Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study to Assess the Effect of CellCept (Mycophenolate Mofetil) and Reduced Corticosteroids in Patients With Active Pemphigus Vulgaris (PV) (NCT NCT00683930)
NCT ID: NCT00683930
Last Updated: 2011-06-22
Results Overview
The proportion of subjects achieving responder status (defined as no new persistent lesions and prednisone dose of not more than 10 mg/day from Week 48 until study termination at Week 52) in the two active treatment groups combined (2 g/day and 3 g/day mycophenolate mofetil) compared with the placebo group
COMPLETED
PHASE3
96 participants
52 weeks
2011-06-22
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Placebo
Placebo for Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) 2 g/day group: 4 tablets orally twice daily for 52 weeks; placebo for MMF 3 g/day group: 6 tablets orally twice daily for 52 weeks
|
MMF 2 g/Day
Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) 500 mg tablets; 4 tablets twice daily for 52 weeks
|
MMF 3 g/Day
Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) 500 mg tablets; 6 tablets twice daily for 52 weeks
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
36
|
21
|
37
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
29
|
18
|
28
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
7
|
3
|
9
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
A Study to Assess the Effect of CellCept (Mycophenolate Mofetil) and Reduced Corticosteroids in Patients With Active Pemphigus Vulgaris (PV)
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Placebo
n=36 Participants
Placebo for Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) 2 g/day group: 4 tablets orally twice daily for 52 weeks; placebo for MMF 3 g/day group: 6 tablets orally twice daily for 52 weeks
|
MMF 2 g/Day
n=21 Participants
Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) 500 mg tablets; 4 tablets twice daily for 52 weeks
|
MMF 3 g/Day
n=37 Participants
Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) 500 mg tablets; 6 tablets twice daily for 52 weeks
|
Total
n=94 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age Continuous
|
45.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.18 • n=5 Participants
|
41.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.59 • n=7 Participants
|
44.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.47 • n=5 Participants
|
44.33 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.45 • n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
24 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
56 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
38 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 52 weeksPopulation: Intent-to-treat population. Analysis population (AP): Placebo = 36; MMF 2 g/day or 3 g/day = 58.
The proportion of subjects achieving responder status (defined as no new persistent lesions and prednisone dose of not more than 10 mg/day from Week 48 until study termination at Week 52) in the two active treatment groups combined (2 g/day and 3 g/day mycophenolate mofetil) compared with the placebo group
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=36 Participants
Placebo for MMF 2 g/day group: 4 tablets orally twice daily for 52 weeks; placebo for MMF 3 g/day group: 6 tablets orally twice daily for 52 weeks
|
MMF 2 g/Day and MMF 3 g/Day Groups Combined
n=58 Participants
MMF 2 g/day group: 500 mg tablets, 4 tablets twice daily for 52 weeks MMF 3 g/day group: 500 mg tablets, 6 tablets twice daily for 52 weeks
|
Mycophenolate Mofetil 2 g/Day
MMF 500 mg tablets; 4 tablets twice daily for 52 weeks
|
Mycophenolate Mofetil 3 g/Day
MMF 500 mg tablets; 6 tablets twice daily for 52 weeks
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Patients Achieving Responder Status at Week 52
|
63.9 Percentage of Participants
|
69.0 Percentage of Participants
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: up to 52 weeksPopulation: Intent-to-treat population. Analysis population (AP): Placebo = 36, subjects censored = 7; MMF 2 g/day or 3 g/day = 58, subjects censored = 10.
Time to initial response defined as the time that the subject first demonstrated responder status (defined as no new persistent lesions and prednisone dose of not more than 10 mg/day from Week 48 until study termination at Week 52)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=36 Participants
Placebo for MMF 2 g/day group: 4 tablets orally twice daily for 52 weeks; placebo for MMF 3 g/day group: 6 tablets orally twice daily for 52 weeks
|
MMF 2 g/Day and MMF 3 g/Day Groups Combined
n=58 Participants
MMF 2 g/day group: 500 mg tablets, 4 tablets twice daily for 52 weeks MMF 3 g/day group: 500 mg tablets, 6 tablets twice daily for 52 weeks
|
Mycophenolate Mofetil 2 g/Day
MMF 500 mg tablets; 4 tablets twice daily for 52 weeks
|
Mycophenolate Mofetil 3 g/Day
MMF 500 mg tablets; 6 tablets twice daily for 52 weeks
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Time to Initial Response
|
31.3 Weeks
Interval 25.0 to 36.4
|
24.1 Weeks
Interval 20.3 to 32.4
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: up to 52 weeksPopulation: Intent-to-treat population. Analysis population (AP): Placebo = 36, subjects censored = 20; MMF 2 g/day or 3 g/day = 58, subjects censored = 23.
Time to sustained response is defined as the week the subject first demonstrates both of the conditions of responder status provided the conditions are maintained through to study termination at Week 52. If a subject does not have a sustained response, time to sustained response is censored on the last day of the study.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=16 Participants
Placebo for MMF 2 g/day group: 4 tablets orally twice daily for 52 weeks; placebo for MMF 3 g/day group: 6 tablets orally twice daily for 52 weeks
|
MMF 2 g/Day and MMF 3 g/Day Groups Combined
n=35 Participants
MMF 2 g/day group: 500 mg tablets, 4 tablets twice daily for 52 weeks MMF 3 g/day group: 500 mg tablets, 6 tablets twice daily for 52 weeks
|
Mycophenolate Mofetil 2 g/Day
MMF 500 mg tablets; 4 tablets twice daily for 52 weeks
|
Mycophenolate Mofetil 3 g/Day
MMF 500 mg tablets; 6 tablets twice daily for 52 weeks
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Time to Sustained Response
|
46.0 Weeks
Interval 29.7 to
Data not available. Median, Q1, and Q3 are calculated from Kaplan-Meier estimates.
|
32.1 Weeks
Interval 20.6 to
Data not available. Median, Q1, and Q3 are calculated from Kaplan-Meier estimates.
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 52 weeksPopulation: Intent-to-treat population. Analysis population (AP): Placebo = 36; MMF 2 g/day = 21; MMF 3 g/day = 37; MMF Groups Combined (2 g/day or 3 g/day) = 58.
The duration of prednisone maintenance dosing was defined as the number of days that subjects maintained a prednisone dose of not more than 10 mg/day in the absence of new persistent lesions.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=36 Participants
Placebo for MMF 2 g/day group: 4 tablets orally twice daily for 52 weeks; placebo for MMF 3 g/day group: 6 tablets orally twice daily for 52 weeks
|
MMF 2 g/Day and MMF 3 g/Day Groups Combined
n=58 Participants
MMF 2 g/day group: 500 mg tablets, 4 tablets twice daily for 52 weeks MMF 3 g/day group: 500 mg tablets, 6 tablets twice daily for 52 weeks
|
Mycophenolate Mofetil 2 g/Day
n=21 Participants
MMF 500 mg tablets; 4 tablets twice daily for 52 weeks
|
Mycophenolate Mofetil 3 g/Day
n=37 Participants
MMF 500 mg tablets; 6 tablets twice daily for 52 weeks
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Duration of Prednisone Maintenance Dosing
|
136.5 Days
Interval 60.0 to 191.0
|
186.0 Days
Interval 79.0 to 244.0
|
185.0 Days
Interval 109.0 to 246.0
|
187.0 Days
Interval 75.0 to 225.0
|
Adverse Events
Placebo
MMF 2 g/Day
MMF 3 g/Day
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo
n=36 participants at risk
Placebo for Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) 2 g/day group: 4 tablets orally twice daily for 52 weeks; placebo for MMF 3 g/day group: 6 tablets orally twice daily for 52 weeks
|
MMF 2 g/Day
n=21 participants at risk
Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) 500 mg tablets; 4 tablets twice daily for 52 weeks
|
MMF 3 g/Day
n=37 participants at risk
Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) 500 mg tablets; 6 tablets twice daily for 52 weeks
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Food Poisoning
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebrovascular Accident
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
4.8%
1/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pemphigus
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
Pregnancy
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
Abortion Spontaneous
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Cardiovascular Insufficiency
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Duodenal Ulcer
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Pancreatitis
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteonecrosis
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Varicella
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Eye disorders
Cataract
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo
n=36 participants at risk
Placebo for Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) 2 g/day group: 4 tablets orally twice daily for 52 weeks; placebo for MMF 3 g/day group: 6 tablets orally twice daily for 52 weeks
|
MMF 2 g/Day
n=21 participants at risk
Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) 500 mg tablets; 4 tablets twice daily for 52 weeks
|
MMF 3 g/Day
n=37 participants at risk
Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) 500 mg tablets; 6 tablets twice daily for 52 weeks
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Arthropod Sting
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Contusion
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
4.8%
1/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
19.0%
4/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
8.1%
3/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper Respiratory Tract Infection
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
4.8%
1/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
13.5%
5/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Rhinitis
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
5.4%
2/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Laryngitis
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pharyngitis
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Tonsillitis
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Oral Candidiasis
|
5.6%
2/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
4.8%
1/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
24.3%
9/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Candidiasis
|
5.6%
2/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
4.8%
1/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Skin Candida
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Skin Infection
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
9.5%
2/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Furuncle
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
5.4%
2/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Paronychia
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pyoderma
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
4.8%
1/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Subcutaneous Abscess
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
4.8%
1/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis Acute
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
5.4%
2/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Lower Respiratory Tract Infection
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
4.8%
1/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia Primary Atypical
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary Tract Infection
|
5.6%
2/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
10.8%
4/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cystitis
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
5.4%
2/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pyelonephritis
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urethritis
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Herpes Simplex
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
9.5%
2/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
5.4%
2/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Herpetic Gingivostomatitis
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
5.4%
2/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Herpes Zoster
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Folliculitis
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
5.4%
2/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bacteriuria
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bacterial Infection
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Tinea Versicolour
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
4.8%
1/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
5.4%
2/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Body Tinea
|
5.6%
2/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Viral Infection
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
5.4%
2/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis Viral
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis Viral
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Dysentery
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Tooth Abscess
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
4.8%
1/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Fungal Skin Infection
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Infection
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
4.8%
1/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Respiratory Tract Infection
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Molluscum Contagiosum
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
4.8%
1/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Anogenital Warts
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pemphigus
|
33.3%
12/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
33.3%
7/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
27.0%
10/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Blister
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
4.8%
1/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Acne
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
10.8%
4/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatitis Acneiform
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
9.5%
2/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash Pruritic
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus Generalised
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Alopecia
|
5.6%
2/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
4.8%
1/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Alopecia Effluvium
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Heat Rash
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
4.8%
1/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Hyperhidrosis
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Swelling Face
|
8.3%
3/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
4.8%
1/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin Lesion
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Ecchymosis
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
4.8%
1/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Petechiae
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
4.8%
1/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Purpura
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
4.8%
1/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Purpura Senile
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin Ulcer
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
4.8%
1/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Erythema
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
4.8%
1/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin Hyperpigmentation
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
4.8%
1/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
10.8%
4/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
4.8%
1/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
5.6%
2/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
9.5%
2/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
8.1%
3/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrooesophageal Reflux Disease
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
4.8%
1/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
8.3%
3/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
4.8%
1/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
8.1%
3/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal Pain
|
8.3%
3/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
5.4%
2/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal Pain Upper
|
5.6%
2/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
5.4%
2/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Frequent Bowel Movements
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
4.8%
1/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Cheilitis
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Lip Ulceration
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
4.8%
1/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Oral Soft Tissue Disorder
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Aphthous Stomatitis
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
4.8%
1/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Mouth Ulceration
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Oral Mucosa Erosion
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Stomatitis
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Rectal Tenesmus
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Toothache
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dyspepsia
|
5.6%
2/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal Distension
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Flatulence
|
5.6%
2/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastritis
|
5.6%
2/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Enteritis
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
4.8%
1/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Stomach Discomfort
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
4.8%
1/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dysphagia
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Haemorrhoids
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Rectal Haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dry Mouth
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
4.8%
1/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Oral Pain
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Odynophagia
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Oral Discomfort
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Salivary Hypersecretion
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Anal Fissure
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Loose Tooth
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gingivitis
|
5.6%
2/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Haematemesis
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
8.3%
3/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
19.0%
4/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
8.1%
3/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
4.8%
1/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
5.4%
2/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
General disorders
Asthenia
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
5.4%
2/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
General disorders
Pain
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
4.8%
1/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
5.4%
2/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
General disorders
Chest Pain
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
General disorders
Irritability
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
4.8%
1/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
General disorders
Influenza Like Illness
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
General disorders
Chest Discomfort
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
General disorders
Oedema Peripheral
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
4.8%
1/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back Pain
|
5.6%
2/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
4.8%
1/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
8.1%
3/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Flank Pain
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
5.4%
2/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal Chest Pain
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal Pain
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain In Extremity
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
4.8%
1/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Sensation of Heaviness
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
4.8%
1/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
14.3%
3/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
5.4%
2/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Joint Stiffness
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle Spasms
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
8.1%
3/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle Twitching
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
4.8%
1/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Bone Pain
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscular Weakness
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myopathy
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
4.8%
1/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myopathy Steroid
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Spinal Column Stenosis
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoporosis
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle Rigidity
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
4.8%
1/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
16.2%
6/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dysgeusia
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
9.5%
2/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
5.4%
2/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Lethargy
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Somnolence
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
4.8%
1/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Migraine
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Migraine With Aura
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
5.4%
2/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Hypoaesthesia
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
4.8%
1/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Post Herpetic Neuralgia
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Tremor
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dyskinesia
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
5.6%
2/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
14.3%
3/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
8.1%
3/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Productive Cough
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
5.4%
2/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dysphonia
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pharyngolaryngeal Pain
|
8.3%
3/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
5.6%
2/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
4.8%
1/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea Exertional
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Bronchial Hyperreactivity
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Wheezing
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Lung Infiltration
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fall
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
5.4%
2/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Arthropod Bite
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Wound
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Skin Laceration
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
4.8%
1/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Ear Abrasion
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
4.8%
1/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Rib Fracture
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Joint Sprain
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Amenorrhoea
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
9.5%
2/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Metrorrhagia
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Polymenorrhoea
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
4.8%
1/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Erectile Dysfunction
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Perineal Pain
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Vaginal Erosion
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
8.3%
3/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
4.8%
1/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Lymphopenia
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
5.4%
2/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukocytosis
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
4.8%
1/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutropenia
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombocythaemia
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombocytopenia
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Eye disorders
Conjunctivitis
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
4.8%
1/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Eye disorders
Vision Blurred
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
4.8%
1/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Eye disorders
Visual Disturbance
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Eye disorders
Cataract
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
4.8%
1/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Eye disorders
Glaucoma
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
4.8%
1/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Eye disorders
Lacrimation Increased
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
4.8%
1/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Eye disorders
Abnormal Sensation in Eye
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Investigations
Weight Increased
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
8.1%
3/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Investigations
Weight Decreased
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Investigations
Blood Glucose Increased
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
4.8%
1/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Investigations
Electrocardiogram ST-T Change
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Investigations
Culture Urine Positive
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Investigations
Sputum Culture Positive
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Investigations
Intraocular Pressure Increased
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Investigations
White Blood Cells Urine
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
11.1%
4/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
14.3%
3/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
8.1%
3/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Venous Thrombosis
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Tachycardia
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
5.4%
2/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial Infarction
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Palpitations
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
4.8%
1/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Libido Decreased
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
4.8%
1/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Sleep Disorder
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
4.8%
1/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Nervousness
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depressed Mood
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Dysuria
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
5.4%
2/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Pollakiuria
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Endocrine disorders
Cushingoid
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
5.4%
2/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Vertigo
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Allergy to Arthropod Bite
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Central Obesity
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
2.7%
1/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Diabetes Mellitus
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycaemia
|
5.6%
2/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperlipidaemia
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Iron Deficiency
|
2.8%
1/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Skin Papilloma
|
0.00%
0/36 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
4.8%
1/21 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
0.00%
0/37 • AEs were monitored throughout the course of the study. Further follow-up was made at approximately 24 weeks (±7 days) after the Week 52 visit to record any AEs that occurred during the follow-up period.
Safety analysis population. Note one patient from both the placebo group and MMF 2g/day group were excluded from the safety population as no study drug was dispensed.
|
Additional Information
Medical Communications
Hoffmann-La Roche
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The Study being conducted under this Agreement is part of the Overall Study. Investigator is free to publish in reputable journals or to present at professional conferences the results of the Study, but only after the first publication or presentation that involves the Overall Study. The Sponsor may request that Confidential Information be deleted and/or the publication be postponed in order to protect the Sponsor's intellectual property rights.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER