Nepicastat for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) in OIF/OEF Veterans
NCT ID: NCT00659230
Last Updated: 2017-10-13
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-07-01
2012-08-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
In the experience of the clinical investigators, the most common chief complaint of the OIF/OEF veterans with PTSD is hyperarousal (DSM-IV criterion D symptom cluster). These symptoms significantly interfere with social, occupational, and interpersonal function. Standard treatments with antidepressants are not fully effective in treating the symptoms of PTSD in veterans; thus, new treatments are needed. An intervention, such as nepicastat, aimed at reducing hyperarousal, as well as other PTSD symptoms, would have significant impact of restoring overall function and quality of life in OIF/OEF veterans with PTSD. Since hyperarousal symptoms responded relatively quickly to medications of this type, our study in 120 outpatient veterans with PTSD will compare nepicastat 120 mg/day vs. placebo in a 6-week double-blind, randomized clinical trial (RCT). The veterans will be followed for an additional 8 weeks after the RCT, during which, those who have a priori defined positive clinical response to the study medication, nepicastat vs. placebo, will be continued on the study medication, in order to assess further improvement and safety. Those patients who do not have a positive clinical response during the 6 week RCT will be offered the addition of the standard first-line PTSD pharmacotherapy, paroxetine, during the 8 weeks extension phase. Thus, weeks 7-14 offer an opportunity to evaluate longer-term nepicastat efficacy and to compare the treatment response of nonresponders after augmentation with paroxetine.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Secondary Hypotheses: Compared to placebo, nepicastat-treated OIF/OEF veterans with PTSD will have:
* Significantly reduced PTSD symptoms (total CAPS)
* Significantly reduced PTSD reexperiencing symptoms (CAPS-B)
* Significantly reduced PTSD avoidance symptoms (CAPS-C)
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Placebo
Arm 1
Placebo
100-800mg placebo
Nepicastat
Arm 2
Nepicastat
100-800mg
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Nepicastat
100-800mg
Placebo
100-800mg placebo
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patient understands the risks and benefits and agrees to visit frequency and procedures
* Male or female
* Any race or ethnic origin
* Served in OIF/OEF or Afghanistan conflicts or other Southwest Asia conditions
* Currently Active Duty, National Guard, Reservist, Veteran, and/or Retired Military
* Diagnosis of PTSD (by MINI (Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview) and CAPS-DX (Clinician Administered PTSD scale- Diagnostic Form) using Rule of Fours and total CAPS-DX score of 45)
* No substance use disorders in the previous 2 weeks and no substance dependence disorders in the past 4 weeks (except for nicotine and caffeine)
* Free of psychotropic medication for 2 weeks prior to randomization
* Physical and laboratory panel are within normal limits or not clinically significant
* Women of childbearing potential must be using medically-approved methods of birth control
* ≥19 to 65 years of age
Exclusion Criteria
* Actively considering plans of suicide or homicide
* Psychotic symptoms that in the investigator's opinion impair the patient's ability to give informed consent or make it unsafe for patient to be maintained without a neuroleptic
* Unstable general medical conditions or a contraindication to the use of nepicastat
* Women planning to become pregnant or breastfeed during the study
* Current or pending incarceration
* Terminal Illness
19 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Acorda Therapeutics
INDUSTRY
Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center
FED
Baylor College of Medicine
OTHER
San Diego Veterans Healthcare System
FED
James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center
FED
Tuscaloosa Research & Education Advancement Corporation
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Lori Davis, MD
Associate Chief of Staff
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Carlos Berry, M.D.
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
IRB Tuscaloosa VAMC
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Tuscaloosa VAMC
Tuscaloosa, Alabama, United States
VA San Diego Healthcare System
San Diego, California, United States
James J.Peters VA Medical Center
The Bronx, New York, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kosten TR, Krystal J. Biological mechanisms in posttraumatic stress disorder. Relevance for substance abuse. Recent Dev Alcohol. 1988;6:49-68. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-7718-8_3.
Graham DP, Nielsen DA, Kosten TR, Davis LL, Hamner MB, Makotkine I, Yehuda R. Examining the utility of using genotype and functional biology in a clinical pharmacology trial: pilot testing dopamine beta-hydroxylase, norepinephrine, and post-traumatic stress disorder. Psychiatr Genet. 2014 Aug;24(4):181-2. doi: 10.1097/YPG.0000000000000039. No abstract available.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PT074384/W81XWH-08-2-0071
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
PT074384/W81XWH-09-1-0287
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
08-06
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id