Trial Outcomes & Findings for Clinical Evaluation of the Phototoxic Potential of Xenaderm Ointment (NCT NCT00644917)

NCT ID: NCT00644917

Last Updated: 2014-01-13

Results Overview

Scores for phototoxic skin irritation were used to evaluate safety. In this study, irritation was graded using a scale that ranged from 0 (no reaction) to 7 (large vesiculo-bullous reaction) in whole units.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE1

Target enrollment

38 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

48 hours

Results posted on

2014-01-13

Participant Flow

This phase 1 study was conducted at one investigational site (Research Laboratory) located in the US, and conducted on healthy adult subjects of either gender, and skin-type I, II, or III, who were 18 years of age and older, from 19-Feb-2008 to 29-Feb-2008.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Xenaderm Ointment - Subjects Acted as Own Comparator
Two 20 mg samples of Xenaderm Ointment and two 20 mg samples of Vehicle were applied in Finn Chambers to four test sites of the left side of each subject's back; a fifth test site was covered with an empty Finn Chamber as a control site
Overall Study
STARTED
38
Overall Study
COMPLETED
36
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
2

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Xenaderm Ointment - Subjects Acted as Own Comparator
Two 20 mg samples of Xenaderm Ointment and two 20 mg samples of Vehicle were applied in Finn Chambers to four test sites of the left side of each subject's back; a fifth test site was covered with an empty Finn Chamber as a control site
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
2

Baseline Characteristics

Clinical Evaluation of the Phototoxic Potential of Xenaderm Ointment

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Xenaderm vs. Vehicle - Subjects Acted as Own Comparator
n=38 Participants
Subjects received duplicate 20 mg applications of Xenaderm Ointment and Xenaderm vehicle contained in Finn Chambers, to the left sides of their backs
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
37 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Continuous
37.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.7 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
38 participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 48 hours

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT)

Scores for phototoxic skin irritation were used to evaluate safety. In this study, irritation was graded using a scale that ranged from 0 (no reaction) to 7 (large vesiculo-bullous reaction) in whole units.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Xenaderm Ointment - Irradiated
n=36 Participants
20 mg samples of Xenaderm Ointment applied in a Finn Chambers to test site the left side of each subject's back - then irradiated
Xenaderm Vehicle - Irradiated
n=36 Participants
20 mg sample of Vehicle applied in Finn Chamber to test site on the left side of each subject's back - then irradiated
Control - Irradiated
n=36 Participants
test site was covered with an empty Finn Chamber as a control site - then irradiated
Xenaderm Ointment - Non-irradiated
n=36 Participants
20 mg samples of Xenaderm Ointment applied in a Finn Chambers to test site the left side of each subject's back - not irradiated
Xenaderm Vehicle - Non-irradiated
n=36 Participants
20 mg samples of Xenaderm Vehicle applied in a Finn Chambers to test site the left side of each subject's back - not irradiated
Skin Reaction Score
Day 2 at patch removal
0.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.5
0.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.6
0.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.2
0.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.5
0.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.6
Skin Reaction Score
Day 2 immediately post UV radiation
0.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.6
0.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.9
0.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.8
0.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.5
0.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.6
Skin Reaction Score
Day 3 - 24 hours post UV radiation
0.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.0
0.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.1
0.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.1
0.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.6
0.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.4
Skin Reaction Score
Day 4 - 48 hours post UV radiation
0.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.8
0.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.0
0.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.1
0.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.5
0.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.5

Adverse Events

Xenaderm Ointment - Subjects Acted as Own Comparator

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 3 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Xenaderm Ointment - Subjects Acted as Own Comparator
n=36 participants at risk
Two 20 mg samples of Xenaderm Ointment and two 20 mg samples of Vehicle were applied in Finn Chambers to four test sites of the left side of each subject's back; a fifth test site was covered with an empty Finn Chamber as a control site
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin Irritation
8.3%
3/36 • Number of events 3 • All subjects were exposed to Xenaderm Ointment and Xenaderm vehicle at Day 1. The exposures were occluded under Finn Chambers for 24 hours.
Tabulations of adverse events were used to qualitatively summarize the events by description, severity, and causality. The tabulations were reviewed for evidence of safety trends unrelated to the phototoxicity assessments.

Additional Information

Jaime E Dickerson, Jr, PhD

Smith & Nephew Biotherapeutics

Phone: 817-302-3914

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: LTE60