APRiCOT-L: Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Apricoxib With Erlotinib in Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

NCT ID: NCT00652340

Last Updated: 2012-04-09

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

120 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-04-30

Study Completion Date

2012-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will compare the anti-tumor efficacy of apricoxib and erlotinib with placebo and erlotinib as measured by time to disease progression to test the hypothesis that down regulation of COX-2 and EGFR pathways in patients with up-regulated COX-2 expression in tumor will have a clinical benefit compared with erlotinib alone.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Recurrent Non Small Cell Lung Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

A

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

apricoxib/erlotinib

Intervention Type DRUG

apricoxib: 100 mg tablets, 400mg/day

erlotinib: per package insert

B

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

erlotinib/placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

erlotinib: per package insert

placebo: 100 mg tablets, 400 mg/day

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

apricoxib/erlotinib

apricoxib: 100 mg tablets, 400mg/day

erlotinib: per package insert

Intervention Type DRUG

erlotinib/placebo

erlotinib: per package insert

placebo: 100 mg tablets, 400 mg/day

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Pathologically determined Stage IV NSCLC including Stage IIIb (pleural effusion)
* Failed at least one prior platinum-based chemotherapy for Stage IIIb or Stage IV NSCLC. Patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapy only given in an adjuvant setting are not eligible.
* Measurable disease by RECIST
* Greater than or equal to 18 years of age
* ECOG PS of 0 or 1

Exclusion Criteria

* Radiation therapy within 2 weeks; chemotherapy within 3 weeks; non-cytotoxic investigational agents within 4 weeks of initiating study treatment
* Evidence of NYHA class III or greater cardiac disease
* History of MI, stroke, ventricular arrhythmia, or symptomatic conduction abnormality within 12 months
* Known HIV infection or AIDS
* Symptomatic CNS metastases
* Pregnant or nursing women
* Hypersensitivity or intolerance to erlotinib, sulfonamides, aspirin, or other NSAIDs.
* History of upper GI bleeding, ulceration, or perforation
* Prior history of COX-2 inhibitor therapy for the treatment of metastatic NSCLC
* Previous anti-EGFR kinase therapy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Tragara Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Tracy Parrott

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Tragara Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Bakersfield, California, United States

Site Status

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Rancho Mirage, California, United States

Site Status

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

San Dimas, California, United States

Site Status

Stockton, California, United States

Site Status

Norwich, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Lake North, Florida, United States

Site Status

Lakeland, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Savannah, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Kokomo, Indiana, United States

Site Status

New Albany, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Waterloo, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Jackson, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Lansing, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Livonia, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Saginaw, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Saint Joseph, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Robbinsdale, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Neptune City, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Elmhurst, New York, United States

Site Status

Stony Brook, New York, United States

Site Status

Gastonia, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Wilmington, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Akron, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Canton, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Jefferson, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Sylvania, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Corvallis, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Upland, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Arlington, Texas, United States

Site Status

Galveston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Newport News, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Tacoma, Washington, United States

Site Status

Huntington, West Virginia, United States

Site Status

Morgantown, West Virginia, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Gitlitz BJ, Bernstein E, Santos ES, Otterson GA, Milne G, Syto M, Burrows F, Zaknoen S. A randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter, biomarker-selected, phase 2 study of apricoxib in combination with erlotinib in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2014 Apr;9(4):577-82. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000082.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 24736085 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

APRiCOT-L

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

TP2001-201

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.