep and the urge to urinate woke him/her up) micturitions and calculated as the total number of 'night time' urinations, divided by the total diary days collected at that visit.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=754 Participants
|
Fesoterodine 8 mg
n=11 Participants
|
Increase of Dose From 4 mg to 8 mg Due to Lack of Efficacy
n=57 Participants
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Nocturnal Micturition Frequency Per 24 Hours at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4
Baseline
|
3.027 episodes
Standard Deviation 1.2593
|
4.000 episodes
Standard Deviation 1.4220
|
3.528 episodes
Standard Deviation 1.3452
|
|
Change From Baseline in Nocturnal Micturition Frequency Per 24 Hours at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4
Visit 2 (Month 1)
|
-1.104 episodes
Standard Deviation 0.7960
|
-1.212 episodes
Standard Deviation 0.8065
|
-0.915 episodes
Standard Deviation 0.9115
|
|
Change From Baseline in Nocturnal Micturition Frequency Per 24 Hours at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4
Visit 3 (Month 2)
|
-1.621 episodes
Standard Deviation 0.9281
|
-1.848 episodes
Standard Deviation 1.1290
|
-1.613 episodes
Standard Deviation 1.0928
|
|
Change From Baseline in Nocturnal Micturition Frequency Per 24 Hours at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4
Visit 4 (Month 3 or ET)
|
-1.914 episodes
Standard Deviation 1.0820
|
-2.030 episodes
Standard Deviation 1.3035
|
-2.072 episodes
Standard Deviation 1.0907
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3 or ETPopulation: FAS
UEF: mean number of micturition related urgency episodes per 24 hours and calculated as the total number of 'urgency' urinations (i.e., sudden urges to urinate and problems to delay micturition) divided by 3 (or if data for 3 days were not available, over the total number of diary days collected at that visit).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=754 Participants
|
Fesoterodine 8 mg
n=11 Participants
|
Increase of Dose From 4 mg to 8 mg Due to Lack of Efficacy
n=57 Participants
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Urgency Episode Frequency (UEF) Per 24 Hours at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4
Baseline
|
4.412 episodes
Standard Deviation 2.4355
|
4.697 episodes
Standard Deviation 1.9914
|
5.587 episodes
Standard Deviation 3.7759
|
|
Change From Baseline in Urgency Episode Frequency (UEF) Per 24 Hours at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4
Visit 2 (Month 1)
|
-1.890 episodes
Standard Deviation 1.5967
|
-1.697 episodes
Standard Deviation 0.9827
|
-1.650 episodes
Standard Deviation 1.3065
|
|
Change From Baseline in Urgency Episode Frequency (UEF) Per 24 Hours at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4
Visit 3 (Month 2)
|
-2.736 episodes
Standard Deviation 1.9249
|
-2.182 episodes
Standard Deviation 1.4557
|
-2.895 episodes
Standard Deviation 2.6468
|
|
Change From Baseline in Urgency Episode Frequency (UEF) Per 24 Hours at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4
Visit 4 (Month 3 or ET)
|
-3.127 episodes
Standard Deviation 2.0210
|
-2.636 episodes
Standard Deviation 1.7221
|
-3.814 episodes
Standard Deviation 3.0690
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3 or ETPopulation: FAS
The mean number of UUI episodes: total number of UUI episodes, divided by the total diary days collected at that visit.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=754 Participants
|
Fesoterodine 8 mg
n=11 Participants
|
Increase of Dose From 4 mg to 8 mg Due to Lack of Efficacy
n=57 Participants
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4
Baseline
|
2.601 episodes
Standard Deviation 1.7127
|
2.933 episodes
Standard Deviation 1.2551
|
3.467 episodes
Standard Deviation 2.4484
|
|
Change From Baseline in Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4
Visit 2 (Month 1)
|
-1.209 episodes
Standard Deviation 1.0891
|
-1.067 episodes
Standard Deviation 1.1738
|
-1.190 episodes
Standard Deviation 1.2532
|
|
Change From Baseline in Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4
Visit 3 (Month 2)
|
-1.806 episodes
Standard Deviation 1.3107
|
-1.583 episodes
Standard Deviation 1.4974
|
-1.781 episodes
Standard Deviation 1.4729
|
|
Change From Baseline in Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4
Visit 4 (Month 3 or ET)
|
-2.065 episodes
Standard Deviation 1.4582
|
-1.733 episodes
Standard Deviation 1.6836
|
-2.362 episodes
Standard Deviation 1.6477
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3 or ETPopulation: FAS
The PVR urine volume: measured by an ultrasound scan.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=754 Participants
|
Fesoterodine 8 mg
n=11 Participants
|
Increase of Dose From 4 mg to 8 mg Due to Lack of Efficacy
n=57 Participants
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Post Void Residual (PVR) Urine Volume at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4
Baseline
|
27.932 ml
Standard Deviation 27.6079
|
42.000 ml
Standard Deviation 35.6059
|
24.867 ml
Standard Deviation 27.7108
|
|
Change From Baseline in Post Void Residual (PVR) Urine Volume at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4
Visit 2 (Month 1)
|
-6.650 ml
Standard Deviation 16.4784
|
-12.800 ml
Standard Deviation 13.2313
|
-2.364 ml
Standard Deviation 11.2500
|
|
Change From Baseline in Post Void Residual (PVR) Urine Volume at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4
Visit 3 (Month 2)
|
-9.864 ml
Standard Deviation 20.2348
|
-18.700 ml
Standard Deviation 22.2663
|
-5.791 ml
Standard Deviation 17.8493
|
|
Change From Baseline in Post Void Residual (PVR) Urine Volume at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4
Visit 4 (Month 3 or ET)
|
-12.800 ml
Standard Deviation 23.9575
|
-21.000 ml
Standard Deviation 24.3584
|
-7.415 ml
Standard Deviation 21.7658
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3 or ETPopulation: The safety analysis set (SAS) included all subjects who enrolled in the study, signed informed consent and received at least one dose of study medication.
The patients global evaluation of study medication was assessed via the question 'how would you rate your overall response to the study medication?' and was assessed on the four point categorical scale, ranging from 'Poor' to 'Excellent'.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=823 Participants
|
Fesoterodine 8 mg
|
Increase of Dose From 4 mg to 8 mg Due to Lack of Efficacy
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Patient's Global Evaluation of Fesoterodine
Excellent
|
536 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Patient's Global Evaluation of Fesoterodine
Good
|
252 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Patient's Global Evaluation of Fesoterodine
Fair
|
22 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Patient's Global Evaluation of Fesoterodine
Poor
|
10 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Patient's Global Evaluation of Fesoterodine
Missing
|
3 participants
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 weeksPopulation: SAS
Clinical global evaluation of study medication was assessed via the question 'how would you rate the study medication the patient received for overactive bladder?,' and was assessed on the four point categorical scale, ranging from 'Poor' to 'Excellent.'
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=823 Participants
|
Fesoterodine 8 mg
|
Increase of Dose From 4 mg to 8 mg Due to Lack of Efficacy
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Clinical Global Evaluation of Fesoterodine
Excellent
|
513 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Clinical Global Evaluation of Fesoterodine
Good
|
274 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Clinical Global Evaluation of Fesoterodine
Fair
|
24 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Clinical Global Evaluation of Fesoterodine
Poor
|
9 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Clinical Global Evaluation of Fesoterodine
Missing
|
3 participants
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 3 or ETPopulation: FAS
Overall Treatment Effect Scale: 3 questions from which a numeric score was derived. If a subject answered '(2) About the same' to question 1 then a score of 0 was given. If a subject answered '(1) Worse' to question 1, then a score between -7=a very great deal worse to -1=Almost the same, hardly worse at all was given depending on severity of their symptoms (determined from answer to question 2). If a subject answered '(3) Better' to question 1, then a score ranging from 1=Almost the same, hardly better at all to 7=A very great deal better, depending on their answer to question 3, was given.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=754 Participants
|
Fesoterodine 8 mg
n=11 Participants
|
Increase of Dose From 4 mg to 8 mg Due to Lack of Efficacy
n=57 Participants
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Efficacy and Tolerability Compared to Previous Medication (Overall Treatment Effect Scale) at Visit 4
|
5.661 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.1663
|
5.818 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.9816
|
4.702 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.7925
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3 or ETPopulation: FAS
Symptom severity/bother score: sub-section of the OAB-q consists of 8 questions. Each item assessed on ordinal scale (0=Not at all to 5=a very great deal). Score=sum of scores for items 1 to 8 and a further 2 points were added if subject was male. Lowest possible score=0 and highest=42. Data were transformed onto a 0 to 100 scale and analyzed based on the transformed score: Transformed Symptom Bother Score=\[(Actual Total Raw Score minus Lowest possible value of raw score) divided by Range\] multiplied by 100. Higher scores=greater symptom severity or bother and lower=minimal symptom severity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=754 Participants
|
Fesoterodine 8 mg
n=11 Participants
|
Increase of Dose From 4 mg to 8 mg Due to Lack of Efficacy
n=57 Participants
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q): Symptom Severity/Bother Scale
Baseline
|
59.263 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.5239
|
70.000 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.1242
|
64.737 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.1696
|
|
Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q): Symptom Severity/Bother Scale
Visit 4 (Month 3 or ET)
|
25.147 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.3690
|
35.682 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.7520
|
32.719 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.9115
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3 or ETPopulation: FAS
Symptom severity/bother score: sub-section of the OAB-q consists of 8 questions. Each item assessed on ordinal scale (0=Not at all to 5=a very great deal). Score=sum of scores for items 1 to 8 and a further 2 points were added if subject was male. Lowest possible score=0 and highest=42. Data were transformed onto a 0 to 100 scale and analyzed based on the transformed score: Transformed Symptom Bother Score=\[(Actual Total Raw Score minus Lowest possible value of raw score) divided by Range\] multiplied by 100. Higher scores=greater symptom severity or bother and lower=minimal symptom severity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=754 Participants
|
Fesoterodine 8 mg
n=11 Participants
|
Increase of Dose From 4 mg to 8 mg Due to Lack of Efficacy
n=57 Participants
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Total Scores of OAB-q at Visit 4
|
-34.101 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.0799
|
-34.318 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.4928
|
-32.018 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.7183
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 1, Month 2, Month 3 or ETPopulation: FAS
Participant's perception of treatment response assessment since the previous visit was noted at each visit. Time to onset of response was calculated in weeks from start of treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=754 Participants
|
Fesoterodine 8 mg
n=11 Participants
|
Increase of Dose From 4 mg to 8 mg Due to Lack of Efficacy
n=57 Participants
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Time To Onset Of Treatment Response
|
3.0 weeks
Full Range 1.27 • Interval 0.0 to 10.0
|
3.0 weeks
Full Range 1.10 • Interval 1.0 to 4.0
|
3.0 weeks
Full Range 2.72 • Interval 1.0 to 13.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 3 or ETPopulation: SAS
Number of subjects that changed doses throughout the study period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=823 Participants
|
Fesoterodine 8 mg
|
Increase of Dose From 4 mg to 8 mg Due to Lack of Efficacy
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Study Doses
Increased
|
57 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Study Doses
Stayed the same
|
766 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Study Doses
Decreased
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Study Doses
Fluctuated
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 3 or ETPopulation: SAS
Possible change in the dose and the reasons for the change were collected and documented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Fesoterodine 4 mg
n=823 Participants
|
Fesoterodine 8 mg
|
Increase of Dose From 4 mg to 8 mg Due to Lack of Efficacy
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Reasons for Study Treatment Dose Changes
Insufficient response
|
1 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Reasons for Study Treatment Dose Changes
Inefectivity, Not Sufficient Effectivity
|
22 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Reasons for Study Treatment Dose Changes
Infectivity
|
29 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Reasons for Study Treatment Dose Changes
Insufficient (efficiency) effect
|
1 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Reasons for Study Treatment Dose Changes
Poor overall response
|
1 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Reasons for Study Treatment Dose Changes
Missing
|
4 participants
|
—
|
—
|
Adverse Events
Fesoterodine 4 mg or 8 mg
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Fesoterodine 4 mg or 8 mg
n=823 participants at risk
All Subjects
|
|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
1.3%
11/823
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dry mouth
|
8.0%
66/823
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal disorder
|
0.12%
1/823
|
|
General disorders
Adverse event
|
0.24%
2/823
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
0.12%
1/823
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Pfizer has the right to review disclosures, requesting a delay of \< 60 days. Investigator will postpone single center publications until after disclosure of pooled data (all sites), \< 12 months from study completion/termination at all participating sites. Investigator may not disclose previously undisclosed confidential information other than study results.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER