Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Phase 1/2A, Single Dose Study Of PF-04383119 In Japanese Patients With Moderate To Severe Pain From Osteoarthritis Of The Knee (NCT NCT00669409)
NCT ID: NCT00669409
Last Updated: 2021-02-21
Results Overview
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent: events between first dose of study drug and up to Day 1 through Day 120 (Part 1 and 2) were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state
COMPLETED
PHASE2
83 participants
Day 1 up to Day 92 for tanezumab 10, 25, 50 mcg/kg group and matching placebo group (Part 1, 2); Day 1 up to Day 120 for tanezumab 100 mcg/kg group and matching placebo group (Part 1, 2), 200 mcg/kg group and matching placebo group (Part 1)
2021-02-21
Participant Flow
A total of 83 participants were enrolled in this study, out of which 42 were enrolled in Part 1 and remaining 41 in Part 2.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mcg/kg - Part 1
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 10 microgram/kilogram (mcg/kg) over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Tanezumab 25 mcg/kg - Part 1
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 25 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Tanezumab 50 mcg/kg - Part 1
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 50 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Tanezumab 100 mcg/kg - Part 1
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 100 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Tanezumab 200 mcg/kg - Part 1
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 200 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Placebo - Part 1
Placebo matched to either of the single intravenous infusion over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Tanezumab 10 mcg/kg - Part 2
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 10 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 25 mcg/kg - Part 2
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 25 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 50 mcg/kg - Part 2
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 50 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 100 mcg/kg - Part 2
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 100 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 2.
|
Placebo - Part 2
Placebo matched to either of the single intravenous infusion over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part 1
STARTED
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
12
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Part 1
COMPLETED
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
12
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Part 1
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Part 2
STARTED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
9
|
9
|
9
|
10
|
4
|
|
Part 2
COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
9
|
9
|
9
|
9
|
4
|
|
Part 2
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mcg/kg - Part 1
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 10 microgram/kilogram (mcg/kg) over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Tanezumab 25 mcg/kg - Part 1
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 25 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Tanezumab 50 mcg/kg - Part 1
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 50 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Tanezumab 100 mcg/kg - Part 1
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 100 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Tanezumab 200 mcg/kg - Part 1
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 200 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Placebo - Part 1
Placebo matched to either of the single intravenous infusion over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Tanezumab 10 mcg/kg - Part 2
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 10 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 25 mcg/kg - Part 2
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 25 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 50 mcg/kg - Part 2
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 50 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 100 mcg/kg - Part 2
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 100 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 2.
|
Placebo - Part 2
Placebo matched to either of the single intravenous infusion over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part 2
Withdrawal by Subject
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Phase 1/2A, Single Dose Study Of PF-04383119 In Japanese Patients With Moderate To Severe Pain From Osteoarthritis Of The Knee
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 10 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 25 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 25 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 50 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 50 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 100 mcg/kg
n=16 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 100 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 200 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 200 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Placebo
n=16 Participants
Placebo matched to either of the single intravenous infusion over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Total
n=83 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Customized
36-45 Years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
46-55 Years
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
56-65 Years
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
58 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
66-75 Years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
57 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
26 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 up to Day 92 for tanezumab 10, 25, 50 mcg/kg group and matching placebo group (Part 1, 2); Day 1 up to Day 120 for tanezumab 100 mcg/kg group and matching placebo group (Part 1, 2), 200 mcg/kg group and matching placebo group (Part 1)Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received single intravenous dose of study medication. It was planned to report combined data for Part 1 and 2.
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent: events between first dose of study drug and up to Day 1 through Day 120 (Part 1 and 2) were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 10 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 25 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 25 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 50 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 50 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 100 mcg/kg
n=16 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 100 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 200 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 200 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Placebo
n=16 Participants
Placebo matched to either of the single intravenous infusion over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
AEs
|
9 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
13 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
SAEs
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Part 1 and Part 2)Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received single intravenous dose of study medication. It was planned to report combined data for Part 1 and 2.
The HVLT-R is an instrument used to measure verbal learning and memory (recognition and recall). It consists of 3 learning trials: free recall, delayed recall, and yes/no delayed recognition. The total recall score was the sum of 3 'free recall' learning trials, and reflects the participant's ability to learn. The total score ranges from 0 (no memory) to 36 (best memory). Higher score indicated best memory.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 10 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 25 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 25 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 50 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 50 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 100 mcg/kg
n=16 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 100 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 200 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 200 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Placebo
n=16 Participants
Placebo matched to either of the single intravenous infusion over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) Total Score at Baseline
|
27.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.20
|
26.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.48
|
24.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.05
|
26.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.29
|
27.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.94
|
25.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.14
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 (Part 1 and 2)Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received single intravenous dose of study medication. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those who were evaluable for this measure. It was planned to report combined data for Part 1 and 2.
The HVLT-R is an instrument used to measure verbal learning and memory (recognition and recall). It consists of 3 learning trials: free recall, delayed recall, and yes/no delayed recognition. The total recall score was the sum of 3 'free recall' learning trials, and reflects the participant's ability to learn. The total score ranges from 0 (no memory) to 36 (best memory). Higher score indicated best memory.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 10 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 25 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 25 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 50 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 50 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 100 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 100 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 200 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 200 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Placebo
n=12 Participants
Placebo matched to either of the single intravenous infusion over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) Total Score at Day 1
|
24.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.42
|
23.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.88
|
24.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.07
|
27.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.16
|
23.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.58
|
23.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.40
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 4/5 (Part 1 and 2)Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received single intravenous dose of study medication. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those who were evaluable for this measure. It was planned to report combined data for Part 1 and 2.
The HVLT-R is an instrument used to measure verbal learning and memory (recognition and recall). It consists of 3 learning trials: free recall, delayed recall, and yes/no delayed recognition. The total recall score was the sum of 3 'free recall' learning trials, and reflects the participant's ability to learn. The total score ranges from 0 (no memory) to 36 (best memory). Higher score indicated best memory.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 10 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 25 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 25 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 50 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 50 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 100 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 100 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 200 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 200 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Placebo
n=12 Participants
Placebo matched to either of the single intravenous infusion over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) Total Score at Day 4/5
|
27.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.27
|
26.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.01
|
27.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.96
|
29.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.92
|
26.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.22
|
27.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.36
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 1 (Part 1 and Part 2)Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received single intravenous dose of study medication. It was planned to report combined data for Part 1 and 2.
The HVLT-R is an instrument used to measure verbal learning and memory (recognition and recall). It consists of 3 learning trials: free recall, delayed recall, and yes/no delayed recognition. The total recall score was the sum of 3 'free recall' learning trials, and reflects the participant's ability to learn. The total score ranges from 0 (no memory) to 36 (best memory). Higher score indicated best memory.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 10 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 25 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 25 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 50 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 50 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 100 mcg/kg
n=16 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 100 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 200 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 200 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Placebo
n=16 Participants
Placebo matched to either of the single intravenous infusion over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) Total Score at Week 1
|
26.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.35
|
26.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.81
|
25.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.32
|
25.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.15
|
26.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.72
|
26.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.15
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 2 (Part 1 and Part 2)Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received single intravenous dose of study medication. It was planned to report combined data for Part 1 and 2.
The HVLT-R is an instrument used to measure verbal learning and memory (recognition and recall). It consists of 3 learning trials: free recall, delayed recall, and yes/no delayed recognition. The total recall score was the sum of 3 'free recall' learning trials, and reflects the participant's ability to learn. The total score ranges from 0 (no memory) to 36 (best memory). Higher score indicated best memory.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 10 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 25 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 25 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 50 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 50 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 100 mcg/kg
n=16 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 100 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 200 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 200 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Placebo
n=16 Participants
Placebo matched to either of the single intravenous infusion over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) Total Score at Week 2
|
27.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.00
|
27.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.32
|
25.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.50
|
27.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.98
|
25.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.97
|
27.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.60
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 3 (Part 1 and 2)Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received single intravenous dose of study medication. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those who were evaluable for this measure. It was planned to report combined data for Part 1 and 2.
The HVLT-R is an instrument used to measure verbal learning and memory (recognition and recall). It consists of 3 learning trials: free recall, delayed recall, and yes/no delayed recognition. The total recall score was the sum of 3 'free recall' learning trials, and reflects the participant's ability to learn. The total score ranges from 0 (no memory) to 36 (best memory). Higher score indicated best memory.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 10 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 25 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 25 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 50 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 50 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 100 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 100 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 200 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 200 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Placebo
n=12 Participants
Placebo matched to either of the single intravenous infusion over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) Total Score at Week 3
|
28.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.75
|
30.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.93
|
28.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.27
|
31.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.49
|
27.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.07
|
27.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.45
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 4 (Part 1 and Part 2)Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received single intravenous dose of study medication. It was planned to report combined data for Part 1 and 2.
The HVLT-R is an instrument used to measure verbal learning and memory (recognition and recall). It consists of 3 learning trials: free recall, delayed recall, and yes/no delayed recognition. The total recall score was the sum of 3 'free recall' learning trials, and reflects the participant's ability to learn. The total score ranges from 0 (no memory) to 36 (best memory). Higher score indicated best memory.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 10 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 25 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 25 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 50 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 50 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 100 mcg/kg
n=16 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 100 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 200 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 200 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Placebo
n=16 Participants
Placebo matched to either of the single intravenous infusion over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) Total Score at Week 4
|
28.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.60
|
26.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.45
|
27.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.02
|
27.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.86
|
27.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.58
|
26.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.75
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 13 (Part 1 and Part 2)Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received single intravenous dose of study medication. It was planned to report combined data for Part 1 and 2.
The HVLT-R is an instrument used to measure verbal learning and memory (recognition and recall). It consists of 3 learning trials: free recall, delayed recall, and yes/no delayed recognition. The total recall score was the sum of 3 'free recall' learning trials, and reflects the participant's ability to learn. The total score ranges from 0 (no memory) to 36 (best memory). Higher score indicated best memory.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 10 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 25 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 25 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 50 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 50 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 100 mcg/kg
n=16 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 100 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 200 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 200 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Placebo
n=16 Participants
Placebo matched to either of the single intravenous infusion over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) Total Score at Week 13
|
28.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.16
|
26.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.23
|
27.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.92
|
28.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.87
|
23.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.83
|
26.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.32
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 17 (Part 1 and Part 2)Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received single intravenous dose of study medication. Week 17 analyses was performed only for treatment arms Tanezumab 100 mcg/kg, 200 mcg/kg and Placebo as per analysis plan. It was planned to report combined data for Part 1 and 2.
The HVLT-R is an instrument used to measure verbal learning and memory (recognition and recall). It consists of 3 learning trials: free recall, delayed recall, and yes/no delayed recognition. The total recall score was the sum of 3 'free recall' learning trials, and reflects the participant's ability to learn. The total score ranges from 0 (no memory) to 36 (best memory). Higher score indicated best memory.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mcg/kg
n=16 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 10 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 25 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 25 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 50 mcg/kg
n=16 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 50 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 100 mcg/kg
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 100 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 200 mcg/kg
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 200 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Placebo
Placebo matched to either of the single intravenous infusion over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) Total Score at Week 17
|
29.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.27
|
27.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.07
|
28.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.72
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1 (Part 1 and 2)Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants who had received full single intravenous dose of study medication and had at least one entry of electronic diary in both pre and post treatments. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those who were evaluable for this measure. It was planned to report combined data for Part 1 and 2.
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for current index knee pain was recorded on the electronic diary.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 10 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 25 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 25 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 50 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 50 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 100 mcg/kg
n=16 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 100 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 200 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 200 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Placebo
n=14 Participants
Placebo matched to either of the single intravenous infusion over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Current Index Knee Pain at Week 1
Baseline
|
66.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.61
|
64.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.49
|
67.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.41
|
65.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.77
|
69.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.27
|
62.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.86
|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Current Index Knee Pain at Week 1
Change at Week 1
|
-13.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.75
|
-29.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.10
|
-15.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.96
|
-25.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.35
|
-46.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.62
|
-10.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.31
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2 (Part 1 and 2)Population: FAS included all participants who had received full single intravenous dose of study medication and had at least one entry of electronic diary in both pre and post treatments. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those who were evaluable for this measure. It was planned to report combined data for Part 1 and 2.
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for current index knee pain was recorded on the electronic diary.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 10 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 25 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 25 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 50 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 50 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 100 mcg/kg
n=16 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 100 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 200 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 200 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Placebo
n=14 Participants
Placebo matched to either of the single intravenous infusion over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Current Index Knee Pain at Week 2
|
-18.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.82
|
-29.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.09
|
-11.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.89
|
-25.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.48
|
-25.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.23
|
-13.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.20
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 3 (Part 1 and 2)Population: FAS included all participants who had received full single intravenous dose of study medication and had at least one entry of electronic diary in both pre and post treatments. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those who were evaluable for this measure. It was planned to report combined data for Part 1 and 2.
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for current index knee pain was recorded on the electronic diary.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 10 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 25 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 25 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 50 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 50 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 100 mcg/kg
n=16 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 100 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 200 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 200 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Placebo
n=14 Participants
Placebo matched to either of the single intravenous infusion over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Current Index Knee Pain at Week 3
|
-21.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.33
|
-35.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.58
|
-15.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.49
|
-27.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.19
|
-23.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.44
|
-16.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.41
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4 (Part 1 and 2)Population: FAS included all participants who had received full single intravenous dose of study medication and had at least one entry of electronic diary in both pre and post treatments. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those who were evaluable for this measure. It was planned to report combined data for Part 1 and 2.
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for current index knee pain was recorded on the electronic diary.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 10 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 25 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 25 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 50 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 50 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 100 mcg/kg
n=16 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 100 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 200 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 200 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Placebo
n=14 Participants
Placebo matched to either of the single intravenous infusion over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Current Index Knee Pain at Week 4
|
-22.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.30
|
-37.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.96
|
-21.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.41
|
-30.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.15
|
-46.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.47
|
-18.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.73
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 5 (Part 1 and 2)Population: FAS included all participants who had received full single intravenous dose of study medication and had at least one entry of electronic diary in both pre and post treatments. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those who were evaluable for this measure. It was planned to report combined data for Part 1 and 2.
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for current index knee pain was recorded on the electronic diary.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 10 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 25 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 25 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 50 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 50 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 100 mcg/kg
n=16 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 100 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 200 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 200 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Placebo
n=14 Participants
Placebo matched to either of the single intravenous infusion over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Current Index Knee Pain at Week 5
|
-22.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.25
|
-38.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.44
|
-27.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.90
|
-33.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.02
|
-50.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.36
|
-19.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.07
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 6 (Part 1 and 2)Population: FAS included all participants who had received full single intravenous dose of study medication and had at least one entry of electronic diary in both pre and post treatments. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those who were evaluable for this measure. It was planned to report combined data for Part 1 and 2.
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for current index knee pain was recorded on the electronic diary.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 10 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 25 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 25 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 50 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 50 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 100 mcg/kg
n=16 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 100 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 200 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 200 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Placebo
n=14 Participants
Placebo matched to either of the single intravenous infusion over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline In Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Current Index Knee Pain at Week 6
|
-22.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.49
|
-39.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.56
|
-27.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.73
|
-33.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.14
|
-51.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.13
|
-19.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.01
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 7 (Part 1 and 2)Population: FAS included all participants who had received full single intravenous dose of study medication and had at least one entry of electronic diary in both pre and post treatments. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those who were evaluable for this measure. It was planned to report combined data for Part 1 and 2.
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 10 0= extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for current index knee pain was recorded on the electronic diary.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 10 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 25 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 25 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 50 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 50 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 100 mcg/kg
n=16 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 100 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 200 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 200 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Placebo
n=14 Participants
Placebo matched to either of the single intravenous infusion over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline In Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Current Index Knee Pain at Week 7
|
-18.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.34
|
-41.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.30
|
-28.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.77
|
-34.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.43
|
-47.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.28
|
-20.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.62
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8 (Part 1 and 2)Population: FAS included all participants who had received full single intravenous dose of study medication and had at least one entry of electronic diary in both pre and post treatments. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those who were evaluable for this measure. It was planned to report combined data for Part 1 and 2.
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for current index knee pain was recorded on the electronic diary.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 10 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 25 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 25 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 50 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 50 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 100 mcg/kg
n=16 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 100 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 200 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 200 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Placebo
n=14 Participants
Placebo matched to either of the single intravenous infusion over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline In Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Current Index Knee Pain at Week 8
|
-17.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.35
|
-39.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.94
|
-27.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.86
|
-34.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.98
|
-48.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.18
|
-22.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.67
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 9 (Part 1 and 2)Population: FAS included all participants who had received full single intravenous dose of study medication and had at least one entry of electronic diary in both pre and post treatments. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those who were evaluable for this measure. It was planned to report combined data for Part 1 and 2.
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for current index knee pain was recorded on the electronic diary.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 10 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 25 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 25 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 50 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 50 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 100 mcg/kg
n=16 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 100 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 200 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 200 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Placebo
n=14 Participants
Placebo matched to either of the single intravenous infusion over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Current Index Knee Pain at Week 9
|
-16.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.80
|
-41.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.62
|
-26.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.77
|
-33.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.60
|
-47.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.81
|
-25.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.77
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 10 (Part 1 and 2)Population: FAS included all participants who had received full single intravenous dose of study medication and had at least one entry of electronic diary in both pre and post treatments. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those who were evaluable for this measure. It was planned to report combined data for Part 1 and 2.
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for current index knee pain was recorded on the electronic diary.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 10 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 25 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 25 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 50 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 50 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 100 mcg/kg
n=16 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 100 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 200 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 200 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Placebo
n=14 Participants
Placebo matched to either of the single intravenous infusion over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Current Index Knee Pain at Week 10
|
-15.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.94
|
-39.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 28.09
|
-25.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.44
|
-31.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.94
|
-41.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.35
|
-24.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.50
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 11 (Part 1 and 2)Population: FAS included all participants who had received full single intravenous dose of study medication and had at least one entry of electronic diary in both pre and post treatments. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those who were evaluable for this measure. It was planned to report combined data for Part 1 and 2.
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for current index knee pain was recorded on the electronic diary.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 10 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 25 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 25 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 50 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 50 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 100 mcg/kg
n=16 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 100 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 200 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 200 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Placebo
n=14 Participants
Placebo matched to either of the single intravenous infusion over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Current Index Knee Pain at Week 11
|
-17.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.92
|
-38.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.04
|
-25.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.41
|
-30.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.75
|
-41.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.24
|
-25.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.27
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12 (Part 1 and 2)Population: FAS included all participants who had received full single intravenous dose of study medication and had at least one entry of electronic diary in both pre and post treatments. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those who were evaluable for this measure. It was planned to report combined data for Part 1 and 2.
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for current index knee pain was recorded on the electronic diary.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 10 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 25 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 25 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 50 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 50 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 100 mcg/kg
n=16 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 100 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 200 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 200 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Placebo
n=14 Participants
Placebo matched to either of the single intravenous infusion over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Current Index Knee Pain at Week 12
|
-16.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.34
|
-34.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.93
|
-25.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.06
|
-30.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.56
|
-40.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.88
|
-25.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.76
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 13 (Part 1 and 2)Population: FAS included all participants who had received full single intravenous dose of study medication and had at least one entry of electronic diary in both pre and post treatments. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signify those who were evaluable for this measure. It was planned to report combined data for Part 1 and 2.
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for current index knee pain was recorded on the electronic diary.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 10 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 25 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 25 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 50 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 50 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 100 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 100 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 200 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 200 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Placebo
n=14 Participants
Placebo matched to either of the single intravenous infusion over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Current Index Knee Pain at Week 13
|
-15.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.64
|
-32.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.89
|
-23.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.15
|
-32.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.67
|
-31.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 28.83
|
-25.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.56
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1 (Part 1 and 2)Population: FAS included all participants who had received full single intravenous dose of study medication and had at least one entry of electronic diary in both pre and post treatments. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those who were evaluable for this measure. It was planned to report combined data for Part 1 and 2.
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for index knee pain in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 10 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 25 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 25 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 50 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 50 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 100 mcg/kg
n=16 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 100 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 200 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 200 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Placebo
n=14 Participants
Placebo matched to either of the single intravenous infusion over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain in the Past 24 Hours at Week 1
Baseline
|
75.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.32
|
67.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.24
|
70.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.63
|
67.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.70
|
69.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.37
|
68.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.27
|
|
Change From Baseline Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain in the Past 24 Hours at Week 1
Change at Week 1
|
-17.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.59
|
-29.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.13
|
-15.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.33
|
-26.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.78
|
-45.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.49
|
-10.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.83
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2 (Part 1 and 2)Population: FAS included all participants who had received full single intravenous dose of study medication and had at least one entry of electronic diary in both pre and post treatments. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those who were evaluable for this measure. It was planned to report combined data for Part 1 and 2.
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for index knee pain in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 10 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 25 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 25 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 50 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 50 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 100 mcg/kg
n=16 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 100 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 200 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 200 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Placebo
n=14 Participants
Placebo matched to either of the single intravenous infusion over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain in the Past 24 Hours at Week 2
|
-20.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.94
|
-29.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.26
|
-11.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.62
|
-26.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.31
|
-24.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.09
|
-13.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.53
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 3 (Part 1 and 2)Population: FAS included all participants who had received full single intravenous dose of study medication and had at least one entry of electronic diary in both pre and post treatments. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those who were evaluable for this measure. It was planned to report combined data for Part 1 and 2.
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for index knee pain in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 10 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 25 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 25 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 50 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 50 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 100 mcg/kg
n=16 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 100 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 200 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 200 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Placebo
n=14 Participants
Placebo matched to either of the single intravenous infusion over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain in the Past 24 Hours at Week 3
|
-25.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.75
|
-36.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.06
|
-16.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.85
|
-28.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.82
|
-21.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 28.87
|
-16.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.73
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4 (Part 1 and 2)Population: FAS included all participants who had received full single intravenous dose of study medication and had at least one entry of electronic diary in both pre and post treatments. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those who were evaluable for this measure. It was planned to report combined data for Part 1 and 2.
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for index knee pain in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 10 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 25 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 25 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 50 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 50 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 100 mcg/kg
n=16 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 100 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 200 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 200 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Placebo
n=14 Participants
Placebo matched to either of the single intravenous infusion over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain in the Past 24 Hours at Week 4
|
-25.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.07
|
-37.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.37
|
-23.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.07
|
-32.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.00
|
-45.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.10
|
-18.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.39
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 5 (Part 1 and 2)Population: FAS included all participants who had received full single intravenous dose of study medication and had at least one entry of electronic diary in both pre and post treatments. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those who were evaluable for this measure. It was planned to report combined data for Part 1 and 2.
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for index knee pain in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 10 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 25 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 25 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 50 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 50 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 100 mcg/kg
n=16 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 100 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 200 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 200 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Placebo
n=14 Participants
Placebo matched to either of the single intravenous infusion over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain in The Past 24 Hours at Week 5
|
-24.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.64
|
-38.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.13
|
-28.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.64
|
-35.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.03
|
-50.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.62
|
-18.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.31
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 6 (Part 1 and 2)Population: FAS included all participants who had received full single intravenous dose of study medication and had at least one entry of electronic diary in both pre and post treatments. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those who were evaluable for this measure. It was planned to report combined data for Part 1 and 2.
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for index knee pain in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 10 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 25 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 25 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 50 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 50 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 100 mcg/kg
n=16 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 100 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 200 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 200 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Placebo
n=14 Participants
Placebo matched to either of the single intravenous infusion over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain in the Past 24 Hours at Week 6
|
-24.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.85
|
-40.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.22
|
-28.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.30
|
-34.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.86
|
-50.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.59
|
-18.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.35
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 7 (Part 1 and 2)Population: FAS included all participants who had received full single intravenous dose of study medication and had at least one entry of electronic diary in both pre and post treatments. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those who were evaluable for this measure. It was planned to report combined data for Part 1 and 2.
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for index knee pain in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 10 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 25 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 25 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 50 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 50 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 100 mcg/kg
n=16 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 100 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 200 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 200 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Placebo
n=14 Participants
Placebo matched to either of the single intravenous infusion over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain in the Past 24 Hours at Week 7
|
-22.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.08
|
-41.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.78
|
-28.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.90
|
-36.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.19
|
-46.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.37
|
-19.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.21
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8 (Part 1 and 2)Population: FAS included all participants who had received full single intravenous dose of study medication and had at least one entry of electronic diary in both pre and post treatments. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those who were evaluable for this measure. It was planned to report combined data for Part 1 and 2.
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for index knee pain in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 10 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 25 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 25 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 50 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 50 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 100 mcg/kg
n=16 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 100 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 200 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 200 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Placebo
n=14 Participants
Placebo matched to either of the single intravenous infusion over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain in the Past 24 Hours at Week 8
|
-21.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.17
|
-40.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.93
|
-28.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.65
|
-36.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.34
|
-46.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.38
|
-22.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.87
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 9 (Part 1 and 2)Population: FAS included all participants who had received full single intravenous dose of study medication and had at least one entry of electronic diary in both pre and post treatments. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those who were evaluable for this measure. It was planned to report combined data for Part 1 and 2.
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for index knee pain in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 10 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 25 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 25 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 50 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 50 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 100 mcg/kg
n=16 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 100 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 200 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 200 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Placebo
n=14 Participants
Placebo matched to either of the single intravenous infusion over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain in the Past 24 Hours at Week 9
|
-19.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.76
|
-41.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.52
|
-27.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.72
|
-35.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.54
|
-46.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.44
|
-25.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.41
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 10 (Part 1 and 2)Population: FAS included all participants who had received full single intravenous dose of study medication and had at least one entry of electronic diary in both pre and post treatments. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those who were evaluable for this measure. It was planned to report combined data for Part 1 and 2.
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for index knee pain in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 10 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 25 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 25 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 50 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 50 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 100 mcg/kg
n=16 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 100 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 200 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 200 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Placebo
n=14 Participants
Placebo matched to either of the single intravenous infusion over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain in the Past 24 Hours at Week 10
|
-18.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.60
|
-40.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 28.43
|
-26.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.58
|
-32.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.45
|
-40.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.00
|
-24.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.24
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 11 (Part 1 and 2)Population: FAS included all participants who had received full single intravenous dose of study medication and had at least one entry of electronic diary in both pre and post treatments. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those who were evaluable for this measure. It was planned to report combined data for Part 1 and 2.
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for index knee pain in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 10 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 25 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 25 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 50 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 50 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 100 mcg/kg
n=16 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 100 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 200 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 200 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Placebo
n=14 Participants
Placebo matched to either of the single intravenous infusion over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain in the Past 24 Hours at Week 11
|
-18.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.93
|
-38.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.76
|
-25.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.08
|
-32.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.99
|
-40.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.64
|
-24.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.72
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12 (Part 1 and 2)Population: FAS included all participants who had received full single intravenous dose of study medication and had at least one entry of electronic diary in both pre and post treatments. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those who were evaluable for this measure. It was planned to report combined data for Part 1 and 2.
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for index knee pain in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 10 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 25 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 25 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 50 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 50 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 100 mcg/kg
n=16 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 100 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 200 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 200 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Placebo
n=14 Participants
Placebo matched to either of the single intravenous infusion over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain in the Past 24 Hours at Week 12
|
-17.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.78
|
-35.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.85
|
-25.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.09
|
-32.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.04
|
-39.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.06
|
-24.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.15
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 13 (Part 1 and 2)Population: FAS included all participants who had received full single intravenous dose of study medication and had at least one entry of electronic diary in both pre and post treatments. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those who were evaluable for this measure. It was planned to report combined data for Part 1 and 2.
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for index knee pain in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 10 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 25 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 25 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 50 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 50 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 100 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 100 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 200 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 200 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Placebo
n=14 Participants
Placebo matched to either of the single intravenous infusion over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain in the Past 24 Hours at Week 13
|
-15.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.60
|
-32.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.39
|
-23.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.93
|
-33.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.10
|
-30.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.65
|
-24.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.45
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1 (Part 1 and 2)Population: FAS included all participants who had received full single intravenous dose of study medication and had at least one entry of electronic diary in both pre and post treatments. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those who were evaluable for this measure. It was planned to report combined data for Part 1 and 2.
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for index knee pain during walking in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 10 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 25 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 25 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 50 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 50 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 100 mcg/kg
n=16 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 100 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 200 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 200 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Placebo
n=14 Participants
Placebo matched to either of the single intravenous infusion over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain During Walking in the Past 24 Hours at Week 1
Baseline
|
74.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.11
|
69.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.46
|
72.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.58
|
69.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.45
|
75.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.55
|
69.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.58
|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain During Walking in the Past 24 Hours at Week 1
Change at Week 1
|
-18.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.95
|
-31.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.33
|
-17.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.48
|
-26.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.77
|
-52.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.71
|
-11.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.11
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2 (Part 1 and 2)Population: FAS included all participants who had received full single intravenous dose of study medication and had at least one entry of electronic diary in both pre and post treatments. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those who were evaluable for this measure. It was planned to report combined data for Part 1 and 2.
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for index knee pain during walking in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 10 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 25 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 25 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 50 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 50 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 100 mcg/kg
n=16 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 100 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 200 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 200 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Placebo
n=14 Participants
Placebo matched to either of the single intravenous infusion over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain During Walking in the Past 24 Hours at Week 2
|
-20.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.66
|
-30.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.31
|
-12.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.49
|
-26.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.80
|
-32.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.88
|
-14.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.12
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 3 (Part 1 and 2)Population: FAS included all participants who had received full single intravenous dose of study medication and had at least one entry of electronic diary in both pre and post treatments. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those who were evaluable for this measure. It was planned to report combined data for Part 1 and 2.
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for index knee pain during walking in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 10 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 25 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 25 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 50 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 50 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 100 mcg/kg
n=16 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 100 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 200 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 200 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Placebo
n=14 Participants
Placebo matched to either of the single intravenous infusion over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain During Walking in the Past 24 Hours at Week 3
|
-24.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.91
|
-36.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.37
|
-17.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.32
|
-29.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.23
|
-26.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.71
|
-16.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.79
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4 (Part 1 and 2)Population: FAS included all participants who had received full single intravenous dose of study medication and had at least one entry of electronic diary in both pre and post treatments. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those who were evaluable for this measure. It was planned to report combined data for Part 1 and 2.
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for index knee pain during walking in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 10 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 25 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 25 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 50 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 50 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 100 mcg/kg
n=16 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 100 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 200 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 200 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Placebo
n=14 Participants
Placebo matched to either of the single intravenous infusion over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain During Walking in the Past 24 Hours at Week 4
|
-24.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.88
|
-37.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.43
|
-22.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.63
|
-33.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.10
|
-48.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.41
|
-18.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.02
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 5 (Part 1 and 2)Population: FAS included all participants who had received full single intravenous dose of study medication and had at least one entry of electronic diary in both pre and post treatments. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those who were evaluable for this measure. It was planned to report combined data for Part 1 and 2.
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for index knee pain during walking in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 10 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 25 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 25 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 50 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 50 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 100 mcg/kg
n=16 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 100 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 200 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 200 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Placebo
n=14 Participants
Placebo matched to either of the single intravenous infusion over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain During Walking in the Past 24 Hours at Week 5
|
-21.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.25
|
-38.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.14
|
-28.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.06
|
-35.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.79
|
-51.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.04
|
-19.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.46
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 6 (Part 1 and 2)Population: FAS included all participants who had received full single intravenous dose of study medication and had at least one entry of electronic diary in both pre and post treatments. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those who were evaluable for this measure. It was planned to report combined data for Part 1 and 2.
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for index knee pain during walking in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 10 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 25 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 25 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 50 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 50 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 100 mcg/kg
n=16 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 100 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 200 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 200 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Placebo
n=14 Participants
Placebo matched to either of the single intravenous infusion over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain During Walking in the Past 24 Hours at Week 6
|
-22.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.42
|
-40.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.30
|
-28.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.71
|
-33.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.08
|
-54.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.52
|
-19.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.62
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 7 (Part 1 and 2)Population: FAS included all participants who had received full single intravenous dose of study medication and had at least one entry of electronic diary in both pre and post treatments. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those who were evaluable for this measure. It was planned to report combined data for Part 1 and 2.
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for index knee pain during walking in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 10 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 25 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 25 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 50 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 50 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 100 mcg/kg
n=16 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 100 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 200 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 200 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Placebo
n=14 Participants
Placebo matched to either of the single intravenous infusion over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain During Walking in the Past 24 Hours at Week 7
|
-18.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.81
|
-40.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.92
|
-28.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.38
|
-35.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.34
|
-49.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.06
|
-20.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.28
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8 (Part 1 and 2)Population: FAS included all participants who had received full single intravenous dose of study medication and had at least one entry of electronic diary in both pre and post treatments. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those who were evaluable for this measure. It was planned to report combined data for Part 1 and 2.
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for index knee pain during walking in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 10 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 25 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 25 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 50 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 50 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 100 mcg/kg
n=16 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 100 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 200 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 200 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Placebo
n=14 Participants
Placebo matched to either of the single intravenous infusion over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain During Walking in the Past 24 Hours at Week 8
|
-17.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.15
|
-40.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.00
|
-27.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.85
|
-36.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.21
|
-52.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.37
|
-22.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.93
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 9 (Part 1 and 2)Population: FAS included all participants who had received full single intravenous dose of study medication and had at least one entry of electronic diary in both pre and post treatments. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those who were evaluable for this measure. It was planned to report combined data for Part 1 and 2.
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for index knee pain during walking in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 10 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 25 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 25 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 50 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 50 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 100 mcg/kg
n=16 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 100 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 200 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 200 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Placebo
n=14 Participants
Placebo matched to either of the single intravenous infusion over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain During Walking in the Past 24 Hours at Week 9
|
-16.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.80
|
-41.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.37
|
-25.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.91
|
-35.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.43
|
-50.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.75
|
-26.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.46
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 10 (Part 1 and 2)Population: FAS included all participants who had received full single intravenous dose of study medication and had at least one entry of electronic diary in both pre and post treatments. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those who were evaluable for this measure. It was planned to report combined data for Part 1 and 2.
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for index knee pain during walking in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 10 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 25 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 25 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 50 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 50 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 100 mcg/kg
n=16 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 100 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 200 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 200 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Placebo
n=14 Participants
Placebo matched to either of the single intravenous infusion over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain During Walking in the Past 24 Hours at Week 10
|
-15.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.29
|
-40.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 29.14
|
-23.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.04
|
-32.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.85
|
-44.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.13
|
-24.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.21
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 11 (Part 1 and 2)Population: FAS included all participants who had received full single intravenous dose of study medication and had at least one entry of electronic diary in both pre and post treatments. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those who were evaluable for this measure. It was planned to report combined data for Part 1 and 2.
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for index knee pain during walking in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 10 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 25 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 25 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 50 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 50 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 100 mcg/kg
n=16 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 100 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 200 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 200 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Placebo
n=14 Participants
Placebo matched to either of the single intravenous infusion over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain During Walking in the Past 24 Hours at Week 11
|
-15.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.52
|
-36.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.95
|
-23.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.80
|
-33.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.01
|
-44.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.86
|
-25.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.19
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12 (Part 1 and 2)Population: FAS included all participants who had received full single intravenous dose of study medication and had at least one entry of electronic diary in both pre and post treatments. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those who were evaluable for this measure. It was planned to report combined data for Part 1 and 2.
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for index knee pain during walking in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 10 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 25 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 25 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 50 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 50 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 100 mcg/kg
n=16 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 100 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 200 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 200 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Placebo
n=14 Participants
Placebo matched to either of the single intravenous infusion over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain During Walking in the Past 24 Hours at Week 12
|
-15.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.67
|
-34.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.63
|
-23.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.35
|
-31.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.93
|
-45.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.54
|
-23.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.70
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 13 (Part 1 and 2)Population: FAS included all participants who had received full single intravenous dose of study medication and had at least one entry of electronic diary in both pre and post treatments. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those who were evaluable for this measure. It was planned to report combined data for Part 1 and 2.
VAS assesses participant responses from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme) with 101 point resolution for measuring pain intensity. Higher score indicated greater pain intensity. VAS for index knee pain during walking in the past 24 hours was recorded on the electronic diary.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 10 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 25 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 25 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 50 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 50 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 100 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 100 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 200 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 200 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Placebo
n=14 Participants
Placebo matched to either of the single intravenous infusion over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score For Index Knee Pain During Walking in the Past 24 Hours at Week 13
|
-13.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.25
|
-31.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.99
|
-20.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.36
|
-32.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.74
|
-35.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 34.29
|
-24.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 29.09
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1 (Part 1 and 2)Population: FAS included all participants who had received full single intravenous dose of study medication and had at least one entry of electronic diary in both pre and post treatments. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those who were evaluable for this measure. It was planned to report combined data for Part 1 and 2.
WOMAC 3.1: participant assessed questionnaire consists of 24 questions divided into 3 domains; pain (5 questions), stiffness (2 questions), function (17 questions). Functional domain provided information of ability to perform activities of daily living. The participant performed test directly on electronic diary, using validated electronic VAS ranging from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme). Each domain scored by averaging VAS scores of component questions. Total subscale score for each of the 3 domains range from: 0 to 100, lower score indicated better daily living.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 10 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 25 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 25 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 50 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 50 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 100 mcg/kg
n=16 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 100 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 200 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 200 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Placebo
n=14 Participants
Placebo matched to either of the single intravenous infusion over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Version 3.1 (WOMAC 3.1) Subscales Scores at Week 1
Baseline: Pain
|
61.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.33
|
61.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.29
|
65.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.07
|
58.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.04
|
59.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.81
|
54.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.70
|
|
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Version 3.1 (WOMAC 3.1) Subscales Scores at Week 1
Baseline: Physical Function
|
55.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.88
|
56.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.22
|
67.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.94
|
60.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.94
|
57.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.26
|
53.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.85
|
|
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Version 3.1 (WOMAC 3.1) Subscales Scores at Week 1
Baseline: Stiffness
|
50.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.78
|
50.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.86
|
69.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.86
|
56.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.86
|
55.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.24
|
54.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.89
|
|
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Version 3.1 (WOMAC 3.1) Subscales Scores at Week 1
Change at Week 1: Pain
|
-19.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.89
|
-30.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.79
|
-16.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.63
|
-24.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.94
|
-37.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.94
|
-6.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.18
|
|
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Version 3.1 (WOMAC 3.1) Subscales Scores at Week 1
Change at Week 1: Physical Function
|
-13.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 29.69
|
-26.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.15
|
-19.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.68
|
-27.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.45
|
-35.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 29.04
|
-10.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.69
|
|
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Version 3.1 (WOMAC 3.1) Subscales Scores at Week 1
Change at Week 1: Stiffness
|
-17.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 33.85
|
-27.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 30.09
|
-21.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 29.86
|
-24.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.29
|
-30.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 28.30
|
-4.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.93
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2 (Part 1 and 2)Population: FAS included all participants who had received full single intravenous dose of study medication and had at least one entry of electronic diary in both pre and post treatments. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those who were evaluable for this measure. It was planned to report combined data for Part 1 and 2.
WOMAC 3.1: participant assessed questionnaire consists of 24 questions divided into 3 domains; pain (5 questions), stiffness (2 questions), function (17 questions). Functional domain provided information of ability to perform activities of daily living. The participant performed test directly on electronic diary, using validated electronic VAS ranging from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme). Each domain scored by averaging VAS scores of component questions. Total subscale score for each of the 3 domains range from: 0 to 100, lower score indicated better daily living.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 10 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 25 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 25 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 50 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 50 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 100 mcg/kg
n=16 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 100 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 200 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 200 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Placebo
n=14 Participants
Placebo matched to either of the single intravenous infusion over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in WOMAC 3.1 Subscales Scores at Week 2
Change at Week 2: Physical Function
|
-12.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.96
|
-23.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.65
|
-7.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.46
|
-22.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.16
|
-18.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.96
|
-11.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.53
|
|
Change From Baseline in WOMAC 3.1 Subscales Scores at Week 2
Change at Week 2: Pain
|
-16.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.88
|
-28.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.69
|
-3.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.93
|
-20.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.51
|
-14.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.74
|
-10.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.90
|
|
Change From Baseline in WOMAC 3.1 Subscales Scores at Week 2
Change at Week 2: Stiffness
|
-15.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 29.13
|
-24.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.23
|
-8.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.35
|
-21.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.68
|
-20.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 35.94
|
-14.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.34
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4 (Part 1 and 2)Population: FAS included all participants who had received full single intravenous dose of study medication and had at least one entry of electronic diary in both pre and post treatments. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those who were evaluable for this measure. It was planned to report combined data for Part 1 and 2.
WOMAC 3.1: participant assessed questionnaire consists of 24 questions divided into 3 domains; pain (5 questions), stiffness (2 questions), function (17 questions). Functional domain provided information of ability to perform activities of daily living. The participant performed test directly on electronic diary, using validated electronic VAS ranging from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme). Each domain scored by averaging VAS scores of component questions. Total subscale score for each of the 3 domains range from: 0 to 100, lower score indicated better daily living.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 10 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 25 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 25 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 50 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 50 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 100 mcg/kg
n=16 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 100 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 200 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 200 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Placebo
n=14 Participants
Placebo matched to either of the single intravenous infusion over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in WOMAC 3.1 Subscales Scores at Week 4
Change at Week 4: Pain
|
-23.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.84
|
-35.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.91
|
-27.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.39
|
-30.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.35
|
-41.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.65
|
-12.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.83
|
|
Change From Baseline in WOMAC 3.1 Subscales Scores at Week 4
Change at Week 4: Physical Function
|
-19.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 28.10
|
-30.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.23
|
-29.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.93
|
-33.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.20
|
-41.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.33
|
-11.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.67
|
|
Change From Baseline in WOMAC 3.1 Subscales Scores at Week 4
Change at Week 4: Stiffness
|
-19.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 32.36
|
-30.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 28.81
|
-30.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 29.00
|
-29.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.58
|
-39.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 31.46
|
-14.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.04
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8 (Part 1 and 2)Population: FAS included all participants who had received full single intravenous dose of study medication and had at least one entry of electronic diary in both pre and post treatments. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those who were evaluable for this measure. It was planned to report combined data for Part 1 and 2.
WOMAC 3.1: participant assessed questionnaire consists of 24 questions divided into 3 domains; pain (5 questions), stiffness (2 questions), function (17 questions). Functional domain provided information of ability to perform activities of daily living. The participant performed test directly on electronic diary, using validated electronic VAS ranging from 0 to 100 (0=none to 100= extreme). Each domain scored by averaging VAS scores of component questions. Total subscale score for each of the 3 domains range from: 0 to 100, lower score indicated better daily living.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 10 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 25 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 25 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 50 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 50 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 100 mcg/kg
n=16 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 100 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 200 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 200 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Placebo
n=14 Participants
Placebo matched to either of the single intravenous infusion over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in WOMAC 3.1 Subscales Scores at Week 8
Change at Week 8: Pain
|
-20.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.64
|
-35.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.28
|
-27.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.62
|
-32.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.07
|
-40.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.08
|
-20.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.11
|
|
Change From Baseline in WOMAC 3.1 Subscales Scores at Week 8
Change at Week 8: Physical Function
|
-16.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.65
|
-29.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.89
|
-29.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.71
|
-33.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.49
|
-39.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.10
|
-19.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.81
|
|
Change From Baseline in WOMAC 3.1 Subscales Scores at Week 8
Change at Week 8: Stiffness
|
-16.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.56
|
-35.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.39
|
-32.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 29.58
|
-30.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.41
|
-31.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.18
|
-18.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.16
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 13 (Part 1 and 2)Population: FAS included all participants who had received full single intravenous dose of study medication and had at least one entry of electronic diary in both pre and post treatments. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those who were evaluable for this measure. It was planned to report combined data for Part 1 and 2.
WOMAC 3.1: participant assessed questionnaire consists of 24 questions divided into 3 domains; pain (5 questions), stiffness (2 questions), function (17 questions). Functional domain provided information of ability to perform activities of daily living. The participant performed test directly on electronic diary, using validated electronic VAS ranging from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme). Each domain scored by averaging VAS scores of component questions. Total subscale score for each of the 3 domains range from: 0 to 100, lower score indicated better daily living.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 10 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 25 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 25 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 50 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 50 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 100 mcg/kg
n=16 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 100 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 200 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 200 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Placebo
n=14 Participants
Placebo matched to either of the single intravenous infusion over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in WOMAC 3.1 Subscales Scores at Week 13
Change at Week 13: Stiffness
|
-7.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 33.04
|
-20.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.16
|
-17.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.03
|
-27.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.73
|
-21.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 33.51
|
-18.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 28.16
|
|
Change From Baseline in WOMAC 3.1 Subscales Scores at Week 13
Change at Week 13: Pain
|
-8.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.81
|
-27.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.64
|
-18.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.92
|
-28.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.77
|
-28.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 28.82
|
-17.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.91
|
|
Change From Baseline in WOMAC 3.1 Subscales Scores at Week 13
Change at Week 13: Physical Function
|
-4.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.86
|
-22.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.70
|
-18.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.10
|
-31.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.37
|
-26.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 29.62
|
-16.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.99
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 17 (Part 1 and 2)Population: FAS. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those who were evaluable for this measure. Week 17: analysis was performed only for treatment arms Tanezumab 100 mcg/kg, 200 mcg/kg and Placebo as per analysis plan. It was planned to report combined data for Part 1 and 2.
WOMAC 3.1: participant assessed questionnaire consists of 24 questions divided into 3 domains; pain (5 questions), stiffness (2 questions), function (17 questions). Functional domain provided information of ability to perform activities of daily living. The participant performed test directly on electronic diary, using validated electronic VAS ranging from 0 to 100 (0 = none to 100 = extreme). Each domain scored by averaging VAS scores of component questions. Total subscale score for each of the 3 domains range from: 0 to 100, lower score indicated better daily living.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mcg/kg
n=16 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 10 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 25 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 25 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 50 mcg/kg
n=14 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 50 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 100 mcg/kg
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 100 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 200 mcg/kg
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 200 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Placebo
Placebo matched to either of the single intravenous infusion over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in WOMAC 3.1 Subscales Scores at Week 17
Change at Week 17: Pain
|
-26.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.14
|
-32.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.58
|
-41.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.45
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in WOMAC 3.1 Subscales Scores at Week 17
Change at Week 17: Physical Function
|
-30.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.99
|
-30.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.69
|
-36.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.41
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in WOMAC 3.1 Subscales Scores at Week 17
Change at Week 17: Stiffness
|
-21.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.50
|
-20.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.72
|
-43.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.11
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Part 1: Pre-dose, Day 1 (10 minutes, 0.5, 1, 4, 12 hours post intravenous infusion), Day 2, 3, 4/5, 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 71, 92, 120 post-infusionPopulation: Pharmacokinetic analysis population included all participants who received study medication, had no protocol violations and at least one plasma tanezumab concentration.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 10 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 25 mcg/kg
n=5 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 25 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 50 mcg/kg
n=5 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 50 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 100 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 100 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 200 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 200 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Placebo
Placebo matched to either of the single intravenous infusion over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) - Part 1
|
0.309 microgram/milliliter (mcg/mL)
Standard Deviation 0.0524
|
0.681 microgram/milliliter (mcg/mL)
Standard Deviation 0.2288
|
1.053 microgram/milliliter (mcg/mL)
Standard Deviation 0.1348
|
2.395 microgram/milliliter (mcg/mL)
Standard Deviation 0.3390
|
4.789 microgram/milliliter (mcg/mL)
Standard Deviation 0.6948
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Part 1: Pre-dose, Day 1 (10 minutes, 0.5, 1, 4, 12 hours post intravenous infusion), Day 2, 3, 4/5, 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 71, 92, 120 post-infusionPopulation: Pharmacokinetic analysis population included all participants who received study medication, had no protocol violations and at least one plasma tanezumab concentration.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 10 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 25 mcg/kg
n=5 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 25 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 50 mcg/kg
n=5 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 50 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 100 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 100 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 200 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 200 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Placebo
Placebo matched to either of the single intravenous infusion over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) - Part 1
|
0.334 Hour
Interval 0.167 to 1.0
|
0.500 Hour
Interval 0.167 to 24.0
|
1.00 Hour
Interval 0.183 to 4.03
|
0.750 Hour
Interval 0.167 to 1.0
|
0.750 Hour
Interval 0.217 to 12.0
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Part 1: Pre-dose, Day 1 (10 minutes, 0.5, 1, 4, 12 hours post intravenous infusion), Day 2, 3, 4/5, 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 71, 92, 120 post-infusionPopulation: Pharmacokinetic analysis population included all participants who received study medication, had no protocol violations and at least one plasma tanezumab concentration. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those who were evaluable for this measure.
AUC (0-infinity) is defined as the area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) from time zero (pre-dose) to extrapolated infinite time (0-infinity). It is obtained from AUC (0-t) plus AUC (t-infinity).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 10 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 25 mcg/kg
n=4 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 25 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 50 mcg/kg
n=5 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 50 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 100 mcg/kg
n=5 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 100 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 200 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 200 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Placebo
Placebo matched to either of the single intravenous infusion over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Extrapolated Infinite Time [AUC (0-infinity)] - Part 1
|
72.05 microgram*hour/milliliter (mcg*hr/mL)
Standard Deviation 36.317
|
157.5 microgram*hour/milliliter (mcg*hr/mL)
Standard Deviation 25.586
|
312.4 microgram*hour/milliliter (mcg*hr/mL)
Standard Deviation 38.837
|
851.8 microgram*hour/milliliter (mcg*hr/mL)
Standard Deviation 281.61
|
1885 microgram*hour/milliliter (mcg*hr/mL)
Standard Deviation 377.43
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Part 1: Pre-dose, Day 1 (10 minutes, 0.5, 1, 4, 12 hours post intravenous infusion), Day 2, 3, 4/5, 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 71, 92, 120 post-infusionPopulation: Pharmacokinetic analysis population included all participants who received study medication, had no protocol violations and at least one plasma tanezumab concentration.
AUClast is defined as the area under the plasma concentration time-curve from zero to the last measured concentration.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 10 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 25 mcg/kg
n=5 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 25 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 50 mcg/kg
n=5 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 50 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 100 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 100 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 200 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 200 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Placebo
Placebo matched to either of the single intravenous infusion over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Area Under The Curve From Time Zero to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) - Part 1
|
63.19 mcg*hr/mL
Standard Deviation 32.747
|
183.8 mcg*hr/mL
Standard Deviation 155.82
|
303.5 mcg*hr/mL
Standard Deviation 37.119
|
855.5 mcg*hr/mL
Standard Deviation 247.71
|
1825 mcg*hr/mL
Standard Deviation 319.30
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Part 1: Pre-dose, Day 1 (10 minutes, 0.5, 1, 4, 12 hours post intravenous infusion), Day 2, 3, 4/5, 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 71, 92, 120 post-infusionPopulation: Pharmacokinetic analysis population included all participants who received study medication, had no protocol violations and at least one plasma tanezumab concentration. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those who were evaluable for this measure.
Vz is defined as the the theoretical volume in which the total amount of drug would need to be uniformly distributed to produce the desired blood concentration of a drug.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 10 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 25 mcg/kg
n=4 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 25 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 50 mcg/kg
n=5 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 50 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 100 mcg/kg
n=5 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 100 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 200 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 200 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Placebo
Placebo matched to either of the single intravenous infusion over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Volume of Distribution (Vz) - Part 1
|
51.10 milliliter per kilogram (mL/kg)
Standard Deviation 16.636
|
67.52 milliliter per kilogram (mL/kg)
Standard Deviation 30.705
|
71.08 milliliter per kilogram (mL/kg)
Standard Deviation 10.874
|
60.21 milliliter per kilogram (mL/kg)
Standard Deviation 8.9428
|
84.30 milliliter per kilogram (mL/kg)
Standard Deviation 12.885
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Part 1: Pre-dose, Day 1 (10 minutes, 0.5, 1, 4, 12 hours post intravenous infusion), Day 2, 3, 4/5, 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 71, 92, 120 post-infusionPopulation: Pharmacokinetic analysis population included all participants who received study medication, had no protocol violations and at least one plasma tanezumab concentration. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those who were evaluable for this measure.
Vss is defined as the the theoretical volume in which the total amount of drug would need to be uniformly distributed to produce the desired blood concentration of a drug. It is the apparent volume of distribution at steady-state.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 10 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 25 mcg/kg
n=4 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 25 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 50 mcg/kg
n=5 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 50 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 100 mcg/kg
n=5 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 100 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 200 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 200 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Placebo
Placebo matched to either of the single intravenous infusion over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Volume of Distribution At Steady State (Vss) - Part 1
|
49.98 mL/kg
Standard Deviation 15.192
|
66.98 mL/kg
Standard Deviation 23.556
|
75.56 mL/kg
Standard Deviation 16.329
|
62.74 mL/kg
Standard Deviation 5.6509
|
82.56 mL/kg
Standard Deviation 10.740
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Part 1: Pre-dose, Day 1 (10 minutes, 0.5, 1, 4, 12 hours post intravenous infusion), Day 2, 3, 4/5, 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 71, 92, 120 post-infusionPopulation: Pharmacokinetic analysis population included all participants who received study medication, had no protocol violations and at least one plasma tanezumab concentration. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those who were evaluable for this measure.
CL is a quantitative measure of the rate at which a drug substance is removed from the body.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 10 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 25 mcg/kg
n=4 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 25 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 50 mcg/kg
n=5 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 50 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 100 mcg/kg
n=5 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 100 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 200 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 200 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Placebo
Placebo matched to either of the single intravenous infusion over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Systemic Clearance (CL) - Part 1
|
3.330 milliliter/day/kilogram (mL/day/kg)
Standard Deviation 2.2806
|
3.807 milliliter/day/kilogram (mL/day/kg)
Standard Deviation 0.5984
|
3.838 milliliter/day/kilogram (mL/day/kg)
Standard Deviation 0.5086
|
2.817 milliliter/day/kilogram (mL/day/kg)
Standard Deviation 1.3324
|
2.547 milliliter/day/kilogram (mL/day/kg)
Standard Deviation 0.4058
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Part 1: Pre-dose, Day 1 (10 minutes, 0.5, 1, 4, 12 hours post intravenous infusion), Day 2, 3, 4/5, 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 71, 92, 120 post-infusionPopulation: Pharmacokinetic analysis population included all participants who received study medication, had no protocol violations and at least one plasma tanezumab concentration. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those who were evaluable for this measure.
MRT was calculated as area under the moment curve/area under the concentration effect curve.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 10 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 25 mcg/kg
n=4 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 25 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 50 mcg/kg
n=5 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 50 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 100 mcg/kg
n=5 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 100 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 200 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 200 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Placebo
Placebo matched to either of the single intravenous infusion over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Residence Time (MRT) - Part 1
|
17.47 days
Standard Deviation 8.9511
|
18.08 days
Standard Deviation 4.6284
|
19.92 days
Standard Deviation 3.6745
|
23.22 days
Standard Deviation 6.3625
|
33.02 days
Standard Deviation 6.7913
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Part 1: Pre-dose, Day 1 (10 minutes, 0.5, 1, 4, 12 hours post intravenous infusion), Day 2, 3, 4/5, 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 71, 92, 120 post-infusionPopulation: Pharmacokinetic analysis population included all participants who received study medication, had no protocol violations and at least one plasma tanezumab concentration. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those who were evaluable for this measure.
Plasma decay half-life is the time measured for the plasma concentration to decrease by one half.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 10 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 25 mcg/kg
n=4 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 25 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 50 mcg/kg
n=5 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 50 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 100 mcg/kg
n=5 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 100 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 200 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 200 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Placebo
Placebo matched to either of the single intravenous infusion over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Plasma Decay Half-Life (t1/2) - Part 1
|
12.47 days
Standard Deviation 6.4305
|
12.83 days
Standard Deviation 4.2500
|
12.96 days
Standard Deviation 2.0194
|
15.55 days
Standard Deviation 4.5725
|
23.48 days
Standard Deviation 5.4138
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to Day 120Population: FAS included all participants who had received full single intravenous dose of study medication and had at least one entry of electronic diary in both pre and post treatments. It was planned to report combined data for Part 1 and 2.
Human serum anti-drug antibody (ADA) samples were analyzed for the presence or absence of anti-tanezumab antibodies by using the semi-quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 10 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 25 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 25 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 50 mcg/kg
n=15 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 50 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 100 mcg/kg
n=16 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 100 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 200 mcg/kg
n=6 Participants
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 200 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Placebo
Placebo matched to either of the single intravenous infusion over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Positive Anti-tanezumab Antibody Test Results
|
0 percentage of participants
|
0 percentage of participants
|
0 percentage of participants
|
0 percentage of participants
|
0 percentage of participants
|
—
|
Adverse Events
Tanezumab 10 mcg/kg
Tanezumab 25 mcg/kg
Tanezumab 50 mcg/kg
Tanezumab 100 mcg/kg
Tanezumab 200 mcg/kg
Placebo
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mcg/kg
n=15 participants at risk
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 10 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 25 mcg/kg
n=15 participants at risk
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 25 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 50 mcg/kg
n=15 participants at risk
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 50 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 100 mcg/kg
n=16 participants at risk
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 100 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 200 mcg/kg
n=6 participants at risk
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 200 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Placebo
n=16 participants at risk
Placebo matched to either of the single intravenous infusion over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrioventricular block
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
6.7%
1/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Inguinal hernia
|
6.7%
1/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Tanezumab 10 mcg/kg
n=15 participants at risk
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 10 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 25 mcg/kg
n=15 participants at risk
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 25 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 50 mcg/kg
n=15 participants at risk
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 50 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 100 mcg/kg
n=16 participants at risk
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 100 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
Tanezumab 200 mcg/kg
n=6 participants at risk
Single intravenous infusion of tanezumab 200 mcg/kg over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1.
|
Placebo
n=16 participants at risk
Placebo matched to either of the single intravenous infusion over 10 minutes on Day 1 during Part 1 and Part 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutropenia
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
16.7%
1/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Supraventricular extrasystoles
|
6.7%
1/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
6.2%
1/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Ear congestion
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
16.7%
1/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Tinnitus
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
6.2%
1/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Vertigo
|
6.7%
1/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
6.2%
1/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Asthenopia
|
6.7%
1/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Cataract
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
6.7%
1/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Lacrimation increased
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
16.7%
1/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Visual impairment
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
6.7%
1/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
6.2%
1/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal distension
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
6.7%
1/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
6.7%
1/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
6.7%
1/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
6.2%
1/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
6.2%
1/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Face oedema
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
6.7%
1/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
16.7%
1/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site swelling
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
12.5%
2/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
6.7%
1/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Arthritis infective
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
16.7%
1/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
16.7%
1/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
6.7%
1/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
13.3%
2/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
13.3%
2/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
12.5%
2/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
31.2%
5/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Trichophytosis
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
6.2%
1/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Arthropod bite
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
6.2%
1/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Contusion
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
6.7%
1/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
12.5%
2/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fall
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
6.7%
1/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
6.2%
1/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Skeletal injury
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
6.2%
1/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Wound
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
12.5%
2/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Investigations
Blood creatine phosphokinase increased
|
6.7%
1/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
6.7%
1/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
6.2%
1/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Investigations
Blood pressure decreased
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
6.2%
1/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Investigations
Blood pressure increased
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
6.7%
1/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Investigations
Electrocardiogram T wave abnormal
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
6.2%
1/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Investigations
Electrocardiogram T wave amplitude decreased
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
16.7%
1/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Investigations
Low density lipoprotein increased
|
6.7%
1/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Investigations
White blood cells urine positive
|
6.7%
1/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperuricaemia
|
6.7%
1/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
33.3%
2/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
6.2%
1/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
6.7%
1/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
16.7%
1/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Joint swelling
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
16.7%
1/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle twitching
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
16.7%
1/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
6.7%
1/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoarthritis
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
16.7%
1/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
6.2%
1/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Allodynia
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
33.3%
2/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Amnesia
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
6.7%
1/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Decreased vibratory sense
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
6.2%
1/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dysaesthesia
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
16.7%
1/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
6.7%
1/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
12.5%
2/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
16.7%
1/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
6.2%
1/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Paraesthesia
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
33.3%
2/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Sympathicotonia
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
6.7%
1/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Thermohypoaesthesia
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
6.2%
1/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
6.7%
1/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
6.2%
1/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatitis
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
6.7%
1/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dry skin
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
6.2%
1/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Eczema
|
6.7%
1/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
6.7%
1/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Haemorrhage subcutaneous
|
6.7%
1/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pigmentation disorder
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
6.2%
1/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
6.7%
1/15
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/6
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Pfizer has the right to review disclosures, requesting a delay of less than 60 days. Investigator will postpone single center publications until after disclosure of pooled data (all sites), less than 12 months from study completion/termination at all participating sites. Investigator may not disclose previously undisclosed confidential information other than study results.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER