Randomized Study of Cisplatin-Etoposide Versus an Etoposide Regimen Without Cisplatin in Extensive Small-Cell Lung Cancer
NCT ID: NCT00658580
Last Updated: 2015-02-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
361 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2000-04-30
2015-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer
NCT00003606
Topotecan Plus Cisplatin Versus Etoposide Plus Cisplatin In 1st Line Extensive Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
NCT00320359
Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Stage I, II, or IIIA Non-small Cell Lung Cancer That Has Been Surgically Removed
NCT00003053
Cisplatin Plus Etoposide With or Without Paclitaxel in Treating Patients With Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer
NCT00003299
Docetaxel and Cisplatin in Treating Patients With Untreated Stage IIIA Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
NCT00005868
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
A
Every 3 weeks intravenous cisplatin plus etoposide
Cisplatin + etoposide
Cisplatin 90 mg/m² day 1, every 3 weeks
Etoposide 100 mg/m² days 1-3, every 3 weeks
B
Every 3 weeks intravenous epirubicin plus ifosfamide plus etoposide
Epirubicin + ifosfamide + etoposide
Epirubicin 60 mg/m² day 1, every 3 weeks
Ifosfamide (+ uromitexan) 1.5 g/m² days 1-3, every 3 weeks
Etoposide 100 mg/m² days 1-3, every 3 weeks
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cisplatin + etoposide
Cisplatin 90 mg/m² day 1, every 3 weeks
Etoposide 100 mg/m² days 1-3, every 3 weeks
Epirubicin + ifosfamide + etoposide
Epirubicin 60 mg/m² day 1, every 3 weeks
Ifosfamide (+ uromitexan) 1.5 g/m² days 1-3, every 3 weeks
Etoposide 100 mg/m² days 1-3, every 3 weeks
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Extensive disease (i.e. a disease with distant metastases or that cannot be included in a single irradiation field incorporating primary tumour, mediastinum and supraclavicular lymph node(s))
* Availability for participating in the detailed follow-up of the protocol
* Presence of an evaluable or measurable lesion
* Informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Performance status \< 60 on the Karnofsky scale
* A history of prior malignant tumor, except non-melanoma skin cancer or in situ carcinoma of the cervix or a cured cancer (defined as a disease-free interval \> 5 years)
* White blood cells \< 4000/mm3
* Platelets \< 100000/mm3
* Serum bilirubin \> 1.5 mg/100 ml
* Serum creatinine \> 1.3 mg/100 ml and creatinine clearance \<60 ml/min
* Recent myocardial infarction (less than 3 months prior to date of diagnosis)
* Congestive cardiac failure or cardiac arrhythmia uncontrolled by medical treatment
* Uncontrolled infectious disease
* Serious medical or psychological factors which may prevent adherence to the treatment schedule
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
European Lung Cancer Working Party
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jean-Paul Sculier, MD, PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
European Lung Cancer Working Party
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Department of Intensive Care Unit and Thoracic Oncology Institut Jules Bordet
Brussels, , Belgium
Department of Pneumology CHRU Lille
Lille, , France
Hellenic Cancer Institute - St Savas Oncology Hospital
Athens, , Greece
Medical Oncology Hospital de Sagunto
Valencia, , Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Berghmans T, Scherpereel A, Meert AP, Giner V, Lecomte J, Lafitte JJ, Leclercq N, Paesmans M, Sculier JP; European Lung Cancer Working Party (ELCWP). A Phase III Randomized Study Comparing a Chemotherapy with Cisplatin and Etoposide to a Etoposide Regimen without Cisplatin for Patients with Extensive Small-Cell Lung Cancer. Front Oncol. 2017 Sep 19;7:217. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2017.00217. eCollection 2017.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Click here for more information on the protocol
Trials registry of the French National Cancer Institute
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ELCWP 01994
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.