Trial Outcomes & Findings for Pivotal Study for the FLAIR Endovascular Stent Graft (NCT NCT00678249)
NCT ID: NCT00678249
Last Updated: 2011-05-11
Results Overview
TAPP was defined as patency (open to blood flow) after the study index procedure until reintervention in the treatment area (within 5 mm proximal or 5 mm distal to the study device or index balloon angioplasty treatment area), or thrombotic occlusion that involved the treatment area.
COMPLETED
NA
227 participants
6 month follow-up
2011-05-11
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
FLAIR
Primary PTA followed by placement of the FLAIR Endovascular Stent Graft
|
PTA Only
Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty
|
FLAIR Roll-In Participants
Primary PTA followed by placement of the FLAIR Endovascular Stent Graft. Roll-in participants were enrolled in the study for training purposes and were not randomized.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
97
|
93
|
37
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
97
|
93
|
37
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Pivotal Study for the FLAIR Endovascular Stent Graft
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
FLAIR
n=97 Participants
Primary PTA followed by placement of the FLAIR Endovascular Stent Graft
|
PTA Only
n=93 Participants
Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty
|
FLAIR Roll-In Participants
n=37 Participants
Primary PTA followed by placement of the FLAIR Endovascular Stent Graft. Roll-in participants were enrolled in the study for training purposes and were not randomized.
|
Total
n=227 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
52 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
50 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
21 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
123 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
45 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
43 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
104 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Age Continuous
|
61.83 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.63 • n=5 Participants
|
59.83 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.58 • n=7 Participants
|
62.16 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.84 • n=5 Participants
|
60.36 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.09 • n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
64 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
57 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
144 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
33 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
36 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
83 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
97 participants
n=5 Participants
|
93 participants
n=7 Participants
|
37 participants
n=5 Participants
|
227 participants
n=4 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 month follow-upPopulation: If a participant was lost to follow-up prior to the follow-up interval window, then the participant's status was considered missing for that time point and was not included in the ITT analysis.
TAPP was defined as patency (open to blood flow) after the study index procedure until reintervention in the treatment area (within 5 mm proximal or 5 mm distal to the study device or index balloon angioplasty treatment area), or thrombotic occlusion that involved the treatment area.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
FLAIR
n=91 Participants
Primary PTA followed by placement of the FLAIR Endovascular Stent Graft
|
PTA Only
n=86 Participants
Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty
|
FLAIR Roll-In Participants
n=35 Participants
Primary PTA followed by placement of the FLAIR Endovascular Stent Graft. Roll-in participants were enrolled in the study for training purposes and were not randomized.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent of Participants With Treatment Area Primary Patency (TAPP)
|
51 Percentage of Participants
|
23 Percentage of Participants
|
60 Percentage of Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 month Follow-UpThe safety endpoint was evaluated based on the incidence of adverse events observed within the same time interval. An adverse event was defined as any undesirable clinical occurrence in a patient that (a) is considered possibly or definietly device related by the investigator, (b) involves the access circuit (AV graft arterial anastomosis to the superior vena cava-right atrial junction) or the arm where the access circuit is located or (c) the investigator considers relevant to the objectives of this study. An adverse event could be mild, moderate or severe.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
FLAIR
n=97 Participants
Primary PTA followed by placement of the FLAIR Endovascular Stent Graft
|
PTA Only
n=93 Participants
Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty
|
FLAIR Roll-In Participants
n=37 Participants
Primary PTA followed by placement of the FLAIR Endovascular Stent Graft. Roll-in participants were enrolled in the study for training purposes and were not randomized.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total Number of Adverse Events
|
106 total events
|
106 total events
|
33 total events
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Index ProcedurePopulation: The PTA Only group was not analyzed for this outcome measure because it is for successful delivery of the FLAIR study device (PTA Only is the control arm).
The ability to successfully deliver the FLAIR™ Endovascular Stent Graft. Successful delivery is the ability to deliver and seat the implant in the intended location of a stenosed segment of the venous anastomosis region of a synthetic access graft. This attribute is only applicable to the FLAIR and FLAIR Roll-in arms.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
FLAIR
n=97 Participants
Primary PTA followed by placement of the FLAIR Endovascular Stent Graft
|
PTA Only
Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty
|
FLAIR Roll-In Participants
n=37 Participants
Primary PTA followed by placement of the FLAIR Endovascular Stent Graft. Roll-in participants were enrolled in the study for training purposes and were not randomized.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent of Participants With Successful Delivery of the Device
|
99 Percentage of Participants
|
—
|
100 Percentage of Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Index ProcedureProcedural Success was defined as anatomic success (\<30% residual stenosis) and at least one indicator of hemodynamic or clinical success
Outcome measures
| Measure |
FLAIR
n=97 Participants
Primary PTA followed by placement of the FLAIR Endovascular Stent Graft
|
PTA Only
n=93 Participants
Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty
|
FLAIR Roll-In Participants
n=37 Participants
Primary PTA followed by placement of the FLAIR Endovascular Stent Graft. Roll-in participants were enrolled in the study for training purposes and were not randomized.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent of Participants With Procedural Success
|
94 Percentage of Participants
|
73 Percentage of Participants
|
95 Percentage of Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 month Follow-UpPopulation: If a participant was lost to follow-up prior to the follow-up interval window, then the participant's status was considered missing for that time point and was not included in the ITT analysis.
TAPP was defined as patency (open to blood flow) after the study index procedure until reintervention in the treatment area (within 5 mm proximal or 5 mm distal to the study device or index balloon angioplasty treatment area), or thrombotic occlusion that involved the treatment area.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
FLAIR
n=96 Participants
Primary PTA followed by placement of the FLAIR Endovascular Stent Graft
|
PTA Only
n=92 Participants
Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty
|
FLAIR Roll-In Participants
n=37 Participants
Primary PTA followed by placement of the FLAIR Endovascular Stent Graft. Roll-in participants were enrolled in the study for training purposes and were not randomized.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent of Participants With TAPP
|
80 Percentage of Participants
|
77 Percentage of Participants
|
89 Percentage of Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 month Follow-UpPopulation: If a participant was lost to follow-up prior to the follow-up interval window, then the participant's status was considered missing for that time point and was not included in the ITT analysis.
ACCP defined as patency (open to blood flow) following the index study procedure until access thrombosis or an intervention of a lesion anywhere within the access circuit.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
FLAIR
n=92 Participants
Primary PTA followed by placement of the FLAIR Endovascular Stent Graft
|
PTA Only
n=86 Participants
Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty
|
FLAIR Roll-In Participants
n=35 Participants
Primary PTA followed by placement of the FLAIR Endovascular Stent Graft. Roll-in participants were enrolled in the study for training purposes and were not randomized.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent of Participants With Access Circuit Primary Patency (ACPP)
|
38 Percentage of Participants
|
20 Percentage of Participants
|
43 Percentage of Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 month Follow-UpPopulation: If a participant was lost to follow-up prior to the follow-up interval window, then the participant's status was considered missing for that time point and was not included in the ITT analysis.
ACAPP defined as patency (open to blood flow)following the index study procedure until access thrombosis or a surgical intervention that excludes the treated lesion from the access circuit.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
FLAIR
n=90 Participants
Primary PTA followed by placement of the FLAIR Endovascular Stent Graft
|
PTA Only
n=84 Participants
Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty
|
FLAIR Roll-In Participants
n=35 Participants
Primary PTA followed by placement of the FLAIR Endovascular Stent Graft. Roll-in participants were enrolled in the study for training purposes and were not randomized.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent of Participants With Access Circuit Assisted Primary Patency (ACAPP)
|
66 Percentage of Participants
|
74 Percentage of Participants
|
66 Percentage of Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 month Follow-UpPopulation: If a participant was lost to follow-up prior to the follow-up interval window, then the participant's status was considered missing for that time point and was not included in the ITT analysis.
ACCP defined as patency (open to blood flow) following the index study procedure until the access is surgically revised or abandoned because of the inability to treat the original lesion. Multiple treatments for occlusions to restore patency are compatible with ACCP.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
FLAIR
n=91 Participants
Primary PTA followed by placement of the FLAIR Endovascular Stent Graft
|
PTA Only
n=85 Participants
Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty
|
FLAIR Roll-In Participants
n=35 Participants
Primary PTA followed by placement of the FLAIR Endovascular Stent Graft. Roll-in participants were enrolled in the study for training purposes and were not randomized.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent of Participants With Access Circuit Cumulative Patency (ACCP or Secondary Patency)
|
81 Percentage of Participants
|
86 Percentage of Participants
|
91 Percentage of Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 month Follow-UpPopulation: If a participant was lost to follow-up prior to the follow-up interval window (or the core lab could not assess the angiogram), then the participant's status was considered missing for that time point and was not included in the ITT analysis.
Binary restenosis defined as lesions with greater than or equal to 50% diameter stenosis of the treatment area (calculated by a core lab).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
FLAIR
n=76 Participants
Primary PTA followed by placement of the FLAIR Endovascular Stent Graft
|
PTA Only
n=67 Participants
Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty
|
FLAIR Roll-In Participants
n=28 Participants
Primary PTA followed by placement of the FLAIR Endovascular Stent Graft. Roll-in participants were enrolled in the study for training purposes and were not randomized.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent of Participants With Binary Restenosis
|
28 Percentage of Participants
|
78 Percentage of Participants
|
25 Percentage of Participants
|
Adverse Events
FLAIR
PTA Only
FLAIR Roll-In Participants
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
FLAIR
n=97 participants at risk
Primary PTA followed by placement of the FLAIR Endovascular Stent Graft
|
PTA Only
n=93 participants at risk
Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty
|
FLAIR Roll-In Participants
n=37 participants at risk
Primary PTA followed by placement of the FLAIR Endovascular Stent Graft. Roll-in participants were enrolled in the study for training purposes and were not randomized.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Death
|
5.3%
5/95 • Number of events 5 • 6 months
|
5.6%
5/90 • Number of events 5 • 6 months
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • 6 months
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
FLAIR
n=97 participants at risk
Primary PTA followed by placement of the FLAIR Endovascular Stent Graft
|
PTA Only
n=93 participants at risk
Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty
|
FLAIR Roll-In Participants
n=37 participants at risk
Primary PTA followed by placement of the FLAIR Endovascular Stent Graft. Roll-in participants were enrolled in the study for training purposes and were not randomized.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Infection
|
6.3%
6/95 • Number of events 6 • 6 months
|
2.2%
2/90 • Number of events 2 • 6 months
|
0.00%
0/36 • 6 months
|
|
Vascular disorders
Stenosis
|
40.0%
38/95 • Number of events 38 • 6 months
|
76.7%
69/90 • Number of events 69 • 6 months
|
41.7%
15/36 • Number of events 15 • 6 months
|
|
Vascular disorders
Thrombotic Occlusion
|
32.6%
31/95 • Number of events 31 • 6 months
|
21.1%
19/90 • Number of events 19 • 6 months
|
33.3%
12/36 • Number of events 12 • 6 months
|
|
Vascular disorders
Vessel rupture
|
3.2%
3/95 • Number of events 3 • 6 months
|
1.1%
1/90 • Number of events 1 • 6 months
|
0.00%
0/36 • 6 months
|
|
Vascular disorders
Pseudoaneurysm
|
5.3%
5/95 • Number of events 5 • 6 months
|
2.2%
2/90 • Number of events 2 • 6 months
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • 6 months
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hematoma
|
2.1%
2/95 • Number of events 2 • 6 months
|
0.00%
0/90 • 6 months
|
0.00%
0/36 • 6 months
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Signficant arm or hand edema
|
3.2%
3/95 • Number of events 3 • 6 months
|
2.2%
2/90 • Number of events 2 • 6 months
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • 6 months
|
|
Vascular disorders
Steal syndrome
|
2.1%
2/95 • Number of events 2 • 6 months
|
1.1%
1/90 • Number of events 1 • 6 months
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • 6 months
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Congestive heart failure
|
4.2%
4/95 • Number of events 4 • 6 months
|
2.2%
2/90 • Number of events 2 • 6 months
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • 6 months
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebrovascular accident
|
2.1%
2/95 • Number of events 2 • 6 months
|
3.3%
3/90 • Number of events 3 • 6 months
|
0.00%
0/36 • 6 months
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Device migration
|
4.2%
4/95 • Number of events 4 • 6 months
|
0.00%
0/90 • 6 months
|
0.00%
0/36 • 6 months
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Permanent deformation of the Endoluminal Device
|
1.1%
1/95 • Number of events 1 • 6 months
|
0.00%
0/90 • 6 months
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • 6 months
|
Additional Information
John Reviere, Director, Clinical Affairs
Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place