Inoculating Celiac Disease Patients With the Human Hookworm Necator Americanus: Evaluating Immunity and Gluten-sensitivity

NCT ID: NCT00671138

Last Updated: 2016-02-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-10-31

Study Completion Date

2009-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The disappearance of intestinal parasites from humans in developed countries may be responsible for the upsurge in many diseases including Celiac Disease, Crohn's, ulcerative colitis, asthma and hay fever. A parasite's survival relies on its ability to interfere with the host's immune response. The mechanisms employed to do this are similar to those required by a person to regulate against the so-called autoimmune disorders, diseases in which the system turns on itself. The investigators suspect that when parasites are excluded from the environment, some individuals become sufficiently self-reactive to develop an autoimmune disease. American researchers have successfully treated patients with Crohn's and ulcerative colitis using a pig whipworm (Trichuris suis). The investigators have undertaken a similar preliminary study using a human hookworm in Crohn's patients.

Using a small group of healthy people with celiac disease, the investigators will test if a human hookworm, Necator americanus, inhibits immune responsiveness to gluten. Celiac disease is a very common autoimmune-like disease (1% of Americans are affected although only a minority are aware they have the condition). In this condition, an individual becomes reactive to gluten, a protein in foods derived from wheat, barley, oats and rye.

What makes celiac disease such a good model for Crohn's disease is that similar immune changes are common to both, but in celiac disease the people are usually well, are not taking powerful immune suppressive drugs and the provocative antigens (the molecules that engage the immune system and provoke the disease) are known and can be excluded or introduced. As well as being of direct benefit to people with celiac disease, this study may give direction as to the potential of this parasite to manage inflammatory bowel disease.

People with proven celiac disease who live in Brisbane, a modern Australian city, will be invited to participate. Enrollment will require that the candidate has been avoiding gluten for six months.

The study is a blinded study (where the researchers and study subjects do not know who has gotten the parasites) aimed at comparing the disease activity and immunity after a controlled breach of the gluten-free diet in individuals with celiac disease, before and after hookworm infection. The disease severity and the immune system of celiac subjects before and after being inoculated with N. americanus will be examined using conventional and experimental investigations. This group's immunity will be compared to that of a group of matched, celiac control subjects (not infected with hookworm), before and after eating four pieces of standard white bread each day for three to five days. Twenty people, ten subjects per arm, will be recruited. Ten larvae initially, then five more after twelve weeks will be placed on the skin under a light dressing for thirty minutes.

The investigators aim to test whether the hookworm infection will change the immune processes and suppress gluten sensitivity in people with celiac disease. Outcomes to be measured will be those that reflect the activity of celiac disease.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background and aims: A number of lines of evidence suggest that the disappearance of helminths from human populations in developed countries may be responsible for the upsurge in autoimmune diseases, the so-called hygiene hypothesis. Using a small cohort of healthy subjects with quiescent celiac disease, our aim is to test if the ubiquitous hookworm (HW) of humans, Necator americanus, inhibits immune responsiveness to a gluten challenge (GC). As well as being of potential benefit to people with gluten intolerance, this study will provide the opportunity to undertake detailed investigation at the mucosal level of the host-parasite interaction, and the underlying immune response, and by extension, the potential of nematode infection to modulate the inflammatory response in IBD. Unlike experimental helminth infections in either animals genetically predisposed to colitis or in clinical IBD (where a range of complicating cofactors are present), this study addresses what happens in healthy humans who do not have a background of helminth exposure, and who are not currently compromised by either inflammation or immunosuppressive drugs.

Methods: Twenty healthy adults with well-documented celiac disease (DQ2 phenotype) compliant with a gluten-free (GF) diet for ≥ 6 months (based on history and a normal tissue transglutaminase \[tTG\]) will be recruited and randomly assigned to two groups of ten. Ten will be inoculated with hookworm (HW) larvae and 10 will serve as uninfected controls. Study subjects and Investigators will be blinded to allow comparison of disease activity and immune profiles. HW larvae will be cultured from feces supplied by a volunteer donor, previously infected for this purpose. Conventional endoscopy and biopsy will be performed twice per subject, before and after oral and rectal GCs (2x50g slices of wheat bread twice daily for 3-5 days and 6g of gluten in a 40ml slurry instilled into the rectum per endoscope, respectively). Rectal biopsy will be undertaken 4 hr and duodenal biopsy collected six days following GC; blood will be collected before and after acquiring hookworm infection and on day six following GC. Thus, four data sets will be accrued for comparison: ten GF celiac-subjects before HW infection; 10 GF celiac-s after HW infection; ten GC celiac-s before HW infection; and 10 GC celiac-s after HW infection.

Safety: A large body of observational data documenting the safety of experimental hookworm infection is available, both from our own and studies by others. Two of our researchers have maintained infections including occasional "top-up" inoculations for three years without ill effects.

Outcome Measures: These will include: subject symptom diary, full blood analysis, C-reactive protein, total and specific IgE and serum tryptase activity. The duodenal (Marsh classification) and rectal histology will be graded by a single pathologist. Goblet cells and mucosal T cells will be stained to aid quantification of responses. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and mucosal lymphocytes from intestinal biopsies will be grown ex vivo and challenged with gluten antigen immunodominant peptide (alpha-gliadin 57-73 Q65E, QLQPFPQPELPYPQPQS). Cell proliferation and cytokine profiles in response to HW and gluten antigens will be measured from PBMCs and intestinal biopsies. Varying the timing of the inoculations may provide worthwhile direction on the importance of the Th2 response only if there is a profound difference between newly established (Th2-dominant) versus mature (Th-neutral) parasite infections, as suggested by our earlier work with experimental human infections. Levels of transcription of genes of interest will be assessed using quantitative real time PCR and microarrays.

Outcomes: The null hypothesis is that Necator americanus does not change the immune process sufficiently to suppress gluten sensitivity in people with celiac disease. The measured outcomes reflect the activity of celiac disease, including the severity of mucosal inflammation, and the character and intensity of the immune processes. This study though is as much about IBD. Celiac disease is not IBD, but this model of IBD affords a previously unexplored opportunity to test quasi autoimmune responses in the duodenum and rectum to a specific antigen, one that can be introduced or excluded on demand. The immune profiling will focus on the characteristics that drive inflammation in IBD providing a clear insight as to the potential of helminths in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis.

Extension Study; Control patients invited to enroll in an extension of the study; each to be inoculated, challenged and investigated as per the original hookworm cohort (as above).

Low dose gluten challenge Study: This trial extension seeks to establish if hookworm infection might improve tolerance to small amounts of gluten in patients with celiac disease. The study is open. It utilises celiac patients already infected with hookworm and in whom the blood and mucosal baseline characteristics have been carefully documented. The gluten exposure will apply doses that have been demonstrated by others in a trial setting to be safe and well-tolerated. Effectiveness of hookworm infection to mitigate gluten intolerance will be measured by the quantifiable changes that occur in biopsies previously taken (pre-challenge) compared with tissue collected post-challenge.Histology will be performed as previously described. Biopsies are to be fixed in neutral buffered formalin, processed and carefully orientated and embedded in paraffin wax. Sections (3 μm) will be stained with haematoxylin and eosin (H\&E) and immunostained with anti-CD8 (or anti-CD3 depending on availability) antibodies (Novocastra Laboratories Ltd). The intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs) per 100 nucleated enterocytes (100NE) will be counted at 24 randomly selected sites between the villous tip and the base of the crypt (Vh/Cd) in each biopsy. Individual and collective outcomes on tissue collected after hookworm infection, but whilst on a gluten free diet, will be compared with those from tissue collected after the pasta challenge.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Celiac Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

I

Arm I will be inoculated with the human hookworm necator americanus at weeks 0 and 12.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Necator americanus

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

10 necator americanus larvae will be inoculated at week 0 with a further 5 larvae inoculated at week 12

II

Arm II participants will receive and identical sham-inoculums comprising a diluted amount of 0.2ml McIlhenny \& Co Tabasco Pepper Sauce®

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Sham inoculation

Intervention Type OTHER

A diluted amount of McIlhenny \& Co Tabasco Pepper Sauce will be applied via a gauze dressing at weeks 0 and 12.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Necator americanus

10 necator americanus larvae will be inoculated at week 0 with a further 5 larvae inoculated at week 12

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Sham inoculation

A diluted amount of McIlhenny \& Co Tabasco Pepper Sauce will be applied via a gauze dressing at weeks 0 and 12.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Diagnosis of celiac disease
* Positive tTG (IgA)or positive anti IgA gliadin or anti-endomysial antibody test.
* Marsh score ≥3 on small bowel biopsy (subtotal villous atrophy)
* Clinical, biochemical or histological improvement on gluten free diet.
* Compliance with a gluten-free diet for 6 months lead-in.
* Lifestyle \& travel history indicative of a low risk for helminthic infection.
* Good general health not on immunomodifying agents.
* Ability to complete study
* Understand study \& risks
* Social supports
* Workplace flexibility
* Normal tTG at enrollment (\<10 dependent on serology)
* A HLA-DQ2 phenotype
* Negative fecal test for intestinal helminthes.
* Negative serological test for anti-strongyloides antibodies

Exclusion Criteria

* Children (age \< 18)
* Immunomodulating medication in 6 months pre-enrollment
* Oral or intramuscular/intravascular steroids
* Regular weekly use of aspirin
* Regular weekly use of NSAID
* Regular weekly use of COXII inhibitors
* Regular weekly use of statin medications
* Clinical history indicating a likely need to use an immune suppressive agent during the course of the study.
* Unmanaged risk of pregnancy
* Past history of infection with helminthes (other than a past history of infection with the pinworm, Enterobius vermicularis)
* History of insulin dependent diabetes mellitus or Addison's disease
* History of anaphylaxis or severe allergic reactions
* Having received a vaccine within the preceding 30 days
* Positive strongyloides serology
* Iron deficiency anemia
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

The Broad Foundation

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Townsville Hospital

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

James Cook University, Queensland, Australia

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Queensland Institute of Medical Research

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

A James M Daveson

Doctor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

John T Croese, FRACP MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

The Townsville Hospital

A James M Daveson, MBBS

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Princess Alexandra Hospital

Alex Loukas, BSc Hon, PhD (UQ)

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Queensland Institute of Medical Research

James McCarthy, MBBS FRACP PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Queensland Institute of Medical Research

Robert Anderson, MB ChB BMedSc PhD FRACP

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Walter & Eliza Hall Institute of Immunology

Graeme Macdonald, MBBS FRACP PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Princess Alexandra Hospital

Soraya Gaze, BSc PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Queensland Institute of Medical Research

Rick Speares, MBBS PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Anton Breinl Centre for Public Health and Tropical Medicine, James Cook University, Townsville

Andrew Clouston, MBBS (Qld) PhD (Qld) FRCPA

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Envoi Pathology

Andrew Pascoe, B. Pharm, B.Sc, MBBS, FRACP

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Princess Alexandra Hospital

Geoffrey Cobert, BSc PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Queensland Institute of Medical Research

Dianne Jones, RN RM BAppSc

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Princess Alexandra Hospital

Sharon Cooke, RN

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

The Townsville Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Queensland Institute of Medical Research

Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Site Status

Princess Alexandra Hospital

Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Site Status

Logan Hospital

Logan City, Queensland, Australia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Australia

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Cantacessi C, Giacomin P, Croese J, Zakrzewski M, Sotillo J, McCann L, Nolan MJ, Mitreva M, Krause L, Loukas A. Impact of experimental hookworm infection on the human gut microbiota. J Infect Dis. 2014 Nov 1;210(9):1431-4. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiu256. Epub 2014 May 3.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 24795483 (View on PubMed)

Daveson AJ, Jones DM, Gaze S, McSorley H, Clouston A, Pascoe A, Cooke S, Speare R, Macdonald GA, Anderson R, McCarthy JS, Loukas A, Croese J. Effect of hookworm infection on wheat challenge in celiac disease--a randomised double-blinded placebo controlled trial. PLoS One. 2011 Mar 8;6(3):e17366. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017366.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 21408161 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IBD-0214R

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2007/115

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Immune Responses to Gluten
NCT05209568 RECRUITING NA
PTG-100 for Patients With Celiac Disease
NCT04524221 COMPLETED PHASE1