Trial Outcomes & Findings for Clinical Evaluation of the Phototoxic Potential of Xenaderm Ointment (NCT NCT00644917)
NCT ID: NCT00644917
Last Updated: 2014-01-13
Results Overview
Scores for phototoxic skin irritation were used to evaluate safety. In this study, irritation was graded using a scale that ranged from 0 (no reaction) to 7 (large vesiculo-bullous reaction) in whole units.
COMPLETED
PHASE1
38 participants
48 hours
2014-01-13
Participant Flow
This phase 1 study was conducted at one investigational site (Research Laboratory) located in the US, and conducted on healthy adult subjects of either gender, and skin-type I, II, or III, who were 18 years of age and older, from 19-Feb-2008 to 29-Feb-2008.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Xenaderm Ointment - Subjects Acted as Own Comparator
Two 20 mg samples of Xenaderm Ointment and two 20 mg samples of Vehicle were applied in Finn Chambers to four test sites of the left side of each subject's back; a fifth test site was covered with an empty Finn Chamber as a control site
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
38
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
36
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
2
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Xenaderm Ointment - Subjects Acted as Own Comparator
Two 20 mg samples of Xenaderm Ointment and two 20 mg samples of Vehicle were applied in Finn Chambers to four test sites of the left side of each subject's back; a fifth test site was covered with an empty Finn Chamber as a control site
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
2
|
Baseline Characteristics
Clinical Evaluation of the Phototoxic Potential of Xenaderm Ointment
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Xenaderm vs. Vehicle - Subjects Acted as Own Comparator
n=38 Participants
Subjects received duplicate 20 mg applications of Xenaderm Ointment and Xenaderm vehicle contained in Finn Chambers, to the left sides of their backs
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
37 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
37.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.7 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
38 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 48 hoursPopulation: Intent-to-Treat (ITT)
Scores for phototoxic skin irritation were used to evaluate safety. In this study, irritation was graded using a scale that ranged from 0 (no reaction) to 7 (large vesiculo-bullous reaction) in whole units.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Xenaderm Ointment - Irradiated
n=36 Participants
20 mg samples of Xenaderm Ointment applied in a Finn Chambers to test site the left side of each subject's back - then irradiated
|
Xenaderm Vehicle - Irradiated
n=36 Participants
20 mg sample of Vehicle applied in Finn Chamber to test site on the left side of each subject's back - then irradiated
|
Control - Irradiated
n=36 Participants
test site was covered with an empty Finn Chamber as a control site - then irradiated
|
Xenaderm Ointment - Non-irradiated
n=36 Participants
20 mg samples of Xenaderm Ointment applied in a Finn Chambers to test site the left side of each subject's back - not irradiated
|
Xenaderm Vehicle - Non-irradiated
n=36 Participants
20 mg samples of Xenaderm Vehicle applied in a Finn Chambers to test site the left side of each subject's back - not irradiated
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Skin Reaction Score
Day 2 at patch removal
|
0.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.5
|
0.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.6
|
0.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.2
|
0.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.5
|
0.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.6
|
|
Skin Reaction Score
Day 2 immediately post UV radiation
|
0.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.6
|
0.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.9
|
0.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.8
|
0.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.5
|
0.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.6
|
|
Skin Reaction Score
Day 3 - 24 hours post UV radiation
|
0.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.0
|
0.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.1
|
0.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.1
|
0.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.6
|
0.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.4
|
|
Skin Reaction Score
Day 4 - 48 hours post UV radiation
|
0.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.8
|
0.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.0
|
0.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.1
|
0.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.5
|
0.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.5
|
Adverse Events
Xenaderm Ointment - Subjects Acted as Own Comparator
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Xenaderm Ointment - Subjects Acted as Own Comparator
n=36 participants at risk
Two 20 mg samples of Xenaderm Ointment and two 20 mg samples of Vehicle were applied in Finn Chambers to four test sites of the left side of each subject's back; a fifth test site was covered with an empty Finn Chamber as a control site
|
|---|---|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin Irritation
|
8.3%
3/36 • Number of events 3 • All subjects were exposed to Xenaderm Ointment and Xenaderm vehicle at Day 1. The exposures were occluded under Finn Chambers for 24 hours.
Tabulations of adverse events were used to qualitatively summarize the events by description, severity, and causality. The tabulations were reviewed for evidence of safety trends unrelated to the phototoxicity assessments.
|
Additional Information
Jaime E Dickerson, Jr, PhD
Smith & Nephew Biotherapeutics
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: LTE60