Raltegravir And Darunavir Antiretroviral in Antiretroviral Naive Patients

NCT ID: NCT00677300

Last Updated: 2014-09-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

85 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-01-31

Study Completion Date

2012-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether a combination of raltegravir and darunavir is as effective as standard regimens in the treatment of HIV-infected patients who have not previously used antiretroviral drug (treatment naive)

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

STUDY RATIONALE:

The current guidelines for HIV treatment in antiretroviral naive patients recommend the use of two drugs in the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) class in addition to one drug in the protease inhibitor (PI) or in the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) class.

NRTI use is associated with significant toxicity, including mitochondrial dysfunction (mostly attributed to thymidine-analogue NRTIs): lipoatrophy, peripheral neuropathy, pancreatitis, lactic acidosis. There's also a significant risk of hypersensitivity reaction from Abacavir, and caution is needed when using Tenofovir in patients with renal failure.

Finding effective NRTI-free regimens would have a number of potential benefits including: 1) a significant expansion of therapeutic options; despite the growing number of antiretrovirals, treatment options might still be significantly limited in a patient with a number of baseline NRTI mutations or poor NRTI tolerance; 2) potential avoidance of toxicities.

Raltegravir is a leading candidate in a new class of antiretroviral medications called integrase inhibitors. It is currently approved for use in antiretroviral treatment experienced patients, but has been shown to have excellent virologic efficacy in naïve as well as heavily treatment experienced patients. It also has been shown to have unusually rapid virologic response. This profile might be excellent in delaying emergence of viral resistance in naïve patients.

Three phase III trials of Raltegravir in treatment experienced patients have been conducted (BENCHMRK trials). In both of these studies, more than 75 percent of patients receiving Raltegravir plus optimized background therapy (OBT) achieved viral load (HIV RNA) reductions to less than 400 copies/mL compared to more than 40 percent of patients receiving placebo plus OBT. Both studies also showed that Raltegravir plus OBT was generally well tolerated.

Darunavir is currently approved for use in HAART-experienced patients at the dose of 600 mg bid with ritonavir boosting. In subgroup analysis of the BENCHMRK trials, use of Raltegravir and Darunavir was associated with 90% virologic responses (HIV RNA \< 400 copies/mL) at 24 weeks in treatment experienced subjects. Also, the recently presented ARTEMIS study found once-daily Darunavir to be non-inferior to either once- or twice-daily lopinavir/ritonavir in antiretroviral naïve patients. After 48 weeks a time-to-loss-of-virologic response analysis determined that 84% assigned to darunavir and 78% assigned to lopinavir had a viral load below 50 copies. In subgroup analysis, DRV/r QD was superior to LPV/r (overall) in patients with baseline viral load ≥100,000 copies/mL Furthermore, the DRV/r QD group experienced a lower incidence of lipid abnormalities than the lopinavir/ritonavir group.

HYPOTHESES

We hypothesize that the virologic efficacy (time to loss of virologic response) at 48 weeks will be at least as high following a regimen of Raltegravir + boosted Darunavir as with a regimen of Tenofovir + Emtricitabine + boosted Darunavir.

We further hypothesize that a regimen of Raltegravir + boosted Darunavir will not result in higher rates of adverse events at 48 weeks than a regimen of Tenofovir + Emtricitabine + boosted Darunavir.

STUDY DESIGN AND DURATION

This is a randomized, active Control, safety/efficacy study. All eligible patients (antiretroviral naïve,) will be randomized (1:1) into two treatment groups:

1. Group A: will receive Raltegravir + Ritonavir-boosted Darunavir
2. Group B: will receive Tenofovir + Emtricitabine + Ritonavir-boosted Darunavir

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

HIV Infections

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group A

Will receive Raltegravir (400mg twice daily) + Ritonavir-boosted (100mg once daily) Darunavir (800mg once daily)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Raltegravir

Intervention Type DRUG

400mg P.O. (orally) twice daily for 48 weeks

Darunavir

Intervention Type DRUG

800 mg P.O. (orally) once daily

Ritonavir

Intervention Type DRUG

100mg once daily

Group B

Will receive Tenofovir (300mg once daily) + Emtricitabine (200mg once daily) + Ritonavir-boosted (100mg once daily) Darunavir (800mg once daily)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Darunavir

Intervention Type DRUG

800 mg P.O. (orally) once daily

Ritonavir

Intervention Type DRUG

100mg once daily

Tenofovir/Emtricitabine

Intervention Type DRUG

300 mg/200 mg P.O. (orally) once daily

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Raltegravir

400mg P.O. (orally) twice daily for 48 weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

Darunavir

800 mg P.O. (orally) once daily

Intervention Type DRUG

Ritonavir

100mg once daily

Intervention Type DRUG

Tenofovir/Emtricitabine

300 mg/200 mg P.O. (orally) once daily

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Isentris Prezista Norvir Truvada

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* The patient has documented HIV-1 infection.
* The patient is at least 18 years of age.
* Antiretroviral naive, defined as 7 days or less of ARV treatment at any time prior to study entry. HIV viral load greater than 5,000 copies/ml within 90 days of study entry
* Willing to use acceptable forms of contraception
* Parent or guardian willing to provide informed consent, if applicable
* Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) negative at study entry

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient is current participant in a Raltegravir trial or in trials involving any of the other study medications (Darunavir, Tenofovir or Emtricitabine).
* Immunomodulators (e.g., interleukins, interferons, cyclosporine), HIV vaccine, systemic cytotoxic chemotherapy, or investigational therapy within 30 days prior to study entry. Individuals receiving either stable physiologic glucocorticoid doses, corticosteroids for acute therapy for pneumocystis pneumonia, or a short course (2 weeks or less) of pharmacologic glucocorticoid therapy will not be excluded.
* Known allergy/sensitivity to study drugs or their formulations
* Patient has a condition (including but not limited to active alcohol or drug use) that, in the opinion of the investigator, may interfere with patient adherence or safety
* Patient with acute hepatitis due to any cause or clinically significant chronic liver disease including but not limited to cirrhosis, ascites, encephalopathy, hypoalbuminemia, prolonged PT/PTT and/or esophageal varices.
* Patient has severe renal insufficiency defined as a calculated creatinine clearance at time of screening \<30 mL/min, base on Cockcroft/Gault equation which is as follows (and 0.85 X this value for females):
* CrCl (mL/min) = \[(140-Age) x Weight (in Kg)\]/72 x Serum Creatinine (mg/mL)
* Serious illness requiring systemic treatment or hospitalization. Patients who have completed therapy or are clinically stable on therapy for at least 7 days prior to study entry are not excluded.
* Known clinically relevant cardiac conduction system disease
* Patient requires or is anticipated to require any of the prohibited medications noted in the protocol
* Current imprisonment or involuntary incarceration for psychiatric or physical (e.g., infectious disease) illness
* Pregnancy and Breastfeeding. Women who become pregnant during the study will be required to permanently discontinue their study regimens.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Tibotec Pharmaceutical Limited

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Dallas VA Medical Center

FED

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Roger Bedimo, M.D.

ID Section Chief

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Roger Bedimo, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Dallas VA Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Dallas VA Medical Center

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Parkland Health & Hospital System

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bedimo RJ, Drechsler H, Jain M, Cutrell J, Zhang S, Li X, Farukhi I, Castanon R, Tebas P, Maalouf NM. The RADAR study: week 48 safety and efficacy of RAltegravir combined with boosted DARunavir compared to tenofovir/emtricitabine combined with boosted darunavir in antiretroviral-naive patients. Impact on bone health. PLoS One. 2014 Aug 29;9(8):e106221. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106221. eCollection 2014.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 25170938 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Merck 072-00

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.