Trial Outcomes & Findings for Study Evaluating Etanercept for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Psoriasis (NCT NCT00663052)
NCT ID: NCT00663052
Last Updated: 2012-04-23
Results Overview
PASI: Combined assessment of lesion severity and area affected into single score; range: 0(no disease) to 72(maximal disease). Body was divided into 4 sections (head, arms, trunk, legs); each area was scored by itself and scores were combined for final PASI. For each section percent area of skin involved was estimated: 0 (0%) to 6 (90 - 100%), and severity was estimated by clinical signs: erythema, induration, and desquamation; scale: 0 (none) to 4 (maximum). Final PASI = sum of severity parameters for each section \* area score \* weight of section (head: 0.1, arms: 0.2, body: 0.3, legs: 0.4).
COMPLETED
PHASE4
273 participants
Week 24
2012-04-23
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
ETN 50 mg BW/QW
Etanercept (ETN) subcutaneously (s.c.) 50 milligram (mg) twice weekly (BIW) for 12 weeks (double blind phase) followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg once weekly (QW) for 12 weeks (open label Phase).
|
ETN 50 mg QW/QW
ETN s.c. 50 mg QW and matching placebo for ETN QW for 12 weeks (double blind phase), followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg QW for 12 weeks (open label phase).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
136
|
137
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
124
|
127
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
12
|
10
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
ETN 50 mg BW/QW
Etanercept (ETN) subcutaneously (s.c.) 50 milligram (mg) twice weekly (BIW) for 12 weeks (double blind phase) followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg once weekly (QW) for 12 weeks (open label Phase).
|
ETN 50 mg QW/QW
ETN s.c. 50 mg QW and matching placebo for ETN QW for 12 weeks (double blind phase), followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg QW for 12 weeks (open label phase).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
6
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Discontinuation of Study by Sponsor
|
2
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
2
|
5
|
|
Overall Study
Unsatisfactory Response - Efficacy
|
1
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Other
|
0
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Study Evaluating Etanercept for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Psoriasis
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
ETN 50 mg BW/QW
n=136 Participants
Etanercept (ETN) subcutaneously (s.c.) 50 milligram (mg) twice weekly (BIW) for 12 weeks (double blind phase) followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg once weekly (QW) for 12 weeks (open label Phase).
|
ETN 50 mg QW/QW
n=137 Participants
ETN s.c. 50 mg QW and matching placebo for ETN QW for 12 weeks (double blind phase), followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg QW for 12 weeks (open label phase).
|
Total
n=273 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age Continuous
|
43.95 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.68 • n=5 Participants
|
43.85 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.69 • n=7 Participants
|
43.90 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.66 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
47 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
36 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
83 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
89 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
101 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
190 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Mean Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score
|
21.4 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.4 • n=5 Participants
|
20.9 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.4 • n=7 Participants
|
21.2 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.4 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving the Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Reponses
PGA Clear (0)
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving the Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Reponses
PGA Clear/Almost Clear (0,1)
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving the Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Reponses
PGA Clear/Almost Clear/Mild (0,1,2)
|
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
30 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) of Involvement
|
33.0 Percentage of BSA
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.4 • n=5 Participants
|
32.9 Percentage of BSA
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.0 • n=7 Participants
|
33.0 Percentage of BSA
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.2 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Not Using Topical Preparations
|
120 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
124 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
244 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Evaluated Using Psoriasis Physician Satisfaction Questionnaire (PPSQ)
Consider patient's condition satisfactory
|
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
32 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Evaluated Using Psoriasis Physician Satisfaction Questionnaire (PPSQ)
Consider primary psoriasis therapy satisfactory
|
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
32 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Mean Psoriasis Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSSQ) Scores
Overall appearance of your skin
|
0.9 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.8 • n=5 Participants
|
0.9 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9 • n=7 Participants
|
0.9 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Mean Psoriasis Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSSQ) Scores
Flaking skin
|
1.0 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9 • n=5 Participants
|
1.0 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9 • n=7 Participants
|
1.0 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Mean Psoriasis Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSSQ) Scores
Skin redness
|
1.1 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9 • n=5 Participants
|
1.0 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9 • n=7 Participants
|
1.0 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Mean Psoriasis Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSSQ) Scores
Skin tightness
|
1.2 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9 • n=5 Participants
|
1.2 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.0 • n=7 Participants
|
1.2 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.0 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Mean Psoriasis Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSSQ) Scores
Skin bleeding
|
1.7 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.0 • n=5 Participants
|
1.8 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.2 • n=7 Participants
|
1.7 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.1 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Mean Psoriasis Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSSQ) Scores
Burning sensation in the skin
|
1.5 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.1 • n=5 Participants
|
1.5 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.1 • n=7 Participants
|
1.5 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.1 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Mean Psoriasis Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSSQ) Scores
Skin pain
|
1.5 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.2 • n=5 Participants
|
1.5 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.1 • n=7 Participants
|
1.5 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.1 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Mean Psoriasis Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSSQ) Scores
Joint pain
|
1.8 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.3 • n=5 Participants
|
1.8 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.4 • n=7 Participants
|
1.8 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.3 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Mean Psoriasis Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSSQ) Scores
Comfort level with your appearance
|
1.3 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.1 • n=5 Participants
|
1.2 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.0 • n=7 Participants
|
1.3 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.0 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Mean Psoriasis Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSSQ) Scores
Anxiety
|
1.8 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.1 • n=5 Participants
|
1.7 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.1 • n=7 Participants
|
1.7 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.1 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Mean Psoriasis Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSSQ) Scores
Depression
|
2.0 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.1 • n=5 Participants
|
1.9 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.1 • n=7 Participants
|
1.9 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.1 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Mean Psoriasis Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSSQ) Scores
Fatigue
|
2.0 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.0 • n=5 Participants
|
1.8 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.0 • n=7 Participants
|
1.9 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.0 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Mean Psoriasis Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSSQ) Scores
How others respond to your appearance
|
1.6 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.0 • n=5 Participants
|
1.8 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.0 • n=7 Participants
|
1.7 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.0 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Mean Psoriasis Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSSQ) Scores
How your skin affects social, leisure activities
|
1.5 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.2 • n=5 Participants
|
1.3 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.0 • n=7 Participants
|
1.4 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.1 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Mean Psoriasis Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSSQ) Scores
Satisfaction with psoriasis treatment in general
|
1.4 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.2 • n=5 Participants
|
1.4 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.1 • n=7 Participants
|
1.4 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.1 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Mean Psoriasis Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSSQ) Scores
Would like to continue with my current treatment
|
2.0 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.6 • n=5 Participants
|
2.2 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.6 • n=7 Participants
|
2.1 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.6 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who were Considered Satisfied According to Psoriasis Subject Satisfaction
Satisfaction with health state
|
25 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
28 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
53 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who were Considered Satisfied According to Psoriasis Subject Satisfaction
Satisfaction with primary psoriasis treatment
|
31 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
28 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
59 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Mean Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score
|
14.1 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.3 • n=5 Participants
|
15.0 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.0 • n=7 Participants
|
14.6 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.7 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Mean Euro Quality of Life 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Utility Index Scores
|
0.65 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.30 • n=5 Participants
|
0.66 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.31 • n=7 Participants
|
0.65 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.31 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Mean Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Anxiety and Depression Scores
HADS Anxiety Score
|
7.2 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.4 • n=5 Participants
|
6.9 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.1 • n=7 Participants
|
7.0 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.3 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Mean Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Anxiety and Depression Scores
HADS Depression Score
|
6.0 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.1 • n=5 Participants
|
6.5 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.1 • n=7 Participants
|
6.2 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.1 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Psoriasis (WPAI:PSO)
Percent Activity Impairment Due to Problem
|
39.77 Percentage of indicated parameter
STANDARD_DEVIATION 28.96 • n=5 Participants
|
40.15 Percentage of indicated parameter
STANDARD_DEVIATION 30.94 • n=7 Participants
|
39.96 Percentage of indicated parameter
STANDARD_DEVIATION 29.93 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Psoriasis (WPAI:PSO)
Percent Impairment While Working Due to Problem
|
24.36 Percentage of indicated parameter
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.28 • n=5 Participants
|
26.09 Percentage of indicated parameter
STANDARD_DEVIATION 27.08 • n=7 Participants
|
25.27 Percentage of indicated parameter
STANDARD_DEVIATION 25.29 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Psoriasis (WPAI:PSO)
Percent Overall Work Impairment Due to Problem
|
25.45 Percentage of indicated parameter
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.53 • n=5 Participants
|
29.51 Percentage of indicated parameter
STANDARD_DEVIATION 28.66 • n=7 Participants
|
27.54 Percentage of indicated parameter
STANDARD_DEVIATION 26.30 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Psoriasis (WPAI:PSO)
Percent Work Time Missed
|
3.60 Percentage of indicated parameter
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.14 • n=5 Participants
|
7.19 Percentage of indicated parameter
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.92 • n=7 Participants
|
5.45 Percentage of indicated parameter
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.67 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Mean Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale Scores
Sleep Snoring
|
37.9 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 29.6 • n=5 Participants
|
45.7 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 31.0 • n=7 Participants
|
41.9 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 30.5 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Mean Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale Scores
Sleep Somnolence
|
29.9 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.9 • n=5 Participants
|
30.9 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.3 • n=7 Participants
|
30.4 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.5 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Mean Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale Scores
Sleep Short of Breath or Headache
|
13.2 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.4 • n=5 Participants
|
14.3 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.7 • n=7 Participants
|
13.8 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.5 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Mean Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale Scores
Sleep Adequacy
|
54.6 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 25.9 • n=5 Participants
|
54.0 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 27.3 • n=7 Participants
|
54.3 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 26.6 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Mean Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale Scores
Sleep Disturbance
|
35.0 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.6 • n=5 Participants
|
34.4 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.8 • n=7 Participants
|
34.7 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.6 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Mean Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale Scores
Sleep Quantity
|
6.9 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.4 • n=5 Participants
|
6.9 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.4 • n=7 Participants
|
6.9 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.4 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Mean Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale Scores
Sleep Problem Index I
|
32.5 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.7 • n=5 Participants
|
32.9 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.1 • n=7 Participants
|
32.7 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.9 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Mean Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale Scores
Sleep Problem Index II
|
33.9 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.2 • n=5 Participants
|
34.2 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.6 • n=7 Participants
|
34.0 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.9 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Mean Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Fatigue Questionnaire Total Scores
|
37.9 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.0 • n=5 Participants
|
36.7 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.8 • n=7 Participants
|
37.3 Units on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.4 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Emergency Room Visits
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Mean Number of Emergency Room Days
|
7.8 Days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.64 • n=5 Participants
|
9.4 Days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.31 • n=7 Participants
|
8.7 Days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.45 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Doctor Visits
|
58 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
61 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
119 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Mean Number of Doctor Visits
|
2.9 Visits
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.36 • n=5 Participants
|
3.0 Visits
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.68 • n=7 Participants
|
3.0 Visits
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.51 • n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 24Population: Modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population: all randomly assigned participants who received at least 1 ETN dose and had both baseline and on-therapy PASI evaluations. If participant had a missing evaluation for any time point assessments, the last observation carried forward (LOCF) method of imputation was used.
PASI: Combined assessment of lesion severity and area affected into single score; range: 0(no disease) to 72(maximal disease). Body was divided into 4 sections (head, arms, trunk, legs); each area was scored by itself and scores were combined for final PASI. For each section percent area of skin involved was estimated: 0 (0%) to 6 (90 - 100%), and severity was estimated by clinical signs: erythema, induration, and desquamation; scale: 0 (none) to 4 (maximum). Final PASI = sum of severity parameters for each section \* area score \* weight of section (head: 0.1, arms: 0.2, body: 0.3, legs: 0.4).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ETN 50 mg BW/QW
n=133 Participants
Etanercept (ETN) subcutaneously (s.c.) 50 milligram (mg) twice weekly (BIW) for 12 weeks (double blind phase) followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg once weekly (QW) for 12 weeks (open label Phase).
|
ETN 50 mg QW/QW
n=137 Participants
ETN s.c. 50 mg QW and matching placebo for ETN QW for 12 weeks (double blind phase), followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg QW for 12 weeks (open label phase).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving a 75% Improvement From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score at Week 24
|
78.2 Percentage of participants
|
59.9 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24Population: mITT population: all randomly assigned participants who received at least 1 ETN dose and had both baseline and on-therapy PASI evaluations. If participant had a missing evaluation for any time point assessments, the LOCF method of imputation was used.
PASI: Combined assessment of lesion severity and area affected into single score; range: 0(no disease) to 72(maximal disease). Body was divided into 4 sections (head, arms, trunk, legs); each area was scored by itself and scores were combined for final PASI. For each section percent area of skin involved was estimated: 0 (0%) to 6 (90 - 100%), and severity was estimated by clinical signs: erythema, induration, and desquamation; scale: 0 (none) to 4 (maximum). Final PASI = sum of severity parameters for each section \* area score \* weight of section (head: 0.1, arms: 0.2, body: 0.3, legs: 0.4).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ETN 50 mg BW/QW
n=133 Participants
Etanercept (ETN) subcutaneously (s.c.) 50 milligram (mg) twice weekly (BIW) for 12 weeks (double blind phase) followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg once weekly (QW) for 12 weeks (open label Phase).
|
ETN 50 mg QW/QW
n=137 Participants
ETN s.c. 50 mg QW and matching placebo for ETN QW for 12 weeks (double blind phase), followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg QW for 12 weeks (open label phase).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving a 50% Improvement From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 20
|
93.2 Percentage of participants
|
82.5 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving a 50% Improvement From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 2
|
9.0 Percentage of participants
|
5.9 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving a 50% Improvement From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 8
|
71.4 Percentage of participants
|
51.8 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving a 50% Improvement From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 16
|
92.5 Percentage of participants
|
78.1 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving a 50% Improvement From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 24
|
92.5 Percentage of participants
|
81.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving a 50% Improvement From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 4
|
38.3 Percentage of participants
|
20.4 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving a 50% Improvement From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 12
|
88.0 Percentage of participants
|
67.9 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24Population: mITT population: all randomly assigned participants who received at least 1 ETN dose and had both baseline and on-therapy PASI evaluations. If participant had a missing evaluation for any time point assessments, the LOCF method of imputation was used.
PASI: Combined assessment of lesion severity and area affected into single score; range: 0(no disease) to 72(maximal disease). Body was divided into 4 sections (head, arms, trunk, legs); each area was scored by itself and scores were combined for final PASI. For each section percent area of skin involved was estimated: 0 (0%) to 6 (90 - 100%), and severity was estimated by clinical signs: erythema, induration, and desquamation; scale: 0 (none) to 4 (maximum). Final PASI = sum of severity parameters for each section \* area score \* weight of section (head: 0.1, arms: 0.2, body: 0.3, legs: 0.4).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ETN 50 mg BW/QW
n=133 Participants
Etanercept (ETN) subcutaneously (s.c.) 50 milligram (mg) twice weekly (BIW) for 12 weeks (double blind phase) followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg once weekly (QW) for 12 weeks (open label Phase).
|
ETN 50 mg QW/QW
n=137 Participants
ETN s.c. 50 mg QW and matching placebo for ETN QW for 12 weeks (double blind phase), followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg QW for 12 weeks (open label phase).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving a 75% Improvement From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 2
|
1.5 Percentage of participants
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving a 75% Improvement From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 4
|
6.0 Percentage of participants
|
4.4 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving a 75% Improvement From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 8
|
35.3 Percentage of participants
|
21.9 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving a 75% Improvement From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 12
|
62.4 Percentage of participants
|
37.2 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving a 75% Improvement From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 16
|
72.9 Percentage of participants
|
51.1 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving a 75% Improvement From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 20
|
78.2 Percentage of participants
|
58.4 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving a 75% Improvement From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 24
|
78.2 Percentage of participants
|
59.9 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to week 24Population: mITT population: all randomly assigned participants who received at least 1 ETN dose and had both baseline and on-therapy PASI evaluations. If participant had a missing evaluation for any time point assessments, the LOCF method of imputation was used.
PASI: Combined assessment of lesion severity and area affected into single score; range: 0(no disease) to 72(maximal disease). Body was divided into 4 sections (head, arms, trunk, legs); each area was scored by itself and scores were combined for final PASI. For each section percent area of skin involved was estimated: 0 (0%) to 6 (90 - 100%), and severity was estimated by clinical signs: erythema, induration, and desquamation; scale: 0 (none) to 4 (maximum). Final PASI = sum of severity parameters for each section \* area score \* weight of section (head: 0.1, arms: 0.2, body: 0.3, legs: 0.4).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ETN 50 mg BW/QW
n=133 Participants
Etanercept (ETN) subcutaneously (s.c.) 50 milligram (mg) twice weekly (BIW) for 12 weeks (double blind phase) followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg once weekly (QW) for 12 weeks (open label Phase).
|
ETN 50 mg QW/QW
n=137 Participants
ETN s.c. 50 mg QW and matching placebo for ETN QW for 12 weeks (double blind phase), followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg QW for 12 weeks (open label phase).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving a 90% Improvement From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 2
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving a 90% Improvement From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 4
|
0.8 Percentage of participants
|
0.7 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving a 90% Improvement From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 8
|
9.8 Percentage of participants
|
5.8 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving a 90% Improvement From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 12
|
29.3 Percentage of participants
|
10.9 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving a 90% Improvement From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 16
|
42.9 Percentage of participants
|
25.5 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving a 90% Improvement From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 20
|
45.1 Percentage of participants
|
29.2 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving a 90% Improvement From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 24
|
49.6 Percentage of participants
|
32.8 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24Population: mITT population: all randomly assigned participants who received at least 1 ETN dose and had both baseline and on-therapy PASI evaluations. If participant had a missing evaluation for any time point assessments, the LOCF method of imputation was used.
PASI: Combined assessment of lesion severity and area affected into single score; range: 0(no disease) to 72(maximal disease). Body was divided into 4 sections (head, arms, trunk, legs); each area was scored by itself and scores were combined for final PASI. For each section percent area of skin involved was estimated: 0 (0%) to 6 (90 - 100%), and severity was estimated by clinical signs: erythema, induration, and desquamation; scale: 0 (none) to 4 (maximum). Final PASI = sum of severity parameters for each section \* area score \* weight of section (head: 0.1, arms: 0.2, body: 0.3, legs: 0.4).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ETN 50 mg BW/QW
n=133 Participants
Etanercept (ETN) subcutaneously (s.c.) 50 milligram (mg) twice weekly (BIW) for 12 weeks (double blind phase) followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg once weekly (QW) for 12 weeks (open label Phase).
|
ETN 50 mg QW/QW
n=137 Participants
ETN s.c. 50 mg QW and matching placebo for ETN QW for 12 weeks (double blind phase), followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg QW for 12 weeks (open label phase).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving a 100% Improvement From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 2.7
|
0.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 4.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving a 100% Improvement From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 2
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 2.7
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 2.7
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving a 100% Improvement From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 8
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 2.7
|
1.5 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.2 to 5.2
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving a 100% Improvement From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 12
|
3.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.2 to 8.6
|
2.2 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.5 to 6.3
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving a 100% Improvement From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 16
|
7.5 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.7 to 13.4
|
4.4 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.6 to 9.3
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving a 100% Improvement From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 20
|
14.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 8.8 to 21.4
|
7.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.6 to 13.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving a 100% Improvement From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 24
|
14.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 8.8 to 21.4
|
8.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 4.6 to 14.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24Population: mITT population: all randomly assigned participants who received at least 1 ETN dose and had both baseline and on-therapy PASI evaluations. If participant had a missing evaluation for any time point assessments, the LOCF method of imputation was used.
PASI: Combined assessment of lesion severity and area affected into single score; range: 0(no disease) to 72(maximal disease). Body was divided into 4 sections (head, arms, trunk, legs); each area scored by itself and scores were combined for final PASI. For each section, percent area of skin involved estimated: 0 (0%) to 6 (90 - 100%), and severity was estimated by clinical signs: erythema, induration, and desquamation; scale: 0 (none) to 4 (maximum). Final PASI = sum of severity parameters for each section \* area score \* weight of section (head: 0.1, arms: 0.2, body: 0.3, legs: 0.4).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ETN 50 mg BW/QW
n=133 Participants
Etanercept (ETN) subcutaneously (s.c.) 50 milligram (mg) twice weekly (BIW) for 12 weeks (double blind phase) followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg once weekly (QW) for 12 weeks (open label Phase).
|
ETN 50 mg QW/QW
n=137 Participants
ETN s.c. 50 mg QW and matching placebo for ETN QW for 12 weeks (double blind phase), followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg QW for 12 weeks (open label phase).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 2
|
-4.5 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.4
|
-3.2 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.4
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 4
|
-8.7 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.5
|
-6.8 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.4
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 8
|
-13.6 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.5
|
-10.6 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.5
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 12
|
-16.2 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.5
|
-12.6 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.5
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 16
|
-17.4 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.5
|
-14.6 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.5
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 20
|
-17.5 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.5
|
-15.5 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.5
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 24
|
-17.4 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.5
|
-15.4 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24Population: mITT population: all randomly assigned participants who received at least 1 ETN dose and had both baseline and on-therapy PASI evaluations. Observed cases (OC) analyses were performed including only those participants who were evaluated at the specified visits.
Time taken to achieve first PASI was calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimate and presented as median. PASI 50=50% improvement from baseline in PASI; PASI 75=75% improvement from baseline in PASI; PASI 90=90% improvement from baseline in PASI; PASI 100=100% improvement from baseline in PASI. PASI score percent improvement =100\*(baseline score - visit score)/baseline score.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ETN 50 mg BW/QW
n=133 Participants
Etanercept (ETN) subcutaneously (s.c.) 50 milligram (mg) twice weekly (BIW) for 12 weeks (double blind phase) followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg once weekly (QW) for 12 weeks (open label Phase).
|
ETN 50 mg QW/QW
n=137 Participants
ETN s.c. 50 mg QW and matching placebo for ETN QW for 12 weeks (double blind phase), followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg QW for 12 weeks (open label phase).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Time to Achieve Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 50, PASI 75 and PASI 100 Over 24 Weeks
PASI 50
|
57 Days
Interval 56.0 to 57.0
|
57 Days
Interval 57.0 to 85.0
|
|
Time to Achieve Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 50, PASI 75 and PASI 100 Over 24 Weeks
PASI 75
|
85 Days
Interval 84.0 to 85.0
|
113 Days
Interval 110.0 to 141.0
|
|
Time to Achieve Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 50, PASI 75 and PASI 100 Over 24 Weeks
PASI 90
|
141 Days
Interval 113.0 to 170.0
|
171 Days
Interval 169.0 to
Not estimable
|
|
Time to Achieve Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 50, PASI 75 and PASI 100 Over 24 Weeks
PASI 100
|
NA Days
Not estimable
|
NA Days
Not estimable
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24Population: mITT population: all randomly assigned participants who received at least 1 ETN dose and had both baseline and on-therapy PASI evaluations. If participant had a missing evaluation for any time point assessments, the LOCF method of imputation was used.
PGA of Psoriasis: score based on dermatologist's assessment of head, scalp, and neck psoriasis (averaged over all lesions). The PGA of Psoriasis scale ranges from 0 (no psoriasis) to 5 (severe disease). PGA score of 0 = Status of Clear.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ETN 50 mg BW/QW
n=133 Participants
Etanercept (ETN) subcutaneously (s.c.) 50 milligram (mg) twice weekly (BIW) for 12 weeks (double blind phase) followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg once weekly (QW) for 12 weeks (open label Phase).
|
ETN 50 mg QW/QW
n=137 Participants
ETN s.c. 50 mg QW and matching placebo for ETN QW for 12 weeks (double blind phase), followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg QW for 12 weeks (open label phase).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving the Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Responses of Clear (0) at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 2
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 2.7
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 2.7
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving the Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Responses of Clear (0) at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 2.7
|
0.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 4.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving the Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Responses of Clear (0) at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 8
|
1.5 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.2 to 5.3
|
1.5 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.2 to 5.2
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving the Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Responses of Clear (0) at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 12
|
9.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 4.7 to 15.2
|
2.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.8 to 7.3
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving the Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Responses of Clear (0) at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 16
|
12.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 7.6 to 19.7
|
9.5 Percentage of participants
Interval 5.1 to 15.7
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving the Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Responses of Clear (0) at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 20
|
19.5 Percentage of participants
Interval 13.2 to 27.3
|
10.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.3 to 17.4
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving the Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Responses of Clear (0) at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 24
|
21.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 14.5 to 29.0
|
12.4 Percentage of participants
Interval 7.4 to 19.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24Population: mITT population: all randomly assigned participants who received at least 1 ETN dose and had both baseline and on-therapy PASI evaluations. If participant had a missing evaluation for any time point assessments, the LOCF method of imputation was used.
PGA of Psoriasis: score based on dermatologist's assessment of head, scalp, and neck psoriasis (averaged over all lesions). The PGA of Psoriasis scale ranges from 0 (no psoriasis) to 5 (severe disease). PGA score of 0 = Status of Clear; 1 = Almost Clear.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ETN 50 mg BW/QW
n=133 Participants
Etanercept (ETN) subcutaneously (s.c.) 50 milligram (mg) twice weekly (BIW) for 12 weeks (double blind phase) followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg once weekly (QW) for 12 weeks (open label Phase).
|
ETN 50 mg QW/QW
n=137 Participants
ETN s.c. 50 mg QW and matching placebo for ETN QW for 12 weeks (double blind phase), followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg QW for 12 weeks (open label phase).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving the Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Responses Clear/Almost Clear (0, 1) at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 2
|
0.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 4.1
|
2.2 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.5 to 6.3
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving the Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Responses Clear/Almost Clear (0, 1) at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 4
|
12.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 7.6 to 19.7
|
6.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.0 to 12.1
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving the Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Responses Clear/Almost Clear (0, 1) at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 8
|
33.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 25.9 to 42.5
|
18.2 Percentage of participants
Interval 12.2 to 25.7
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving the Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Responses Clear/Almost Clear (0, 1) at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 12
|
54.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 46.0 to 63.5
|
32.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 25.1 to 41.4
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving the Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Responses Clear/Almost Clear (0, 1) at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 16
|
60.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 52.1 to 69.2
|
47.4 Percentage of participants
Interval 38.9 to 56.1
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving the Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Responses Clear/Almost Clear (0, 1) at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 20
|
65.4 Percentage of participants
Interval 56.7 to 73.4
|
50.4 Percentage of participants
Interval 41.7 to 59.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving the Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Responses Clear/Almost Clear (0, 1) at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 24
|
69.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 61.4 to 77.6
|
50.4 Percentage of participants
Interval 41.7 to 59.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24Population: mITT population: all randomly assigned participants who received at least 1 ETN dose and had both baseline and on-therapy PASI evaluations. If participant had a missing evaluation for any time point assessments, the LOCF method of imputation was used.
PGA of Psoriasis: score based on dermatologist's assessment of head, scalp, and neck psoriasis (averaged over all lesions). The PGA of Psoriasis scale ranges from 0 (no psoriasis) to 5 (severe disease). PGA score of 0 = Status of Clear; 1 = Almost Clear and 2 = Mild.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ETN 50 mg BW/QW
n=133 Participants
Etanercept (ETN) subcutaneously (s.c.) 50 milligram (mg) twice weekly (BIW) for 12 weeks (double blind phase) followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg once weekly (QW) for 12 weeks (open label Phase).
|
ETN 50 mg QW/QW
n=137 Participants
ETN s.c. 50 mg QW and matching placebo for ETN QW for 12 weeks (double blind phase), followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg QW for 12 weeks (open label phase).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving the Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Responses of Clear/Almost Clear/Mild (0, 1, 2) at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 2
|
27.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 19.7 to 35.5
|
22.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 15.4 to 30.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving the Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Responses of Clear/Almost Clear/Mild (0, 1, 2) at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 4
|
46.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 37.9 to 55.5
|
38.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 29.8 to 46.6
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving the Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Responses of Clear/Almost Clear/Mild (0, 1, 2) at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 8
|
72.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 64.5 to 80.3
|
59.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 50.4 to 67.4
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving the Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Responses of Clear/Almost Clear/Mild (0, 1, 2) at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 12
|
88.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 82.1 to 93.5
|
69.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 60.9 to 76.9
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving the Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Responses of Clear/Almost Clear/Mild (0, 1, 2) at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 16
|
88.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 82.1 to 93.5
|
75.2 Percentage of participants
Interval 67.1 to 82.2
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving the Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Responses of Clear/Almost Clear/Mild (0, 1, 2) at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 20
|
88.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 82.1 to 93.5
|
78.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 70.2 to 84.7
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving the Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Responses of Clear/Almost Clear/Mild (0, 1, 2) at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 24
|
89.5 Percentage of participants
Interval 83.0 to 94.1
|
78.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 70.2 to 84.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24Population: mITT population: all randomly assigned participants who received at least 1 ETN dose and had both baseline and on-therapy PASI evaluations. OC analyses were performed including only those participants who were evaluated at the specified visits.
Time taken to achieve PGA was calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimate and presented as median. Assessment of clear or almost clear or Mild = PGA score of 0 (no evidence) or 1 (minimal/faint) or 2 (mild plaque elevation, mild fine scales predominates or light red coloration).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ETN 50 mg BW/QW
n=133 Participants
Etanercept (ETN) subcutaneously (s.c.) 50 milligram (mg) twice weekly (BIW) for 12 weeks (double blind phase) followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg once weekly (QW) for 12 weeks (open label Phase).
|
ETN 50 mg QW/QW
n=137 Participants
ETN s.c. 50 mg QW and matching placebo for ETN QW for 12 weeks (double blind phase), followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg QW for 12 weeks (open label phase).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Time to First Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis of Clear/Almost Clear (0, 1), or Clear/Almost Clear/Mild (0, 1, 2) Over 24 Weeks
PGA Clear / Almost Clear (0, 1)
|
85 Days
Interval 85.0 to 89.0
|
114 Days
Interval 112.0 to 167.0
|
|
Time to First Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis of Clear/Almost Clear (0, 1), or Clear/Almost Clear/Mild (0, 1, 2) Over 24 Weeks
PGA Clear / Almost Clear / Mild (0, 1, 2)
|
53 Days
Interval 29.0 to 57.0
|
57 Days
Interval 56.0 to 57.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24Population: mITT population: all randomly assigned participants who received at least 1 ETN dose and had both baseline and on-therapy PASI evaluations. If participant had a missing evaluation for any time point assessments, the LOCF method of imputation was used.
PGA of Psoriasis: score based on dermatologist's assessment of disease averaged over all lesions of head, scalp, and neck. Overall lesions were graded for induration, erythema, and scaling; range: 0 (no evidence) to 5 (severe). The sum of the 3 scores was divided by 3 to obtain a final PGA score. Higher scores indicate greater severity of disease.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ETN 50 mg BW/QW
n=133 Participants
Etanercept (ETN) subcutaneously (s.c.) 50 milligram (mg) twice weekly (BIW) for 12 weeks (double blind phase) followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg once weekly (QW) for 12 weeks (open label Phase).
|
ETN 50 mg QW/QW
n=137 Participants
ETN s.c. 50 mg QW and matching placebo for ETN QW for 12 weeks (double blind phase), followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg QW for 12 weeks (open label phase).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 2
|
-0.4 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.0
|
-0.3 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.0
|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 4
|
-0.9 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.1
|
-0.7 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.1
|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 8
|
-1.4 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.1
|
-1.1 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.1
|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 12
|
-1.9 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.1
|
-1.4 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.1
|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 16
|
-2.0 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.1
|
-1.7 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.1
|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 20
|
-2.1 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.1
|
-1.7 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.1
|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 24
|
-2.1 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.1
|
-1.8 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24Population: mITT population: all randomly assigned participants who received at least 1 ETN dose and had both baseline and on-therapy PASI evaluations. If participant had a missing evaluation for any time point assessments, the LOCF method of imputation was used.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ETN 50 mg BW/QW
n=133 Participants
Etanercept (ETN) subcutaneously (s.c.) 50 milligram (mg) twice weekly (BIW) for 12 weeks (double blind phase) followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg once weekly (QW) for 12 weeks (open label Phase).
|
ETN 50 mg QW/QW
n=137 Participants
ETN s.c. 50 mg QW and matching placebo for ETN QW for 12 weeks (double blind phase), followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg QW for 12 weeks (open label phase).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) Involvement of Psoriasis at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 24
|
-25.9 Percentage of BSA
Standard Deviation 19.2
|
-19.0 Percentage of BSA
Standard Deviation 17.2
|
|
Change From Baseline in Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) Involvement of Psoriasis at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 2
|
-1.8 Percentage of BSA
Standard Deviation 7.0
|
-0.3 Percentage of BSA
Standard Deviation 6.7
|
|
Change From Baseline in Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) Involvement of Psoriasis at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 4
|
-5.3 Percentage of BSA
Standard Deviation 10.1
|
-3.1 Percentage of BSA
Standard Deviation 7.7
|
|
Change From Baseline in Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) Involvement of Psoriasis at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 8
|
-13.4 Percentage of BSA
Standard Deviation 15.2
|
-8.4 Percentage of BSA
Standard Deviation 11.8
|
|
Change From Baseline in Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) Involvement of Psoriasis at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 12
|
-20.0 Percentage of BSA
Standard Deviation 19.2
|
-12.7 Percentage of BSA
Standard Deviation 15.7
|
|
Change From Baseline in Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) Involvement of Psoriasis at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 16
|
-23.8 Percentage of BSA
Standard Deviation 19.7
|
-15.9 Percentage of BSA
Standard Deviation 15.9
|
|
Change From Baseline in Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) Involvement of Psoriasis at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 20
|
-25.4 Percentage of BSA
Standard Deviation 18.8
|
-18.2 Percentage of BSA
Standard Deviation 16.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24Population: The data was not collected as planned.
Compare the before and after photographs with the clinical assessments (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index, Physician's Global Assessment) taken at the same time for illustration purposes. Measured as yes or no for change.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Week 12 to Week 24Population: mITT population: all randomly assigned participants who received at least 1 ETN dose and had both baseline and on-therapy PASI evaluations. If participant had a missing evaluation for any time point assessments, the LOCF method of imputation was used.
Moderate topical steroids to very potent topical steroids, topical vitamin D analogs, topical steroids in combination with vitamin D analogs, and anthralin compounds were prohibited for 14 days before the baseline visit until week 12.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ETN 50 mg BW/QW
n=133 Participants
Etanercept (ETN) subcutaneously (s.c.) 50 milligram (mg) twice weekly (BIW) for 12 weeks (double blind phase) followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg once weekly (QW) for 12 weeks (open label Phase).
|
ETN 50 mg QW/QW
n=137 Participants
ETN s.c. 50 mg QW and matching placebo for ETN QW for 12 weeks (double blind phase), followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg QW for 12 weeks (open label phase).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Not Using Topical Preparations at Each Visit From Week 12 Through Week 24
Week 12
|
89.5 Percentage of participants
|
89.1 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Not Using Topical Preparations at Each Visit From Week 12 Through Week 24
Week 16
|
85.0 Percentage of participants
|
81.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Not Using Topical Preparations at Each Visit From Week 12 Through Week 24
Week 20
|
86.5 Percentage of participants
|
82.5 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Not Using Topical Preparations at Each Visit From Week 12 Through Week 24
Week 24
|
85.7 Percentage of participants
|
83.2 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 12Population: mITT population: all randomly assigned participants who received at least 1 ETN dose and had both baseline and on-therapy PASI evaluations. If participant had a missing evaluation for any time point assessments, the LOCF method of imputation was used.
PSSQ: participant's assessment that includes 18 items, 16 items (1-16) scored using Likert score with scores from 0 (very dissatisfied) to 4 (very satisfied) and 5 ( never had this problem). Only those participants who do not have score of 5 at baseline included in the item 1-16 analyses. Two items (17, 18) are with Yes/No answers. The scores of items 1-16 for change from baseline are summarized here.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ETN 50 mg BW/QW
n=133 Participants
Etanercept (ETN) subcutaneously (s.c.) 50 milligram (mg) twice weekly (BIW) for 12 weeks (double blind phase) followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg once weekly (QW) for 12 weeks (open label Phase).
|
ETN 50 mg QW/QW
n=137 Participants
ETN s.c. 50 mg QW and matching placebo for ETN QW for 12 weeks (double blind phase), followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg QW for 12 weeks (open label phase).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Psoriasis Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSSQ) Scores at Week 12
How your skin affects social, leisure activities
|
3.1 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.2
|
2.7 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.4
|
|
Mean Psoriasis Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSSQ) Scores at Week 12
Flaking skin
|
3.3 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.0
|
2.7 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.2
|
|
Mean Psoriasis Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSSQ) Scores at Week 12
Skin pain
|
3.8 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.1
|
3.1 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.4
|
|
Mean Psoriasis Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSSQ) Scores at Week 12
Depression
|
3.5 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.3
|
3.2 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.4
|
|
Mean Psoriasis Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSSQ) Scores at Week 12
How others respond to your appearance
|
3.5 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.1
|
2.9 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.3
|
|
Mean Psoriasis Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSSQ) Scores at Week 12
Satisfaction with psoriasis treatment in general
|
3.3 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 0.8
|
2.9 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.0
|
|
Mean Psoriasis Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSSQ) Scores at Week 12
Would like to continue with my current treatment
|
3.7 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 0.6
|
3.5 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 0.9
|
|
Mean Psoriasis Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSSQ) Scores at Week 12
Skin redness
|
3.2 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.0
|
2.5 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.2
|
|
Mean Psoriasis Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSSQ) Scores at Week 12
Skin tightness
|
3.4 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.1
|
3.0 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.2
|
|
Mean Psoriasis Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSSQ) Scores at Week 12
Skin bleeding
|
3.8 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.0
|
3.2 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.3
|
|
Mean Psoriasis Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSSQ) Scores at Week 12
Burning sensation in the skin
|
3.8 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.1
|
3.0 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.4
|
|
Mean Psoriasis Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSSQ) Scores at Week 12
Joint pain
|
3.1 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.3
|
2.9 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.4
|
|
Mean Psoriasis Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSSQ) Scores at Week 12
Comfort level with your appearance
|
3.2 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.0
|
2.7 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.2
|
|
Mean Psoriasis Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSSQ) Scores at Week 12
Anxiety
|
3.2 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.3
|
3.1 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.3
|
|
Mean Psoriasis Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSSQ) Scores at Week 12
Fatigue
|
3.0 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.1
|
2.9 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.2
|
|
Mean Psoriasis Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSSQ) Scores at Week 12
Overall appearance of your skin
|
3.2 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 0.9
|
2.6 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 24Population: mITT population: all randomly assigned participants who received at least 1 ETN dose and had both baseline and on-therapy PASI evaluations. If participant had a missing evaluation for any time point assessments, the LOCF method of imputation was used.
PSSQ: participant's assessment that includes 18 items, 16 items (1-16) scored using Likert score with scores from 0 (very dissatisfied) to 4 (very satisfied) and 5 (never had this problem). Only those participants who do not have score of 5 at baseline included in the item 1-16 analyses. Two items (17, 18) are with Yes/No answers. The scores of items 1-16 for change from baseline are summarized here.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ETN 50 mg BW/QW
n=133 Participants
Etanercept (ETN) subcutaneously (s.c.) 50 milligram (mg) twice weekly (BIW) for 12 weeks (double blind phase) followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg once weekly (QW) for 12 weeks (open label Phase).
|
ETN 50 mg QW/QW
n=137 Participants
ETN s.c. 50 mg QW and matching placebo for ETN QW for 12 weeks (double blind phase), followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg QW for 12 weeks (open label phase).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Psoriasis Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSSQ) Scores at Week 24
Would like to continue with my current treatment
|
3.5 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.0
|
3.4 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.0
|
|
Mean Psoriasis Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSSQ) Scores at Week 24
Overall appearance of your skin
|
3.2 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.0
|
2.8 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.2
|
|
Mean Psoriasis Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSSQ) Scores at Week 24
Flaking skin
|
3.4 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.1
|
3.0 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.3
|
|
Mean Psoriasis Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSSQ) Scores at Week 24
Skin redness
|
3.3 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.1
|
2.9 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.3
|
|
Mean Psoriasis Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSSQ) Scores at Week 24
Skin tightness
|
3.5 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.1
|
3.2 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.3
|
|
Mean Psoriasis Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSSQ) Scores at Week 24
Skin bleeding
|
3.8 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.1
|
3.3 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.4
|
|
Mean Psoriasis Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSSQ) Scores at Week 24
Burning sensation in the skin
|
3.7 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.1
|
3.3 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.4
|
|
Mean Psoriasis Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSSQ) Scores at Week 24
Skin pain
|
3.7 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.1
|
3.3 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.4
|
|
Mean Psoriasis Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSSQ) Scores at Week 24
Joint pain
|
3.3 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.2
|
3.1 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.5
|
|
Mean Psoriasis Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSSQ) Scores at Week 24
Comfort level with your appearance
|
3.2 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.0
|
2.9 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.2
|
|
Mean Psoriasis Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSSQ) Scores at Week 24
Anxiety
|
3.4 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.2
|
3.2 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.5
|
|
Mean Psoriasis Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSSQ) Scores at Week 24
Depression
|
3.3 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.3
|
3.4 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.4
|
|
Mean Psoriasis Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSSQ) Scores at Week 24
Fatigue
|
3.1 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.1
|
3.0 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.3
|
|
Mean Psoriasis Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSSQ) Scores at Week 24
How others respond to your appearance
|
3.4 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.0
|
3.2 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.2
|
|
Mean Psoriasis Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSSQ) Scores at Week 24
How your skin affects social, leisure activities
|
3.4 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.0
|
3.2 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.4
|
|
Mean Psoriasis Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSSQ) Scores at Week 24
Satisfaction with psoriasis treatment in general
|
3.2 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.0
|
3.1 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.0
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24Population: mITT population: all randomly assigned participants who received at least 1 ETN dose and had both baseline and on-therapy PASI evaluations. If participant had a missing evaluation for any time point assessments, the LOCF method of imputation was used.
SGA of Psoriasis: score based on participant's assessment of itching at a scale of 0 to 5; where 0 = no itching and 5 = severe itching.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ETN 50 mg BW/QW
n=133 Participants
Etanercept (ETN) subcutaneously (s.c.) 50 milligram (mg) twice weekly (BIW) for 12 weeks (double blind phase) followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg once weekly (QW) for 12 weeks (open label Phase).
|
ETN 50 mg QW/QW
n=137 Participants
ETN s.c. 50 mg QW and matching placebo for ETN QW for 12 weeks (double blind phase), followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg QW for 12 weeks (open label phase).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Subject Global Assessment (SGA) of Itching at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 2
|
-0.8 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.1
|
-0.7 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.1
|
|
Change From Baseline in Subject Global Assessment (SGA) of Itching at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 4
|
-1.5 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.1
|
-1.1 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.1
|
|
Change From Baseline in Subject Global Assessment (SGA) of Itching at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 8
|
-2.0 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.1
|
-1.4 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.1
|
|
Change From Baseline in Subject Global Assessment (SGA) of Itching at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 12
|
-2.4 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.1
|
-1.6 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.1
|
|
Change From Baseline in Subject Global Assessment (SGA) of Itching at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 16
|
-2.2 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.1
|
-1.8 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.1
|
|
Change From Baseline in Subject Global Assessment (SGA) of Itching at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 20
|
-2.3 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.1
|
-1.8 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.1
|
|
Change From Baseline in Subject Global Assessment (SGA) of Itching at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 24
|
-2.2 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.1
|
-2.0 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.1
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24Population: mITT population: all randomly assigned participants who received at least 1 ETN dose and had both baseline and on-therapy PASI evaluations. If participant had a missing evaluation for any time point assessments, the LOCF method of imputation was used.
SGA of Joint Pain: score based on participant's assessment of joint pain at a scale of 0 to 5; where 0 = no pain and 5 = severe pain.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ETN 50 mg BW/QW
n=133 Participants
Etanercept (ETN) subcutaneously (s.c.) 50 milligram (mg) twice weekly (BIW) for 12 weeks (double blind phase) followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg once weekly (QW) for 12 weeks (open label Phase).
|
ETN 50 mg QW/QW
n=137 Participants
ETN s.c. 50 mg QW and matching placebo for ETN QW for 12 weeks (double blind phase), followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg QW for 12 weeks (open label phase).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Subject Global Assessment (SGA) of Joint Pain at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 2
|
-0.4 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.1
|
-0.5 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.1
|
|
Change From Baseline in Subject Global Assessment (SGA) of Joint Pain at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 4
|
-0.7 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.1
|
-0.5 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.1
|
|
Change From Baseline in Subject Global Assessment (SGA) of Joint Pain at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 8
|
-0.7 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.1
|
-0.6 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.1
|
|
Change From Baseline in Subject Global Assessment (SGA) of Joint Pain at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 12
|
-0.8 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.1
|
-0.6 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.1
|
|
Change From Baseline in Subject Global Assessment (SGA) of Joint Pain at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 16
|
-0.8 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.1
|
-0.6 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.1
|
|
Change From Baseline in Subject Global Assessment (SGA) of Joint Pain at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 20
|
-0.9 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.1
|
-0.6 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.1
|
|
Change From Baseline in Subject Global Assessment (SGA) of Joint Pain at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 24
|
-0.8 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.1
|
-0.8 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.1
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24Population: mITT population: all randomly assigned participants who received at least 1 ETN dose and had both baseline and on-therapy PASI evaluations. If participant had a missing evaluation for any time point assessments, the LOCF method of imputation was used.
SGA of Psoriasis: score based on participant's assessment of psoriasis disease activity at a scale of 0 to 5; where 0 = good and 5 = severe.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ETN 50 mg BW/QW
n=133 Participants
Etanercept (ETN) subcutaneously (s.c.) 50 milligram (mg) twice weekly (BIW) for 12 weeks (double blind phase) followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg once weekly (QW) for 12 weeks (open label Phase).
|
ETN 50 mg QW/QW
n=137 Participants
ETN s.c. 50 mg QW and matching placebo for ETN QW for 12 weeks (double blind phase), followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg QW for 12 weeks (open label phase).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Subject Global Assessment (SGA) of Psoriasis at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 2
|
-1.0 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.1
|
-1.0 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.1
|
|
Change From Baseline in Subject Global Assessment (SGA) of Psoriasis at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 4
|
-1.8 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.1
|
-1.4 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.1
|
|
Change From Baseline in Subject Global Assessment (SGA) of Psoriasis at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 8
|
-2.1 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.1
|
-1.7 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.1
|
|
Change From Baseline in Subject Global Assessment (SGA) of Psoriasis at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 12
|
-2.5 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.1
|
-1.9 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.1
|
|
Change From Baseline in Subject Global Assessment (SGA) of Psoriasis at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 16
|
-2.6 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.1
|
-2.0 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.1
|
|
Change From Baseline in Subject Global Assessment (SGA) of Psoriasis at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 20
|
-2.6 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.1
|
-2.1 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.1
|
|
Change From Baseline in Subject Global Assessment (SGA) of Psoriasis at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 24
|
-2.5 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.1
|
-2.2 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.1
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12Population: mITT population: all randomly assigned participants who received at least 1 ETN dose and had both baseline and on-therapy PASI evaluations. If participant had a missing evaluation for any time point assessments, the LOCF method of imputation was used.
PASE a participant-administered questionnaire and a simple scoring system to assist physicians in screening participants with psoriasis for evidence of psoriatic arthritis with two sub-scales: system sub-scale and function sub-scale. Total of 15 questions in both sub-scales (7 questions in system and 8 in function sub-scale) to score from 1 to 5; where 1 = strongly disagree and 5 = strongly agree. The total of system and function scores provides the total PASE score ranging from 15 to 75 where higher scores indicate greater severity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ETN 50 mg BW/QW
n=129 Participants
Etanercept (ETN) subcutaneously (s.c.) 50 milligram (mg) twice weekly (BIW) for 12 weeks (double blind phase) followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg once weekly (QW) for 12 weeks (open label Phase).
|
ETN 50 mg QW/QW
n=133 Participants
ETN s.c. 50 mg QW and matching placebo for ETN QW for 12 weeks (double blind phase), followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg QW for 12 weeks (open label phase).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriatic Arthritis Screening and Evaluation (PASE) Total Score at Week 12
|
-3.7 Units on scale
Standard Error 1.0
|
-3.5 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.9
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24Population: mITT population: all randomly assigned participants who received at least 1 ETN dose and had both baseline and on-therapy PASI evaluations. If participant had a missing evaluation for any time point assessments, the LOCF method of imputation was used.
Physician Psoriasis Satisfaction Questionnaire (PPSQ) included two global satisfaction questions to which physicians respond either 'satisfactory' or 'not satisfactory.' These are: 1) whether the participant's current condition is satisfactory, considering psoriasis symptoms, skin appearance and all other problems that psoriasis causes; 2) whether the participant's current primary psoriasis therapy is satisfactory, considering psoriasis symptoms, skin appearance, therapy side effects and therapy ease/difficulty of use. Each of these questions was summarized for change from baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ETN 50 mg BW/QW
n=133 Participants
Etanercept (ETN) subcutaneously (s.c.) 50 milligram (mg) twice weekly (BIW) for 12 weeks (double blind phase) followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg once weekly (QW) for 12 weeks (open label Phase).
|
ETN 50 mg QW/QW
n=137 Participants
ETN s.c. 50 mg QW and matching placebo for ETN QW for 12 weeks (double blind phase), followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg QW for 12 weeks (open label phase).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Evaluated Using Psoriasis Physician Satisfaction Questionnaire (PPSQ): Consider Patient's Condition Satisfactory From Baseline at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 2
|
33.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 25.2 to 41.8
|
27.4 Percentage of participants
Interval 20.1 to 35.7
|
|
Percentage of Participants Evaluated Using Psoriasis Physician Satisfaction Questionnaire (PPSQ): Consider Patient's Condition Satisfactory From Baseline at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 4
|
53.4 Percentage of participants
Interval 44.5 to 62.1
|
38.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 30.5 to 47.4
|
|
Percentage of Participants Evaluated Using Psoriasis Physician Satisfaction Questionnaire (PPSQ): Consider Patient's Condition Satisfactory From Baseline at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 8
|
68.4 Percentage of participants
Interval 59.8 to 76.2
|
54.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 45.3 to 62.6
|
|
Percentage of Participants Evaluated Using Psoriasis Physician Satisfaction Questionnaire (PPSQ): Consider Patient's Condition Satisfactory From Baseline at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 12
|
87.2 Percentage of participants
Interval 80.3 to 92.4
|
65.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 57.1 to 73.6
|
|
Percentage of Participants Evaluated Using Psoriasis Physician Satisfaction Questionnaire (PPSQ): Consider Patient's Condition Satisfactory From Baseline at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 16
|
85.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 78.6 to 91.2
|
75.2 Percentage of participants
Interval 67.1 to 82.2
|
|
Percentage of Participants Evaluated Using Psoriasis Physician Satisfaction Questionnaire (PPSQ): Consider Patient's Condition Satisfactory From Baseline at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 20
|
87.2 Percentage of participants
Interval 80.3 to 92.4
|
75.2 Percentage of participants
Interval 67.1 to 82.2
|
|
Percentage of Participants Evaluated Using Psoriasis Physician Satisfaction Questionnaire (PPSQ): Consider Patient's Condition Satisfactory From Baseline at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 24
|
86.5 Percentage of participants
Interval 79.5 to 91.8
|
75.2 Percentage of participants
Interval 67.1 to 82.2
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24Population: mITT population: all randomly assigned participants who received at least 1 ETN dose and had both baseline and on-therapy PASI evaluations. If participant had a missing evaluation for any time point assessments, the LOCF method of imputation was used.
Physician Psoriasis Satisfaction Questionnaire (PPSQ) includes two global satisfaction questions to which physicians respond either 'satisfactory' or 'not satisfactory.' These are: 1) whether the participant's current condition is satisfactory, considering psoriasis symptoms, skin appearance and all other problems that psoriasis causes; 2) whether the participant's current primary psoriasis therapy is satisfactory, considering psoriasis symptoms, skin appearance, therapy side effects and therapy ease/difficulty of use. Each of these questions was summarized for change from baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ETN 50 mg BW/QW
n=133 Participants
Etanercept (ETN) subcutaneously (s.c.) 50 milligram (mg) twice weekly (BIW) for 12 weeks (double blind phase) followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg once weekly (QW) for 12 weeks (open label Phase).
|
ETN 50 mg QW/QW
n=137 Participants
ETN s.c. 50 mg QW and matching placebo for ETN QW for 12 weeks (double blind phase), followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg QW for 12 weeks (open label phase).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Evaluated by Physicians Using Psoriasis Physician Satisfaction Questionnaire (PPSQ): Consider Primary Psoriasis Therapy Satisfactory From Baseline at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 2
|
66.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 58.2 to 74.8
|
54.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 46.0 to 63.4
|
|
Percentage of Participants Evaluated by Physicians Using Psoriasis Physician Satisfaction Questionnaire (PPSQ): Consider Primary Psoriasis Therapy Satisfactory From Baseline at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 4
|
77.4 Percentage of participants
Interval 69.4 to 84.2
|
68.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 60.1 to 76.3
|
|
Percentage of Participants Evaluated by Physicians Using Psoriasis Physician Satisfaction Questionnaire (PPSQ): Consider Primary Psoriasis Therapy Satisfactory From Baseline at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 8
|
83.5 Percentage of participants
Interval 76.0 to 89.3
|
72.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 64.0 to 79.6
|
|
Percentage of Participants Evaluated by Physicians Using Psoriasis Physician Satisfaction Questionnaire (PPSQ): Consider Primary Psoriasis Therapy Satisfactory From Baseline at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 12
|
91.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 85.7 to 95.8
|
83.2 Percentage of participants
Interval 75.9 to 89.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants Evaluated by Physicians Using Psoriasis Physician Satisfaction Questionnaire (PPSQ): Consider Primary Psoriasis Therapy Satisfactory From Baseline at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 16
|
91.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 85.7 to 95.8
|
84.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 77.5 to 90.3
|
|
Percentage of Participants Evaluated by Physicians Using Psoriasis Physician Satisfaction Questionnaire (PPSQ): Consider Primary Psoriasis Therapy Satisfactory From Baseline at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 20
|
91.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 85.7 to 95.8
|
83.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 76.7 to 89.7
|
|
Percentage of Participants Evaluated by Physicians Using Psoriasis Physician Satisfaction Questionnaire (PPSQ): Consider Primary Psoriasis Therapy Satisfactory From Baseline at Each Visit Through Week 24
Week 24
|
88.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 82.1 to 93.5
|
81.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 73.4 to 87.2
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24Population: mITT population: all randomly assigned participants who received at least 1 ETN dose and had both baseline and on-therapy PASI evaluations. If participant had a missing evaluation for any time point assessments, the LOCF method of imputation was used.
PSSQ: participant's assessment that includes 18 items, 16 items (1-16) scored using Likert score with scores from 0 (very dissatisfied) to 4 (very satisfied) and 5 (never had this problem). Only those participants who do not have score of 5 at baseline included in the item 1-16 analyses. Two items (17, 18) with Yes/No answers are summarized here.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ETN 50 mg BW/QW
n=133 Participants
Etanercept (ETN) subcutaneously (s.c.) 50 milligram (mg) twice weekly (BIW) for 12 weeks (double blind phase) followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg once weekly (QW) for 12 weeks (open label Phase).
|
ETN 50 mg QW/QW
n=137 Participants
ETN s.c. 50 mg QW and matching placebo for ETN QW for 12 weeks (double blind phase), followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg QW for 12 weeks (open label phase).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Were Considered Satisfied With Health State According to Psoriasis Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSSQ)
Week 2
|
47.4 Percentage of participants
Interval 38.7 to 56.2
|
44.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 35.6 to 52.9
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Were Considered Satisfied With Health State According to Psoriasis Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSSQ)
Week 4
|
68.4 Percentage of participants
Interval 59.8 to 76.2
|
59.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 50.4 to 67.4
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Were Considered Satisfied With Health State According to Psoriasis Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSSQ)
Week 8
|
81.2 Percentage of participants
Interval 73.5 to 87.5
|
69.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 60.9 to 76.9
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Were Considered Satisfied With Health State According to Psoriasis Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSSQ)
Week 12
|
85.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 77.7 to 90.6
|
70.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 62.4 to 78.3
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Were Considered Satisfied With Health State According to Psoriasis Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSSQ)
Week 16
|
85.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 78.6 to 91.2
|
73.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 65.5 to 80.9
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Were Considered Satisfied With Health State According to Psoriasis Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSSQ)
Week 20
|
85.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 77.7 to 90.6
|
75.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 67.9 to 82.8
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Were Considered Satisfied With Health State According to Psoriasis Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSSQ)
Week 24
|
85.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 77.7 to 90.6
|
74.5 Percentage of participants
Interval 66.3 to 81.5
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24Population: mITT population: all randomly assigned participants who received at least 1 ETN dose and had both baseline and on-therapy PASI evaluations. If participant had a missing evaluation for any time point assessments, the LOCF method of imputation was used.
PSSQ: participant's assessment that includes 18 items, 16 items (1-16) scored using Likert score with scores from 0 (very dissatisfied) to 4 (very satisfied) and 5 (never had this problem). Only those participants who do not have score of 5 at baseline included in the item 1-16 analyses. Two items (17, 18) with Yes/No answers are summarized here.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ETN 50 mg BW/QW
n=133 Participants
Etanercept (ETN) subcutaneously (s.c.) 50 milligram (mg) twice weekly (BIW) for 12 weeks (double blind phase) followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg once weekly (QW) for 12 weeks (open label Phase).
|
ETN 50 mg QW/QW
n=137 Participants
ETN s.c. 50 mg QW and matching placebo for ETN QW for 12 weeks (double blind phase), followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg QW for 12 weeks (open label phase).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Were Considered Satisfied With Primary Psoriasis Treatment According to Psoriasis Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSSQ)
Week 2
|
82.7 Percentage of participants
|
76.5 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Were Considered Satisfied With Primary Psoriasis Treatment According to Psoriasis Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSSQ)
Week 4
|
88.0 Percentage of participants
|
82.5 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Were Considered Satisfied With Primary Psoriasis Treatment According to Psoriasis Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSSQ)
Week 8
|
92.5 Percentage of participants
|
82.5 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Were Considered Satisfied With Primary Psoriasis Treatment According to Psoriasis Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSSQ)
Week 12
|
92.5 Percentage of participants
|
82.5 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Were Considered Satisfied With Primary Psoriasis Treatment According to Psoriasis Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSSQ)
Week 16
|
91.0 Percentage of participants
|
86.1 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Were Considered Satisfied With Primary Psoriasis Treatment According to Psoriasis Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSSQ)
Week 20
|
91.7 Percentage of participants
|
86.1 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Were Considered Satisfied With Primary Psoriasis Treatment According to Psoriasis Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSSQ)
Week 24
|
87.2 Percentage of participants
|
83.2 Percentage of participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24Population: mITT population: all randomly assigned participants who received at least 1 ETN dose and had both baseline and on-therapy PASI evaluations. If participant had a missing evaluation for any time point assessments, the LOCF method of imputation was used.
DLQI is the dermatology-specific quality of life measure used for psoriatic population. The 10-item questionnaire has a score range of 0 to 30 with higher scores indicating poor quality of life. An estimate of the minimal clinically important difference of the DLQI total score is a 5 point improvement. Total score range: 0 (best) to 30 (worst).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ETN 50 mg BW/QW
n=133 Participants
Etanercept (ETN) subcutaneously (s.c.) 50 milligram (mg) twice weekly (BIW) for 12 weeks (double blind phase) followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg once weekly (QW) for 12 weeks (open label Phase).
|
ETN 50 mg QW/QW
n=137 Participants
ETN s.c. 50 mg QW and matching placebo for ETN QW for 12 weeks (double blind phase), followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg QW for 12 weeks (open label phase).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score to Week 24
Week 2
|
-4.6 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.4
|
-4.3 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.4
|
|
Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score to Week 24
Week 4
|
-7.1 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.5
|
-5.9 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.4
|
|
Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score to Week 24
Week 8
|
-9.0 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.5
|
-7.0 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.5
|
|
Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score to Week 24
Week 12
|
-10.2 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.5
|
-8.1 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.5
|
|
Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score to Week 24
Week 16
|
-10.7 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.4
|
-8.8 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.4
|
|
Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score to Week 24
Week 20
|
-10.5 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.5
|
-9.0 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.5
|
|
Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score to Week 24
Week 24
|
-10.5 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.5
|
-9.2 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.5
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12 and Week 24Population: mITT population: all randomly assigned participants who received at least 1 ETN dose and had both baseline and on-therapy PASI evaluations. If participant had a missing evaluation for any time point assessments, the LOCF method of imputation was used.
EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state (example "confined to bed"). Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates better health state.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ETN 50 mg BW/QW
n=130 Participants
Etanercept (ETN) subcutaneously (s.c.) 50 milligram (mg) twice weekly (BIW) for 12 weeks (double blind phase) followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg once weekly (QW) for 12 weeks (open label Phase).
|
ETN 50 mg QW/QW
n=134 Participants
ETN s.c. 50 mg QW and matching placebo for ETN QW for 12 weeks (double blind phase), followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg QW for 12 weeks (open label phase).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Euro Quality of Life 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Utility Index
Week 12
|
0.21 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.02
|
0.17 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.02
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Euro Quality of Life 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Utility Index
Week 24
|
0.21 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.02
|
0.15 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.02
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12 and Week 24Population: mITT population: all randomly assigned participants who received at least 1 ETN dose and had both baseline and on-therapy PASI evaluations. If participant had a missing evaluation for any time point assessments, the LOCF method of imputation was used.
HADS: participant rated questionnaire with 2 subscales. HADS-A assesses state of generalized anxiety (anxious mood, restlessness, anxious thoughts, panic attacks); HADS-D assesses state of lost interest and diminished pleasure response (lowering of hedonic tone). Each subscale comprised of 7 items with range 0 (no presence of anxiety or depression) to 3 (severe feeling of anxiety or depression). Total score 0 to 21 for each subscale; higher score indicates greater severity of anxiety and depression symptoms.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ETN 50 mg BW/QW
n=131 Participants
Etanercept (ETN) subcutaneously (s.c.) 50 milligram (mg) twice weekly (BIW) for 12 weeks (double blind phase) followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg once weekly (QW) for 12 weeks (open label Phase).
|
ETN 50 mg QW/QW
n=135 Participants
ETN s.c. 50 mg QW and matching placebo for ETN QW for 12 weeks (double blind phase), followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg QW for 12 weeks (open label phase).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) - Anxiety Score
Week 12
|
-1.6 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.3
|
-1.6 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.3
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) - Anxiety Score
Week 24
|
-1.9 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.3
|
-1.8 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.3
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12 and Week 24Population: mITT population: all randomly assigned participants who received at least 1 ETN dose and had both baseline and on-therapy PASI evaluations. If participant had a missing evaluation for any time point assessments, the LOCF method of imputation was used.
HADS: participant rated questionnaire with 2 subscales. HADS-A assesses state of generalized anxiety (anxious mood, restlessness, anxious thoughts, panic attacks); HADS-D assesses state of lost interest and diminished pleasure response (lowering of hedonic tone). Each subscale comprised of 7 items with range 0 (no presence of anxiety or depression) to 3 (severe feeling of anxiety or depression). Total score 0 to 21 for each subscale; higher score indicates greater severity of anxiety and depression symptoms.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ETN 50 mg BW/QW
n=131 Participants
Etanercept (ETN) subcutaneously (s.c.) 50 milligram (mg) twice weekly (BIW) for 12 weeks (double blind phase) followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg once weekly (QW) for 12 weeks (open label Phase).
|
ETN 50 mg QW/QW
n=135 Participants
ETN s.c. 50 mg QW and matching placebo for ETN QW for 12 weeks (double blind phase), followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg QW for 12 weeks (open label phase).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) - Depression Score
Week 12
|
-1.9 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.3
|
-1.3 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.3
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) - Depression Score
Week 24
|
-2.2 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.3
|
-1.7 Units on scale
Standard Error 0.3
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Week 12Population: mITT population: all randomized participants who received at least 1 ETN dose and had both baseline and on-therapy PASI evaluations. If participant had missing values at any time point, LOCF method of imputation used. 'n' signifies participants evaluated for this measure at each timepoint, for each group respectively.
WPAI:PSO - participant rated questionnaire to assess effect of psoriasis on ability to work and perform regular activities in 4 areas: percent activity impairment (0 \[no effect on daily activities\] to 100 \[psoriasis completely prevented from doing daily activities\]), percent impairment while working (0 \[no effect\] to 100 \[completely prevented from working\]); percent work time missed due to psoriasis, and percent overall work impairment (0 \[no effect\] to 100 \[completely prevented from working\]).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ETN 50 mg BW/QW
n=131 Participants
Etanercept (ETN) subcutaneously (s.c.) 50 milligram (mg) twice weekly (BIW) for 12 weeks (double blind phase) followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg once weekly (QW) for 12 weeks (open label Phase).
|
ETN 50 mg QW/QW
n=135 Participants
ETN s.c. 50 mg QW and matching placebo for ETN QW for 12 weeks (double blind phase), followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg QW for 12 weeks (open label phase).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Psoriasis (WPAI:PSO) at Week 12
Percent Activity Impairment (n=131, 135)
|
16.87 Percentage of indicated parameter
Standard Deviation 21.49
|
21.78 Percentage of indicated parameter
Standard Deviation 25.65
|
|
Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Psoriasis (WPAI:PSO) at Week 12
Percent Impairment While Working (n=66, 78)
|
10.25 Percentage of indicated parameter
Standard Deviation 14.41
|
13.19 Percentage of indicated parameter
Standard Deviation 20.43
|
|
Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Psoriasis (WPAI:PSO) at Week 12
Percent Overall Work Impairment (n=64, 71))
|
14.30 Percentage of indicated parameter
Standard Deviation 21.49
|
16.88 Percentage of indicated parameter
Standard Deviation 25.24
|
|
Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Psoriasis (WPAI:PSO) at Week 12
Percent Work Time Missed (n=66, 73)
|
4.35 Percentage of indicated parameter
Standard Deviation 16.86
|
4.85 Percentage of indicated parameter
Standard Deviation 19.11
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Week 24Population: mITT population: all randomized participants who received at least 1 ETN dose and had both baseline and on-therapy PASI evaluations. If participant had missing values at any time point, LOCF method of imputation used. 'n' signifies participants evaluated for this measure at each timepoint, for each group respectively.
WPAI:PSO - participant rated questionnaire to assess effect of psoriasis on ability to work and perform regular activities in 4 areas: percent activity impairment (0 \[no effect on daily activities\] to 100 \[psoriasis completely prevented from doing daily activities\]), percent impairment while working (0 \[no effect\] to 100 \[completely prevented from working\]); percent work time missed due to psoriasis, and percent overall work impairment (0 \[no effect\] to 100 \[completely prevented from working\]).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ETN 50 mg BW/QW
n=131 Participants
Etanercept (ETN) subcutaneously (s.c.) 50 milligram (mg) twice weekly (BIW) for 12 weeks (double blind phase) followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg once weekly (QW) for 12 weeks (open label Phase).
|
ETN 50 mg QW/QW
n=135 Participants
ETN s.c. 50 mg QW and matching placebo for ETN QW for 12 weeks (double blind phase), followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg QW for 12 weeks (open label phase).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Psoriasis (WPAI:PSO) at Week 24
Percent Activity Impairment (n=131, 135))
|
13.28 Percentage of indicated parameter
Standard Deviation 18.99
|
18.85 Percentage of indicated parameter
Standard Deviation 24.58
|
|
Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Psoriasis (WPAI:PSO) at Week 24
Percent Impairment While Working (n=72, 81)
|
8.00 Percentage of indicated parameter
Standard Deviation 11.34
|
13.43 Percentage of indicated parameter
Standard Deviation 19.57
|
|
Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Psoriasis (WPAI:PSO) at Week 24
Percent Overall Work Impairment (n=70, 76)
|
12.78 Percentage of indicated parameter
Standard Deviation 20.27
|
15.96 Percentage of indicated parameter
Standard Deviation 23.05
|
|
Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Psoriasis (WPAI:PSO) at Week 24
Percent Work Time Missed (n=72, 78)
|
5.03 Percentage of indicated parameter
Standard Deviation 17.57
|
3.10 Percentage of indicated parameter
Standard Deviation 13.91
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Week 12Population: mITT population: all randomly assigned participants who received at least 1 ETN dose and had both baseline and on-therapy PASI evaluations. If participant had a missing evaluation for any time point assessments, the LOCF method of imputation was used.
MOS scale has 12 questions to assess sleep quality \& quantity: 1)time to fall asleep, 2)hours of sleep/night in past 4 weeks,3)sleep not peaceful, 4)got enough sleep to feel rested in morning,5)awaken short of breath/headache 6)feel drowsy in day,7)trouble going to sleep, 8)wake up during sleep; trouble going back to sleep,9)trouble staying awake in day, 10)Snoring,11)take naps in day,12)get amount of sleep needed. Sleep problem index(SPI) I:mean of 4,5,7,8,9,12; SPI II:mean of 1,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,12. All reported responses are on scale:0-100, higher scores indicate greater intensity of attribute.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ETN 50 mg BW/QW
n=133 Participants
Etanercept (ETN) subcutaneously (s.c.) 50 milligram (mg) twice weekly (BIW) for 12 weeks (double blind phase) followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg once weekly (QW) for 12 weeks (open label Phase).
|
ETN 50 mg QW/QW
n=137 Participants
ETN s.c. 50 mg QW and matching placebo for ETN QW for 12 weeks (double blind phase), followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg QW for 12 weeks (open label phase).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale Scores at Week 12
Sleep Snoring
|
35.7 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 27.8
|
45.3 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 30.3
|
|
Mean Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale Scores at Week 12
Sleep Somnolence
|
27.3 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 19.8
|
28.8 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 20.3
|
|
Mean Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale Scores at Week 12
Sleep Short of Breath or Headache
|
13.6 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 20.8
|
15.3 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 21.2
|
|
Mean Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale Scores at Week 12
Sleep Adequacy
|
59.8 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 26.4
|
55.6 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 24.4
|
|
Mean Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale Scores at Week 12
Sleep Disturbance
|
30.1 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 21.3
|
28.4 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 21.1
|
|
Mean Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale Scores at Week 12
Sleep Quantity
|
7.2 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.4
|
6.9 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.2
|
|
Mean Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale Scores at Week 12
Sleep Problem Index I
|
29.3 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 17.8
|
30.4 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 17.8
|
|
Mean Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale Scores at Week 12
Sleep Problem Index II
|
30.1 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 17.5
|
30.8 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 17.7
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Week 24Population: mITT population: all randomly assigned participants who received at least 1 ETN dose and had both baseline and on-therapy PASI evaluations. If participant had a missing evaluation for any time point assessments, the LOCF method of imputation was used.
MOS: participant rated questionnaire to assess sleep quality and quantity. Consists of a 9-item overall sleep problems index (length of time to fall asleep, how many hours of sleep each night during past 4 weeks); 7 subscales rated 1 (all the time) to 6 (none of the time): sleep disturbance, snoring, awaken short of breath (SOB) or with headache, somnolence adequacy, and sleep quantity. Scores are transformed (actual raw score minus lowest possible score divided by possible raw score range multiplied by 100); total score range = 0 to 100; higher score indicates greater intensity of attribute.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ETN 50 mg BW/QW
n=133 Participants
Etanercept (ETN) subcutaneously (s.c.) 50 milligram (mg) twice weekly (BIW) for 12 weeks (double blind phase) followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg once weekly (QW) for 12 weeks (open label Phase).
|
ETN 50 mg QW/QW
n=137 Participants
ETN s.c. 50 mg QW and matching placebo for ETN QW for 12 weeks (double blind phase), followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg QW for 12 weeks (open label phase).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale Scores at Week 24
Sleep Snoring
|
38.2 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 31.1
|
44.0 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 31.3
|
|
Mean Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale Scores at Week 24
Sleep Somnolence
|
27.0 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 18.4
|
28.1 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 20.3
|
|
Mean Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale Scores at Week 24
Sleep Short of Breath or Headache
|
11.9 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 17.3
|
13.9 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 19.7
|
|
Mean Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale Scores at Week 24
Sleep Adequacy
|
59.8 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 25.4
|
60.9 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 26.7
|
|
Mean Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale Scores at Week 24
Sleep Disturbance
|
26.7 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 19.8
|
26.6 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 21.1
|
|
Mean Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale Scores at Week 24
Sleep Quantity
|
7.2 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.5
|
7.0 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.3
|
|
Mean Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale Scores at Week 24
Sleep Problem Index I
|
27.3 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 15.9
|
27.7 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 17.7
|
|
Mean Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale Scores at Week 24
Sleep Problem Index II
|
28.2 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 15.7
|
28.4 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 17.5
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Week 12 and Week 24Population: mITT population: all randomly assigned participants who received at least 1 ETN dose and had both baseline and on-therapy PASI evaluations. If participant had a missing evaluation for any time point assessments, the LOCF method of imputation was used.
FACIT Fatigue questionnaire: Participant rated 13 items questionnaire to assess fatigue. For each question, participant rates his / her condition for the past week on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). Higher scores always represent less fatigue. The total FACIT-Fatigue score ranges from 0 to 52 and is the sum of non-missing item scores; divided by the number of non-missing items, then multiplied by 13. If more than 6 items were missing, the total score was missing.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ETN 50 mg BW/QW
n=133 Participants
Etanercept (ETN) subcutaneously (s.c.) 50 milligram (mg) twice weekly (BIW) for 12 weeks (double blind phase) followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg once weekly (QW) for 12 weeks (open label Phase).
|
ETN 50 mg QW/QW
n=137 Participants
ETN s.c. 50 mg QW and matching placebo for ETN QW for 12 weeks (double blind phase), followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg QW for 12 weeks (open label phase).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Fatigue Questionnaire Total Scores
Week 12
|
41.8 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 8.1
|
40.1 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 8.6
|
|
Mean Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Fatigue Questionnaire Total Scores
Week 24
|
41.9 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 8.3
|
40.8 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 9.1
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Week 12 and Week 24Population: mITT population: all randomly assigned participants who received at least 1 ETN dose and had both baseline and on-therapy PASI evaluations. OC analyses were performed including only those participants who were evaluated at the specified visits.
As a part of pharmacoeconomic questionnaire, the visits to emergency room were evaluated and presented as Yes or No.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ETN 50 mg BW/QW
n=133 Participants
Etanercept (ETN) subcutaneously (s.c.) 50 milligram (mg) twice weekly (BIW) for 12 weeks (double blind phase) followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg once weekly (QW) for 12 weeks (open label Phase).
|
ETN 50 mg QW/QW
n=137 Participants
ETN s.c. 50 mg QW and matching placebo for ETN QW for 12 weeks (double blind phase), followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg QW for 12 weeks (open label phase).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Emergency Room Visits
Week 12
|
0.8 Percentage of participants
|
3.7 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Emergency Room Visits
Week 24
|
1.6 Percentage of participants
|
0.8 Percentage of participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Week 12 and Week 24Population: mITT population: all randomly assigned participants who received at least 1 ETN dose and had both baseline and on-therapy PASI evaluations. OC analyses were performed including only those participants who were evaluated at the specified visits.
As a part of pharmacoeconomic questionnaire, mean number of emergency room days were summarized.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ETN 50 mg BW/QW
n=133 Participants
Etanercept (ETN) subcutaneously (s.c.) 50 milligram (mg) twice weekly (BIW) for 12 weeks (double blind phase) followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg once weekly (QW) for 12 weeks (open label Phase).
|
ETN 50 mg QW/QW
n=137 Participants
ETN s.c. 50 mg QW and matching placebo for ETN QW for 12 weeks (double blind phase), followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg QW for 12 weeks (open label phase).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Number of Emergency Room Days
Week 24
|
1.0 Days
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
1.0 Days
Standard Deviation NA
Not estimable due to small sample size.
|
|
Mean Number of Emergency Room Days
Week 12
|
1.0 Days
Standard Deviation NA
Not estimable due to small sample size.
|
3.6 Days
Standard Deviation 5.81
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Week 12 and Week 24Population: mITT population: all randomly assigned participants who received at least 1 ETN dose and had both baseline and on-therapy PASI evaluations. OC analyses were performed including only those participants who were evaluated at the specified visits.
As a part of pharmacoeconomic questionnaire, the percentage of participants who had doctor visits were presented as Yes or No.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ETN 50 mg BW/QW
n=133 Participants
Etanercept (ETN) subcutaneously (s.c.) 50 milligram (mg) twice weekly (BIW) for 12 weeks (double blind phase) followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg once weekly (QW) for 12 weeks (open label Phase).
|
ETN 50 mg QW/QW
n=137 Participants
ETN s.c. 50 mg QW and matching placebo for ETN QW for 12 weeks (double blind phase), followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg QW for 12 weeks (open label phase).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Doctor Visits
Week 12
|
29.8 Percentage of participants
|
36.8 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Doctor Visits
Week 24
|
31.7 Percentage of participants
|
31.7 Percentage of participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Week 12 and Week 24Population: mITT population: all randomly assigned participants who received at least 1 ETN dose and had both baseline and on-therapy PASI evaluations. OC analyses were performed including only those participants who were evaluated at the specified visits.
As a part of pharmacoeconomic questionnaire, the mean number of doctor visits were summarized.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ETN 50 mg BW/QW
n=133 Participants
Etanercept (ETN) subcutaneously (s.c.) 50 milligram (mg) twice weekly (BIW) for 12 weeks (double blind phase) followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg once weekly (QW) for 12 weeks (open label Phase).
|
ETN 50 mg QW/QW
n=137 Participants
ETN s.c. 50 mg QW and matching placebo for ETN QW for 12 weeks (double blind phase), followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg QW for 12 weeks (open label phase).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Number of Doctor Visits
Week 12
|
2.2 Visits
Standard Deviation 1.25
|
3.3 Visits
Standard Deviation 3.89
|
|
Mean Number of Doctor Visits
Week 24
|
2.4 Visits
Standard Deviation 1.99
|
1.9 Visits
Standard Deviation 1.28
|
Adverse Events
ETN 50 mg BW/QW
ETN 50 mg QW/QW
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
ETN 50 mg BW/QW
n=136 participants at risk
Etanercept (ETN) subcutaneously (s.c.) 50 milligram (mg) twice weekly (BIW) for 12 weeks (double blind phase) followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg once weekly (QW) for 12 weeks (open label Phase).
|
ETN 50 mg QW/QW
n=137 participants at risk
ETN s.c. 50 mg QW and matching placebo for ETN QW for 12 weeks (double blind phase), followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg QW for 12 weeks (open label phase).
|
|---|---|---|
|
General disorders
Injection site erythema
|
0.00%
0/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site pruritus
|
0.00%
0/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatitis
|
0.00%
0/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Dengue fever
|
0.00%
0/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Erysipelas
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Investigations
Transaminases increased
|
0.00%
0/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Joint swelling
|
0.00%
0/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle spasms
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Demyelinating polyneuropathy
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dysaesthesia
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Paraesthesia
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Libido decreased
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
ETN 50 mg BW/QW
n=136 participants at risk
Etanercept (ETN) subcutaneously (s.c.) 50 milligram (mg) twice weekly (BIW) for 12 weeks (double blind phase) followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg once weekly (QW) for 12 weeks (open label Phase).
|
ETN 50 mg QW/QW
n=137 participants at risk
ETN s.c. 50 mg QW and matching placebo for ETN QW for 12 weeks (double blind phase), followed by ETN s.c. 50 mg QW for 12 weeks (open label phase).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Lymphadenopathy
|
1.5%
2/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Lymphadenopathy mediastinal
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombocytopenia
|
0.00%
0/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Arrhythmia
|
0.00%
0/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Arteriosclerosis coronary artery
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Deafness
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Tinnitus
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Vertigo
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.5%
2/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Asthenopia
|
0.00%
0/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Conjunctivitis
|
0.00%
0/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.5%
2/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Eye discharge
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Eye pruritus
|
0.00%
0/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal discomfort
|
0.00%
0/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Anal inflammation
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Apical granuloma
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Chapped lips
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
0.00%
0/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.5%
2/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dental caries
|
1.5%
2/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
5.1%
7/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
7.3%
10/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dry mouth
|
0.00%
0/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dyspepsia
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.5%
2/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastritis
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Glossodynia
|
0.00%
0/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Haemorrhoids
|
1.5%
2/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Lip dry
|
0.00%
0/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.5%
2/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
2.2%
3/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Periodontitis
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Stomatitis
|
0.00%
0/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Toothache
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Cyst
|
0.00%
0/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
5.9%
8/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
2.9%
4/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Generalised oedema
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Influenza like illness
|
1.5%
2/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site erythema
|
5.1%
7/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
2.9%
4/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site induration
|
0.00%
0/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site oedema
|
0.00%
0/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site pain
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site pruritus
|
2.2%
3/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site reaction
|
2.2%
3/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
5.1%
7/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site swelling
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.5%
2/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Malaise
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.5%
2/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
|
0.00%
0/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
4.4%
6/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
2.2%
3/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Allergy to arthropod bite
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Seasonal allergy
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Acute tonsillitis
|
0.00%
0/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Body tinea
|
0.00%
0/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.5%
2/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cystitis
|
2.2%
3/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Ear infection
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Folliculitis
|
2.9%
4/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Fungal infection
|
1.5%
2/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Furuncle
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.5%
2/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Infection parasitic
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
1.5%
2/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.4%
6/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Mumps
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nail infection
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
10.3%
14/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
16.1%
22/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Oral herpes
|
1.5%
2/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Otitis externa
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Paronychia
|
0.00%
0/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pharyngitis
|
4.4%
6/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
5.1%
7/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pharyngotonsillitis
|
1.5%
2/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.5%
2/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Rhinitis
|
1.5%
2/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Soft tissue infection
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Subcutaneous abscess
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Tinea cruris
|
0.00%
0/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Tinea pedis
|
0.00%
0/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Tonsillitis
|
0.00%
0/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Tooth abscess
|
0.00%
0/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Tooth infection
|
1.5%
2/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
6.6%
9/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
5.8%
8/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
2.2%
3/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Vaginitis bacterial
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Arthropod bite
|
0.00%
0/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Arthropod sting
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Contusion
|
1.5%
2/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Epicondylitis
|
0.00%
0/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Excoriation
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Face injury
|
0.00%
0/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Joint injury
|
0.00%
0/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.5%
2/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Joint sprain
|
1.5%
2/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Laceration
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Limb injury
|
2.2%
3/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Medical device pain
|
0.00%
0/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Procedural pain
|
0.00%
0/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Thermal burn
|
0.00%
0/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase abnormal
|
0.00%
0/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
|
1.5%
2/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
2.9%
4/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Investigations
Albumin urine present
|
0.00%
0/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Investigations
Apolipoprotein B/Apolipoprotein A-1 ratio increased
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Investigations
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.5%
2/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Investigations
Blood alkaline phosphatase increased
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Investigations
Blood bilirubin increased
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Investigations
Blood cholesterol increased
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Investigations
Blood glucose increased
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
2.2%
3/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Investigations
Blood insulin increased
|
5.1%
7/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
6.6%
9/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Investigations
Blood iron decreased
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Investigations
Blood pressure abnormal
|
0.00%
0/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Investigations
Blood pressure increased
|
0.00%
0/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Investigations
Blood triglycerides increased
|
1.5%
2/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.5%
2/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Investigations
C-reactive protein increased
|
2.2%
3/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Investigations
Glycosylated haemoglobin increased
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Investigations
Lipids increased
|
2.2%
3/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
2.2%
3/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Investigations
Liver function test abnormal
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Investigations
Low density lipoprotein increased
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Investigations
Lymphocyte count decreased
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Investigations
Prostatic specific antigen increased
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Investigations
Urine albumin/creatinine ratio increased
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Investigations
Weight increased
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased appetite
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Diabetes mellitus
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycaemia
|
0.00%
0/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperlipidaemia
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypertriglyceridaemia
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Increased appetite
|
0.00%
0/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Obesity
|
0.00%
0/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
5.1%
7/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
5.8%
8/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
2.9%
4/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
2.9%
4/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Intervertebral disc protrusion
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Joint swelling
|
0.00%
0/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle spasms
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscular weakness
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal chest pain
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal stiffness
|
0.00%
0/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.5%
2/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
|
2.2%
3/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
2.2%
3/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myofascial pain syndrome
|
1.5%
2/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myosclerosis
|
0.00%
0/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Neck pain
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.5%
2/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Psoriatic arthropathy
|
2.2%
3/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Keratoacanthoma
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Oral neoplasm
|
0.00%
0/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Skin papilloma
|
0.00%
0/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Uterine leiomyoma
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Burning sensation
|
0.00%
0/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
1.5%
2/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dysaesthesia
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
11.0%
15/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
10.9%
15/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Hypersomnia
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
2.9%
4/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Hypoaesthesia
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.5%
2/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Paraesthesia
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Sciatica
|
0.00%
0/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Syncope
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
|
0.00%
0/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Initial insomnia
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Libido decreased
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Panic attack
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Suicidal ideation
|
0.00%
0/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Dysuria
|
0.00%
0/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Haematuria
|
0.00%
0/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Breast pain
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Gynaecomastia
|
0.00%
0/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Menstruation irregular
|
0.00%
0/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Ovarian cyst
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Vaginal haemorrhage
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Asthma
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Bronchospasm
|
1.5%
2/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
2.9%
4/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dysphonia
|
0.00%
0/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasal congestion
|
0.00%
0/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasal inflammation
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasal mucosal disorder
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
2.2%
3/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Productive cough
|
0.00%
0/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Rhinitis allergic
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Rhinorrhoea
|
0.00%
0/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Acne
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Angioedema
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Erythema multiforme
|
0.00%
0/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Hyperhidrosis
|
1.5%
2/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pain of skin
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
|
3.7%
5/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.4%
6/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Psoriasis
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
1.5%
2/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rosacea
|
0.00%
0/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Scar pain
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin chapped
|
0.00%
0/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin fissures
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin nodule
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin ulcer
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Haematoma
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
2.2%
3/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
2.9%
4/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertensive crisis
|
0.74%
1/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
|
0.00%
0/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Orthostatic hypotension
|
0.00%
0/136
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.73%
1/137
The same event may appear as both an Adverse Event and a Serious Adverse Event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Wyeth has the right to review disclosures, requesting a delay of less than 60 days. Investigator will postpone single center publications until after disclosure of pooled data (all sites), less than 12 months from study completion/termination at all participating sites. Investigator may not disclose previously undisclosed confidential information other than study results.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER