Trial Outcomes & Findings for Cost Comparison of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Use in Emergency Department (ED) Patients With Chest Pain (NCT NCT00678639)
NCT ID: NCT00678639
Last Updated: 2018-09-11
Results Overview
Index hospitalization refers to the hospital visit during which the participant was enrolled in the trial. The primary outcome is examining the cost for this visit.
COMPLETED
NA
110 participants
Emergency Department (ED) arrival through hospital discharge, median length of stay was 28.1 hours
2018-09-11
Participant Flow
Participants were recruited from the emergency department January 2008 - March 2009.
Once consented, no participants were excluded from the trial prior to group assignment.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Emergency Department (ED) Observation Unit
Emergency Department observation unit - Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Protocol. Patients will be transferred to the observation unit and undergo a stress cardiac MRI evaluation.
|
Usual Care
This is the comparison arm. Patients are admitted to the hospital and undergo usual care.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
53
|
57
|
|
Overall Study
Hospital Discharge
|
53
|
57
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
51
|
57
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
2
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Emergency Department (ED) Observation Unit
Emergency Department observation unit - Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Protocol. Patients will be transferred to the observation unit and undergo a stress cardiac MRI evaluation.
|
Usual Care
This is the comparison arm. Patients are admitted to the hospital and undergo usual care.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up at 30 days
|
2
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Cost Comparison of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Use in Emergency Department (ED) Patients With Chest Pain
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Emergency Department (ED) Observation Unit
n=53 Participants
Emergency Department observation unit - Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Protocol. Patients will be transferred to the observation unit and undergo a stress cardiac MRI evaluation.
|
Usual Care
n=57 Participants
This is the comparison arm. Patients are admitted to the hospital and undergo usual care.
|
Total
n=110 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
45 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
47 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
92 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
28 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
27 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
55 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
25 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
30 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
55 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
53 participants
n=5 Participants
|
57 participants
n=7 Participants
|
110 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Emergency Department (ED) arrival through hospital discharge, median length of stay was 28.1 hoursPopulation: All participants were analyzed based on intention to treat.
Index hospitalization refers to the hospital visit during which the participant was enrolled in the trial. The primary outcome is examining the cost for this visit.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Emergency Department (ED) Observation Unit
n=53 Participants
Emergency Department observation unit - Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Protocol. Patients will be transferred to the observation unit and undergo a stress cardiac MRI evaluation.
|
Usual Care
n=57 Participants
This is the comparison arm. Patients are admitted to the hospital and undergo usual care.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Cost of Index Hospitalization
|
2062 US Dollars
Interval 1918.0 to 2367.0
|
2680 US Dollars
Interval 2408.0 to 3448.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 30 DaysPopulation: 4 participants (3 in the usual care group and 1 in the ED obs unit group) left Against Medical Advice (AMA) prior to completion of their evaluation and were excluded from this analysis. Analysis was per intention to treat.
Participants with ACS and admitted or not experiencing ACS and discharged will be considered a correct admission decision. Remaining participants will be considered to have incorrect admission decisions.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Emergency Department (ED) Observation Unit
n=52 Participants
Emergency Department observation unit - Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Protocol. Patients will be transferred to the observation unit and undergo a stress cardiac MRI evaluation.
|
Usual Care
n=54 Participants
This is the comparison arm. Patients are admitted to the hospital and undergo usual care.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Correct Admission Decision, Based Upon the Reference Standard of Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) at 30 Days
|
43 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Emergency Department (ED) arrival through hospital dischargePopulation: All participants randomized to the Observation Unit - Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging (OU-CMR) arm were analyzed based on intention to treat.
The number of participants able to complete the planned imaging sequences will be measured.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Emergency Department (ED) Observation Unit
n=53 Participants
Emergency Department observation unit - Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Protocol. Patients will be transferred to the observation unit and undergo a stress cardiac MRI evaluation.
|
Usual Care
This is the comparison arm. Patients are admitted to the hospital and undergo usual care.
|
|---|---|---|
|
The Number of Participants Randomized to the OU and Were Able to Complete CMR Imaging
|
46 Participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 30d, 3mo, 6mo, and 1 yearPopulation: Data reported through 30 days. Follow-up with participants is ongoing. Results will be updated once follow-up is complete.
Measured as self report, assessed during telephone follow-up.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Emergency Department (ED) Observation Unit
n=53 Participants
Emergency Department observation unit - Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Protocol. Patients will be transferred to the observation unit and undergo a stress cardiac MRI evaluation.
|
Usual Care
n=57 Participants
This is the comparison arm. Patients are admitted to the hospital and undergo usual care.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Utilized the Indicated Health Care Procedures
Resting Echocardiogram
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Utilized the Indicated Health Care Procedures
Cardiac related office visit
|
7 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Utilized the Indicated Health Care Procedures
Cardiac related ED visit
|
0 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Utilized the Indicated Health Care Procedures
Cardiac related hospitalization
|
0 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Utilized the Indicated Health Care Procedures
Cardiac related procedures
|
0 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Utilized the Indicated Health Care Procedures
Cardiac Catheterization
|
0 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Utilized the Indicated Health Care Procedures
Stress Test
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Occuring in the MRI scanning suite or within 30 minutes of the last image acquisition.Population: Only participants undergoing Cardiac MRI scanning are eligible for this endpoint. Only 49 of the 53 participants randomized to observation unit arm underwent CMR testing. Nine participants in the usual care arm underwent CMR testing.
Any event leading to early termination of the MRI acquisition, or requiring intervention by a physician, will be considered an adverse event related to MRI, excluding physician termination of image acquisition due to concerns of cardiac ischemia.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Emergency Department (ED) Observation Unit
n=49 Participants
Emergency Department observation unit - Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Protocol. Patients will be transferred to the observation unit and undergo a stress cardiac MRI evaluation.
|
Usual Care
n=9 Participants
This is the comparison arm. Patients are admitted to the hospital and undergo usual care.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Adverse Events During Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Scanning
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Emergency Department (ED) Observation Unit
Usual Care
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Emergency Department (ED) Observation Unit
n=53 participants at risk
Emergency Department observation unit - Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Protocol. Patients will be transferred to the observation unit and undergo a stress cardiac MRI evaluation.
|
Usual Care
n=57 participants at risk
This is the comparison arm. Patients are admitted to the hospital and undergo usual care.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Hospitalization for abdominal pain due to cholecystitis
|
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • The reported adverse event data was collected from participant enrollment through 90 days.
Adverse event assessment is ongoing and will be updated when follow-up is complete.
|
0.00%
0/57 • The reported adverse event data was collected from participant enrollment through 90 days.
Adverse event assessment is ongoing and will be updated when follow-up is complete.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Hospitalization for cerebral infarct
|
0.00%
0/53 • The reported adverse event data was collected from participant enrollment through 90 days.
Adverse event assessment is ongoing and will be updated when follow-up is complete.
|
1.8%
1/57 • Number of events 1 • The reported adverse event data was collected from participant enrollment through 90 days.
Adverse event assessment is ongoing and will be updated when follow-up is complete.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Hospitalization for chest pain
|
0.00%
0/53 • The reported adverse event data was collected from participant enrollment through 90 days.
Adverse event assessment is ongoing and will be updated when follow-up is complete.
|
8.8%
5/57 • Number of events 6 • The reported adverse event data was collected from participant enrollment through 90 days.
Adverse event assessment is ongoing and will be updated when follow-up is complete.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Hospitalization for chest pain and suicidal ideation
|
0.00%
0/53 • The reported adverse event data was collected from participant enrollment through 90 days.
Adverse event assessment is ongoing and will be updated when follow-up is complete.
|
1.8%
1/57 • Number of events 1 • The reported adverse event data was collected from participant enrollment through 90 days.
Adverse event assessment is ongoing and will be updated when follow-up is complete.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Hospitalization for neck surgery
|
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • The reported adverse event data was collected from participant enrollment through 90 days.
Adverse event assessment is ongoing and will be updated when follow-up is complete.
|
0.00%
0/57 • The reported adverse event data was collected from participant enrollment through 90 days.
Adverse event assessment is ongoing and will be updated when follow-up is complete.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Emergency Department (ED) Observation Unit
n=53 participants at risk
Emergency Department observation unit - Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Protocol. Patients will be transferred to the observation unit and undergo a stress cardiac MRI evaluation.
|
Usual Care
n=57 participants at risk
This is the comparison arm. Patients are admitted to the hospital and undergo usual care.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Investigations
Excessive cost of cardiac testing without Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS)
|
9.4%
5/53 • Number of events 5 • The reported adverse event data was collected from participant enrollment through 90 days.
Adverse event assessment is ongoing and will be updated when follow-up is complete.
|
1.8%
1/57 • Number of events 1 • The reported adverse event data was collected from participant enrollment through 90 days.
Adverse event assessment is ongoing and will be updated when follow-up is complete.
|
|
Social circumstances
Participant left before evaluation was completed
|
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • The reported adverse event data was collected from participant enrollment through 90 days.
Adverse event assessment is ongoing and will be updated when follow-up is complete.
|
5.3%
3/57 • Number of events 3 • The reported adverse event data was collected from participant enrollment through 90 days.
Adverse event assessment is ongoing and will be updated when follow-up is complete.
|
Additional Information
Chadwick Miller, MD
Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place