Trial Outcomes & Findings for Study of New Antibiotic Regimen for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Cellulitis in Emergency Department Patients (NCT NCT00676130)

NCT ID: NCT00676130

Last Updated: 2012-08-14

Results Overview

Proportion of subjects in each arm with successful treatment. Treatment success was assessed by physician examination at 12 +/- 2 days. Non-success was defined as subsequent hospitalization, change in antibiotics, surgical or needle drainage of an abscess, or recurrence of infection within 30 days. Cure was defined as resolution of all symptoms other than mild residual erythema or edema. We confirmed the determination of cure by telephone interview and medical record review at 30 +/- 2 days.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

153 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

12 +/- 2 days; 30 +/- 2 days

Results posted on

2012-08-14

Participant Flow

We enrolled generally-healthy subjects with uncomplicated acute cellulitis from 6/2007 to 12/2011. Eligible subjects were adults and children presenting to EDs of 3 teaching hospitals in Boston, MA.

Each subject was assigned randomly to a treatment group by the institutions' research pharmacies. The research pharmacies had no knowledge of subjects' clinical characteristics. Treating (non-research) clinicians, research clinicians, coordinators, and subjects had no knowledge of the randomization sequence.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole
Cephalexin plus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole
Placebo
Cephalexin plus placebo
Overall Study
STARTED
76
77
Overall Study
COMPLETED
73
73
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
3
4

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole
Cephalexin plus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole
Placebo
Cephalexin plus placebo
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
0
1
Overall Study
Found ineligible
3
2
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
0
1

Baseline Characteristics

Study of New Antibiotic Regimen for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Cellulitis in Emergency Department Patients

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole
n=76 Participants
Cephalexin plus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole
Placebo
n=77 Participants
Cephalexin plus placebo
Total
n=153 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
68 Participants
n=5 Participants
69 Participants
n=7 Participants
137 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age Continuous
37.03 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.07 • n=5 Participants
32.43 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.15 • n=7 Participants
34.71 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.23 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
39 Participants
n=5 Participants
36 Participants
n=7 Participants
75 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
37 Participants
n=5 Participants
41 Participants
n=7 Participants
78 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
76 participants
n=5 Participants
77 participants
n=7 Participants
153 participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 12 +/- 2 days; 30 +/- 2 days

Population: Of the 153 randomized subjects, 4 were randomized in error and did not receive study drug, 1 received two doses before it was discovered that he was ineligible, 1 was lost to follow up, and 1 withdrew voluntarily in the first few days after enrollment. This left 146 subjects for intent-to-treat analysis.

Proportion of subjects in each arm with successful treatment. Treatment success was assessed by physician examination at 12 +/- 2 days. Non-success was defined as subsequent hospitalization, change in antibiotics, surgical or needle drainage of an abscess, or recurrence of infection within 30 days. Cure was defined as resolution of all symptoms other than mild residual erythema or edema. We confirmed the determination of cure by telephone interview and medical record review at 30 +/- 2 days.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole
n=73 Participants
Cephalexin plus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole
Placebo
n=73 Participants
Cephalexin plus placebo
Relative Efficacy
62 participants
60 participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 12 +/- 2 days, 30 days +/- 2 days

Proportion of subjects in each arm with progression from cellulitis to abscess.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole
n=73 Participants
Cephalexin plus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole
Placebo
n=73 Participants
Cephalexin plus placebo
Progression to Abscess
5 participants
5 participants

Adverse Events

Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 36 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Placebo

Serious events: 1 serious events
Other events: 39 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole
n=73 participants at risk
Cephalexin plus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole
Placebo
n=73 participants at risk
Cephalexin plus placebo
Gastrointestinal disorders
Clostridium difficile colitis
0.00%
0/73 • 30 days, assessed via telephone contact, in-person visit, and medical record review.
Serious adverse events were considered to be those resulting in hospital admission.
1.4%
1/73 • Number of events 1 • 30 days, assessed via telephone contact, in-person visit, and medical record review.
Serious adverse events were considered to be those resulting in hospital admission.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole
n=73 participants at risk
Cephalexin plus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole
Placebo
n=73 participants at risk
Cephalexin plus placebo
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhea
28.8%
21/73 • 30 days, assessed via telephone contact, in-person visit, and medical record review.
Serious adverse events were considered to be those resulting in hospital admission.
34.2%
25/73 • 30 days, assessed via telephone contact, in-person visit, and medical record review.
Serious adverse events were considered to be those resulting in hospital admission.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
6.8%
5/73 • 30 days, assessed via telephone contact, in-person visit, and medical record review.
Serious adverse events were considered to be those resulting in hospital admission.
11.0%
8/73 • 30 days, assessed via telephone contact, in-person visit, and medical record review.
Serious adverse events were considered to be those resulting in hospital admission.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
20.5%
15/73 • 30 days, assessed via telephone contact, in-person visit, and medical record review.
Serious adverse events were considered to be those resulting in hospital admission.
17.8%
13/73 • 30 days, assessed via telephone contact, in-person visit, and medical record review.
Serious adverse events were considered to be those resulting in hospital admission.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritis
6.8%
5/73 • 30 days, assessed via telephone contact, in-person visit, and medical record review.
Serious adverse events were considered to be those resulting in hospital admission.
4.1%
3/73 • 30 days, assessed via telephone contact, in-person visit, and medical record review.
Serious adverse events were considered to be those resulting in hospital admission.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
6.8%
5/73 • 30 days, assessed via telephone contact, in-person visit, and medical record review.
Serious adverse events were considered to be those resulting in hospital admission.
4.1%
3/73 • 30 days, assessed via telephone contact, in-person visit, and medical record review.
Serious adverse events were considered to be those resulting in hospital admission.

Additional Information

Daniel J. Pallin, MD, MPH

Brigham and Women's Hospital

Phone: 617-525-6614

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place