Trial Outcomes & Findings for Safety and Efficacy Study of a Triple Combination Therapy in Subjects With Hypertension (NCT NCT00649389)

NCT ID: NCT00649389

Last Updated: 2019-01-09

Results Overview

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE3

Target enrollment

2500 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

baseline to 12 weeks

Results posted on

2019-01-09

Participant Flow

First subject first visit 12 May 2008. Last subject last follow-up 27 Feb 2009. 317 sites in USA and Puerto Rico. Planned: 2400 subjects (600 per treatment arm). Enrolled: 6724 subjects. Randomized: 2492 subjects.

Duration of the study was 57 weeks with 52 weeks of treatment. This included 3-week stabilization/washout (Period I), 12-week double blind treatment (Period II), 40 week open label treatment (Period III), and 2-week post treatment follow-up (Period IV).

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
OM40/AML10
Double blind treatment olmesartan medoxomil (OM) 40 mg, Amlodipine (AML) 10 mg tablets once daily.
OM40/HCTZ25
Double blind treatment olmesartan medoxomil (OM) 40 mg, Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 25 mg tablets once daily.
AML10/HCTZ25
Double blind treatment Amlodipine (AML) 10 mg, Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 25 mg tablets once daily.
OM40/AML10/HCTZ25
Double blind treatment olmesartan medoxomil (OM) 40 mg, Amlodipine (AML) 10 mg, Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 25 mg, tablets once daily.
Overall Study
STARTED
628
637
600
627
Overall Study
COMPLETED
557
531
512
516
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
71
106
88
111

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
OM40/AML10
Double blind treatment olmesartan medoxomil (OM) 40 mg, Amlodipine (AML) 10 mg tablets once daily.
OM40/HCTZ25
Double blind treatment olmesartan medoxomil (OM) 40 mg, Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 25 mg tablets once daily.
AML10/HCTZ25
Double blind treatment Amlodipine (AML) 10 mg, Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 25 mg tablets once daily.
OM40/AML10/HCTZ25
Double blind treatment olmesartan medoxomil (OM) 40 mg, Amlodipine (AML) 10 mg, Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 25 mg, tablets once daily.
Overall Study
Adverse Event
22
46
38
48
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
15
17
21
26
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
11
13
9
8
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
20
21
19
23
Overall Study
Other
3
9
1
6

Baseline Characteristics

Safety and Efficacy Study of a Triple Combination Therapy in Subjects With Hypertension

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
OM40/AML10
n=628 Participants
Double blind treatment olmesartan medoxomil (OM) 40 mg, Amlodipine (AML) 10 mg tablets once daily.
OM40/HCTZ25
n=637 Participants
Double blind treatment olmesartan medoxomil (OM) 40 mg, Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 25 mg tablets once daily.
AML10/HCTZ25
n=600 Participants
Double blind treatment Amlodipine (AML) 10 mg, Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 25 mg tablets once daily.
OM40/AML10/HCTZ25
n=627 Participants
Double blind treatment olmesartan medoxomil (OM) 40 mg, Amlodipine (AML) 10 mg, Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 25 mg, tablets once daily.
Total
n=2492 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
508 Participants
n=5 Participants
505 Participants
n=7 Participants
504 Participants
n=5 Participants
504 Participants
n=4 Participants
2021 Participants
n=21 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
120 Participants
n=5 Participants
132 Participants
n=7 Participants
96 Participants
n=5 Participants
123 Participants
n=4 Participants
471 Participants
n=21 Participants
Age, Continuous
55.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.93 • n=5 Participants
55.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.78 • n=7 Participants
54.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.82 • n=5 Participants
54.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.22 • n=4 Participants
55.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.94 • n=21 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
303 Participants
n=5 Participants
298 Participants
n=7 Participants
266 Participants
n=5 Participants
307 Participants
n=4 Participants
1174 Participants
n=21 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
325 Participants
n=5 Participants
339 Participants
n=7 Participants
334 Participants
n=5 Participants
320 Participants
n=4 Participants
1318 Participants
n=21 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian/Alaskan Native
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
9 Participants
n=21 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
10 Participants
n=7 Participants
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
19 Participants
n=4 Participants
49 Participants
n=21 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hawaiian/Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
4 Participants
n=21 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black/African American
181 Participants
n=5 Participants
200 Participants
n=7 Participants
192 Participants
n=5 Participants
184 Participants
n=4 Participants
757 Participants
n=21 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
431 Participants
n=5 Participants
421 Participants
n=7 Participants
391 Participants
n=5 Participants
415 Participants
n=4 Participants
1658 Participants
n=21 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
6 Participants
n=4 Participants
15 Participants
n=21 Participants
Diabetes Status
Diabetic
100 Participants
n=5 Participants
99 Participants
n=7 Participants
92 Participants
n=5 Participants
96 Participants
n=4 Participants
387 Participants
n=21 Participants
Diabetes Status
Not diabetic
528 Participants
n=5 Participants
538 Participants
n=7 Participants
508 Participants
n=5 Participants
531 Participants
n=4 Participants
2105 Participants
n=21 Participants
Weight
95.9 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.65 • n=5 Participants
96.1 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.55 • n=7 Participants
96.1 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.41 • n=5 Participants
96.0 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.24 • n=4 Participants
96.0 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.94 • n=21 Participants
Body Mass Index
Less than 30 kg/m2
229 Participants
n=5 Participants
238 Participants
n=7 Participants
230 Participants
n=5 Participants
240 Participants
n=4 Participants
937 Participants
n=21 Participants
Body Mass Index
Greater than or equal to 30 kg/m2
399 Participants
n=5 Participants
399 Participants
n=7 Participants
370 Participants
n=5 Participants
387 Participants
n=4 Participants
1555 Participants
n=21 Participants
Duration of hypertension
10.12 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.865 • n=5 Participants
10.34 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.826 • n=7 Participants
9.73 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.983 • n=5 Participants
9.54 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.558 • n=4 Participants
9.94 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.571 • n=21 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: baseline to 12 weeks

Population: The full analysis set consists of subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had a baseline and at least one post-dose assessment of SeDBP

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
OM40/AML10
n=624 Participants
Double blind treatment olmesartan medoxomil (OM) 40 mg, Amlodipine (AML) 10 mg tablets once daily.
OM40/HCTZ25
n=627 Participants
Double blind treatment olmesartan medoxomil (OM) 40 mg, Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 25 mg tablets once daily.
AML10/HCTZ25
n=593 Participants
Double blind treatment Amlodipine (AML) 10 mg, Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 25 mg tablets once daily.
OM40/AML10/HCTZ25
n=614 Participants
Double blind treatment olmesartan medoxomil (OM) 40 mg, Amlodipine (AML) 10 mg, Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 25 mg, tablets once daily.
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Seated Diastolic Blood Pressure (SeDBP).
-17.8 mm Hg
Standard Deviation 9.47
-16.5 mm Hg
Standard Deviation 10.84
-14.8 mm Hg
Standard Deviation 8.78
-21.5 mm Hg
Standard Deviation 10.25

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to 12 weeks

Population: The full analysis set consists of subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had a baseline and at least one post-dose assessment of seated diastolic blood pressure

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
OM40/AML10
n=624 Participants
Double blind treatment olmesartan medoxomil (OM) 40 mg, Amlodipine (AML) 10 mg tablets once daily.
OM40/HCTZ25
n=627 Participants
Double blind treatment olmesartan medoxomil (OM) 40 mg, Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 25 mg tablets once daily.
AML10/HCTZ25
n=593 Participants
Double blind treatment Amlodipine (AML) 10 mg, Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 25 mg tablets once daily.
OM40/AML10/HCTZ25
n=614 Participants
Double blind treatment olmesartan medoxomil (OM) 40 mg, Amlodipine (AML) 10 mg, Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 25 mg, tablets once daily.
Percentage of Subjects Who Reached Blood Pressure Goal (<140/90 mmHg; <130/80 mmHg for Subjects With Diabetes, Chronic Renal Disease, or Chronic Cardiovascular Disease)by 12 Weeks
46.0 Percentage of subjects
46.6 Percentage of subjects
34.9 Percentage of subjects
64.3 Percentage of subjects

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to 12 weeks or early termination

Population: The ABPM Analysis Set included 440 subjects who provided consent to participate in the ABPM sub-study and who were to provide ABPM measurements prior to and after randomization. Those analyzed is the number who had values at both baseline and 12 weeks or early termination

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
OM40/AML10
n=96 Participants
Double blind treatment olmesartan medoxomil (OM) 40 mg, Amlodipine (AML) 10 mg tablets once daily.
OM40/HCTZ25
n=101 Participants
Double blind treatment olmesartan medoxomil (OM) 40 mg, Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 25 mg tablets once daily.
AML10/HCTZ25
n=83 Participants
Double blind treatment Amlodipine (AML) 10 mg, Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 25 mg tablets once daily.
OM40/AML10/HCTZ25
n=100 Participants
Double blind treatment olmesartan medoxomil (OM) 40 mg, Amlodipine (AML) 10 mg, Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 25 mg, tablets once daily.
Change in Mean 24-hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure From Baseline to Week 12 or Early Termination
Diastolic blood pressure
-13.9 mm Hg
Standard Deviation 8.09
-14.5 mm Hg
Standard Deviation 8.73
-10.7 mm Hg
Standard Deviation 7.46
-18.0 mm Hg
Standard Deviation 8.11
Change in Mean 24-hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure From Baseline to Week 12 or Early Termination
Systolic blood pressure
-23.5 mm Hg
Standard Deviation 11.80
-23.9 mm Hg
Standard Deviation 13.10
-18.5 mm Hg
Standard Deviation 10.67
-30.3 mm Hg
Standard Deviation 13.85

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to week 12

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
OM40/AML10
n=624 Participants
Double blind treatment olmesartan medoxomil (OM) 40 mg, Amlodipine (AML) 10 mg tablets once daily.
OM40/HCTZ25
n=627 Participants
Double blind treatment olmesartan medoxomil (OM) 40 mg, Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 25 mg tablets once daily.
AML10/HCTZ25
n=593 Participants
Double blind treatment Amlodipine (AML) 10 mg, Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 25 mg tablets once daily.
OM40/AML10/HCTZ25
n=614 Participants
Double blind treatment olmesartan medoxomil (OM) 40 mg, Amlodipine (AML) 10 mg, Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 25 mg, tablets once daily.
Change in Seated Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to Week 12
-31.1 mm Hg
Standard Deviation 15.44
-31.2 mm Hg
Standard Deviation 18.58
-28.9 mm Hg
Standard Deviation 15.12
-38.1 mm Hg
Standard Deviation 17.40

Adverse Events

OM40/AML10

Serious events: 9 serious events
Other events: 210 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

OM40/HCTZ25

Serious events: 7 serious events
Other events: 210 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

AML10/HCTZ25

Serious events: 9 serious events
Other events: 212 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

OM40/AML10/HCTZ25

Serious events: 10 serious events
Other events: 237 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
OM40/AML10
n=596 participants at risk
Double blind treatment olmesartan medoxomil (OM) 40 mg, Amlodipine (AML) 10 mg tablets once daily.
OM40/HCTZ25
n=580 participants at risk
Double blind treatment olmesartan medoxomil (OM) 40 mg, Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 25 mg tablets once daily.
AML10/HCTZ25
n=552 participants at risk
Double blind treatment Amlodipine (AML) 10 mg, Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 25 mg tablets once daily.
OM40/AML10/HCTZ25
n=574 participants at risk
Double blind treatment olmesartan medoxomil (OM) 40 mg, Amlodipine (AML) 10 mg, Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 25 mg, tablets once daily.
Infections and infestations
appendicitis
0.17%
1/596 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/580 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/552 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/574 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
Infections and infestations
arthritis bacterial
0.17%
1/596 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/580 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/552 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/574 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
Infections and infestations
cellulitis
0.00%
0/596 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/580 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.18%
1/552 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/574 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
Infections and infestations
lobar pneumonia
0.00%
0/596 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/580 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.18%
1/552 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/574 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
Infections and infestations
osteomyelitis
0.00%
0/596 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/580 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/552 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.17%
1/574 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
Infections and infestations
pyelonephritis
0.00%
0/596 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/580 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.18%
1/552 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/574 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
Infections and infestations
sepsis
0.00%
0/596 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/580 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.18%
1/552 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/574 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
prostate cancer
0.00%
0/596 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/580 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.18%
1/552 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.35%
2/574 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
bladder cancer
0.00%
0/596 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.17%
1/580 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/552 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/574 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
colon cancer
0.17%
1/596 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/580 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/552 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/574 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
renal cell carcinoma
0.00%
0/596 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/580 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.18%
1/552 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/574 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
Nervous system disorders
cerebrovasular accident
0.00%
0/596 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.34%
2/580 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/552 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/574 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
Nervous system disorders
ataxia
0.00%
0/596 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/580 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.18%
1/552 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/574 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
Nervous system disorders
cerebellar infarction
0.00%
0/596 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.17%
1/580 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/552 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/574 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
Nervous system disorders
hemiparesis
0.00%
0/596 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/580 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.18%
1/552 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/574 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
Nervous system disorders
peroneal nerve palsy
0.00%
0/596 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/580 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/552 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.17%
1/574 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
Nervous system disorders
syncope
0.00%
0/596 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/580 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/552 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.17%
1/574 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
Cardiac disorders
coronary artery disease
0.17%
1/596 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/580 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/552 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.35%
2/574 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
Cardiac disorders
acute myocardial infarction
0.17%
1/596 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/580 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/552 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/574 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
Cardiac disorders
angina pectoris
0.17%
1/596 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/580 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/552 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/574 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
Cardiac disorders
right ventricular failure
0.17%
1/596 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/580 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/552 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/574 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
duodenitis
0.00%
0/596 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/580 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/552 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.17%
1/574 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
gastritis
0.00%
0/596 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/580 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/552 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.17%
1/574 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
gastrointstial haemhorrhage
0.17%
1/596 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/580 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/552 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/574 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
hiatus hernia
0.00%
0/596 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/580 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.18%
1/552 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/574 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
rectal haemhorrhage
0.00%
0/596 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/580 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/552 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.17%
1/574 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
osteoarthritis
0.34%
2/596 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/580 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/552 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/574 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
intervertebral disc degeneration
0.00%
0/596 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/580 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/552 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.17%
1/574 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
musculoskeletal chest pain
0.00%
0/596 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.17%
1/580 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/552 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/574 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
dyspnoea
0.00%
0/596 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/580 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/552 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.17%
1/574 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
obstructive airways disorder
0.00%
0/596 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/580 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/552 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.17%
1/574 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
sleep apnoea syndrome
0.17%
1/596 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/580 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/552 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/574 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
General disorders
non-cardiac chest pain
0.00%
0/596 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/580 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.18%
1/552 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.17%
1/574 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
fall
0.00%
0/596 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/580 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.18%
1/552 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/574 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
hip fracture
0.00%
0/596 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/580 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.18%
1/552 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/574 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
vertebral injury
0.00%
0/596 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/580 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/552 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.17%
1/574 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
diabetes mellitus
0.00%
0/596 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.17%
1/580 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/552 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/574 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
hypokalemia
0.00%
0/596 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/580 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.18%
1/552 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/574 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
hyponatraemia
0.00%
0/596 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/580 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.18%
1/552 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/574 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
Renal and urinary disorders
acute prerenal failure
0.00%
0/596 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/580 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/552 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.17%
1/574 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
Renal and urinary disorders
hydronephrosis
0.00%
0/596 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/580 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.18%
1/552 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/574 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
Congenital, familial and genetic disorders
pulmonary artery atresia
0.00%
0/596 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/580 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/552 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.17%
1/574 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
Immune system disorders
hypersensitivity
0.17%
1/596 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/580 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/552 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/574 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
Reproductive system and breast disorders
ovarian cyst
0.00%
0/596 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.17%
1/580 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/552 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.00%
0/574 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
OM40/AML10
n=596 participants at risk
Double blind treatment olmesartan medoxomil (OM) 40 mg, Amlodipine (AML) 10 mg tablets once daily.
OM40/HCTZ25
n=580 participants at risk
Double blind treatment olmesartan medoxomil (OM) 40 mg, Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 25 mg tablets once daily.
AML10/HCTZ25
n=552 participants at risk
Double blind treatment Amlodipine (AML) 10 mg, Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 25 mg tablets once daily.
OM40/AML10/HCTZ25
n=574 participants at risk
Double blind treatment olmesartan medoxomil (OM) 40 mg, Amlodipine (AML) 10 mg, Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 25 mg, tablets once daily.
Nervous system disorders
dizziness
4.9%
29/596 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
10.0%
58/580 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
3.1%
17/552 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
9.9%
57/574 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
Nervous system disorders
headache
7.0%
42/596 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
6.6%
38/580 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
6.0%
33/552 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
6.4%
37/574 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
Infections and infestations
upper respiratory tract infection
4.4%
26/596 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
3.1%
18/580 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
2.5%
14/552 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
2.8%
16/574 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
Infections and infestations
nasopharyngitis
1.8%
11/596 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
3.4%
20/580 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
2.9%
16/552 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
3.5%
20/574 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
General disorders
edema peripheral
7.0%
42/596 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
1.0%
6/580 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
8.3%
46/552 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
7.7%
44/574 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
General disorders
fatigue
5.7%
34/596 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
5.3%
31/580 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
6.5%
36/552 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
4.2%
24/574 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
muscle spasms
2.0%
12/596 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
2.4%
14/580 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
2.4%
13/552 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
3.1%
18/574 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
nausea
2.0%
12/596 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
3.8%
22/580 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
2.2%
12/552 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
3.0%
17/574 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
hypokalemia
0.34%
2/596 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.52%
3/580 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
4.5%
25/552 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.
0.70%
4/574 • 12 weeks
Safety was assessed at all study visits. Variables included adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The assessment of causality was based on the investigator's judgment.

Additional Information

Howard Kessler

Daiichi Sankyo

Phone: 732-590-5032

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Study site may not publish results of study until after coordinated multicenter publication has been submitted for publication or one year after study has ended, whichever occurs first. Therefore, study site will have the opportunity to publish results of study, provided that Daiichi Sankyo has had the opportunity to review and comment on study site's proposed publication prior to being submitted for publication with advice of company patent council and in accord with subject protection needs.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER