Comparison of Airway Clearance Therapy in Cystic Fibrosis Using the Same VEST Therapy Device But With Different Settings
NCT ID: NCT00685035
Last Updated: 2016-07-25
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
17 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2008-05-31
2008-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Airway Clearance Efficacy of Two High Frequency Chest Wall Oscillation (HFCWO) Devices in Cystic Fibrosis
NCT00308958
Airway Secretion Clearance in Cystic Fibrosis
NCT00839644
High Frequency Chest Wall Oscillation and Cystic Fibrosis
NCT01057524
Long-term Study, Comparing Vest Therapy to Positive Expiratory Pressure (PEP) Therapy in the Treatment of Cystic Fibrosis
NCT00817180
A Pilot Study to Evaluate the Use of the Vest® System for Treatment of Bronchiectasis Patients in the Home Setting
NCT04017312
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
HFCWC with higher pressure/variable frequency settings
Half patients randomly assigned to perform HFCWC therapy first with a higher pressure/variable frequency protocol. This entailed performing a 30 minute session with pressure of 10 and 5 minutes each at frequencies of 8,9, and 10 Hz followed by pressure of 6 and 5 minutes each at frequencies of 18, 19, and 20 Hz. This group subsequently crossed-over to the lower-pressure/mid-frequency HFCWC protocol after a washout period of 2 days. This entailed performing a HFCWC session using a pressure of 5 and frequency of 12 Hz for the entire 30 minute session. The other half of subjects were randomly assigned to perform the lower-pressure/mid-frequency protocol first followed by the higher pressure/mixed-frequency after the 2 day washout period
HFCWC with higher pressure/variable-frequency settings
Randomized crossover trial of airway clearance therapy comparing sine wave HFCWO with high pressures and variable frequency (pressure 10, frequencies 8,9,10 and pressure 6, frequencies 18,19,20) to low pressure and mid frequency (pressure 5, frequency 12). Subjects will have 2-day washout between airway clearance sessions. All sputum collected during sessions.
HFCWC with lower pressure/mid-frequency settings
Subjects will perform pulmonary function tests prior to and following each airway clearance therapy. All sputum produced during, and for 15 minutes following airway clearance therapy will be collected. Subjects will complete a questionnaire addressing the comfort of therapy upon completion of the session.
HFCWC with lower pressure/mid-frequency settings
lower-pressure/mid-frequency protocol first followed by the higher pressure/mixed-frequency
HFCWC with higher pressure/variable-frequency settings
Randomized crossover trial of airway clearance therapy comparing sine wave HFCWO with high pressures and variable frequency (pressure 10, frequencies 8,9,10 and pressure 6, frequencies 18,19,20) to low pressure and mid frequency (pressure 5, frequency 12). Subjects will have 2-day washout between airway clearance sessions. All sputum collected during sessions.
HFCWC with lower pressure/mid-frequency settings
Subjects will perform pulmonary function tests prior to and following each airway clearance therapy. All sputum produced during, and for 15 minutes following airway clearance therapy will be collected. Subjects will complete a questionnaire addressing the comfort of therapy upon completion of the session.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
HFCWC with higher pressure/variable-frequency settings
Randomized crossover trial of airway clearance therapy comparing sine wave HFCWO with high pressures and variable frequency (pressure 10, frequencies 8,9,10 and pressure 6, frequencies 18,19,20) to low pressure and mid frequency (pressure 5, frequency 12). Subjects will have 2-day washout between airway clearance sessions. All sputum collected during sessions.
HFCWC with lower pressure/mid-frequency settings
Subjects will perform pulmonary function tests prior to and following each airway clearance therapy. All sputum produced during, and for 15 minutes following airway clearance therapy will be collected. Subjects will complete a questionnaire addressing the comfort of therapy upon completion of the session.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Age older than 18 years.
3. History of chronic daily sputum production.
4. Currently on a home therapeutic regimen that includes some form of airway clearance performed with a HFCWO device at least once daily that also includes concomitant use of an inhaled mucolytic and inhaled bronchodilator.
5. FVC and FEV1 \> 40%-predicted, and with stable lung function (no greater than a 10% variation in lung function parameters over the preceding 3 months).
6. Evaluated at the University of Minnesota CF Center 3 or more times in the preceding 12 months.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Hemoptysis \> 60 cc in a single episode in the 4 weeks preceding enrollment.
3. Chest pain requiring use of narcotic for pain control.
4. Current participation in another clinical trial.
5. Use of intravenous antibiotics for CF respiratory complications in the 2 months preceding enrollment.
6. No prior experience using HFCWO devices for airway clearance
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hill-Rom
INDUSTRY
University of Minnesota
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Robert R Kempainen, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Minnesota
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Minnesota Medical Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kempainen RR, Milla C, Dunitz J, Savik K, Hazelwood A, Williams C, Rubin BK, Billings JL. Comparison of settings used for high-frequency chest-wall compression in cystic fibrosis. Respir Care. 2010 Jun;55(6):695-701.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
0802M26441
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.