Trial Outcomes & Findings for A 12 Month Core Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Ranibizumab (Intravitreal Injections) in Patients With Visual Impairment Due to Diabetic Macular Edema and a 24 Month Open-label Extension Study (NCT NCT00687804)
NCT ID: NCT00687804
Last Updated: 2013-04-01
Results Overview
Visual acuity (VA) was assessed on both eyes during every study visit using best correction determined from protocol refraction. VA measurements (number of letters correctly identified) were performed with the patient in a sitting position using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-like visual acuity testing charts at a testing distance of 4 meters.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
345 participants
Baseline through the end of study (Month 12)
2013-04-01
Participant Flow
Participants who completed the 12 month randomized core study CRFB002D2301 were eligible to participate in the 24 month open-label extension study CRFB002D2301E1. The reporting groups for the participants in the extension study are according to their assigned treatment groups in the core study.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg was administered monthly by intravitreal injection in the study eye for 3 months. After the third injection, treatment was suspended if either one of the following criteria was met:
Improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) could not be attributed to treatment at the last 2 visits, in the opinion of the investigator, or BCVA \> 84 letters (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/20) was observed at the last 2 last visits.
Patients also received sham laser treatment on Day 1 and subsequently at intervals of at least 3 months, if deemed necessary by the evaluating physician.
Active/sham laser treatment was always administered before (sham) intravitreal injections. The minimum interval between the 2 treatments was 30 minutes.
In the extension study at the investigator's discretion, patients received open-label ranibizumab 0.5 mg intravitreal injections once a month until stable vision was reached (a maximum of 24 injections) and could receive laser therapy.
|
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg + Laser
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg was administered monthly by intravitreal injection in the study eye for 3 months. After the third injection, treatment was suspended if either one of the following criteria was met:
Improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) could not be attributed to treatment at the last 2 visits, in the opinion of the investigator, or BCVA \> 84 letters (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/20) was observed at the last 2 last visits.
Patients also received active laser treatment on Day 1 and subsequently at intervals of at least 3 months, if deemed necessary by the physician.
Active/sham laser treatment was always administered before (sham) intravitreal injections. The minimum interval between the 2 treatments was 30 minutes.
In the extension study at the investigator's discretion, patients received open-label ranibizumab 0.5 mg intravitreal injections once a month until stable vision was reached (a maximum of 24 injections) and could receive laser therapy.
|
Laser
Active laser photocoagulation treatment was administered on Day 1 and at intervals of at least 3 months, if deemed necessary by the evaluating physician. Patients also received monthly sham intravitreal injection in the study eye for 3 consecutive months. After the third injection, treatment was suspended if either one of the following criteria was met:
Improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) could not be attributed to treatment at the last 2 visits, in the opinion of the investigator, or BCVA \> 84 letters (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/20) was observed at the last 2 last visits.
Active/sham laser treatment was always administered before (sham) intravitreal injections. The minimum interval between the 2 treatments was 30 minutes.
In the extension study at the investigator's discretion, patients received open-label ranibizumab 0.5 mg intravitreal injections once a month until stable vision was reached (a maximum of 24 injections) and could receive laser therapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Core Study
STARTED
|
116
|
118
|
111
|
|
Core Study
COMPLETED
|
102
|
103
|
98
|
|
Core Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
14
|
15
|
13
|
|
Open-Label Extension Study
STARTED
|
83
|
83
|
74
|
|
Open-Label Extension Study
Did Not Receive Ranibizumab in Extension
|
16
|
21
|
15
|
|
Open-Label Extension Study
COMPLETED
|
73
|
72
|
63
|
|
Open-Label Extension Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
10
|
11
|
11
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg was administered monthly by intravitreal injection in the study eye for 3 months. After the third injection, treatment was suspended if either one of the following criteria was met:
Improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) could not be attributed to treatment at the last 2 visits, in the opinion of the investigator, or BCVA \> 84 letters (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/20) was observed at the last 2 last visits.
Patients also received sham laser treatment on Day 1 and subsequently at intervals of at least 3 months, if deemed necessary by the evaluating physician.
Active/sham laser treatment was always administered before (sham) intravitreal injections. The minimum interval between the 2 treatments was 30 minutes.
In the extension study at the investigator's discretion, patients received open-label ranibizumab 0.5 mg intravitreal injections once a month until stable vision was reached (a maximum of 24 injections) and could receive laser therapy.
|
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg + Laser
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg was administered monthly by intravitreal injection in the study eye for 3 months. After the third injection, treatment was suspended if either one of the following criteria was met:
Improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) could not be attributed to treatment at the last 2 visits, in the opinion of the investigator, or BCVA \> 84 letters (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/20) was observed at the last 2 last visits.
Patients also received active laser treatment on Day 1 and subsequently at intervals of at least 3 months, if deemed necessary by the physician.
Active/sham laser treatment was always administered before (sham) intravitreal injections. The minimum interval between the 2 treatments was 30 minutes.
In the extension study at the investigator's discretion, patients received open-label ranibizumab 0.5 mg intravitreal injections once a month until stable vision was reached (a maximum of 24 injections) and could receive laser therapy.
|
Laser
Active laser photocoagulation treatment was administered on Day 1 and at intervals of at least 3 months, if deemed necessary by the evaluating physician. Patients also received monthly sham intravitreal injection in the study eye for 3 consecutive months. After the third injection, treatment was suspended if either one of the following criteria was met:
Improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) could not be attributed to treatment at the last 2 visits, in the opinion of the investigator, or BCVA \> 84 letters (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/20) was observed at the last 2 last visits.
Active/sham laser treatment was always administered before (sham) intravitreal injections. The minimum interval between the 2 treatments was 30 minutes.
In the extension study at the investigator's discretion, patients received open-label ranibizumab 0.5 mg intravitreal injections once a month until stable vision was reached (a maximum of 24 injections) and could receive laser therapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Core Study
Adverse Event
|
5
|
3
|
3
|
|
Core Study
Abnormal laboratory value(s)
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
Core Study
Lack of Efficacy
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
|
Core Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
4
|
7
|
7
|
|
Core Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
|
Core Study
Death
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
|
Core Study
Protocol Violation
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
|
Open-Label Extension Study
Adverse Event
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
|
Open-Label Extension Study
Subject withdrew consent
|
3
|
4
|
4
|
|
Open-Label Extension Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
|
Open-Label Extension Study
Administrative problems
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
|
Open-Label Extension Study
Death
|
2
|
3
|
3
|
Baseline Characteristics
A 12 Month Core Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Ranibizumab (Intravitreal Injections) in Patients With Visual Impairment Due to Diabetic Macular Edema and a 24 Month Open-label Extension Study
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg
n=116 Participants
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg was administered monthly by intravitreal injection in the study eye for 3 months. After the third injection, treatment was suspended if either one of the following criteria was met:
Improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) could not be attributed to treatment at the last 2 visits, in the opinion of the investigator, or BCVA \> 84 letters (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/20) was observed at the last 2 last visits.
Patients also received sham laser treatment on Day 1 and subsequently at intervals of at least 3 months, if deemed necessary by the evaluating physician.
Active/sham laser treatment was always administered before (sham) intravitreal injections. The minimum interval between the 2 treatments was 30 minutes.
|
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg + Laser
n=118 Participants
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg was administered monthly by intravitreal injection in the study eye for 3 months. After the third injection, treatment was suspended if either one of the following criteria was met:
Improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) could not be attributed to treatment at the last 2 visits, in the opinion of the investigator, or BCVA \> 84 letters (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/20) was observed at the last 2 last visits.
Patients also received active laser treatment on Day 1 and subsequently at intervals of at least 3 months, if deemed necessary by the evaluating physician.
Active/sham laser treatment was always administered before (sham) intravitreal injections. The minimum interval between the 2 treatments was 30 minutes.
|
Laser
n=111 Participants
Laser photocoagulation treatment was administered on Day 1 and subsequently at intervals of at least 3 months, if deemed necessary by the evaluating physician. Patients also received monthly sham intravitreal injection in the study eye for 3 consecutive months. After the third injection, treatment was suspended if either one of the following criteria was met:
Improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) could not be attributed to treatment at the last 2 visits, in the opinion of the investigator, or BCVA \> 84 letters (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/20) was observed at the last 2 last visits.
Active/sham laser treatment was always administered before (sham) intravitreal injections. The minimum interval between the 2 treatments was 30 minutes.
|
Total
n=345 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age Continuous
|
62.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.29 • n=5 Participants
|
64.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.15 • n=7 Participants
|
63.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.81 • n=5 Participants
|
63.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.75 • n=4 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
< 55 years
|
24 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
51 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
55 - <65 years
|
41 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
42 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
53 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
136 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
65 - <75 years
|
40 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
53 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
31 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
124 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
>=75 years
|
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
34 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
43 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
48 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
53 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
144 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
73 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
70 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
58 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
201 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline through the end of study (Month 12)Population: Full analysis set consists of all patients who received at least one application of study treatment and had at least one post-baseline assessment for BCVA. Following the intent to treat principle, patients were analyzed according to the treatment assigned. Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) imputation was utilized.
Visual acuity (VA) was assessed on both eyes during every study visit using best correction determined from protocol refraction. VA measurements (number of letters correctly identified) were performed with the patient in a sitting position using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-like visual acuity testing charts at a testing distance of 4 meters.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg
n=115 Participants
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg was administered monthly by intravitreal injection in the study eye for 3 months. After the third injection, treatment was suspended if either one of the following criteria was met:
Improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) could not be attributed to treatment at the last 2 visits, in the opinion of the investigator, or BCVA \> 84 letters (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/20) was observed at the last 2 last visits.
Patients also received sham laser treatment on Day 1 and subsequently at intervals of at least 3 months, if deemed necessary by the evaluating physician.
Active/sham laser treatment was always administered before (sham) intravitreal injections. The minimum interval between the 2 treatments was 30 minutes.
|
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg + Laser
n=118 Participants
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg was administered monthly by intravitreal injection in the study eye for 3 months. After the third injection, treatment was suspended if either one of the following criteria was met:
Improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) could not be attributed to treatment at the last 2 visits, in the opinion of the investigator, or BCVA \> 84 letters (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/20) was observed at the last 2 last visits.
Patients also received active laser treatment on Day 1 and subsequently at intervals of at least 3 months, if deemed necessary by the evaluating physician.
Active/sham laser treatment was always administered before (sham) intravitreal injections. The minimum interval between the 2 treatments was 30 minutes.
|
Laser
n=110 Participants
Laser photocoagulation treatment was administered on Day 1 and subsequently at intervals of at least 3 months, if deemed necessary by the evaluating physician. Patients also received monthly sham intravitreal injection in the study eye for 3 consecutive months. After the third injection, treatment was suspended if either one of the following criteria was met:
Improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) could not be attributed to treatment at the last 2 visits, in the opinion of the investigator, or BCVA \> 84 letters (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/20) was observed at the last 2 last visits.
Active/sham laser treatment was always administered before (sham) intravitreal injections. The minimum interval between the 2 treatments was 30 minutes.
|
Laser Without Ranibizumab in Extension
Active laser photocoagulation treatment was administered on Day 1 and at intervals of at least 3 months, if deemed necessary by the evaluating physician. Patients also received monthly sham intravitreal injection in the study eye for 3 consecutive months. After the third injection, treatment was suspended if either one of the following criteria was met:
Improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) could not be attributed to treatment at the last 2 visits, in the opinion of the investigator, or BCVA \> 84 letters (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/20) was observed at the last 2 last visits.
Active/sham laser treatment was always administered before (sham) intravitreal injections. The minimum interval between the 2 treatments was 30 minutes.
In the extension study at the investigator's discretion, patients received open-label ranibizumab 0.5 mg intravitreal injections once a month until stable vision was reached (a maximum of 24 injections) and could receive laser therapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Core Study: Difference Between the Baseline Level of Visual Acuity (Letters) of the Study Eye and the Mean Visual Acuity Averaged Over All Monthly Post-baseline Assessments From Month 1 to Month 12
Change from Baseline
|
6.1 Letters
Standard Deviation 6.43
|
5.9 Letters
Standard Deviation 7.92
|
0.8 Letters
Standard Deviation 8.56
|
—
|
|
Core Study: Difference Between the Baseline Level of Visual Acuity (Letters) of the Study Eye and the Mean Visual Acuity Averaged Over All Monthly Post-baseline Assessments From Month 1 to Month 12
Average Month 1 to month 12
|
70.8 Letters
Standard Deviation 10.53
|
69.2 Letters
Standard Deviation 11.44
|
63.4 Letters
Standard Deviation 12.26
|
—
|
|
Core Study: Difference Between the Baseline Level of Visual Acuity (Letters) of the Study Eye and the Mean Visual Acuity Averaged Over All Monthly Post-baseline Assessments From Month 1 to Month 12
Baseline
|
64.7 Letters
Standard Deviation 10.07
|
63.4 Letters
Standard Deviation 9.99
|
62.6 Letters
Standard Deviation 11.01
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Extension baseline (Month 12 -end of core study) to Month 36 (end of extension study) [24 Months]Population: Safety Population included all participants who entered the extension and who had at least one safety assessment in the extension study. Participants were grouped according to the treatment assigned in the Core study.
Participants with ocular (occurring in the eye) serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs in the study eye. The study eye is the eye that received the treatment. AEs are the appearance or worsening of any undesirable sign, symptom, or medical condition occurring after starting the study drug even if the event is not considered to be related to study drug. A serious adverse event is defined as an event that is fatal or life-threatening, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, constitutes a congenital anomaly/birth defect, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization or is medically significant. Additional information about adverse events can be found in the Adverse Event section.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg
n=83 Participants
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg was administered monthly by intravitreal injection in the study eye for 3 months. After the third injection, treatment was suspended if either one of the following criteria was met:
Improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) could not be attributed to treatment at the last 2 visits, in the opinion of the investigator, or BCVA \> 84 letters (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/20) was observed at the last 2 last visits.
Patients also received sham laser treatment on Day 1 and subsequently at intervals of at least 3 months, if deemed necessary by the evaluating physician.
Active/sham laser treatment was always administered before (sham) intravitreal injections. The minimum interval between the 2 treatments was 30 minutes.
|
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg + Laser
n=83 Participants
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg was administered monthly by intravitreal injection in the study eye for 3 months. After the third injection, treatment was suspended if either one of the following criteria was met:
Improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) could not be attributed to treatment at the last 2 visits, in the opinion of the investigator, or BCVA \> 84 letters (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/20) was observed at the last 2 last visits.
Patients also received active laser treatment on Day 1 and subsequently at intervals of at least 3 months, if deemed necessary by the evaluating physician.
Active/sham laser treatment was always administered before (sham) intravitreal injections. The minimum interval between the 2 treatments was 30 minutes.
|
Laser
n=59 Participants
Laser photocoagulation treatment was administered on Day 1 and subsequently at intervals of at least 3 months, if deemed necessary by the evaluating physician. Patients also received monthly sham intravitreal injection in the study eye for 3 consecutive months. After the third injection, treatment was suspended if either one of the following criteria was met:
Improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) could not be attributed to treatment at the last 2 visits, in the opinion of the investigator, or BCVA \> 84 letters (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/20) was observed at the last 2 last visits.
Active/sham laser treatment was always administered before (sham) intravitreal injections. The minimum interval between the 2 treatments was 30 minutes.
|
Laser Without Ranibizumab in Extension
n=15 Participants
Active laser photocoagulation treatment was administered on Day 1 and at intervals of at least 3 months, if deemed necessary by the evaluating physician. Patients also received monthly sham intravitreal injection in the study eye for 3 consecutive months. After the third injection, treatment was suspended if either one of the following criteria was met:
Improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) could not be attributed to treatment at the last 2 visits, in the opinion of the investigator, or BCVA \> 84 letters (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/20) was observed at the last 2 last visits.
Active/sham laser treatment was always administered before (sham) intravitreal injections. The minimum interval between the 2 treatments was 30 minutes.
In the extension study at the investigator's discretion, patients received open-label ranibizumab 0.5 mg intravitreal injections once a month until stable vision was reached (a maximum of 24 injections) and could receive laser therapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Extension Study: Percentage of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events (AEs) in the Study Eye in the 24 Month Extension Study
Serious Adverse Events
|
2.4 Percentage of participants
|
1.2 Percentage of participants
|
1.7 Percentage of participants
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
Extension Study: Percentage of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events (AEs) in the Study Eye in the 24 Month Extension Study
Adverse Events
|
56.6 Percentage of participants
|
56.6 Percentage of participants
|
52.5 Percentage of participants
|
40.0 Percentage of participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Extension baseline (Month 12 -end of core study) to Month 36 (end of extension study) [24 Months]Population: Safety Population included all participants who entered the extension and who had at least one safety assessment in the extension study. Participants were grouped according to the treatment assigned in the Core study.
Participants with non-ocular (not occurring in the eye) serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs. AEs are the appearance or worsening of of any undesirable sign, symptom, or medical condition occurring after starting the study drug even if the event is not considered to be related to study drug. A serious adverse event is defined as an event that is fatal or life-threatening, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, constitutes a congenital anomaly/birth defect, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization or is medically significant. Additional information about adverse events can be found in the Adverse Event section.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg
n=83 Participants
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg was administered monthly by intravitreal injection in the study eye for 3 months. After the third injection, treatment was suspended if either one of the following criteria was met:
Improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) could not be attributed to treatment at the last 2 visits, in the opinion of the investigator, or BCVA \> 84 letters (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/20) was observed at the last 2 last visits.
Patients also received sham laser treatment on Day 1 and subsequently at intervals of at least 3 months, if deemed necessary by the evaluating physician.
Active/sham laser treatment was always administered before (sham) intravitreal injections. The minimum interval between the 2 treatments was 30 minutes.
|
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg + Laser
n=83 Participants
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg was administered monthly by intravitreal injection in the study eye for 3 months. After the third injection, treatment was suspended if either one of the following criteria was met:
Improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) could not be attributed to treatment at the last 2 visits, in the opinion of the investigator, or BCVA \> 84 letters (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/20) was observed at the last 2 last visits.
Patients also received active laser treatment on Day 1 and subsequently at intervals of at least 3 months, if deemed necessary by the evaluating physician.
Active/sham laser treatment was always administered before (sham) intravitreal injections. The minimum interval between the 2 treatments was 30 minutes.
|
Laser
n=59 Participants
Laser photocoagulation treatment was administered on Day 1 and subsequently at intervals of at least 3 months, if deemed necessary by the evaluating physician. Patients also received monthly sham intravitreal injection in the study eye for 3 consecutive months. After the third injection, treatment was suspended if either one of the following criteria was met:
Improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) could not be attributed to treatment at the last 2 visits, in the opinion of the investigator, or BCVA \> 84 letters (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/20) was observed at the last 2 last visits.
Active/sham laser treatment was always administered before (sham) intravitreal injections. The minimum interval between the 2 treatments was 30 minutes.
|
Laser Without Ranibizumab in Extension
n=15 Participants
Active laser photocoagulation treatment was administered on Day 1 and at intervals of at least 3 months, if deemed necessary by the evaluating physician. Patients also received monthly sham intravitreal injection in the study eye for 3 consecutive months. After the third injection, treatment was suspended if either one of the following criteria was met:
Improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) could not be attributed to treatment at the last 2 visits, in the opinion of the investigator, or BCVA \> 84 letters (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/20) was observed at the last 2 last visits.
Active/sham laser treatment was always administered before (sham) intravitreal injections. The minimum interval between the 2 treatments was 30 minutes.
In the extension study at the investigator's discretion, patients received open-label ranibizumab 0.5 mg intravitreal injections once a month until stable vision was reached (a maximum of 24 injections) and could receive laser therapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Extension Study: Percentage of Participants With Non-Ocular Adverse Events (AEs) in the 24 Month Extension Study
Serious Adverse Events
|
27.7 Percentage of participants
|
30.1 Percentage of participants
|
37.3 Percentage of participants
|
13.3 Percentage of participants
|
|
Extension Study: Percentage of Participants With Non-Ocular Adverse Events (AEs) in the 24 Month Extension Study
Adverse Events
|
73.5 Percentage of participants
|
73.5 Percentage of participants
|
71.2 Percentage of participants
|
73.3 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 12Population: Full analysis set consists of all patients who received at least one application of study treatment and had at least one post-baseline assessment for BCVA. Following the intent to treat principle, patients were analyzed according to the treatment assigned. Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) imputation was utilized.
Visual acuity (VA) was assessed on both eyes during every study visit using best correction determined from protocol refraction. VA measurements (number of letters correctly identified) were performed with the patient in a sitting position using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-like visual acuity testing charts at a testing distance of 4 meters.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg
n=115 Participants
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg was administered monthly by intravitreal injection in the study eye for 3 months. After the third injection, treatment was suspended if either one of the following criteria was met:
Improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) could not be attributed to treatment at the last 2 visits, in the opinion of the investigator, or BCVA \> 84 letters (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/20) was observed at the last 2 last visits.
Patients also received sham laser treatment on Day 1 and subsequently at intervals of at least 3 months, if deemed necessary by the evaluating physician.
Active/sham laser treatment was always administered before (sham) intravitreal injections. The minimum interval between the 2 treatments was 30 minutes.
|
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg + Laser
n=118 Participants
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg was administered monthly by intravitreal injection in the study eye for 3 months. After the third injection, treatment was suspended if either one of the following criteria was met:
Improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) could not be attributed to treatment at the last 2 visits, in the opinion of the investigator, or BCVA \> 84 letters (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/20) was observed at the last 2 last visits.
Patients also received active laser treatment on Day 1 and subsequently at intervals of at least 3 months, if deemed necessary by the evaluating physician.
Active/sham laser treatment was always administered before (sham) intravitreal injections. The minimum interval between the 2 treatments was 30 minutes.
|
Laser
n=110 Participants
Laser photocoagulation treatment was administered on Day 1 and subsequently at intervals of at least 3 months, if deemed necessary by the evaluating physician. Patients also received monthly sham intravitreal injection in the study eye for 3 consecutive months. After the third injection, treatment was suspended if either one of the following criteria was met:
Improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) could not be attributed to treatment at the last 2 visits, in the opinion of the investigator, or BCVA \> 84 letters (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/20) was observed at the last 2 last visits.
Active/sham laser treatment was always administered before (sham) intravitreal injections. The minimum interval between the 2 treatments was 30 minutes.
|
Laser Without Ranibizumab in Extension
Active laser photocoagulation treatment was administered on Day 1 and at intervals of at least 3 months, if deemed necessary by the evaluating physician. Patients also received monthly sham intravitreal injection in the study eye for 3 consecutive months. After the third injection, treatment was suspended if either one of the following criteria was met:
Improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) could not be attributed to treatment at the last 2 visits, in the opinion of the investigator, or BCVA \> 84 letters (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/20) was observed at the last 2 last visits.
Active/sham laser treatment was always administered before (sham) intravitreal injections. The minimum interval between the 2 treatments was 30 minutes.
In the extension study at the investigator's discretion, patients received open-label ranibizumab 0.5 mg intravitreal injections once a month until stable vision was reached (a maximum of 24 injections) and could receive laser therapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Core Study: Categorized Change in Visual Acuity (Letters) of the Study Eye From Baseline at Month 12
Gain of ≥ 10 letters
|
43 Participants
|
51 Participants
|
17 Participants
|
—
|
|
Core Study: Categorized Change in Visual Acuity (Letters) of the Study Eye From Baseline at Month 12
Loss of ≥ 10 letters
|
4 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
—
|
|
Core Study: Categorized Change in Visual Acuity (Letters) of the Study Eye From Baseline at Month 12
Gain of ≥ 15 letters
|
26 Participants
|
27 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
—
|
|
Core Study: Categorized Change in Visual Acuity (Letters) of the Study Eye From Baseline at Month 12
Loss of ≥ 15 letters
|
1 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 12Population: Full analysis set, utilizing last observation carried forward.
Visual acuity (VA) was assessed on both eyes during every study visit using best correction determined from protocol refraction. VA measurements (number of letters correctly identified) were performed with the patient in a sitting position using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-like visual acuity testing charts at a testing distance of 4 meters.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg
n=115 Participants
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg was administered monthly by intravitreal injection in the study eye for 3 months. After the third injection, treatment was suspended if either one of the following criteria was met:
Improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) could not be attributed to treatment at the last 2 visits, in the opinion of the investigator, or BCVA \> 84 letters (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/20) was observed at the last 2 last visits.
Patients also received sham laser treatment on Day 1 and subsequently at intervals of at least 3 months, if deemed necessary by the evaluating physician.
Active/sham laser treatment was always administered before (sham) intravitreal injections. The minimum interval between the 2 treatments was 30 minutes.
|
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg + Laser
n=118 Participants
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg was administered monthly by intravitreal injection in the study eye for 3 months. After the third injection, treatment was suspended if either one of the following criteria was met:
Improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) could not be attributed to treatment at the last 2 visits, in the opinion of the investigator, or BCVA \> 84 letters (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/20) was observed at the last 2 last visits.
Patients also received active laser treatment on Day 1 and subsequently at intervals of at least 3 months, if deemed necessary by the evaluating physician.
Active/sham laser treatment was always administered before (sham) intravitreal injections. The minimum interval between the 2 treatments was 30 minutes.
|
Laser
n=110 Participants
Laser photocoagulation treatment was administered on Day 1 and subsequently at intervals of at least 3 months, if deemed necessary by the evaluating physician. Patients also received monthly sham intravitreal injection in the study eye for 3 consecutive months. After the third injection, treatment was suspended if either one of the following criteria was met:
Improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) could not be attributed to treatment at the last 2 visits, in the opinion of the investigator, or BCVA \> 84 letters (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/20) was observed at the last 2 last visits.
Active/sham laser treatment was always administered before (sham) intravitreal injections. The minimum interval between the 2 treatments was 30 minutes.
|
Laser Without Ranibizumab in Extension
Active laser photocoagulation treatment was administered on Day 1 and at intervals of at least 3 months, if deemed necessary by the evaluating physician. Patients also received monthly sham intravitreal injection in the study eye for 3 consecutive months. After the third injection, treatment was suspended if either one of the following criteria was met:
Improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) could not be attributed to treatment at the last 2 visits, in the opinion of the investigator, or BCVA \> 84 letters (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/20) was observed at the last 2 last visits.
Active/sham laser treatment was always administered before (sham) intravitreal injections. The minimum interval between the 2 treatments was 30 minutes.
In the extension study at the investigator's discretion, patients received open-label ranibizumab 0.5 mg intravitreal injections once a month until stable vision was reached (a maximum of 24 injections) and could receive laser therapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Core Study: Mean Change From Baseline in Visual Acuity (Letters) of the Study Eye Over Time
Month 4
|
5.3 Letters
Standard Error 0.68
|
5.4 Letters
Standard Error 0.69
|
0.5 Letters
Standard Error 0.92
|
—
|
|
Core Study: Mean Change From Baseline in Visual Acuity (Letters) of the Study Eye Over Time
Month 1
|
2.9 Letters
Standard Error 0.49
|
3.1 Letters
Standard Error 0.56
|
0.5 Letters
Standard Error 0.64
|
—
|
|
Core Study: Mean Change From Baseline in Visual Acuity (Letters) of the Study Eye Over Time
Month 2
|
4.4 Letters
Standard Error 0.64
|
4.9 Letters
Standard Error 0.56
|
0.4 Letters
Standard Error 0.84
|
—
|
|
Core Study: Mean Change From Baseline in Visual Acuity (Letters) of the Study Eye Over Time
Month 3
|
5.9 Letters
Standard Error 0.65
|
5.8 Letters
Standard Error 0.65
|
-0.5 Letters
Standard Error 0.92
|
—
|
|
Core Study: Mean Change From Baseline in Visual Acuity (Letters) of the Study Eye Over Time
Month 5
|
5.9 Letters
Standard Error 0.68
|
5.7 Letters
Standard Error 0.76
|
0.9 Letters
Standard Error 0.88
|
—
|
|
Core Study: Mean Change From Baseline in Visual Acuity (Letters) of the Study Eye Over Time
Month 6
|
6.7 Letters
Standard Error 0.68
|
6.2 Letters
Standard Error 0.78
|
0.9 Letters
Standard Error 0.94
|
—
|
|
Core Study: Mean Change From Baseline in Visual Acuity (Letters) of the Study Eye Over Time
Month 7
|
7.0 Letters
Standard Error 0.72
|
6.5 Letters
Standard Error 0.84
|
1.1 Letters
Standard Error 0.98
|
—
|
|
Core Study: Mean Change From Baseline in Visual Acuity (Letters) of the Study Eye Over Time
Month 8
|
7.1 Letters
Standard Error 0.75
|
6.4 Letters
Standard Error 1.06
|
1.3 Letters
Standard Error 0.96
|
—
|
|
Core Study: Mean Change From Baseline in Visual Acuity (Letters) of the Study Eye Over Time
Month 9
|
6.8 Letters
Standard Error 0.76
|
6.8 Letters
Standard Error 1.05
|
1.4 Letters
Standard Error 0.90
|
—
|
|
Core Study: Mean Change From Baseline in Visual Acuity (Letters) of the Study Eye Over Time
Month 10
|
7.3 Letters
Standard Error 0.77
|
6.4 Letters
Standard Error 1.04
|
0.8 Letters
Standard Error 1.00
|
—
|
|
Core Study: Mean Change From Baseline in Visual Acuity (Letters) of the Study Eye Over Time
Month 11
|
6.9 Letters
Standard Error 0.79
|
6.8 Letters
Standard Error 1.10
|
1.4 Letters
Standard Error 0.95
|
—
|
|
Core Study: Mean Change From Baseline in Visual Acuity (Letters) of the Study Eye Over Time
Month 12
|
6.8 Letters
Standard Error 0.77
|
6.4 Letters
Standard Error 1.08
|
0.9 Letters
Standard Error 1.09
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 12Population: The number analyzed is the Full Analysis Set, including patients with a value at both baseline and the Month 12 visit. Last Observation Carried Forward imputation was utilized.
Retinal thickness was measured using Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT). The images were reviewed by a central reading center to ensure a standardized evaluation.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg
n=113 Participants
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg was administered monthly by intravitreal injection in the study eye for 3 months. After the third injection, treatment was suspended if either one of the following criteria was met:
Improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) could not be attributed to treatment at the last 2 visits, in the opinion of the investigator, or BCVA \> 84 letters (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/20) was observed at the last 2 last visits.
Patients also received sham laser treatment on Day 1 and subsequently at intervals of at least 3 months, if deemed necessary by the evaluating physician.
Active/sham laser treatment was always administered before (sham) intravitreal injections. The minimum interval between the 2 treatments was 30 minutes.
|
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg + Laser
n=116 Participants
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg was administered monthly by intravitreal injection in the study eye for 3 months. After the third injection, treatment was suspended if either one of the following criteria was met:
Improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) could not be attributed to treatment at the last 2 visits, in the opinion of the investigator, or BCVA \> 84 letters (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/20) was observed at the last 2 last visits.
Patients also received active laser treatment on Day 1 and subsequently at intervals of at least 3 months, if deemed necessary by the evaluating physician.
Active/sham laser treatment was always administered before (sham) intravitreal injections. The minimum interval between the 2 treatments was 30 minutes.
|
Laser
n=108 Participants
Laser photocoagulation treatment was administered on Day 1 and subsequently at intervals of at least 3 months, if deemed necessary by the evaluating physician. Patients also received monthly sham intravitreal injection in the study eye for 3 consecutive months. After the third injection, treatment was suspended if either one of the following criteria was met:
Improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) could not be attributed to treatment at the last 2 visits, in the opinion of the investigator, or BCVA \> 84 letters (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/20) was observed at the last 2 last visits.
Active/sham laser treatment was always administered before (sham) intravitreal injections. The minimum interval between the 2 treatments was 30 minutes.
|
Laser Without Ranibizumab in Extension
Active laser photocoagulation treatment was administered on Day 1 and at intervals of at least 3 months, if deemed necessary by the evaluating physician. Patients also received monthly sham intravitreal injection in the study eye for 3 consecutive months. After the third injection, treatment was suspended if either one of the following criteria was met:
Improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) could not be attributed to treatment at the last 2 visits, in the opinion of the investigator, or BCVA \> 84 letters (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/20) was observed at the last 2 last visits.
Active/sham laser treatment was always administered before (sham) intravitreal injections. The minimum interval between the 2 treatments was 30 minutes.
In the extension study at the investigator's discretion, patients received open-label ranibizumab 0.5 mg intravitreal injections once a month until stable vision was reached (a maximum of 24 injections) and could receive laser therapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Core Study: Mean Change From Baseline at Month 12 in Central Retinal Thickness of the Study Eye
Value at Month 12
|
308.4 Micrometers
Standard Deviation 112.26
|
288.2 Micrometers
Standard Deviation 90.11
|
351.1 Micrometers
Standard Deviation 139.91
|
—
|
|
Core Study: Mean Change From Baseline at Month 12 in Central Retinal Thickness of the Study Eye
Change from Baseline
|
-118.7 Micrometers
Standard Deviation 115.07
|
-128.3 Micrometers
Standard Deviation 114.34
|
-61.3 Micrometers
Standard Deviation 132.29
|
—
|
|
Core Study: Mean Change From Baseline at Month 12 in Central Retinal Thickness of the Study Eye
Baseline
|
427.1 Micrometers
Standard Deviation 118.42
|
416.4 Micrometers
Standard Deviation 119.91
|
412.4 Micrometers
Standard Deviation 124.53
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 12Population: The number analyzed is the Full Analysis Set, including the number of patients with a value at both baseline and the Month 12 visit. Last Observation Carried Forward imputation was utilized.
The National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ-25) was used to measure a patient's subjective assessment of vision-related quality of life. The 12 subscales in the VFQ-25 are general health, general vision, ocular pain, near activities, distance activities, social function, mental health, role difficulties, dependency, driving, color vision, and peripheral vision. The scores on the subscales were added together for a total score, which ranged from 0 to 100. A higher score indicated improvement in quality of life due to vision function.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg
n=114 Participants
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg was administered monthly by intravitreal injection in the study eye for 3 months. After the third injection, treatment was suspended if either one of the following criteria was met:
Improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) could not be attributed to treatment at the last 2 visits, in the opinion of the investigator, or BCVA \> 84 letters (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/20) was observed at the last 2 last visits.
Patients also received sham laser treatment on Day 1 and subsequently at intervals of at least 3 months, if deemed necessary by the evaluating physician.
Active/sham laser treatment was always administered before (sham) intravitreal injections. The minimum interval between the 2 treatments was 30 minutes.
|
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg + Laser
n=116 Participants
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg was administered monthly by intravitreal injection in the study eye for 3 months. After the third injection, treatment was suspended if either one of the following criteria was met:
Improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) could not be attributed to treatment at the last 2 visits, in the opinion of the investigator, or BCVA \> 84 letters (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/20) was observed at the last 2 last visits.
Patients also received active laser treatment on Day 1 and subsequently at intervals of at least 3 months, if deemed necessary by the evaluating physician.
Active/sham laser treatment was always administered before (sham) intravitreal injections. The minimum interval between the 2 treatments was 30 minutes.
|
Laser
n=108 Participants
Laser photocoagulation treatment was administered on Day 1 and subsequently at intervals of at least 3 months, if deemed necessary by the evaluating physician. Patients also received monthly sham intravitreal injection in the study eye for 3 consecutive months. After the third injection, treatment was suspended if either one of the following criteria was met:
Improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) could not be attributed to treatment at the last 2 visits, in the opinion of the investigator, or BCVA \> 84 letters (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/20) was observed at the last 2 last visits.
Active/sham laser treatment was always administered before (sham) intravitreal injections. The minimum interval between the 2 treatments was 30 minutes.
|
Laser Without Ranibizumab in Extension
Active laser photocoagulation treatment was administered on Day 1 and at intervals of at least 3 months, if deemed necessary by the evaluating physician. Patients also received monthly sham intravitreal injection in the study eye for 3 consecutive months. After the third injection, treatment was suspended if either one of the following criteria was met:
Improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) could not be attributed to treatment at the last 2 visits, in the opinion of the investigator, or BCVA \> 84 letters (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/20) was observed at the last 2 last visits.
Active/sham laser treatment was always administered before (sham) intravitreal injections. The minimum interval between the 2 treatments was 30 minutes.
In the extension study at the investigator's discretion, patients received open-label ranibizumab 0.5 mg intravitreal injections once a month until stable vision was reached (a maximum of 24 injections) and could receive laser therapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Core Study: Mean Change From Baseline in Patient-reported Visual Functioning
Baseline
|
72.8 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.91
|
74.1 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.06
|
73.5 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.18
|
—
|
|
Core Study: Mean Change From Baseline in Patient-reported Visual Functioning
Month 12
|
77.8 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.19
|
79.5 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.29
|
74.1 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.80
|
—
|
|
Core Study: Mean Change From Baseline in Patient-reported Visual Functioning
Change from Baseline
|
5.0 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.97
|
5.4 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.14
|
0.6 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.56
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Core baseline (Day 1 of the core study) to Month 36 (end of extension study) [36 months]Population: Safety Population included all participants who entered the extension and who had at least one safety assessment in the extension study. Participants were grouped according to the treatment assigned in the Core study.
Participants with ocular (occurring in the eye) serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs in the study eye. The study eye is the eye that received the treatment. AEs are the appearance or worsening of any undesirable sign, symptom, or medical condition occurring after starting the study drug even if the event is not considered to be related to study drug. A serious adverse event is defined as an event that is fatal or life-threatening, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, constitutes a congenital anomaly/birth defect, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization or is medically significant. Additional information about adverse events can be found in the Adverse Event section.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg
n=83 Participants
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg was administered monthly by intravitreal injection in the study eye for 3 months. After the third injection, treatment was suspended if either one of the following criteria was met:
Improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) could not be attributed to treatment at the last 2 visits, in the opinion of the investigator, or BCVA \> 84 letters (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/20) was observed at the last 2 last visits.
Patients also received sham laser treatment on Day 1 and subsequently at intervals of at least 3 months, if deemed necessary by the evaluating physician.
Active/sham laser treatment was always administered before (sham) intravitreal injections. The minimum interval between the 2 treatments was 30 minutes.
|
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg + Laser
n=83 Participants
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg was administered monthly by intravitreal injection in the study eye for 3 months. After the third injection, treatment was suspended if either one of the following criteria was met:
Improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) could not be attributed to treatment at the last 2 visits, in the opinion of the investigator, or BCVA \> 84 letters (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/20) was observed at the last 2 last visits.
Patients also received active laser treatment on Day 1 and subsequently at intervals of at least 3 months, if deemed necessary by the evaluating physician.
Active/sham laser treatment was always administered before (sham) intravitreal injections. The minimum interval between the 2 treatments was 30 minutes.
|
Laser
n=59 Participants
Laser photocoagulation treatment was administered on Day 1 and subsequently at intervals of at least 3 months, if deemed necessary by the evaluating physician. Patients also received monthly sham intravitreal injection in the study eye for 3 consecutive months. After the third injection, treatment was suspended if either one of the following criteria was met:
Improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) could not be attributed to treatment at the last 2 visits, in the opinion of the investigator, or BCVA \> 84 letters (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/20) was observed at the last 2 last visits.
Active/sham laser treatment was always administered before (sham) intravitreal injections. The minimum interval between the 2 treatments was 30 minutes.
|
Laser Without Ranibizumab in Extension
n=15 Participants
Active laser photocoagulation treatment was administered on Day 1 and at intervals of at least 3 months, if deemed necessary by the evaluating physician. Patients also received monthly sham intravitreal injection in the study eye for 3 consecutive months. After the third injection, treatment was suspended if either one of the following criteria was met:
Improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) could not be attributed to treatment at the last 2 visits, in the opinion of the investigator, or BCVA \> 84 letters (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/20) was observed at the last 2 last visits.
Active/sham laser treatment was always administered before (sham) intravitreal injections. The minimum interval between the 2 treatments was 30 minutes.
In the extension study at the investigator's discretion, patients received open-label ranibizumab 0.5 mg intravitreal injections once a month until stable vision was reached (a maximum of 24 injections) and could receive laser therapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Extension Study: Percentage of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events (AEs) in the Study Eye in the 36 Months of the Core and Extension Studies
Serious Adverse Events
|
2.4 Percentage of participants
|
3.6 Percentage of participants
|
5.1 Percentage of participants
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
Extension Study: Percentage of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events (AEs) in the Study Eye in the 36 Months of the Core and Extension Studies
Adverse Events
|
66.3 Percentage of participants
|
67.5 Percentage of participants
|
64.4 Percentage of participants
|
46.7 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Core baseline (Day 1 of the core study) to Month 36 (end of extension study) [36 Months]Population: Safety Population included all participants who entered the extension and who had at least one safety assessment in the extension study. Participants were grouped according to the treatment assigned in the Core study.
Participants with non-ocular (not occurring in the eye) serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs. AEs are the appearance or worsening of of any undesirable sign, symptom, or medical condition occurring after starting the study drug even if the event is not considered to be related to study drug. A serious adverse event is defined as an event that is fatal or life-threatening, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, constitutes a congenital anomaly/birth defect, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization or is medically significant. Additional information about Adverse Events can be found in the Adverse Event section.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg
n=83 Participants
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg was administered monthly by intravitreal injection in the study eye for 3 months. After the third injection, treatment was suspended if either one of the following criteria was met:
Improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) could not be attributed to treatment at the last 2 visits, in the opinion of the investigator, or BCVA \> 84 letters (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/20) was observed at the last 2 last visits.
Patients also received sham laser treatment on Day 1 and subsequently at intervals of at least 3 months, if deemed necessary by the evaluating physician.
Active/sham laser treatment was always administered before (sham) intravitreal injections. The minimum interval between the 2 treatments was 30 minutes.
|
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg + Laser
n=83 Participants
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg was administered monthly by intravitreal injection in the study eye for 3 months. After the third injection, treatment was suspended if either one of the following criteria was met:
Improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) could not be attributed to treatment at the last 2 visits, in the opinion of the investigator, or BCVA \> 84 letters (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/20) was observed at the last 2 last visits.
Patients also received active laser treatment on Day 1 and subsequently at intervals of at least 3 months, if deemed necessary by the evaluating physician.
Active/sham laser treatment was always administered before (sham) intravitreal injections. The minimum interval between the 2 treatments was 30 minutes.
|
Laser
n=59 Participants
Laser photocoagulation treatment was administered on Day 1 and subsequently at intervals of at least 3 months, if deemed necessary by the evaluating physician. Patients also received monthly sham intravitreal injection in the study eye for 3 consecutive months. After the third injection, treatment was suspended if either one of the following criteria was met:
Improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) could not be attributed to treatment at the last 2 visits, in the opinion of the investigator, or BCVA \> 84 letters (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/20) was observed at the last 2 last visits.
Active/sham laser treatment was always administered before (sham) intravitreal injections. The minimum interval between the 2 treatments was 30 minutes.
|
Laser Without Ranibizumab in Extension
n=15 Participants
Active laser photocoagulation treatment was administered on Day 1 and at intervals of at least 3 months, if deemed necessary by the evaluating physician. Patients also received monthly sham intravitreal injection in the study eye for 3 consecutive months. After the third injection, treatment was suspended if either one of the following criteria was met:
Improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) could not be attributed to treatment at the last 2 visits, in the opinion of the investigator, or BCVA \> 84 letters (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/20) was observed at the last 2 last visits.
Active/sham laser treatment was always administered before (sham) intravitreal injections. The minimum interval between the 2 treatments was 30 minutes.
In the extension study at the investigator's discretion, patients received open-label ranibizumab 0.5 mg intravitreal injections once a month until stable vision was reached (a maximum of 24 injections) and could receive laser therapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Extension Study: Percentage of Participants With Non-Ocular Adverse Events (AEs) in the 36 Months of the Core and Extension Studies
Serious Adverse Events
|
36.1 Percentage of participants
|
37.3 Percentage of participants
|
42.4 Percentage of participants
|
13.3 Percentage of participants
|
|
Extension Study: Percentage of Participants With Non-Ocular Adverse Events (AEs) in the 36 Months of the Core and Extension Studies
Adverse Events
|
83.1 Percentage of participants
|
81.9 Percentage of participants
|
84.7 Percentage of participants
|
73.3 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Extension baseline (Month12 -end of core study), Month 36 (end of extension study)Population: Participants from the Safety Population that included all participants who entered the extension and who had at least one safety assessment in the extension study with data available for analyses. Participants were grouped according to the treatment assigned in the Core study.
Visual acuity (VA) was assessed on both eyes during every study visit using best correction determined from protocol refraction. VA measurements (number of letters correctly identified) were performed with the patient in a sitting position using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-like visual acuity testing charts at a testing distance of 4 meters. An increase in the number of letters read correctly indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg
n=83 Participants
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg was administered monthly by intravitreal injection in the study eye for 3 months. After the third injection, treatment was suspended if either one of the following criteria was met:
Improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) could not be attributed to treatment at the last 2 visits, in the opinion of the investigator, or BCVA \> 84 letters (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/20) was observed at the last 2 last visits.
Patients also received sham laser treatment on Day 1 and subsequently at intervals of at least 3 months, if deemed necessary by the evaluating physician.
Active/sham laser treatment was always administered before (sham) intravitreal injections. The minimum interval between the 2 treatments was 30 minutes.
|
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg + Laser
n=80 Participants
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg was administered monthly by intravitreal injection in the study eye for 3 months. After the third injection, treatment was suspended if either one of the following criteria was met:
Improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) could not be attributed to treatment at the last 2 visits, in the opinion of the investigator, or BCVA \> 84 letters (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/20) was observed at the last 2 last visits.
Patients also received active laser treatment on Day 1 and subsequently at intervals of at least 3 months, if deemed necessary by the evaluating physician.
Active/sham laser treatment was always administered before (sham) intravitreal injections. The minimum interval between the 2 treatments was 30 minutes.
|
Laser
n=74 Participants
Laser photocoagulation treatment was administered on Day 1 and subsequently at intervals of at least 3 months, if deemed necessary by the evaluating physician. Patients also received monthly sham intravitreal injection in the study eye for 3 consecutive months. After the third injection, treatment was suspended if either one of the following criteria was met:
Improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) could not be attributed to treatment at the last 2 visits, in the opinion of the investigator, or BCVA \> 84 letters (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/20) was observed at the last 2 last visits.
Active/sham laser treatment was always administered before (sham) intravitreal injections. The minimum interval between the 2 treatments was 30 minutes.
|
Laser Without Ranibizumab in Extension
Active laser photocoagulation treatment was administered on Day 1 and at intervals of at least 3 months, if deemed necessary by the evaluating physician. Patients also received monthly sham intravitreal injection in the study eye for 3 consecutive months. After the third injection, treatment was suspended if either one of the following criteria was met:
Improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) could not be attributed to treatment at the last 2 visits, in the opinion of the investigator, or BCVA \> 84 letters (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/20) was observed at the last 2 last visits.
Active/sham laser treatment was always administered before (sham) intravitreal injections. The minimum interval between the 2 treatments was 30 minutes.
In the extension study at the investigator's discretion, patients received open-label ranibizumab 0.5 mg intravitreal injections once a month until stable vision was reached (a maximum of 24 injections) and could receive laser therapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Extension Study: Mean Change From Extension Study Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Month 36
|
0.1 Letters
Standard Deviation 9.10
|
-0.5 Letters
Standard Deviation 9.19
|
3.7 Letters
Standard Deviation 6.88
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Core baseline (Day 1 of the core study), Month 36 (end of extension study)Population: Safety Population included all participants who entered the extension and who had at least one safety assessment in the extension study. Participants were grouped according to the treatment assigned in the Core study.
Visual acuity (VA) was assessed on both eyes during every study visit using best correction determined from protocol refraction. VA measurements (number of letters correctly identified) were performed with the patient in a sitting position using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-like visual acuity testing charts at a testing distance of 4 meters. An increase in the number of letters read correctly indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg
n=83 Participants
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg was administered monthly by intravitreal injection in the study eye for 3 months. After the third injection, treatment was suspended if either one of the following criteria was met:
Improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) could not be attributed to treatment at the last 2 visits, in the opinion of the investigator, or BCVA \> 84 letters (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/20) was observed at the last 2 last visits.
Patients also received sham laser treatment on Day 1 and subsequently at intervals of at least 3 months, if deemed necessary by the evaluating physician.
Active/sham laser treatment was always administered before (sham) intravitreal injections. The minimum interval between the 2 treatments was 30 minutes.
|
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg + Laser
n=83 Participants
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg was administered monthly by intravitreal injection in the study eye for 3 months. After the third injection, treatment was suspended if either one of the following criteria was met:
Improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) could not be attributed to treatment at the last 2 visits, in the opinion of the investigator, or BCVA \> 84 letters (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/20) was observed at the last 2 last visits.
Patients also received active laser treatment on Day 1 and subsequently at intervals of at least 3 months, if deemed necessary by the evaluating physician.
Active/sham laser treatment was always administered before (sham) intravitreal injections. The minimum interval between the 2 treatments was 30 minutes.
|
Laser
n=74 Participants
Laser photocoagulation treatment was administered on Day 1 and subsequently at intervals of at least 3 months, if deemed necessary by the evaluating physician. Patients also received monthly sham intravitreal injection in the study eye for 3 consecutive months. After the third injection, treatment was suspended if either one of the following criteria was met:
Improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) could not be attributed to treatment at the last 2 visits, in the opinion of the investigator, or BCVA \> 84 letters (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/20) was observed at the last 2 last visits.
Active/sham laser treatment was always administered before (sham) intravitreal injections. The minimum interval between the 2 treatments was 30 minutes.
|
Laser Without Ranibizumab in Extension
Active laser photocoagulation treatment was administered on Day 1 and at intervals of at least 3 months, if deemed necessary by the evaluating physician. Patients also received monthly sham intravitreal injection in the study eye for 3 consecutive months. After the third injection, treatment was suspended if either one of the following criteria was met:
Improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) could not be attributed to treatment at the last 2 visits, in the opinion of the investigator, or BCVA \> 84 letters (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/20) was observed at the last 2 last visits.
Active/sham laser treatment was always administered before (sham) intravitreal injections. The minimum interval between the 2 treatments was 30 minutes.
In the extension study at the investigator's discretion, patients received open-label ranibizumab 0.5 mg intravitreal injections once a month until stable vision was reached (a maximum of 24 injections) and could receive laser therapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Extension Study: Mean Change From Core Study Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Month 36
|
8.0 Letters
Standard Deviation 10.09
|
6.7 Letters
Standard Deviation 9.59
|
6.0 Letters
Standard Deviation 9.35
|
—
|
Adverse Events
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg + Laser
Laser With Ranibizumab in Extension
Laser Without Ranibizumab in Extension
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg
n=115 participants at risk
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg was administered monthly by intravitreal injection in the study eye for 3 months. After the third injection, treatment was suspended if either one of the following criteria was met:
Improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) could not be attributed to treatment at the last 2 visits, in the opinion of the investigator, or BCVA \> 84 letters (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/20) was observed at the last 2 last visits.
Patients also received sham laser treatment on Day 1 and subsequently at intervals of at least 3 months, if deemed necessary by the evaluating physician.
Active/sham laser treatment was always administered before (sham) intravitreal injections. The minimum interval between the 2 treatments was 30 minutes.
In the extension study at the investigator's discretion, patients received open-label ranibizumab 0.5 mg intravitreal injections once a month until stable vision was reached (a maximum of 24 injections) and could receive laser therapy.
|
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg + Laser
n=120 participants at risk
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg was administered monthly by intravitreal injection in the study eye for 3 months. After the third injection, treatment was suspended if either one of the following criteria was met:
Improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) could not be attributed to treatment at the last 2 visits, in the opinion of the investigator, or BCVA \> 84 letters (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/20) was observed at the last 2 last visits.
Patients also received active laser treatment on Day 1 and subsequently at intervals of at least 3 months, if deemed necessary by the evaluating physician.
Active/sham laser treatment was always administered before (sham) intravitreal injections. The minimum interval between the 2 treatments was 30 minutes.
In the extension study at the investigator's discretion, patients received open-label ranibizumab 0.5 mg intravitreal injections once a month until stable vision was reached (a maximum of 24 injections) and could receive laser therapy
|
Laser With Ranibizumab in Extension
n=59 participants at risk
Active laser photocoagulation treatment was administered on Day 1 and at intervals of at least 3 months, if deemed necessary by the evaluating physician. Patients also received monthly sham intravitreal injection in the study eye for 3 consecutive months. After the third injection, treatment was suspended if either one of the following criteria was met:
Improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) could not be attributed to treatment at the last 2 visits, in the opinion of the investigator, or BCVA \> 84 letters (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/20) was observed at the last 2 last visits.
Active/sham laser treatment was always administered before (sham) intravitreal injections. The minimum interval between the 2 treatments was 30 minutes.
In the extension study at the investigator's discretion, patients received open-label ranibizumab 0.5 mg intravitreal injections once a month until stable vision was reached (a maximum of 24 injections) and could receive laser therapy.
|
Laser Without Ranibizumab in Extension
n=51 participants at risk
Active laser photocoagulation treatment was administered on Day 1 and at intervals of at least 3 months, if deemed necessary by the evaluating physician. Patients also received monthly sham intravitreal injection in the study eye for 3 consecutive months. After the third injection, treatment was suspended if either one of the following criteria was met:
Improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) could not be attributed to treatment at the last 2 visits, in the opinion of the investigator, or BCVA \> 84 letters (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/20) was observed at the last 2 last visits.
Active/sham laser treatment was always administered before (sham) intravitreal injections. The minimum interval between the 2 treatments was 30 minutes.
In the extension study at the investigator's discretion, patients received open-label ranibizumab 0.5 mg intravitreal injections once a month until stable vision was reached (a maximum of 24 injections) and could receive laser therapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Nephrolithiasis
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
1.7%
1/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Polyuria
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
1.7%
1/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal colic
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
1.7%
1/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.83%
1/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure acute
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.83%
1/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure chronic
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.83%
1/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
2.0%
1/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Calculus urinary
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
1.7%
1/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.83%
1/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
1.7%
1/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Febrile neutropenia
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
1.7%
1/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Hypochromic anaemia
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.83%
1/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Lymphadenopathy
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
1.7%
1/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Spleen disorder
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Splenic infarction
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.83%
1/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Acute myocardial infarction
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
3.4%
2/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Angina pectoris
|
2.6%
3/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.83%
1/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Angina unstable
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
1.7%
1/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Aortic valve stenosis
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Arrhythmia
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.83%
1/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac disorder
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
2.0%
1/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.83%
1/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
6.8%
4/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
2.0%
1/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure congestive
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
1.7%
1/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiogenic shock
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiopulmonary failure
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery disease
|
2.6%
3/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.83%
1/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
1.7%
1/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery occlusion
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.83%
1/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Mitral valve incompetence
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
1.7%
1/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial infarction
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
3.3%
4/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
5.1%
3/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial ischaemia
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.83%
1/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Right ventricular failure
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Tachyarrhythmia
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
1.7%
1/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Congenital, familial and genetic disorders
Spinocerebellar ataxia
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.83%
1/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Deafness
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Vertigo
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
1.7%
1/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Cataract (Fellow eye)
|
1.7%
2/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.83%
1/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
1.7%
1/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Cataract (Study eye)
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
2.5%
3/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
3.4%
2/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Cataract subcapsular (Fellow eye)
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Conjunctival haemorrhage (Study eye)
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Corneal oedema (Study eye)
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Diabetic retinal oedema (Fellow eye)
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.83%
1/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
1.7%
1/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Lenticular opacities (Study eye)
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Vitreous adhesions (Study eye)
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
1.7%
1/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Vitreous haemorrhage (Fellow eye)
|
1.7%
2/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
1.7%
1/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
2.0%
1/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Vitreous haemorrhage (Study eye)
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
1.7%
1/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal hernia
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.83%
1/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
1.7%
1/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Colonic polyp
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.83%
1/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.83%
1/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
1.7%
1/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastric haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
2.0%
1/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastric ulcer
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
2.0%
1/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal necrosis
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
1.7%
1/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal obstruction
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.83%
1/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Hernial eventration
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.83%
1/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Intestinal obstruction
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
1.7%
1/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Oesophagitis
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Pancreatitis acute
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
2.0%
1/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Subileus
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.83%
1/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Umbilical hernia
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.83%
1/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
1.7%
1/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
General disorders
Chest discomfort
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
1.7%
1/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
General disorders
Malaise
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.83%
1/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
General disorders
Multi-organ failure
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.83%
1/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
General disorders
Polyserositis
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.83%
1/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.83%
1/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Bile duct obstruction
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.83%
1/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystitis
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.83%
1/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholelithiasis
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.83%
1/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatic function abnormal
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.83%
1/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Appendicitis
|
1.7%
2/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Biliary sepsis
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
1.7%
1/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cholecystitis infective
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gas gangrene
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.83%
1/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.83%
1/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis norovirus
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.83%
1/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Infection
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.83%
1/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Localised infection
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
1.7%
1/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Lower respiratory tract infection
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
1.7%
1/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Mediastinitis
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Osteomyelitis
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Otitis media
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
1.7%
1/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.83%
1/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
5.1%
3/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia cytomegaloviral
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
1.7%
1/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pseudomonas infection
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sepsis
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.83%
1/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Soft tissue infection
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
1.7%
1/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Staphylococcal infection
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.83%
1/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Systemic candida
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
1.7%
1/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Back injury
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Contusion
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Coronary artery restenosis
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.83%
1/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Eye injury (Fellow eye)
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Eye injury (Study eye)
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Eyelid injury (Study eye)
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fall
|
2.6%
3/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Femoral neck fracture
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Femur fracture
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.83%
1/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Head injury
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Lower limb fracture
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
1.7%
2/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Lumbar vertebral fracture
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Meniscus lesion
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Open wound
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Periorbital haematoma (Study eye)
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Post procedural complication
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
1.7%
1/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Radius fracture
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.83%
1/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Road traffic accident
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Spinal cord injury
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Tendon rupture
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Investigations
Blood calcium increased
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.83%
1/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Investigations
Blood glucose increased
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.83%
1/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Investigations
Blood urea increased
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Investigations
Body temperature decreased
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
1.7%
1/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Diabetes mellitus
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
1.7%
2/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Diabetic foot
|
1.7%
2/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
5.1%
3/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
2.0%
1/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycaemia
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.83%
1/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperkalaemia
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.83%
1/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperuricaemia
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.83%
1/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoglycaemia
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
1.7%
1/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Obesity
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Type 2 diabetes mellitus
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Intervertebral disc protrusion
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
2.5%
3/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
1.7%
1/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Lumbar spinal stenosis
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoarthritis
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
1.7%
1/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteochondrosis
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Spinal column stenosis
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Spinal osteoarthritis
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Spondylolisthesis
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Colon cancer
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Gastric cancer
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
1.7%
1/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Hepatic neoplasm
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
1.7%
1/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Malignant neoplasm of ampulla of Vater
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.83%
1/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Multiple myeloma
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.83%
1/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Pancreatic carcinoma
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.83%
1/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Prostate cancer
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
1.7%
1/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Rectal cancer
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.83%
1/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Renal cancer
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.83%
1/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Urethral neoplasm
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Uterine leiomyoma
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Carotid artery stenosis
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
2.0%
1/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebral artery embolism
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebrovascular accident
|
2.6%
3/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.83%
1/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
1.7%
1/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebrovascular disorder
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.83%
1/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Diabetic neuropathy
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
1.7%
1/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
1.7%
1/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Embolic stroke
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.83%
1/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Hepatic encephalopathy
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Loss of consciousness
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Subarachnoid haemorrhage
|
1.7%
2/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Syncope
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
1.7%
1/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Transient ischaemic attack
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
1.7%
1/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
1.7%
1/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Acute prerenal failure
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
1.7%
1/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Bladder prolapse
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Benign prostatic hyperplasia
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.83%
1/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.83%
1/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
1.7%
1/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Epistaxis
|
1.7%
2/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasal septum deviation
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.83%
1/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary embolism
|
1.7%
2/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.83%
1/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary haematoma
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary oedema
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
1.7%
1/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory arrest
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.83%
1/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Sleep apnoea syndrome
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
2.0%
1/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Acute febrile neutrophilic dermatosis
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
1.7%
1/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatitis
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.83%
1/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin hypertrophy
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin ulcer
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.83%
1/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Arterial thrombosis limb
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Deep vein thrombosis
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
1.7%
1/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
1.7%
2/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
1.7%
1/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertensive crisis
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
1.7%
1/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
1.7%
1/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Peripheral arterial occlusive disease
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.83%
1/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
1.7%
1/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Varicose vein
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg
n=115 participants at risk
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg was administered monthly by intravitreal injection in the study eye for 3 months. After the third injection, treatment was suspended if either one of the following criteria was met:
Improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) could not be attributed to treatment at the last 2 visits, in the opinion of the investigator, or BCVA \> 84 letters (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/20) was observed at the last 2 last visits.
Patients also received sham laser treatment on Day 1 and subsequently at intervals of at least 3 months, if deemed necessary by the evaluating physician.
Active/sham laser treatment was always administered before (sham) intravitreal injections. The minimum interval between the 2 treatments was 30 minutes.
In the extension study at the investigator's discretion, patients received open-label ranibizumab 0.5 mg intravitreal injections once a month until stable vision was reached (a maximum of 24 injections) and could receive laser therapy.
|
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg + Laser
n=120 participants at risk
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg was administered monthly by intravitreal injection in the study eye for 3 months. After the third injection, treatment was suspended if either one of the following criteria was met:
Improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) could not be attributed to treatment at the last 2 visits, in the opinion of the investigator, or BCVA \> 84 letters (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/20) was observed at the last 2 last visits.
Patients also received active laser treatment on Day 1 and subsequently at intervals of at least 3 months, if deemed necessary by the evaluating physician.
Active/sham laser treatment was always administered before (sham) intravitreal injections. The minimum interval between the 2 treatments was 30 minutes.
In the extension study at the investigator's discretion, patients received open-label ranibizumab 0.5 mg intravitreal injections once a month until stable vision was reached (a maximum of 24 injections) and could receive laser therapy
|
Laser With Ranibizumab in Extension
n=59 participants at risk
Active laser photocoagulation treatment was administered on Day 1 and at intervals of at least 3 months, if deemed necessary by the evaluating physician. Patients also received monthly sham intravitreal injection in the study eye for 3 consecutive months. After the third injection, treatment was suspended if either one of the following criteria was met:
Improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) could not be attributed to treatment at the last 2 visits, in the opinion of the investigator, or BCVA \> 84 letters (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/20) was observed at the last 2 last visits.
Active/sham laser treatment was always administered before (sham) intravitreal injections. The minimum interval between the 2 treatments was 30 minutes.
In the extension study at the investigator's discretion, patients received open-label ranibizumab 0.5 mg intravitreal injections once a month until stable vision was reached (a maximum of 24 injections) and could receive laser therapy.
|
Laser Without Ranibizumab in Extension
n=51 participants at risk
Active laser photocoagulation treatment was administered on Day 1 and at intervals of at least 3 months, if deemed necessary by the evaluating physician. Patients also received monthly sham intravitreal injection in the study eye for 3 consecutive months. After the third injection, treatment was suspended if either one of the following criteria was met:
Improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) could not be attributed to treatment at the last 2 visits, in the opinion of the investigator, or BCVA \> 84 letters (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/20) was observed at the last 2 last visits.
Active/sham laser treatment was always administered before (sham) intravitreal injections. The minimum interval between the 2 treatments was 30 minutes.
In the extension study at the investigator's discretion, patients received open-label ranibizumab 0.5 mg intravitreal injections once a month until stable vision was reached (a maximum of 24 injections) and could receive laser therapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
1.7%
2/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
5.0%
6/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
5.1%
3/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
2.0%
1/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Blepharitis (Fellow eye)
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.83%
1/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
5.1%
3/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
2.0%
1/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Cataract (Fellow eye)
|
8.7%
10/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
10.0%
12/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
11.9%
7/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
9.8%
5/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Cataract (Study eye)
|
7.8%
9/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
14.2%
17/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
15.3%
9/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
7.8%
4/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Conjunctival haemorrhage (Study eye)
|
7.8%
9/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
10.8%
13/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Conjunctival hyperaemia (Study eye)
|
7.8%
9/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
6.7%
8/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
8.5%
5/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
3.9%
2/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Conjunctivitis (Fellow eye)
|
3.5%
4/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
5.0%
6/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
5.1%
3/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
2.0%
1/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Diabetic retinal oedema (Fellow eye)
|
10.4%
12/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
15.8%
19/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
18.6%
11/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
5.9%
3/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Diabetic retinal oedema (Study eye)
|
6.1%
7/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
5.0%
6/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
5.1%
3/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
2.0%
1/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Diabetic retinopathy (Fellow eye)
|
3.5%
4/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
5.0%
6/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
6.8%
4/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
3.9%
2/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Diabetic retinopathy (Study eye)
|
2.6%
3/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
6.7%
8/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
5.1%
3/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
3.9%
2/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Dry eye (Fellow eye)
|
4.3%
5/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
3.3%
4/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
5.1%
3/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
5.9%
3/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Dry eye (Study eye)
|
4.3%
5/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
3.3%
4/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
5.1%
3/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
5.9%
3/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Eye discharge (Study eye)
|
3.5%
4/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
5.0%
6/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
1.7%
1/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
2.0%
1/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Eye haemorrhage (Fellow eye)
|
1.7%
2/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
2.5%
3/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
5.1%
3/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Eye haemorrhage (Study eye)
|
1.7%
2/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
2.5%
3/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
5.1%
3/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Eye irritation (Study eye)
|
2.6%
3/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
1.7%
2/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
5.1%
3/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Eye pain (Study eye)
|
13.0%
15/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
9.2%
11/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
22.0%
13/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
3.9%
2/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Eye pruritus (Study eye)
|
2.6%
3/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
2.5%
3/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
8.5%
5/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
2.0%
1/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Foreign body sensation in eyes (Study eye)
|
4.3%
5/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
6.7%
8/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
3.4%
2/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Lacrimation increased (Study eye)
|
2.6%
3/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
5.0%
6/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
8.5%
5/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Macular fibrosis (Study eye)
|
1.7%
2/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
1.7%
2/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
8.5%
5/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Punctate keratitis (Fellow eye)
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
5.0%
6/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Retinal aneurysm (Study eye)
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
2.5%
3/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
5.1%
3/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
2.0%
1/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Retinal exudates (Fellow eye)
|
6.1%
7/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
2.5%
3/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
5.1%
3/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
2.0%
1/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Retinal exudates (Study eye)
|
3.5%
4/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
1.7%
2/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
8.5%
5/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
2.0%
1/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Retinal haemorrhage (Fellow eye)
|
3.5%
4/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
6.7%
8/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
3.4%
2/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Vision blurred (Study eye)
|
1.7%
2/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
3.3%
4/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
5.1%
3/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
3.9%
2/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Visual acuity reduced (Fellow eye)
|
3.5%
4/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
2.5%
3/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
5.1%
3/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
3.9%
2/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Visual acuity reduced (Study eye)
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
1.7%
2/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
1.7%
1/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
5.9%
3/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Vitreous haemorrhage (Study eye)
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.83%
1/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
5.1%
3/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrooesophageal reflux disease
|
2.6%
3/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
5.1%
3/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
5.2%
6/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
4.2%
5/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
3.4%
2/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
5.9%
3/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
1.7%
2/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.83%
1/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
3.4%
2/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
5.9%
3/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
5.2%
6/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
3.3%
4/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
1.7%
1/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
3.9%
2/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
10.4%
12/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
6.7%
8/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
13.6%
8/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
9.8%
5/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
15.7%
18/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
17.5%
21/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
25.4%
15/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
15.7%
8/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
1.7%
2/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
1.7%
2/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
5.9%
3/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fall
|
3.5%
4/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
4.2%
5/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
6.8%
4/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
2.0%
1/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Investigations
Blood glucose increased
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
2.5%
3/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
5.1%
3/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
2.0%
1/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Investigations
Intraocular pressure increased (Fellow eye)
|
2.6%
3/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
5.0%
6/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
2.0%
1/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
5.2%
6/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.83%
1/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
5.1%
3/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
6.1%
7/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
4.2%
5/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
13.6%
8/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
2.0%
1/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle spasms
|
0.00%
0/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.83%
1/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
6.8%
4/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
5.2%
6/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.83%
1/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
1.7%
2/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
1.7%
2/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
5.1%
3/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
2.0%
1/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
3.5%
4/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
4.2%
5/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
8.5%
5/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
2.0%
1/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure
|
0.87%
1/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
1.7%
2/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
6.8%
4/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
2.0%
1/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
2.6%
3/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
3.3%
4/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
6.8%
4/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
2.0%
1/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
13.0%
15/115
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
9.2%
11/120
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
10.2%
6/59
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
11.8%
6/51
Safety Population included all randomized treated participants. Participants are grouped according to the treatment actually received in the Core Study.
|
Additional Information
Study Director
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The terms and conditions of Novartis' agreements with its investigators may vary. However, Novartis does not prohibit any investigator from publishing. Any publications from a single-site are postponed until the publication of the pooled data (i.e., data from all sites) in the clinical trial.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER