Trial Outcomes & Findings for CC-4047 in Treating Patients With Myelofibrosis (NCT NCT00669578)
NCT ID: NCT00669578
Last Updated: 2019-12-30
Results Overview
Starting at a dose level of 2.5 mg/d on days 1-21 in every 28 day cycle, participants were accrued in cohorts of three to assess dose limiting toxicities (DLT) and determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Dose escalation at increments of 0.5 mg/d was done if no subject had a DLT (a grade 4 or higher hematologic toxicity or a grade 3 or higher febrile neutropenia or a grade 3 or higher non-hematologic toxicity) in cycle 1. Subsequent cohorts were treated until the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was reached (dose level before that which results in a DLT in \>1 of 6 subjects). Subsequent participants were treated at the MTD, those without response at the MTD after 3 cycles were lowered to the minimal efficacious dose (MED) of 0.5 mg daily. Here, we are reporting the percentage of participants in Phase I with a DLT at each dose level.
COMPLETED
PHASE1/PHASE2
77 participants
The first 28-day cycle of treatment.
2019-12-30
Participant Flow
This study opened June 2008 and accrued 12 Phase I participants and 65 Phase II participants before being closed in January 2010.
Participants were accrued to the Phase I portion of this study in each of the 2.5, 3.0, and 3.5 mg dose cohorts. Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) were observed at the 3.5 mg level, and the 3 mg level was confirmed as the maximum tolerated dose. However, efficacy was not improved at higher doses and the most effective dose level was deemed 0.5 mg/day.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Phase I
Participants were accrued to the Phase I portion of this study in each of the 2.5, 3.0, and 3.5 mg dose cohorts to determine the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD). Dose limiting Toxicities (DLT) were observed at the 3.5 mg level, and the 3 mg level was confirmed as the maximum tolerated dose. For this study a DLT was defined as a grade 4 hematologic toxicity, a grade 3 or higher febrile neutropenia, or a grade 3 or higher non-hematologic toxicity.
|
Phase II
All patients enrolled to this phase II arm started treatment at 0.5mg/day with CC-4047 every day of each 28 day cycle.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
12
|
65
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
12
|
65
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
CC-4047 in Treating Patients With Myelofibrosis
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Phase II
n=65 Participants
All patients enrolled to this Phase II arm started treatment at 0.5mg/day with CC-4047 every day of each 28 day cycle.
|
Phase I
n=12 Participants
Participants were accrued to the Phase I portion of this study in each of the 2.5, 3.0, and 3.5 mg dose cohorts to determine the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD). Dose limiting Toxicities (DLT) were observed at the 3.5 mg level, and the 3 mg level was confirmed as the maximum tolerated dose. For this study a DLT was defined as a grade 4 hematologic toxicity, a grade 3 or higher febrile neutropenia, or a grade 3 or higher non-hematologic toxicity.
|
Total
n=77 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
68 years
FULL_RANGE 9.7 • n=5 Participants
|
66 years
n=7 Participants
|
67 years
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
25 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
47 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
52 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
65 participants
n=5 Participants
|
12 participants
n=7 Participants
|
77 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: The first 28-day cycle of treatment.Population: None of the Phase II participants were evaluable for this endpoint. For the Phase I portion of this study, three participants were accrued at a 2.5 mg/day dose level, six at the 3.0 mg/day dose level, and three at the 3.5 mg/day dose level.
Starting at a dose level of 2.5 mg/d on days 1-21 in every 28 day cycle, participants were accrued in cohorts of three to assess dose limiting toxicities (DLT) and determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Dose escalation at increments of 0.5 mg/d was done if no subject had a DLT (a grade 4 or higher hematologic toxicity or a grade 3 or higher febrile neutropenia or a grade 3 or higher non-hematologic toxicity) in cycle 1. Subsequent cohorts were treated until the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was reached (dose level before that which results in a DLT in \>1 of 6 subjects). Subsequent participants were treated at the MTD, those without response at the MTD after 3 cycles were lowered to the minimal efficacious dose (MED) of 0.5 mg daily. Here, we are reporting the percentage of participants in Phase I with a DLT at each dose level.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase I
n=12 Participants
Participants were accrued to the Phase I portion of this study in each of the 2.5, 3.0, and 3.5 mg dose cohorts to determine the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD). Dose limiting Toxicities (DLT) were observed at the 3.5 mg level, and the 3 mg level was confirmed as the maximum tolerated dose. For this study a DLT was defined as a grade 4 hematologic toxicity, a grade 3 or higher febrile neutropenia, or a grade 3 or higher non-hematologic toxicity.
|
Phase II
All patients enrolled to this phase II arm started treatment at 0.5mg/day with CC-4047 every day of each 28 day cycle.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Determine the Maximum Tolerated Dose of CC-4047
2.5 mg/day
|
0 percentage of participants with DLT
|
—
|
|
Determine the Maximum Tolerated Dose of CC-4047
3.0 mg/day
|
0 percentage of participants with DLT
|
—
|
|
Determine the Maximum Tolerated Dose of CC-4047
3.5 mg/day
|
66 percentage of participants with DLT
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Every cycle of treatment for 6 cycles. Each cycle is 28 days.Population: None of the participants from the Phase I cohort were analyzed for this endpoint. All 65 Phase II participants were evaluable for this endpoint and included in the analysis.
Response evaluation: Complete Remission (CR): Neutrophil count between 1 to 10 x 10\^9/L without peripheral blasts in blood or bone marrow. Partial Hematologic Response/Partial Remission (PR): Increase in neutrophil by 50% + above 10\^9/L for neutropenia) Clinical Improvement (CI): Increase in Neutrophil count, hemoglobin, platelet count or reduction in blood/marrow blasts.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase I
n=65 Participants
Participants were accrued to the Phase I portion of this study in each of the 2.5, 3.0, and 3.5 mg dose cohorts to determine the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD). Dose limiting Toxicities (DLT) were observed at the 3.5 mg level, and the 3 mg level was confirmed as the maximum tolerated dose. For this study a DLT was defined as a grade 4 hematologic toxicity, a grade 3 or higher febrile neutropenia, or a grade 3 or higher non-hematologic toxicity.
|
Phase II
All patients enrolled to this phase II arm started treatment at 0.5mg/day with CC-4047 every day of each 28 day cycle.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Best Overall Response Over the First 6 Cycles of Treatment
Complete Remission
|
0 participants
|
—
|
|
Best Overall Response Over the First 6 Cycles of Treatment
Partial Remission
|
0 participants
|
—
|
|
Best Overall Response Over the First 6 Cycles of Treatment
Clinical Improvement
|
9 participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During treatment and every 6 months until 3 years from registration or progression.Population: None of the Phase I participants were used for this primary endpoint. All 65 Phase II participants were evaluable for this endpoint.
Adverse events (AE) that are classified as either possibly, probably, or definitely related to study treatment according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE version 3.0). The maximum grade for each type of AE will be recorded for each patient. The number of participants with grade 3 or higher adverse events at least possibly related to study treatment are reported here.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase I
n=65 Participants
Participants were accrued to the Phase I portion of this study in each of the 2.5, 3.0, and 3.5 mg dose cohorts to determine the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD). Dose limiting Toxicities (DLT) were observed at the 3.5 mg level, and the 3 mg level was confirmed as the maximum tolerated dose. For this study a DLT was defined as a grade 4 hematologic toxicity, a grade 3 or higher febrile neutropenia, or a grade 3 or higher non-hematologic toxicity.
|
Phase II
All patients enrolled to this phase II arm started treatment at 0.5mg/day with CC-4047 every day of each 28 day cycle.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment Related Adverse Events.
Grade 3 or Higher
|
6 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment Related Adverse Events.
Grade 4 or Higher
|
3 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment Related Adverse Events.
Grade 5
|
0 participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Time from response to disease progression, intolerance of study drug, or death.Population: None of the Phase I participants were evaluable for this endpoint. Sixty-five (65) participants were recruited for the Phase II portion. Results presented here are on the 9 Phase II patients who responded to treatment.
Duration of response is defined as the date at which the patient's objective status is first noted to be a CR, PR or CI to the date progression is documented (if one has occurred) or to the date of last follow-up(for those patients who have not progressed).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase I
n=9 Participants
Participants were accrued to the Phase I portion of this study in each of the 2.5, 3.0, and 3.5 mg dose cohorts to determine the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD). Dose limiting Toxicities (DLT) were observed at the 3.5 mg level, and the 3 mg level was confirmed as the maximum tolerated dose. For this study a DLT was defined as a grade 4 hematologic toxicity, a grade 3 or higher febrile neutropenia, or a grade 3 or higher non-hematologic toxicity.
|
Phase II
All patients enrolled to this phase II arm started treatment at 0.5mg/day with CC-4047 every day of each 28 day cycle.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Duration of Response Time
|
5.6 Months
Interval 1.9 to 13.8
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Time from registration to the first date of response within twelve 28-day cycles of treatment.Population: None of the Phase I participants were evaluable for this endpoint. Sixty-five (65) patients were recruited for the Phase II portion. Only 9 of the 65 patients achieved a response. Thus, the median of time to response and the upper limit of 95% confidence interval are not attainable.
The time to response is defined as the time from study registration to the first date at which the patient's objective status was classified as a response (CR, PR or CI). In patients who do not achieve a response, time to response will be censored at the patient's last evaluation date. The distribution for each of these event-time variables (duration of response and time to response) will be estimated by Kaplan-Meier curves.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
Adverse Events
Phase II
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Phase II
n=65 participants at risk
All patients enrolled to this Phase II arm started treatment at 0.5mg/day with CC-4047 every day of each 28 day cycle.
|
|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Hemoglobin decreased
|
3.1%
2/65 • Number of events 2 • Every 28 day cycle while on treatment (up to 12 cycles).
The primary endpoint for the Phase I cohort of participants was to determine the MTD based on the frequency of DLTs at increasing dose levels. The adverse events in the Phase I cohort were summarized as the Phase I primary endpoint. Here, we report adverse events of all 65 Phase II participants.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial ischemia
|
1.5%
1/65 • Number of events 1 • Every 28 day cycle while on treatment (up to 12 cycles).
The primary endpoint for the Phase I cohort of participants was to determine the MTD based on the frequency of DLTs at increasing dose levels. The adverse events in the Phase I cohort were summarized as the Phase I primary endpoint. Here, we report adverse events of all 65 Phase II participants.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhea
|
1.5%
1/65 • Number of events 1 • Every 28 day cycle while on treatment (up to 12 cycles).
The primary endpoint for the Phase I cohort of participants was to determine the MTD based on the frequency of DLTs at increasing dose levels. The adverse events in the Phase I cohort were summarized as the Phase I primary endpoint. Here, we report adverse events of all 65 Phase II participants.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Esophageal varices hemorrhage
|
1.5%
1/65 • Number of events 1 • Every 28 day cycle while on treatment (up to 12 cycles).
The primary endpoint for the Phase I cohort of participants was to determine the MTD based on the frequency of DLTs at increasing dose levels. The adverse events in the Phase I cohort were summarized as the Phase I primary endpoint. Here, we report adverse events of all 65 Phase II participants.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal disorder
|
1.5%
1/65 • Number of events 1 • Every 28 day cycle while on treatment (up to 12 cycles).
The primary endpoint for the Phase I cohort of participants was to determine the MTD based on the frequency of DLTs at increasing dose levels. The adverse events in the Phase I cohort were summarized as the Phase I primary endpoint. Here, we report adverse events of all 65 Phase II participants.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage
|
1.5%
1/65 • Number of events 1 • Every 28 day cycle while on treatment (up to 12 cycles).
The primary endpoint for the Phase I cohort of participants was to determine the MTD based on the frequency of DLTs at increasing dose levels. The adverse events in the Phase I cohort were summarized as the Phase I primary endpoint. Here, we report adverse events of all 65 Phase II participants.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage
|
1.5%
1/65 • Number of events 1 • Every 28 day cycle while on treatment (up to 12 cycles).
The primary endpoint for the Phase I cohort of participants was to determine the MTD based on the frequency of DLTs at increasing dose levels. The adverse events in the Phase I cohort were summarized as the Phase I primary endpoint. Here, we report adverse events of all 65 Phase II participants.
|
|
General disorders
Edema limbs
|
1.5%
1/65 • Number of events 1 • Every 28 day cycle while on treatment (up to 12 cycles).
The primary endpoint for the Phase I cohort of participants was to determine the MTD based on the frequency of DLTs at increasing dose levels. The adverse events in the Phase I cohort were summarized as the Phase I primary endpoint. Here, we report adverse events of all 65 Phase II participants.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
1.5%
1/65 • Number of events 1 • Every 28 day cycle while on treatment (up to 12 cycles).
The primary endpoint for the Phase I cohort of participants was to determine the MTD based on the frequency of DLTs at increasing dose levels. The adverse events in the Phase I cohort were summarized as the Phase I primary endpoint. Here, we report adverse events of all 65 Phase II participants.
|
|
General disorders
Multi-organ failure
|
1.5%
1/65 • Number of events 1 • Every 28 day cycle while on treatment (up to 12 cycles).
The primary endpoint for the Phase I cohort of participants was to determine the MTD based on the frequency of DLTs at increasing dose levels. The adverse events in the Phase I cohort were summarized as the Phase I primary endpoint. Here, we report adverse events of all 65 Phase II participants.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Hypersensitivity
|
1.5%
1/65 • Number of events 1 • Every 28 day cycle while on treatment (up to 12 cycles).
The primary endpoint for the Phase I cohort of participants was to determine the MTD based on the frequency of DLTs at increasing dose levels. The adverse events in the Phase I cohort were summarized as the Phase I primary endpoint. Here, we report adverse events of all 65 Phase II participants.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Infectious meningitis
|
1.5%
1/65 • Number of events 1 • Every 28 day cycle while on treatment (up to 12 cycles).
The primary endpoint for the Phase I cohort of participants was to determine the MTD based on the frequency of DLTs at increasing dose levels. The adverse events in the Phase I cohort were summarized as the Phase I primary endpoint. Here, we report adverse events of all 65 Phase II participants.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
6.2%
4/65 • Number of events 4 • Every 28 day cycle while on treatment (up to 12 cycles).
The primary endpoint for the Phase I cohort of participants was to determine the MTD based on the frequency of DLTs at increasing dose levels. The adverse events in the Phase I cohort were summarized as the Phase I primary endpoint. Here, we report adverse events of all 65 Phase II participants.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory infection
|
1.5%
1/65 • Number of events 1 • Every 28 day cycle while on treatment (up to 12 cycles).
The primary endpoint for the Phase I cohort of participants was to determine the MTD based on the frequency of DLTs at increasing dose levels. The adverse events in the Phase I cohort were summarized as the Phase I primary endpoint. Here, we report adverse events of all 65 Phase II participants.
|
|
Investigations
Leukocyte count decreased
|
3.1%
2/65 • Number of events 2 • Every 28 day cycle while on treatment (up to 12 cycles).
The primary endpoint for the Phase I cohort of participants was to determine the MTD based on the frequency of DLTs at increasing dose levels. The adverse events in the Phase I cohort were summarized as the Phase I primary endpoint. Here, we report adverse events of all 65 Phase II participants.
|
|
Investigations
Neutrophil count decreased
|
1.5%
1/65 • Number of events 1 • Every 28 day cycle while on treatment (up to 12 cycles).
The primary endpoint for the Phase I cohort of participants was to determine the MTD based on the frequency of DLTs at increasing dose levels. The adverse events in the Phase I cohort were summarized as the Phase I primary endpoint. Here, we report adverse events of all 65 Phase II participants.
|
|
Investigations
Platelet count decreased
|
1.5%
1/65 • Number of events 1 • Every 28 day cycle while on treatment (up to 12 cycles).
The primary endpoint for the Phase I cohort of participants was to determine the MTD based on the frequency of DLTs at increasing dose levels. The adverse events in the Phase I cohort were summarized as the Phase I primary endpoint. Here, we report adverse events of all 65 Phase II participants.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Tumor lysis syndrome
|
1.5%
1/65 • Number of events 1 • Every 28 day cycle while on treatment (up to 12 cycles).
The primary endpoint for the Phase I cohort of participants was to determine the MTD based on the frequency of DLTs at increasing dose levels. The adverse events in the Phase I cohort were summarized as the Phase I primary endpoint. Here, we report adverse events of all 65 Phase II participants.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnea
|
1.5%
1/65 • Number of events 1 • Every 28 day cycle while on treatment (up to 12 cycles).
The primary endpoint for the Phase I cohort of participants was to determine the MTD based on the frequency of DLTs at increasing dose levels. The adverse events in the Phase I cohort were summarized as the Phase I primary endpoint. Here, we report adverse events of all 65 Phase II participants.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Hypoxia
|
1.5%
1/65 • Number of events 1 • Every 28 day cycle while on treatment (up to 12 cycles).
The primary endpoint for the Phase I cohort of participants was to determine the MTD based on the frequency of DLTs at increasing dose levels. The adverse events in the Phase I cohort were summarized as the Phase I primary endpoint. Here, we report adverse events of all 65 Phase II participants.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Laryngeal edema
|
1.5%
1/65 • Number of events 1 • Every 28 day cycle while on treatment (up to 12 cycles).
The primary endpoint for the Phase I cohort of participants was to determine the MTD based on the frequency of DLTs at increasing dose levels. The adverse events in the Phase I cohort were summarized as the Phase I primary endpoint. Here, we report adverse events of all 65 Phase II participants.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin ulceration
|
1.5%
1/65 • Number of events 1 • Every 28 day cycle while on treatment (up to 12 cycles).
The primary endpoint for the Phase I cohort of participants was to determine the MTD based on the frequency of DLTs at increasing dose levels. The adverse events in the Phase I cohort were summarized as the Phase I primary endpoint. Here, we report adverse events of all 65 Phase II participants.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hematoma
|
1.5%
1/65 • Number of events 1 • Every 28 day cycle while on treatment (up to 12 cycles).
The primary endpoint for the Phase I cohort of participants was to determine the MTD based on the frequency of DLTs at increasing dose levels. The adverse events in the Phase I cohort were summarized as the Phase I primary endpoint. Here, we report adverse events of all 65 Phase II participants.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Phase II
n=65 participants at risk
All patients enrolled to this Phase II arm started treatment at 0.5mg/day with CC-4047 every day of each 28 day cycle.
|
|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Hemoglobin decreased
|
81.5%
53/65 • Number of events 214 • Every 28 day cycle while on treatment (up to 12 cycles).
The primary endpoint for the Phase I cohort of participants was to determine the MTD based on the frequency of DLTs at increasing dose levels. The adverse events in the Phase I cohort were summarized as the Phase I primary endpoint. Here, we report adverse events of all 65 Phase II participants.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Left ventricular dysfunction
|
1.5%
1/65 • Number of events 1 • Every 28 day cycle while on treatment (up to 12 cycles).
The primary endpoint for the Phase I cohort of participants was to determine the MTD based on the frequency of DLTs at increasing dose levels. The adverse events in the Phase I cohort were summarized as the Phase I primary endpoint. Here, we report adverse events of all 65 Phase II participants.
|
|
Endocrine disorders
Hypothyroidism
|
1.5%
1/65 • Number of events 1 • Every 28 day cycle while on treatment (up to 12 cycles).
The primary endpoint for the Phase I cohort of participants was to determine the MTD based on the frequency of DLTs at increasing dose levels. The adverse events in the Phase I cohort were summarized as the Phase I primary endpoint. Here, we report adverse events of all 65 Phase II participants.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
1.5%
1/65 • Number of events 1 • Every 28 day cycle while on treatment (up to 12 cycles).
The primary endpoint for the Phase I cohort of participants was to determine the MTD based on the frequency of DLTs at increasing dose levels. The adverse events in the Phase I cohort were summarized as the Phase I primary endpoint. Here, we report adverse events of all 65 Phase II participants.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhea
|
15.4%
10/65 • Number of events 19 • Every 28 day cycle while on treatment (up to 12 cycles).
The primary endpoint for the Phase I cohort of participants was to determine the MTD based on the frequency of DLTs at increasing dose levels. The adverse events in the Phase I cohort were summarized as the Phase I primary endpoint. Here, we report adverse events of all 65 Phase II participants.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
13.8%
9/65 • Number of events 16 • Every 28 day cycle while on treatment (up to 12 cycles).
The primary endpoint for the Phase I cohort of participants was to determine the MTD based on the frequency of DLTs at increasing dose levels. The adverse events in the Phase I cohort were summarized as the Phase I primary endpoint. Here, we report adverse events of all 65 Phase II participants.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
4.6%
3/65 • Number of events 4 • Every 28 day cycle while on treatment (up to 12 cycles).
The primary endpoint for the Phase I cohort of participants was to determine the MTD based on the frequency of DLTs at increasing dose levels. The adverse events in the Phase I cohort were summarized as the Phase I primary endpoint. Here, we report adverse events of all 65 Phase II participants.
|
|
General disorders
Edema limbs
|
1.5%
1/65 • Number of events 1 • Every 28 day cycle while on treatment (up to 12 cycles).
The primary endpoint for the Phase I cohort of participants was to determine the MTD based on the frequency of DLTs at increasing dose levels. The adverse events in the Phase I cohort were summarized as the Phase I primary endpoint. Here, we report adverse events of all 65 Phase II participants.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
100.0%
65/65 • Number of events 477 • Every 28 day cycle while on treatment (up to 12 cycles).
The primary endpoint for the Phase I cohort of participants was to determine the MTD based on the frequency of DLTs at increasing dose levels. The adverse events in the Phase I cohort were summarized as the Phase I primary endpoint. Here, we report adverse events of all 65 Phase II participants.
|
|
General disorders
Localized edema
|
1.5%
1/65 • Number of events 1 • Every 28 day cycle while on treatment (up to 12 cycles).
The primary endpoint for the Phase I cohort of participants was to determine the MTD based on the frequency of DLTs at increasing dose levels. The adverse events in the Phase I cohort were summarized as the Phase I primary endpoint. Here, we report adverse events of all 65 Phase II participants.
|
|
General disorders
Pain
|
3.1%
2/65 • Number of events 2 • Every 28 day cycle while on treatment (up to 12 cycles).
The primary endpoint for the Phase I cohort of participants was to determine the MTD based on the frequency of DLTs at increasing dose levels. The adverse events in the Phase I cohort were summarized as the Phase I primary endpoint. Here, we report adverse events of all 65 Phase II participants.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Hypersensitivity
|
1.5%
1/65 • Number of events 1 • Every 28 day cycle while on treatment (up to 12 cycles).
The primary endpoint for the Phase I cohort of participants was to determine the MTD based on the frequency of DLTs at increasing dose levels. The adverse events in the Phase I cohort were summarized as the Phase I primary endpoint. Here, we report adverse events of all 65 Phase II participants.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Skin infection
|
1.5%
1/65 • Number of events 1 • Every 28 day cycle while on treatment (up to 12 cycles).
The primary endpoint for the Phase I cohort of participants was to determine the MTD based on the frequency of DLTs at increasing dose levels. The adverse events in the Phase I cohort were summarized as the Phase I primary endpoint. Here, we report adverse events of all 65 Phase II participants.
|
|
Investigations
Alkaline phosphatase increased
|
1.5%
1/65 • Number of events 1 • Every 28 day cycle while on treatment (up to 12 cycles).
The primary endpoint for the Phase I cohort of participants was to determine the MTD based on the frequency of DLTs at increasing dose levels. The adverse events in the Phase I cohort were summarized as the Phase I primary endpoint. Here, we report adverse events of all 65 Phase II participants.
|
|
Investigations
Leukocyte count decreased
|
23.1%
15/65 • Number of events 54 • Every 28 day cycle while on treatment (up to 12 cycles).
The primary endpoint for the Phase I cohort of participants was to determine the MTD based on the frequency of DLTs at increasing dose levels. The adverse events in the Phase I cohort were summarized as the Phase I primary endpoint. Here, we report adverse events of all 65 Phase II participants.
|
|
Investigations
Neutrophil count decreased
|
41.5%
27/65 • Number of events 196 • Every 28 day cycle while on treatment (up to 12 cycles).
The primary endpoint for the Phase I cohort of participants was to determine the MTD based on the frequency of DLTs at increasing dose levels. The adverse events in the Phase I cohort were summarized as the Phase I primary endpoint. Here, we report adverse events of all 65 Phase II participants.
|
|
Investigations
Platelet count decreased
|
66.2%
43/65 • Number of events 274 • Every 28 day cycle while on treatment (up to 12 cycles).
The primary endpoint for the Phase I cohort of participants was to determine the MTD based on the frequency of DLTs at increasing dose levels. The adverse events in the Phase I cohort were summarized as the Phase I primary endpoint. Here, we report adverse events of all 65 Phase II participants.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Blood uric acid increased
|
10.8%
7/65 • Number of events 11 • Every 28 day cycle while on treatment (up to 12 cycles).
The primary endpoint for the Phase I cohort of participants was to determine the MTD based on the frequency of DLTs at increasing dose levels. The adverse events in the Phase I cohort were summarized as the Phase I primary endpoint. Here, we report adverse events of all 65 Phase II participants.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Serum potassium increased
|
3.1%
2/65 • Number of events 3 • Every 28 day cycle while on treatment (up to 12 cycles).
The primary endpoint for the Phase I cohort of participants was to determine the MTD based on the frequency of DLTs at increasing dose levels. The adverse events in the Phase I cohort were summarized as the Phase I primary endpoint. Here, we report adverse events of all 65 Phase II participants.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Serum sodium decreased
|
1.5%
1/65 • Number of events 1 • Every 28 day cycle while on treatment (up to 12 cycles).
The primary endpoint for the Phase I cohort of participants was to determine the MTD based on the frequency of DLTs at increasing dose levels. The adverse events in the Phase I cohort were summarized as the Phase I primary endpoint. Here, we report adverse events of all 65 Phase II participants.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Joint effusion
|
1.5%
1/65 • Number of events 1 • Every 28 day cycle while on treatment (up to 12 cycles).
The primary endpoint for the Phase I cohort of participants was to determine the MTD based on the frequency of DLTs at increasing dose levels. The adverse events in the Phase I cohort were summarized as the Phase I primary endpoint. Here, we report adverse events of all 65 Phase II participants.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
1.5%
1/65 • Number of events 1 • Every 28 day cycle while on treatment (up to 12 cycles).
The primary endpoint for the Phase I cohort of participants was to determine the MTD based on the frequency of DLTs at increasing dose levels. The adverse events in the Phase I cohort were summarized as the Phase I primary endpoint. Here, we report adverse events of all 65 Phase II participants.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Peripheral sensory neuropathy
|
27.7%
18/65 • Number of events 81 • Every 28 day cycle while on treatment (up to 12 cycles).
The primary endpoint for the Phase I cohort of participants was to determine the MTD based on the frequency of DLTs at increasing dose levels. The adverse events in the Phase I cohort were summarized as the Phase I primary endpoint. Here, we report adverse events of all 65 Phase II participants.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Hemorrhage urinary tract
|
1.5%
1/65 • Number of events 1 • Every 28 day cycle while on treatment (up to 12 cycles).
The primary endpoint for the Phase I cohort of participants was to determine the MTD based on the frequency of DLTs at increasing dose levels. The adverse events in the Phase I cohort were summarized as the Phase I primary endpoint. Here, we report adverse events of all 65 Phase II participants.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Protein urine positive
|
1.5%
1/65 • Number of events 1 • Every 28 day cycle while on treatment (up to 12 cycles).
The primary endpoint for the Phase I cohort of participants was to determine the MTD based on the frequency of DLTs at increasing dose levels. The adverse events in the Phase I cohort were summarized as the Phase I primary endpoint. Here, we report adverse events of all 65 Phase II participants.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure
|
3.1%
2/65 • Number of events 2 • Every 28 day cycle while on treatment (up to 12 cycles).
The primary endpoint for the Phase I cohort of participants was to determine the MTD based on the frequency of DLTs at increasing dose levels. The adverse events in the Phase I cohort were summarized as the Phase I primary endpoint. Here, we report adverse events of all 65 Phase II participants.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnea
|
1.5%
1/65 • Number of events 1 • Every 28 day cycle while on treatment (up to 12 cycles).
The primary endpoint for the Phase I cohort of participants was to determine the MTD based on the frequency of DLTs at increasing dose levels. The adverse events in the Phase I cohort were summarized as the Phase I primary endpoint. Here, we report adverse events of all 65 Phase II participants.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
|
30.8%
20/65 • Number of events 36 • Every 28 day cycle while on treatment (up to 12 cycles).
The primary endpoint for the Phase I cohort of participants was to determine the MTD based on the frequency of DLTs at increasing dose levels. The adverse events in the Phase I cohort were summarized as the Phase I primary endpoint. Here, we report adverse events of all 65 Phase II participants.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin ulceration
|
1.5%
1/65 • Number of events 1 • Every 28 day cycle while on treatment (up to 12 cycles).
The primary endpoint for the Phase I cohort of participants was to determine the MTD based on the frequency of DLTs at increasing dose levels. The adverse events in the Phase I cohort were summarized as the Phase I primary endpoint. Here, we report adverse events of all 65 Phase II participants.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place