Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of the Beta-3 Agonist Mirabegron (YM178) in Patients With Symptoms of Overactive Bladder (NCT NCT00662909)
NCT ID: NCT00662909
Last Updated: 2024-11-20
Results Overview
The average number of incontinence episodes (any involuntary leakage of urine) per day was derived from the number of incontinence episodes recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days before the Baseline and Week 12 clinic visits. Least Squares (LS) Means were generated from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
2149 participants
Baseline and Week 12 (Final Visit)
2024-11-20
Participant Flow
After screening, 2149 patients took placebo run-in study drug in a 2-week, single-blind, placebo run-in period. On completion of the run-in period, 1329 eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive mirabegron 50 mg, mirabegron 100 mg or a matching placebo for 12 weeks.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Placebo
Participants received matching placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
Mirabegron 100 mg
Participants received mirabegron 100 mg tablets, orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
454
|
442
|
433
|
|
Overall Study
Safety Analysis Set (SAF)
|
453
|
442
|
433
|
|
Overall Study
Full Analysis Set (FAS)
|
433
|
425
|
412
|
|
Overall Study
Full Analysis Set Incontinence (FAS-I)
|
325
|
312
|
296
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
385
|
383
|
380
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
69
|
59
|
53
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Placebo
Participants received matching placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
Mirabegron 100 mg
Participants received mirabegron 100 mg tablets, orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
|
Overall Study
Lack of Efficacy
|
9
|
1
|
5
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
29
|
22
|
16
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
2
|
9
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
|
7
|
4
|
5
|
|
Overall Study
Randomized- never received study drug
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Non-compliance with study procedures
|
3
|
3
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Physician Decision
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Eligibility criterion not met
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of the Beta-3 Agonist Mirabegron (YM178) in Patients With Symptoms of Overactive Bladder
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Placebo
n=453 Participants
Participants received matching placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
n=442 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
Mirabegron 100 mg
n=433 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 100 mg tablets, orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
Total
n=1328 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
60.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.79 • n=5 Participants
|
59.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.53 • n=7 Participants
|
61.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.25 • n=5 Participants
|
60.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.54 • n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
345 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
322 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
320 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
987 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
108 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
120 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
113 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
341 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
|
395 participants
n=5 Participants
|
391 participants
n=7 Participants
|
381 participants
n=5 Participants
|
1167 participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
|
47 participants
n=5 Participants
|
32 participants
n=7 Participants
|
37 participants
n=5 Participants
|
116 participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
|
6 participants
n=5 Participants
|
12 participants
n=7 Participants
|
8 participants
n=5 Participants
|
26 participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
|
5 participants
n=5 Participants
|
7 participants
n=7 Participants
|
7 participants
n=5 Participants
|
19 participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Type of overactive bladder (OAB)
Urge Incontinence
|
127 participants
n=5 Participants
|
144 participants
n=7 Participants
|
123 participants
n=5 Participants
|
394 participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Type of overactive bladder (OAB)
Mixed
|
185 participants
n=5 Participants
|
160 participants
n=7 Participants
|
161 participants
n=5 Participants
|
506 participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Type of overactive bladder (OAB)
Frequency
|
141 participants
n=5 Participants
|
138 participants
n=7 Participants
|
149 participants
n=5 Participants
|
428 participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Duration of OAB symptoms
|
90.6 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 106.95 • n=5 Participants
|
83.8 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 93.76 • n=7 Participants
|
90.8 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 107.83 • n=5 Participants
|
88.4 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 103.02 • n=4 Participants
|
|
Mean number of micturitions per 24 hours
|
11.52 micturitions
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.273 • n=5 Participants
|
11.78 micturitions
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.447 • n=7 Participants
|
11.69 micturitions
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.357 • n=5 Participants
|
11.66 micturitions
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.358 • n=4 Participants
|
|
Mean volume voided per micturition
|
157.2 mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 60.16 • n=5 Participants
|
155.2 mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 58.67 • n=7 Participants
|
157.6 mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 60.20 • n=5 Participants
|
156.7 mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 59.64 • n=4 Participants
|
|
Mean number of urgency episodes (grade 3 or 4) per 24 hours
|
5.63 urgency episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.265 • n=5 Participants
|
5.92 urgency episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.829 • n=7 Participants
|
5.95 urgency episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.610 • n=5 Participants
|
5.83 urgency episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.573 • n=4 Participants
|
|
Mean level of urgency
|
2.45 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.538 • n=5 Participants
|
2.46 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.541 • n=7 Participants
|
2.45 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.544 • n=5 Participants
|
2.45 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.541 • n=4 Participants
|
|
Mean number of nocturia episodes per 24 hours
|
1.96 nocturia episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.639 • n=5 Participants
|
1.89 nocturia episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.602 • n=7 Participants
|
2.06 nocturia episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.715 • n=5 Participants
|
1.97 nocturia episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.652 • n=4 Participants
|
|
Mean number of pads used per 24 hours
|
0.99 pads
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.814 • n=5 Participants
|
0.94 pads
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.685 • n=7 Participants
|
0.90 pads
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.722 • n=5 Participants
|
0.95 pads
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.741 • n=4 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12 (Final Visit)Population: The full analysis set-incontinence included all randomized patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and who had a baseline and at least 1 post baseline micturition measurement in the visit diary and who had at least 1 incontinence episode at baseline. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) was used in this analysis.
The average number of incontinence episodes (any involuntary leakage of urine) per day was derived from the number of incontinence episodes recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days before the Baseline and Week 12 clinic visits. Least Squares (LS) Means were generated from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=325 Participants
Participants received matching placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
n=312 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
Mirabegron 100 mg
n=296 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 100 mg tablets, orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
|
-1.13 Incontinence episodes
Standard Error 0.112
|
-1.47 Incontinence episodes
Standard Error 0.114
|
-1.63 Incontinence episodes
Standard Error 0.117
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12Population: The full analysis set included all randomized patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and who had a baseline and at least 1 post baseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. Last observation carried forward was used in this analysis.
The average number of micturitions (urinations) per 24 hours was derived from the number of times a patient urinates (excluding incontinence only episodes) per day recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days before the Baseline and Week 12 clinic visits. LS Means generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=433 Participants
Participants received matching placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
n=425 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
Mirabegron 100 mg
n=412 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 100 mg tablets, orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours
|
-1.05 Micturitions
Standard Error 0.132
|
-1.66 Micturitions
Standard Error 0.133
|
-1.75 Micturitions
Standard Error 0.135
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12Population: The full analysis set included all randomized patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and who had a baseline and at least 1 post baseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. Last observation carried forward was used in this analysis.
The average volume voided per micturition was calculated from the volume of each micturition measured by the patient and recorded in a micturition diary for 3 days before the Baseline and Week 12 clinic visits. LS Means were generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=433 Participants
Participants received matching placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
n=424 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
Mirabegron 100 mg
n=412 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 100 mg tablets, orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition
|
7.0 mL
Standard Error 2.41
|
18.2 mL
Standard Error 2.44
|
18.0 mL
Standard Error 2.47
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4Population: The full analysis set-incontinence included all randomized patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and who had a baseline and at least 1 post baseline micturition measurement in the visit diary and who had at least 1 incontinence episode at baseline. Last observation carried forward was not used in this analysis.
The average number of incontinence episodes (any involuntary leakage of urine) per 24 hours was derived from the number of incontinence episodes recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days before the Baseline and Week 4 clinic visits. LS Means were generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=325 Participants
Participants received matching placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
n=309 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
Mirabegron 100 mg
n=293 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 100 mg tablets, orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
|
-0.72 Incontinence episodes
Standard Error 0.116
|
-1.20 Incontinence episodes
Standard Error 0.119
|
-1.18 Incontinence episodes
Standard Error 0.122
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4Population: The full analysis set included all randomized patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and who had a baseline and at least 1 post baseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. Last observation carried forward was not used in this analysis.
The average number of micturitions (urinations) per 24 hours was calculated from the number of micturitions recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days before the Baseline and Week 4 clinic visits. LS Means generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=433 Participants
Participants received matching placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
n=422 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
Mirabegron 100 mg
n=409 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 100 mg tablets, orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours
|
-0.77 Micturitions
Standard Error 0.127
|
-1.19 Micturitions
Standard Error 0.129
|
-1.37 Micturitions
Standard Error 0.131
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 8 and 12Population: The full analysis set-incontinence included all randomized patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a baseline and at least 1 post baseline micturition measurement in the visit diary and at least 1 incontinence episode at baseline. The number of patients included at each time point is noted as "N". LOCF was not utilized.
The average number of incontinence episodes (any involuntary leakage of urine) per 24 hours was derived from the number of incontinence episodes recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days before the Baseline, Week 8 and Week 12 clinic visits. LS Means were generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=325 Participants
Participants received matching placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
n=312 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
Mirabegron 100 mg
n=296 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 100 mg tablets, orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
Week 12 [N=283; 278; 267]
|
-1.13 Incontinence episodes
Standard Error 0.114
|
-1.45 Incontinence episodes
Standard Error 0.115
|
-1.60 Incontinence episodes
Standard Error 0.118
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
Week 8 [N= 296; 288; 279]
|
-0.93 Incontinence episodes
Standard Error 0.116
|
-1.32 Incontinence episodes
Standard Error 0.118
|
-1.61 Incontinence episodes
Standard Error 0.120
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 8 and 12Population: The full analysis set included all randomized patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and who had a baseline and at least 1 post baseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. LOCF was not used in this analysis. The number of patients included in the calculation for each time point is noted as "N".
The average number of micturitions (urinations) per 24 hours was calculated from the number of micturitions recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days before the Baseline, Week 8 and 12 clinic visits. LS Means generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=433 Participants
Participants received matching placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
n=425 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
Mirabegron 100 mg
n=412 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 100 mg tablets, orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours
Week 8 [N=394; 394; 391]
|
-0.94 Micturitions
Standard Error 0.134
|
-1.52 Micturitions
Standard Error 0.133
|
-1.74 Micturitions
Standard Error 0.134
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours
Week 12 [N=382; 379; 376]
|
-1.02 Micturitions
Standard Error 0.139
|
-1.71 Micturitions
Standard Error 0.139
|
-1.72 Micturitions
Standard Error 0.140
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12Population: The full analysis set included all randomized patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and who had a baseline and at least 1 post baseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. LOCF was not utilized in this analysis. The number of participants included in the calculation for each time point is noted as "N".
The average volume voided per micturition was calculated from the volume of each micturition measured by the patient and recorded in a micturition diary for 3 days before the Baseline and Week 4, 8 and 12 clinic visits. LS Means generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=433 Participants
Participants received matching placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
n=425 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
Mirabegron 100 mg
n=412 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 100 mg tablets, orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition
Week 4 [N=433; 421; 409]
|
7.1 mL
Standard Error 1.90
|
15.2 mL
Standard Error 1.93
|
19.2 mL
Standard Error 1.95
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition
Week 8 [N=394; 394; 391]
|
5.4 mL
Standard Error 2.27
|
19.0 mL
Standard Error 2.27
|
19.4 mL
Standard Error 2.28
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition
Week 12 [N=382; 378; 376]
|
7.2 mL
Standard Error 2.58
|
19.7 mL
Standard Error 2.59
|
18.7 mL
Standard Error 2.60
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12Population: The full analysis set-incontinence included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug \& had a baseline \& at least 1 post baseline micturition measurement in the visit diary \& at least 1 urgency incontinence episode at baseline. LOCF was used for the Final Visit analysis. N = the number of patients included at each time point.
The involuntary leakage of urine accompanied by or immediately proceeded by urgency, derived from the number of incontinence episodes classified by the patient in a 3-day micturition diary as 3 or 4 on the Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale: 0 = No urgency; 1 = Mild urgency; 2 = Moderate urgency, could postpone voiding a short while; 3 = Severe urgency, could not postpone voiding; 4 = Urge incontinence, leaked before arriving to the toilet. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=325 Participants
Participants received matching placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
n=312 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
Mirabegron 100 mg
n=296 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 100 mg tablets, orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
Week 4 [N=319; 294; 288]
|
-0.62 Urgency incontinence episodes
Standard Error 0.097
|
-1.09 Urgency incontinence episodes
Standard Error 0.101
|
-1.05 Urgency incontinence episodes
Standard Error 0.102
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
Week 8 [N=291; 273; 278]
|
-0.81 Urgency incontinence episodes
Standard Error 0.098
|
-1.23 Urgency incontinence episodes
Standard Error 0.102
|
-1.44 Urgency incontinence episodes
Standard Error 0.101
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
Week 12 [N= 278; 264; 265]
|
-0.94 Urgency incontinence episodes
Standard Error 0.106
|
-1.32 Urgency incontinence episodes
Standard Error 0.108
|
-1.45 Urgency incontinence episodes
Standard Error 0.108
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
Final Visit (LOCF) [N= 319; 297; 291]
|
-0.89 Urgency incontinence episodes
Standard Error 0.100
|
-1.32 Urgency incontinence episodes
Standard Error 0.104
|
-1.45 Urgency incontinence episodes
Standard Error 0.105
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a baseline and at least 1 post baseline micturition measurement in the visit diary and at least 1 episode of urgency grade 3 or 4 at baseline. LOCF was used for the Final Visit analysis. N is the number of patients included at each time point.
The average number of urgency episodes (the sudden, compelling desire to pass urine, which is difficult to defer), derived from urgency episodes classified by the patient in a 3-day micturition diary as grade 3 or 4 on the Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale: 0: No urgency; 1: Mild urgency; 2: Moderate urgency, could delay voiding a short while; 3: Severe urgency, could not delay voiding; 4: Urge incontinence, leaked before arriving to the toilet. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=433 Participants
Participants received matching placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
n=425 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
Mirabegron 100 mg
n=412 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 100 mg tablets, orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grades 3 or 4) Per 24 Hours
Week 4 [N= 430; 420; 408]
|
-0.75 Urgency episodes
Standard Error 0.145
|
-1.03 Urgency episodes
Standard Error 0.147
|
-1.45 Urgency episodes
Standard Error 0.149
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grades 3 or 4) Per 24 Hours
Week 8 [N= 393; 392; 389]
|
-0.91 Urgency episodes
Standard Error 0.159
|
-1.58 Urgency episodes
Standard Error 0.159
|
-1.80 Urgency episodes
Standard Error 0.160
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grades 3 or 4) Per 24 Hours
Week 12 [N= 382; 376; 374]
|
-0.86 Urgency episodes
Standard Error 0.170
|
-1.63 Urgency episodes
Standard Error 0.171
|
-1.79 Urgency episodes
Standard Error 0.172
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grades 3 or 4) Per 24 Hours
Final Visit (LOCF) [N= 432; 424; 411]
|
-0.82 Urgency episodes
Standard Error 0.161
|
-1.57 Urgency episodes
Standard Error 0.162
|
-1.76 Urgency episodes
Standard Error 0.165
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a baseline and at least 1 post baseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. LOCF was used for the Final Visit analysis. The number of participants included in the calculation for each time point is noted as "N".
Average of patients' ratings on the degree of urgency associated with each micturition and/or incontinence episode recorded in a 3-day micturition diary according to the following 5-point categorical scale (Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale): 0: No urgency; 1: Mild urgency; 2: Moderate urgency, could delay voiding a short while; 3: Severe urgency, could not delay voiding; 4: Urge incontinence, leaked before arriving to the toilet. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=433 Participants
Participants received matching placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
n=425 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
Mirabegron 100 mg
n=412 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 100 mg tablets, orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Level of Urgency
Week 4 [N= 430; 421; 408]
|
-0.08 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.021
|
-0.12 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.022
|
-0.18 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.022
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Level of Urgency
Week 8 [N= 393; 393; 389]
|
-0.10 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.026
|
-0.17 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.026
|
-0.21 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.026
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Level of Urgency
Week 12 [N= 382; 377; 374]
|
-0.09 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.028
|
-0.18 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.028
|
-0.21 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.028
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Level of Urgency
Final Visit (LOCF) [N= 432; 425; 411]
|
-0.08 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.026
|
-0.19 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.026
|
-0.21 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.027
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a baseline and at least 1 post baseline micturition measurement in the visit diary and who had at least one nocturia episode at baseline. LOCF was used for the Final Visit analysis. N is the number of participants included at each time point.
Nocturia is defined as waking at night one or more times to void. The average number of times a patient urinated (excluding incontinence only episodes) during sleeping time per day was derived from the 3-day patient micturition diary. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=433 Participants
Participants received matching placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
n=425 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
Mirabegron 100 mg
n=412 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 100 mg tablets, orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 Hours
Week 4 [N= 366; 345; 353]
|
-0.29 Nocturia episodes
Standard Error 0.063
|
-0.43 Nocturia episodes
Standard Error 0.065
|
-0.40 Nocturia episodes
Standard Error 0.064
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 Hours
Week 8 [N= 333; 324; 340]
|
-0.24 Nocturia episodes
Standard Error 0.063
|
-0.54 Nocturia episodes
Standard Error 0.064
|
-0.55 Nocturia episodes
Standard Error 0.062
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 Hours
Week 12 [N= 323; 311; 328]
|
-0.32 Nocturia episodes
Standard Error 0.064
|
-0.59 Nocturia episodes
Standard Error 0.066
|
-0.58 Nocturia episodes
Standard Error 0.064
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 Hours
Final Visit (LOCF) [N= 366; 348; 356]
|
-0.38 Nocturia episodes
Standard Error 0.063
|
-0.57 Nocturia episodes
Standard Error 0.065
|
-0.57 Nocturia episodes
Standard Error 0.064
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a baseline and at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary and who had at least one use of a pad at baseline. LOCF was used for the Final Visit analysis. N is the number of participants included at each time point.
The average number of times a patient records a new pad used per day during the 3-day micturition diary period. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=433 Participants
Participants received matching placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
n=425 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
Mirabegron 100 mg
n=412 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 100 mg tablets, orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 Hours
Week 4 [N= 176; 165; 156]
|
-0.40 pads
Standard Error 0.111
|
-0.77 pads
Standard Error 0.115
|
-0.76 pads
Standard Error 0.118
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 Hours
Week 8 [N= 159; 154; 152]
|
-0.56 pads
Standard Error 0.116
|
-0.96 pads
Standard Error 0.118
|
-1.03 pads
Standard Error 0.119
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 Hours
Week 12 [N= 152; 145; 147]
|
-0.63 pads
Standard Error 0.128
|
-1.04 pads
Standard Error 0.131
|
-1.09 pads
Standard Error 0.130
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 Hours
Final Visit (LOCF) [N= 176; 166; 159]
|
-0.63 pads
Standard Error 0.120
|
-1.03 pads
Standard Error 0.123
|
-1.06 pads
Standard Error 0.126
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8 and 12Population: The full analysis set-incontinence included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug \& had a baseline \& at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary \& who had at least 1 incontinence episode at baseline. LOCF was used for the Final Visit analysis. N is the number of patients included at each time point.
The percentage of participants with no incontinence episodes for the 3 days prior to each clinic visit derived from the micturition diary recorded by the patient.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=325 Participants
Participants received matching placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
n=312 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
Mirabegron 100 mg
n=296 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 100 mg tablets, orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and the Final Visit
Final Visit (LOCF) [N= 325; 312; 296]
|
33.8 Percentage of participants
|
40.7 Percentage of participants
|
49.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and the Final Visit
Week 4 [N= 325; 309; 293]
|
26.8 Percentage of participants
|
30.1 Percentage of participants
|
32.8 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and the Final Visit
Week 8 [N= 296; 288; 279]
|
29.4 Percentage of participants
|
35.4 Percentage of participants
|
43.4 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and the Final Visit
Week 12 [N=283; 278; 267]
|
35.0 Percentage of participants
|
42.8 Percentage of participants
|
48.7 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12Population: The full analysis set-incontinence included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug \& had a baseline \& at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary \& who had at least 1 incontinence episode at baseline. LOCF was used for the Final Visit analysis. N is the number of patients included at each time point.
The percentage of participants with at least 50% decrease from baseline in mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours during the 3 days prior to each clinic visit derived from the patient micturition diary.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=325 Participants
Participants received matching placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
n=312 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
Mirabegron 100 mg
n=296 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 100 mg tablets, orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and the Final Visit
Week 4 [N= 325; 309; 293]
|
48.0 Percentage of participants
|
56.6 Percentage of participants
|
59.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and the Final Visit
Week 8 [N= 296; 288; 279]
|
52.0 Percentage of participants
|
61.8 Percentage of participants
|
73.8 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and the Final Visit
Week 12 [N= 283; 278; 267]
|
61.5 Percentage of participants
|
68.7 Percentage of participants
|
74.5 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and the Final Visit
Final Visit (LOCF) [N= 325; 312; 296]
|
59.4 Percentage of participants
|
66.7 Percentage of participants
|
73.3 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a baseline and at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. LOCF was used for the Final Visit analysis. The number of participants included in the calculation for each time point is noted as "N".
Overactive bladder symptoms were assessed using the symptom bother scale of the overactive bladder questionnaire. The symptom bother scale consists of 8 questions answered by the participant on a scale from 1-6. The total symptom bother score was calculated from the 8 answers and then transformed to range from 0 to 100, with 100 indicating worst severity. A negative change from Baseline in symptom bother score indicates improvements. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=433 Participants
Participants received matching placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
n=425 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
Mirabegron 100 mg
n=412 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 100 mg tablets, orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Symptom Bother Score
Week 4 [ N= 354; 346; 335]
|
-9.7 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.87
|
-13.5 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.88
|
-16.1 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.90
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Symptom Bother Score
Week 8 [N= 325; 321; 323]
|
-11.6 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.95
|
-16.0 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.96
|
-20.3 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.96
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Symptom Bother Score
Week 12 [N=315; 308; 317]
|
-11.3 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.04
|
-17.4 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.05
|
-20.7 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.03
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Symptom Bother Score
Final Visit (LOCF) [N= 356; 350; 344]
|
-10.8 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.97
|
-17.0 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.98
|
-20.2 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.99
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a baseline and at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. LOCF was used for the Final Visit analysis. The number of participants included in the calculation for each time point is noted as "N".
Health-related quality of life was assessed by the HRQL subscales (coping, concern, sleep and social interaction) of the overactive bladder questionnaire (OABq). The HRQL total score was calculated by adding the 4 HRQL subscale scores, and transforming to a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A positive change from Baseline in HRQL score indicates improvements. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=433 Participants
Participants received matching placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
n=425 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
Mirabegron 100 mg
n=412 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 100 mg tablets, orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQL) Total Score
Week 4 [N= 352; 345; 335]
|
9.2 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.80
|
12.1 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.81
|
13.7 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.82
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQL) Total Score
Week 8 [N= 324; 321; 322]
|
11.4 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.87
|
14.7 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.88
|
17.0 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.88
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQL) Total Score
Week 12 [N= 315; 308; 318]
|
11.1 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.95
|
15.2 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.96
|
17.5 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.94
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQL) Total Score
Final Visit (LOCF) [N= 355; 350; 344]
|
10.7 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.89
|
14.8 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.90
|
17.3 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.90
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week12Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug \& had a baseline \& at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. The number of patients at each time point (N) includes those with both baseline and post-baseline values who were employed. LOCF was used for the Final Visit analysis.
The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) questionnaire was used to assess the degree and extent to which overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms interfered with work productivity in the last 7 days. Percent of work time missed is derived from the number of hours of work missed due to OAB symptoms as a percentage of total hours that should have been worked. A higher percentage indicates more hours missed. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=433 Participants
Participants received matching placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
n=425 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
Mirabegron 100 mg
n=412 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 100 mg tablets, orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Work Time Missed
Week 12 [N= 136; 138; 131]
|
0.03 percent work time missed
Standard Deviation 10.18
|
-0.2 percent work time missed
Standard Deviation 2.05
|
-1.3 percent work time missed
Standard Deviation 7.38
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Work Time Missed
Final Visit (LOCF) [N= 141; 140; 131]
|
0.3 percent work time missed
Standard Deviation 10.00
|
-0.2 percent work time missed
Standard Deviation 2.03
|
-1.3 percent work time missed
Standard Deviation 7.38
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug \& had a baseline \& at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. The number of patients at each time point (N) includes those with both baseline and post-baseline values who were employed. LOCF was used for the Final Visit analysis.
The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) questionnaire was used to assess the degree and extent to which overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms interfered with work productivity in the last 7 days. Percent impairment while working was derived from the patient's assessment of the degree to which OAB affected their productivity while working. A higher percentage indicates greater impairment and less productivity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=433 Participants
Participants received matching placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
n=425 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
Mirabegron 100 mg
n=412 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 100 mg tablets, orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Impairment While Working
Week 12 [N= 142; 143; 137]
|
-7.1 percent impairment while working
Standard Deviation 24.04
|
-8.5 percent impairment while working
Standard Deviation 21.76
|
-8.2 percent impairment while working
Standard Deviation 22.36
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Impairment While Working
Final Visit (LOCF) [N= 147; 146; 137]
|
-6.2 percent impairment while working
Standard Deviation 24.62
|
-8.6 percent impairment while working
Standard Deviation 21.56
|
-8.2 percent impairment while working
Standard Deviation 22.36
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug \& had a baseline \& at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. The number of patients at each time point (N) includes those with both baseline and post-baseline values who were employed. LOCF was used for the Final Visit analysis.
The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) questionnaire was used to assess the degree and extent to which overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms interfered with work productivity in the last 7 days. Percent overall work impairment takes into account both hours missed due to OAB symptoms and the patient's assessment of the degree to which OAB affected their productivity while working. A higher percentage indicates greater impairment and less productivity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=433 Participants
Participants received matching placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
n=425 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
Mirabegron 100 mg
n=412 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 100 mg tablets, orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Overall Work Impairment
Week 12 [ N= 135; 138; 130]
|
-7.1 percent overall work impairment
Standard Deviation 24.27
|
-8.2 percent overall work impairment
Standard Deviation 21.84
|
-8.7 percent overall work impairment
Standard Deviation 23.19
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Overall Work Impairment
Final Visit (LOCF) [N= 140; 140; 130]
|
-6.1 percent overall work impairment
Standard Deviation 24.85
|
-8.2 percent overall work impairment
Standard Deviation 21.68
|
-8.7 percent overall work impairment
Standard Deviation 23.19
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a baseline and at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. The number of participants at each time point (N) included patients with both baseline and post-baseline values. LOCF was used for the Final Visit analysis.
The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) questionnaire was used to assess the degree and extent to which overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms interfered with daily activities over the last 7 days. Percent activity impairment is derived from the patient's assessment of the degree to which OAB affected their regular daily activities. A higher percentage indicates greater impairment. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=433 Participants
Participants received matching placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
n=425 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
Mirabegron 100 mg
n=412 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 100 mg tablets, orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Activity Impairment
Week 12 [N= 368; 368; 363]
|
-7.5 percent activity impairment
Standard Deviation 24.02
|
-12.9 percent activity impairment
Standard Deviation 25.19
|
-10.8 percent activity impairment
Standard Deviation 24.44
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Activity Impairment
Final Visit (LOCF) [N= 386; 380; 368]
|
-6.7 percent activity impairment
Standard Deviation 24.51
|
-12.3 percent activity impairment
Standard Deviation 25.43
|
-10.7 percent activity impairment
Standard Deviation 24.55
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug \& had a baseline \& at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. The number of participants at each time point (N) includes only patients with both baseline and post-baseline values. LOCF was used for the Final Visit analysis.
The EQ-5D is an international, standardized, generic instrument for describing and evaluating health status. Health status is assessed by patients evaluating their health on a vertical, visual analog scale from 0 to 100 where the endpoints are labeled 'Worst imaginable health state' (=0) and 'Best imaginable health state' (=100). On the EQ-5D VAS, a positive change from baseline indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=433 Participants
Participants received matching placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
n=425 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
Mirabegron 100 mg
n=412 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 100 mg tablets, orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Week 4 [N= 413; 406; 396]
|
-0.57 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.902
|
0.85 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.850
|
0.52 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.607
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Week 8 [N= 385; 385; 387]
|
1.15 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.718
|
2.17 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.749
|
2.34 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.239
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Week 12 [N= 377; 369; 378]
|
1.92 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.532
|
3.60 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.827
|
3.89 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.101
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Final Visit (LOCF) [N=424; 417; 410]
|
1.46 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.090
|
3.04 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.142
|
3.52 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.184
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a baseline and at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. The number of participants included at each time point (N) only includes those with baseline and post-baseline values. LOCF was used for the Final Visit analysis.
The PPBC scale is a global assessment tool that asks patients to rate their impression of their current bladder condition on a 6-point scale from 1: 'Does not cause me any problems at all'; 2: 'Causes me some very minor problems'; 3: 'Causes me some minor problems'; 4: 'Causes me (some) moderate problems'; 5: 'Causes me severe problems' and 6: 'Causes me many severe problems'. LS means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographical regions as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate. A negative change from Baseline score indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=433 Participants
Participants received matching placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
n=425 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
Mirabegron 100 mg
n=412 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 100 mg tablets, orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC)
Week 12 [N=373; 376; 371]
|
-0.6 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.7 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.8 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC)
Final Visit (LOCF) [N=392; 388; 377]
|
-0.5 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.7 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.8 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a baseline and at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. The number of participants included at each time point (N) only includes those with baseline and post-baseline values. LOCF was used for the Final Visit analysis.
The TS-VAS is a visual analog scale (VAS) that asks patients to rate their satisfaction with treatment by placing a vertical mark on a 10 cm line where the endpoints are labeled 'No, not at all' on the left (=0) to 'Yes, completely satisfied' on the right (=10). LS means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographical regions as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=433 Participants
Participants received matching placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
n=425 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
Mirabegron 100 mg
n=412 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 100 mg tablets, orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Treatment Satisfaction on Visual Analog Scale (TS-VAS)
Week 12 [N= 371; 375; 368]
|
0.72 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.159
|
1.57 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.158
|
2.09 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.159
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Treatment Satisfaction on Visual Analog Scale (TS-VAS)
Final Visit (LOCF) [N= 390; 387; 373]
|
0.70 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.155
|
1.55 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.156
|
2.09 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.159
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a baseline and at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. The number of participants at each time point (N) includes only patients with both baseline and post-baseline values. LOCF was used for the Final Visit analysis.
The number of times the patient visited a physician's office during the 4 weeks prior to each study visit (excluding study visits) because of the patient's bladder condition.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=433 Participants
Participants received matching placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
n=425 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
Mirabegron 100 mg
n=412 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 100 mg tablets, orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Number of Non-study Related Visits to Physician
Week 4 [N= 429; 422; 405]
|
0.0 Physician visits
Standard Deviation 0.17
|
-0.0 Physician visits
Standard Deviation 0.23
|
0.0 Physician visits
Standard Deviation 0.12
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Number of Non-study Related Visits to Physician
Week 8 [N= 392; 389; 389]
|
0.0 Physician visits
Standard Deviation 0.17
|
-0.0 Physician visits
Standard Deviation 0.19
|
0.0 Physician visits
Standard Deviation 0.10
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Number of Non-study Related Visits to Physician
Week 12 [N= 381; 377; 381]
|
-0.0 Physician visits
Standard Deviation 0.15
|
-0.0 Physician visits
Standard Deviation 0.21
|
0.0 Physician visits
Standard Deviation 0.14
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Number of Non-study Related Visits to Physician
Final Visit (LOCF) [N= 430; 422; 410]
|
-0.0 Physician visits
Standard Deviation 0.14
|
-0.0 Physician visits
Standard Deviation 0.21
|
0.0 Physician visits
Standard Deviation 0.16
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a baseline and at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. The number of participants at each time point (N) only includes those with baseline and post-baseline values. LOCF was used for the Final Visit analysis.
The PPBC scale is a global assessment tool that asks patients to rate their impression of their current bladder condition on a 6-point scale from 1: 'Does not cause me any problems at all'; 2: 'Causes me some very minor problems'; 3: 'Causes me some minor problems'; 4: 'Causes me (some) moderate problems'; 5: 'Causes me severe problems' and 6: 'Causes me many severe problems'. Improvement was defined as at least a 1 point improvement from Baseline to post-baseline and a major improvement was defined as at least a 2 point improvement from Baseline to post-baseline in PPBC score.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=433 Participants
Participants received matching placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
n=425 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
Mirabegron 100 mg
n=412 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 100 mg tablets, orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 12 and Final Visit
Improvement at Week 12 [N= 373; 376; 371]
|
48.3 Percentage of participants
|
50.8 Percentage of participants
|
57.1 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 12 and Final Visit
Improvement at Final Visit [N= 392; 388; 377]
|
47.4 Percentage of participants
|
50.8 Percentage of participants
|
56.8 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 12 and Final Visit
Major Improvement at Week 12 [N= 373; 376; 371]
|
17.7 Percentage of participants
|
18.6 Percentage of participants
|
27.8 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 12 and Final Visit
Major Improvement at Final Visit [N=392; 388; 377]
|
17.3 Percentage of participants
|
18.6 Percentage of participants
|
27.3 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a baseline and at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. LOCF was used for this analysis.
The EQ-5D is an international, standardized, nondisease-specific (i.e., generic) instrument for describing and valuing health status. Participants were asked to indicate which of the following statements best describes their health state: I have no problems in walking about; I have some problems in walking about; I am confined to bed. In the table below, each row title lists Baseline health status first followed by Final Visit health status and reports the number of patients in that category. Missing data indicates patients with no data available for that Visit.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=433 Participants
Participants received matching placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
n=425 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
Mirabegron 100 mg
n=412 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 100 mg tablets, orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score
No problem -> No problem
|
318 participants
|
304 participants
|
291 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score
No problem -> Some problems
|
15 participants
|
17 participants
|
24 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score
No problem -> Confined to bed
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score
No problem -> Missing data
|
6 participants
|
2 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score
Some problems -> No problems
|
41 participants
|
37 participants
|
41 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score
Some problems -> Some problems
|
49 participants
|
58 participants
|
54 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score
Some problems -> Confined to bed
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score
Some problems -> Missing data
|
1 participants
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score
Confined -> No problems
|
1 participants
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score
Confined -> Some problems
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score
Confined -> Confined to bed
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score
Confined -> Missing data
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score
Missing data -> No problems
|
2 participants
|
3 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score
Missing data -> Some problems
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score
Missing data -> Confined to bed
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score
Missing data -> Missing data
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a baseline and at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. LOCF was used for this analysis.
The EQ-5D is an international, standardized, nondisease-specific (i.e., generic) instrument for describing and valuing health status. Participants were asked to indicate which of the following statements best describes their health state: I have no problems with self-care; I have some problems washing or dressing myself; I am unable to wash or dress myself. In the table below, each row title lists Baseline health status first followed by Final Visit health status and reports the number of patients in that category. Missing data indicates patients with no data available for that Visit.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=433 Participants
Participants received matching placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
n=425 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
Mirabegron 100 mg
n=412 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 100 mg tablets, orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care Score
Some problems -> No problems
|
7 participants
|
8 participants
|
8 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care Score
Some problems -> Some problems
|
5 participants
|
10 participants
|
5 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care Score
Some problems -> Unable to wash or dress myself
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care Score
Some problems -> Missing data
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care Score
Unable to wash or dress myself -> No problems
|
2 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care Score
Unable to wash or dress myself -> Some problems
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care Score
Unable to wash or dress -> Unable to wash or dress
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care Score
Unable to wash or dress myself -> Missing data
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care Score
Missing data -> No problems
|
2 participants
|
3 participants
|
4 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care Score
Missing data -> Some problems
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care Score
Missing data -> Unable to wash or dress myself
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care Score
Missing data -> Missing data
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care Score
No problem -> No problem
|
398 participants
|
392 participants
|
386 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care Score
No problem -> Some problems
|
10 participants
|
9 participants
|
6 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care Score
No problem -> Unable to wash or dress myself
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care Score
No problem -> Missing data
|
6 participants
|
3 participants
|
2 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a baseline and at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. LOCF was used for this analysis.
The EQ-5D is a standardized, nondisease-specific instrument for describing health status. Participants were asked which statement best describes their health state with regard to usual activities (work, study or leisure): I have no problems performing my usual activities; I have some problems performing my usual activities; I am unable to perform my usual activities. In the table below, each row title lists Baseline health status first followed by Final Visit health status and reports the number of patients in that category. Missing data indicates patients with no data available at that Visit.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=433 Participants
Participants received matching placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
n=425 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
Mirabegron 100 mg
n=412 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 100 mg tablets, orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score
Some problems -> Some problems
|
52 participants
|
50 participants
|
48 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score
Missing data -> Some problems
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score
No problem -> No problem
|
303 participants
|
297 participants
|
287 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score
No problem -> Some problems
|
22 participants
|
19 participants
|
19 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score
No problem -> Unable
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score
No problem -> Missing data
|
6 participants
|
2 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score
Some problems -> No problems
|
47 participants
|
45 participants
|
50 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score
Some problems -> Unable
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
2 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score
Some problems -> Missing data
|
1 participants
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score
Unable -> No problems
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score
Unable -> Some problems
|
1 participants
|
5 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score
Unable -> Unable
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
2 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score
Unable -> Missing data
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score
Missing data -> No problems
|
1 participants
|
2 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score
Missing data -> Unable
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score
Missing data -> Missing data
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a baseline and at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. LOCF was used for this analysis.
The EQ-5D is an international, standardized, nondisease-specific (i.e., generic) instrument for describing and valuing health status. Participants were asked to indicate which of the following statements best describes their health state: I have no pain or discomfort; I have moderate pain or discomfort; I have extreme pain or discomfort. In the table below, each row title lists Baseline health status first followed by Final Visit health status and reports the number of patients in that category. Missing data indicates patients with no data available for that Visit.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=433 Participants
Participants received matching placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
n=425 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
Mirabegron 100 mg
n=412 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 100 mg tablets, orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score
Extreme pain -> Moderate pain
|
7 participants
|
8 participants
|
5 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score
Missing data -> Moderate pain
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score
Missing data -> Extreme pain
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score
Missing data -> Missing data
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score
No pain -> No pain
|
201 participants
|
198 participants
|
204 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score
No pain -> Moderate pain
|
34 participants
|
32 participants
|
31 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score
No pain -> Extreme pain
|
1 participants
|
1 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score
No pain -> Missing data
|
3 participants
|
2 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score
Moderate pain -> No pain
|
76 participants
|
79 participants
|
57 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score
Moderate pain -> Moderate pain
|
92 participants
|
84 participants
|
95 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score
Moderate pain -> Extreme pain
|
3 participants
|
9 participants
|
8 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score
Moderate pain -> Missing data
|
3 participants
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score
Extreme pain -> No pain
|
3 participants
|
2 participants
|
3 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score
Extreme pain -> Extreme pain
|
8 participants
|
6 participants
|
6 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score
Extreme pain -> Missing data
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score
Missing data -> No pain
|
1 participants
|
2 participants
|
1 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a baseline and at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. LOCF was used for this analysis.
The EQ-5D is an international, standardized, nondisease-specific (i.e., generic) instrument for describing and valuing health status. Participants were asked to indicate which of the following statements best describes their health state: I am not anxious or depressed; I am moderately anxious or depressed; I am extremely anxious or depressed. In the table below, each row title lists Baseline health status first followed by Final Visit health status and reports the number of patients in that category. Missing data indicates patients with no data available for that Visit.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=433 Participants
Participants received matching placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
n=425 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
Mirabegron 100 mg
n=412 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 100 mg tablets, orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score
Not anxious -> Not anxious
|
239 participants
|
250 participants
|
250 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score
Not anxious -> Moderately anxious
|
30 participants
|
36 participants
|
33 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score
Not anxious -> Extremely anxious
|
2 participants
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score
Not anxious -> Missing data
|
4 participants
|
1 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score
Moderately anxious -> Not anxious
|
58 participants
|
48 participants
|
46 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score
Extremely anxious -> Extremely anxious
|
7 participants
|
0 participants
|
2 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score
Missing data -> Missing data
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score
Moderately anxious -> Moderately anxious
|
76 participants
|
71 participants
|
75 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score
Moderately anxious -> Extremely anxious
|
7 participants
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score
Moderately anxious -> Missing data
|
3 participants
|
2 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score
Extremely anxious -> Not anxious
|
1 participants
|
2 participants
|
2 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score
Extremely anxious -> Moderately anxious
|
5 participants
|
9 participants
|
2 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score
Extremely anxious -> Missing data
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score
Missing data -> Not anxious
|
1 participants
|
4 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score
Missing data -> Moderately anxious
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score
Missing data -> Extremely anxious
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
Adverse Events
Placebo
Mirabegron 50 mg
Mirabegron 100 mg
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo
n=453 participants at risk
Participants received matching placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
n=442 participants at risk
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
Mirabegron 100 mg
n=433 participants at risk
Participants received mirabegron 100 mg tablets, orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
|
0.00%
0/453 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.23%
1/442 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.23%
1/433 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Angina pectoris
|
0.00%
0/453 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.23%
1/442 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.00%
0/433 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure
|
0.00%
0/453 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.00%
0/442 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.23%
1/433 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Supraventricular tachycardia
|
0.00%
0/453 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.00%
0/442 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.23%
1/433 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Acute coronary syndrome
|
0.22%
1/453 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.00%
0/442 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.00%
0/433 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery disease
|
0.22%
1/453 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.00%
0/442 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.00%
0/433 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
|
Infections and infestations
Appendicitis
|
0.00%
0/453 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.00%
0/442 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.23%
1/433 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
|
Infections and infestations
Clostridial infection
|
0.00%
0/453 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.23%
1/442 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.00%
0/433 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
0.00%
0/453 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.23%
1/442 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.00%
0/433 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.22%
1/453 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.23%
1/442 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.00%
0/433 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sepsis
|
0.00%
0/453 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.00%
0/442 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.23%
1/433 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
|
0.22%
1/453 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.00%
0/442 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.00%
0/433 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
|
Infections and infestations
Localised infection
|
0.22%
1/453 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.00%
0/442 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.00%
0/433 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Prostate Cancer
|
0.00%
0/453 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.45%
2/442 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.00%
0/433 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Bladder cancer
|
0.00%
0/453 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.00%
0/442 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.23%
1/433 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Colon cancer metastatic
|
0.00%
0/453 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.00%
0/442 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.23%
1/433 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Lung carcinoma cell type unspecified recurrent
|
0.00%
0/453 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.00%
0/442 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.23%
1/433 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Malignant melanoma
|
0.00%
0/453 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.23%
1/442 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.00%
0/433 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Metastases to lymph nodes
|
0.00%
0/453 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.23%
1/442 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.00%
0/433 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Lung neoplasm malignant
|
0.22%
1/453 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.00%
0/442 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.00%
0/433 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Cervical spinal stenosis
|
0.00%
0/453 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.23%
1/442 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.00%
0/433 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Lumbar spinal stenosis
|
0.00%
0/453 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.00%
0/442 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.23%
1/433 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoarthritis
|
0.00%
0/453 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.23%
1/442 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.00%
0/433 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Spinal column stenosis
|
0.00%
0/453 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.23%
1/442 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.00%
0/433 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Tenosynovitis
|
0.22%
1/453 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.00%
0/442 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.00%
0/433 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
|
General disorders
Chest pain
|
0.00%
0/453 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.00%
0/442 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.69%
3/433 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Calculus ureteric
|
0.00%
0/453 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.00%
0/442 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.23%
1/433 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Haematuria
|
0.00%
0/453 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.00%
0/442 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.23%
1/433 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure acute
|
0.00%
0/453 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.23%
1/442 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.00%
0/433 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Urinary retention
|
0.22%
1/453 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.00%
0/442 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.00%
0/433 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Cerebral haemorrhage traumatic
|
0.00%
0/453 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.00%
0/442 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.23%
1/433 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Post procedural haematoma
|
0.00%
0/453 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.00%
0/442 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.23%
1/433 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Angioplasty
|
0.00%
0/453 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.23%
1/442 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.00%
0/433 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Gastric banding
|
0.00%
0/453 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.23%
1/442 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.00%
0/433 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Shoulder arthroplasty
|
0.22%
1/453 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.00%
0/442 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.00%
0/433 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anemia
|
0.00%
0/453 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.00%
0/442 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.23%
1/433 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
0.22%
1/453 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.00%
0/442 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.00%
0/433 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Ischaemic stroke
|
0.22%
1/453 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.00%
0/442 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.00%
0/433 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary embolism
|
0.22%
1/453 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.00%
0/442 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.00%
0/433 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
|
Vascular disorders
Deep vein thrombosis
|
0.22%
1/453 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.00%
0/442 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
0.00%
0/433 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo
n=453 participants at risk
Participants received matching placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
n=442 participants at risk
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
Mirabegron 100 mg
n=433 participants at risk
Participants received mirabegron 100 mg tablets, orally once a day for 12 weeks
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
6.6%
30/453 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
6.1%
27/442 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
4.8%
21/433 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake
|
Additional Information
Medical Director, Medical Sciences
Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc.
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Institute and/or Principal Investigator may publish trial data generated at their specific study site after Sponsor publication of the multi-center data. Sponsor must receive a site's manuscript at least 30 days prior to publication to ensure that no confidential information of Sponsor is included in the document. Sponsor may delay the publication for an additional 60 days to seek patent protection.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER