Randomized Study to Reduce Calcineurininhibitor Toxicity in Pediatric and Adolescent Kidney Transplant Recipients

NCT ID: NCT00663455

Last Updated: 2015-06-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-12-31

Study Completion Date

2013-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine if a safe reduction of cyclosporine A in pediatric and adolescent patients with stable renal graft function, reduces signs of calcineurin-inhibitor toxicity.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Chronic transplant nephropathy is one of the major causes of graft loss after renal transplantation. Toxicity of calcineurin-inhibitors is suspected to be one cause for loss of graft function. Therefore reduction of cyclosporine A dosing can result in longer graft survival and better graft function in patients after renal-transplantation. However, reduction of immunosuppression can result in acute rejection episodes, although it is less likely in patients with stable graft function 12 months or longer after successful renal transplantation.

Therefore the aim of this randomized, controlled study in pediatric and adolescent renal transplant recipients, is to compare the impact of reduced cyclosporine A-dosing to standard CSA-dosing on renal graft function. Therapy monitoring in both groups will be performed by obtaining CSA blood levels two hours after intake, as they provide an individual insight in pharmacokinetics in comparison to conventional trough level (C0)-measurements.

Secondary objectives to evaluate are

1. the evaluation of the health-related Quality of life and psychosocial burden in the two treatment arms.
2. measurement of the NFAT-regulated gene expression (nuclear factor of activated t-cells) of intracellular cytokines \[Interleukin-2, TNF-alpha, Interferon-gamma and GMCSF) by quantitative PCR as measurement of CSA activity.
3. To obtain new insights by screening for metabolites conjunct with clinic features of nephrotoxicity or graft rejections a metabolomic screening and a targeted analysis (trimethylamine-N-oxide, neopterin and kynurenine/tryptophan ratio) will be performed.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Kidney Transplant

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

A

Reduction of CSA-dosing over 4 months. Therapy control by safety parameters (serum creatinine, C2-monitoring, renal biopsy).

Group Type OTHER

Reduction of cyclosporine A (CSA)-dosing

Intervention Type DRUG

Reduction of CSA-dosing over 4 months. Therapy control by safety parameters (serum creatinine, C2-monitoring, renal biopsy).

B

Standard CSA-dosing without reduction. Therapy control by C2-monitoring.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Reduction of cyclosporine A (CSA)-dosing

Reduction of CSA-dosing over 4 months. Therapy control by safety parameters (serum creatinine, C2-monitoring, renal biopsy).

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* age at inclusion 3-16 years
* male or female patients
* recipient of first or second renal transplant
* graft age \> 24 months
* last acute rejection episode \> 6 months ago
* Immune suppression comedication Mycophenolatmofetil (MMF) in a dose range of 1200 +/- 200 mg/m² BSA/d within at least 6 months or minimal MPA-AUC ≥ 45 mg x h/l. If MPA-AUC \< 45 mg x h/l adjustment of dosage with re-screening in ≥ 4 weeks is possible.
* Application of CSA in stable dosing within the last 3 months before study inclusion and CSA-C2-level \> 500 ng/ml. If CSA-C2-level \< 500 ng/ml adjustment of dosage with re-screening in ≥ 4 weeks is possible.
* steroid-free immunosuppression for at least 6 months before enrollment
* biopsy of the renal graft without any signs of acute rejection (def. according to BANFF classification), within 3 months before enrollment
* written informed consent of parents/legal guardians and, if applicable, patient's consent

Exclusion Criteria

* glomerular filtration rate \< 40 ml/min/1.73 m2 BSA (acc. to Schwartz' formula) at time of enrollment
* \> 2 episodes of acute graft rejection within 12 months prior to enrollment
* condition after steroid-resistant graft rejection
* actual participation in another clinical trial
* Recurrence of primary renal disease in the graft
* proven infection with EBV and/ or CMV and antiviral therapy within 3 months prior to enrollment
* proven infection with polyoma virus within 3 months prior to enrolment
* pregnant or nursing women
* hemoglobin \< 8 g/dl at screening visit
* non-treated arterial hypertension
* uncontrolled infectious disease
* history of malignancy of any organ system, treated or non-treated
Minimum Eligible Age

3 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

16 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Erlangen-Nürnberg Medical School

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jörg Dötsch, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Dept. of Pediatric Nephrology, University Hospital Erlangen, Germany

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Dept. of Pediatric Nephrology, University Hospital Erlangen

Erlangen, , Germany

Site Status

Dept. of Pediatric Nephrology, University Hospital Freiburg

Freiburg im Breisgau, , Germany

Site Status

Dept. of Pediatric Nephrology, University Hospital Hamburg

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Dept. of Pediatric Nephrology, University Hospital Hannover

Hanover, , Germany

Site Status

Dept. of Pediatric Nephrology, University Hospital Heidelberg

Heidelberg, , Germany

Site Status

Dept. of Pediatric Nephrology, University Hospital Jena

Jena, , Germany

Site Status

Dept. of Pediatric Nephrology, Community Hospital Memmingen

Memmingen, , Germany

Site Status

Dept. of Pediatric Nephrology, University Hospital München

Munich, , Germany

Site Status

Dept. of Pediatric Nephrology, University Hospital Muenster

Münster, , Germany

Site Status

Dept. of Pediatric Nephrology, University Hospital Rostock

Rostock, , Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Recaltox-1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.