Trial Outcomes & Findings for Study of New Antibiotic Regimen for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Cellulitis in Emergency Department Patients (NCT NCT00676130)
NCT ID: NCT00676130
Last Updated: 2012-08-14
Results Overview
Proportion of subjects in each arm with successful treatment. Treatment success was assessed by physician examination at 12 +/- 2 days. Non-success was defined as subsequent hospitalization, change in antibiotics, surgical or needle drainage of an abscess, or recurrence of infection within 30 days. Cure was defined as resolution of all symptoms other than mild residual erythema or edema. We confirmed the determination of cure by telephone interview and medical record review at 30 +/- 2 days.
COMPLETED
NA
153 participants
12 +/- 2 days; 30 +/- 2 days
2012-08-14
Participant Flow
We enrolled generally-healthy subjects with uncomplicated acute cellulitis from 6/2007 to 12/2011. Eligible subjects were adults and children presenting to EDs of 3 teaching hospitals in Boston, MA.
Each subject was assigned randomly to a treatment group by the institutions' research pharmacies. The research pharmacies had no knowledge of subjects' clinical characteristics. Treating (non-research) clinicians, research clinicians, coordinators, and subjects had no knowledge of the randomization sequence.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole
Cephalexin plus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole
|
Placebo
Cephalexin plus placebo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
76
|
77
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
73
|
73
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
3
|
4
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole
Cephalexin plus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole
|
Placebo
Cephalexin plus placebo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Found ineligible
|
3
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
0
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Study of New Antibiotic Regimen for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Cellulitis in Emergency Department Patients
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole
n=76 Participants
Cephalexin plus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole
|
Placebo
n=77 Participants
Cephalexin plus placebo
|
Total
n=153 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
68 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
69 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
137 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age Continuous
|
37.03 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.07 • n=5 Participants
|
32.43 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.15 • n=7 Participants
|
34.71 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.23 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
39 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
36 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
75 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
37 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
41 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
78 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
76 participants
n=5 Participants
|
77 participants
n=7 Participants
|
153 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 +/- 2 days; 30 +/- 2 daysPopulation: Of the 153 randomized subjects, 4 were randomized in error and did not receive study drug, 1 received two doses before it was discovered that he was ineligible, 1 was lost to follow up, and 1 withdrew voluntarily in the first few days after enrollment. This left 146 subjects for intent-to-treat analysis.
Proportion of subjects in each arm with successful treatment. Treatment success was assessed by physician examination at 12 +/- 2 days. Non-success was defined as subsequent hospitalization, change in antibiotics, surgical or needle drainage of an abscess, or recurrence of infection within 30 days. Cure was defined as resolution of all symptoms other than mild residual erythema or edema. We confirmed the determination of cure by telephone interview and medical record review at 30 +/- 2 days.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole
n=73 Participants
Cephalexin plus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole
|
Placebo
n=73 Participants
Cephalexin plus placebo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Relative Efficacy
|
62 participants
|
60 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 +/- 2 days, 30 days +/- 2 daysProportion of subjects in each arm with progression from cellulitis to abscess.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole
n=73 Participants
Cephalexin plus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole
|
Placebo
n=73 Participants
Cephalexin plus placebo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Progression to Abscess
|
5 participants
|
5 participants
|
Adverse Events
Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole
Placebo
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole
n=73 participants at risk
Cephalexin plus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole
|
Placebo
n=73 participants at risk
Cephalexin plus placebo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Clostridium difficile colitis
|
0.00%
0/73 • 30 days, assessed via telephone contact, in-person visit, and medical record review.
Serious adverse events were considered to be those resulting in hospital admission.
|
1.4%
1/73 • Number of events 1 • 30 days, assessed via telephone contact, in-person visit, and medical record review.
Serious adverse events were considered to be those resulting in hospital admission.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole
n=73 participants at risk
Cephalexin plus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole
|
Placebo
n=73 participants at risk
Cephalexin plus placebo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhea
|
28.8%
21/73 • 30 days, assessed via telephone contact, in-person visit, and medical record review.
Serious adverse events were considered to be those resulting in hospital admission.
|
34.2%
25/73 • 30 days, assessed via telephone contact, in-person visit, and medical record review.
Serious adverse events were considered to be those resulting in hospital admission.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
6.8%
5/73 • 30 days, assessed via telephone contact, in-person visit, and medical record review.
Serious adverse events were considered to be those resulting in hospital admission.
|
11.0%
8/73 • 30 days, assessed via telephone contact, in-person visit, and medical record review.
Serious adverse events were considered to be those resulting in hospital admission.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
20.5%
15/73 • 30 days, assessed via telephone contact, in-person visit, and medical record review.
Serious adverse events were considered to be those resulting in hospital admission.
|
17.8%
13/73 • 30 days, assessed via telephone contact, in-person visit, and medical record review.
Serious adverse events were considered to be those resulting in hospital admission.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritis
|
6.8%
5/73 • 30 days, assessed via telephone contact, in-person visit, and medical record review.
Serious adverse events were considered to be those resulting in hospital admission.
|
4.1%
3/73 • 30 days, assessed via telephone contact, in-person visit, and medical record review.
Serious adverse events were considered to be those resulting in hospital admission.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
6.8%
5/73 • 30 days, assessed via telephone contact, in-person visit, and medical record review.
Serious adverse events were considered to be those resulting in hospital admission.
|
4.1%
3/73 • 30 days, assessed via telephone contact, in-person visit, and medical record review.
Serious adverse events were considered to be those resulting in hospital admission.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place