Second-line Endocrine Treatment Followed by Capecitabine Versus Capecitabine Followed by Endocrine Treatment in Patients With Metastatic ER Positive Breast Cancer

NCT ID: NCT00684216

Last Updated: 2017-09-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2/PHASE3

Total Enrollment

10 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-04-30

Study Completion Date

2013-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This trial studies the effects on quality of life and on time to second progression of the sequence endocrine therapy-capecitabine versus the sequence capecitabine-endocrine treatment. It is anticipated that the time on study (which is the time between randomization and the discontinuation of the second treatment in the sequence) will be similar for both arms of the study. The quality of life during this period, however, could be better in the patient group receiving the most effective first agent in the sequence. If this proves to be true, the conventional wisdom that endocrine therapy should be continued until no further endocrine options remain, must be abandoned.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a randomized phase II/II study. Patients are randomized for the sequence capecitabine-hormonal therapy versus hormonal therapy- capecitabine. At progression the patient should receive the other protocol treatment (e.g. if the patient was randomized to capecitabine, at progression the treatment should be switched to hormonal treatment).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Breast Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

capecitabine followed by hormonal treatment

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

capecitabine

Intervention Type DRUG

200 mg, BID, PO, QD until progression of disease

hormonal treatment (tamoxifen, exemestane, anastrozole or letrozole)

Intervention Type DRUG

either tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitor (exemestane, anastrozole or letrozole), QD, until progression of disease

2

hormonal treatment followed by capecitabine

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

capecitabine

Intervention Type DRUG

200 mg, BID, PO, QD until progression of disease

hormonal treatment (tamoxifen, exemestane, anastrozole or letrozole)

Intervention Type DRUG

either tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitor (exemestane, anastrozole or letrozole), QD, until progression of disease

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

capecitabine

200 mg, BID, PO, QD until progression of disease

Intervention Type DRUG

hormonal treatment (tamoxifen, exemestane, anastrozole or letrozole)

either tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitor (exemestane, anastrozole or letrozole), QD, until progression of disease

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Written informed consent.
2. Proven infiltrating breast cancer with distant metastases or inoperable locally advanced disease.
3. Positive estrogen receptor (≥ 10% positive nuclei at immunohistochemistry). Progesterone and HER-2 neu receptor have to be known.
4. \- Progressive disease during first line hormonal therapy (either tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitor) for metastatic or inoperable locally advanced disease. Simultaneous use of LH-RH analogs is allowed. OR - Recurrence of disease (M1) during adjuvant hormonal therapy (either tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitor).
5. No prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease
6. Willing and able to participate in Quality of Life investigation -

Exclusion Criteria

1. Other malignancy except carcinoma in situ, unless the other malignancy was treated 5 or more years ago with curative intent without the use of chemotherapy or radiation therapy.
2. Pregnancy or breast feeding women.
3. Contra-indications to the use of capecitabine
4. Known CNS metastases
Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

The Netherlands Cancer Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

NKI-AVL

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sjoerd Rodenhuis, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

NKI-AvL

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

NKI-AVL

Amsterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Eudract 2007-007030-20

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

N07MAN

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.