Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study In Patients With Neuropathic Pain From Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (DPN) (NCT NCT00643760)
NCT ID: NCT00643760
Last Updated: 2013-07-22
Results Overview
Baseline and EOMT values are the calculated means of the daily 24-hour API scores for each participant during the last 7 days prior to randomization (Baseline) and the earliest date of Week 13 visit/Withdrawal visit/last dose of study drug (EOMT). Participants used a hand-held diary to rate their API over the preceding 24 hours, using an 11-point Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (PI-NRS) (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine). LOCF was used if less than 4 days of diary data were provided. Change from baseline was calculated as the EOMT score minus the Baseline score.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
421 participants
Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)
2013-07-22
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Placebo
Three 600 milligram (mg) gabapentin enacarbil (XP13512/GSK1838262), hereafter referred to as GEn, placebo tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg pregabalin (PGB) placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
GEn 1200 mg/Day
One 600 mg extended release (ER) GEn tablet and two 600 mg GEn placebo tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
GEn 2400 mg/Day
Two 600 mg ER GEn tablets and one 600 mg GEn placebo tablet taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
GEn 3600 mg/Day
Three 600 mg ER GEn tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
PGB 300 mg/Day
Three 600 mg GEn placebo tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
120
|
62
|
56
|
117
|
66
|
|
Overall Study
Safety Population/Treated With Drug
|
120
|
62
|
56
|
116
|
66
|
|
Overall Study
ITT Population
|
120
|
62
|
56
|
116
|
66
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
90
|
47
|
37
|
79
|
47
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
30
|
15
|
19
|
38
|
19
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Placebo
Three 600 milligram (mg) gabapentin enacarbil (XP13512/GSK1838262), hereafter referred to as GEn, placebo tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg pregabalin (PGB) placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
GEn 1200 mg/Day
One 600 mg extended release (ER) GEn tablet and two 600 mg GEn placebo tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
GEn 2400 mg/Day
Two 600 mg ER GEn tablets and one 600 mg GEn placebo tablet taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
GEn 3600 mg/Day
Three 600 mg ER GEn tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
PGB 300 mg/Day
Three 600 mg GEn placebo tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
11
|
5
|
12
|
21
|
6
|
|
Overall Study
Lack of Efficacy
|
3
|
1
|
0
|
4
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
|
7
|
6
|
4
|
4
|
6
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
6
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Investigator Discretion
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
4
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Study In Patients With Neuropathic Pain From Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (DPN)
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Placebo
n=120 Participants
Three 600 milligram (mg) gabapentin enacarbil (XP13512/GSK1838262), hereafter referred to as GEn, placebo tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg pregabalin (PGB) placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
GEn 1200 mg/Day
n=62 Participants
One 600 mg extended release (ER) GEn tablet and two 600 mg GEn placebo tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
GEn 2400 mg/Day
n=56 Participants
Two 600 mg ER GEn tablets and one 600 mg GEn placebo tablet taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
GEn 3600 mg/Day
n=116 Participants
Three 600 mg ER GEn tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
PGB 300 mg/Day
n=66 Participants
Three 600 mg GEn placebo tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
Total
n=420 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age Continuous
|
60.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.63 • n=5 Participants
|
57.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.32 • n=7 Participants
|
60.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.97 • n=5 Participants
|
57.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.87 • n=4 Participants
|
57.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.59 • n=21 Participants
|
58.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.20 • n=10 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
47 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
28 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
45 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
32 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
171 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
73 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
34 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
37 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
71 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
34 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
249 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
African American/African Heritage
|
20 participants
n=5 Participants
|
15 participants
n=7 Participants
|
7 participants
n=5 Participants
|
20 participants
n=4 Participants
|
12 participants
n=21 Participants
|
74 participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaskan Native
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 participants
n=21 Participants
|
2 participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian - Central/South Asian Heritage
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 participants
n=21 Participants
|
1 participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian - South East Asian Heritage
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 participants
n=21 Participants
|
3 participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White - Arabic/North African Heritage
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 participants
n=21 Participants
|
5 participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White - White/Caucasian/European Heritage
|
98 participants
n=5 Participants
|
44 participants
n=7 Participants
|
45 participants
n=5 Participants
|
89 participants
n=4 Participants
|
52 participants
n=21 Participants
|
328 participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Mixed Race
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 participants
n=21 Participants
|
2 participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Provided
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 participants
n=4 Participants
|
2 participants
n=21 Participants
|
5 participants
n=10 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)Population: ITT Population
Baseline and EOMT values are the calculated means of the daily 24-hour API scores for each participant during the last 7 days prior to randomization (Baseline) and the earliest date of Week 13 visit/Withdrawal visit/last dose of study drug (EOMT). Participants used a hand-held diary to rate their API over the preceding 24 hours, using an 11-point Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (PI-NRS) (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine). LOCF was used if less than 4 days of diary data were provided. Change from baseline was calculated as the EOMT score minus the Baseline score.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=120 Participants
Three 600 milligram (mg) gabapentin enacarbil (XP13512/GSK1838262), hereafter referred to as GEn, placebo tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg pregabalin (PGB) placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
GEn 1200 mg/Day
n=62 Participants
One 600 mg extended release (ER) GEn tablet and two 600 mg GEn placebo tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
GEn 2400 mg/Day
n=56 Participants
Two 600 mg ER GEn tablets and one 600 mg GEn placebo tablet taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
GEn 3600 mg/Day
n=116 Participants
Three 600 mg ER GEn tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
PGB 300 mg/Day
n=66 Participants
Three 600 mg GEn placebo tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Mean 24-hour Average Pain Intensity (API) Score at End of Maintenance Treatment (EOMT) Using Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Data
|
-2.08 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.196
|
-2.43 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.274
|
-2.10 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.289
|
-2.63 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.202
|
-1.65 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.266
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)Population: ITT Population
Day-time is defined as the time between rising in the morning and going to bed at night. Participants recorded day-time API on a daily basis in the evening before bedtime using an 11-point PI-NRS (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine). Baseline and EOMT are as defined for the primary endpoint. Change from baseline was calculated as the EOMT score minus the baseline score. An ANCOVA model with baseline value, BMI, grouped center as covariates was used.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=120 Participants
Three 600 milligram (mg) gabapentin enacarbil (XP13512/GSK1838262), hereafter referred to as GEn, placebo tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg pregabalin (PGB) placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
GEn 1200 mg/Day
n=62 Participants
One 600 mg extended release (ER) GEn tablet and two 600 mg GEn placebo tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
GEn 2400 mg/Day
n=56 Participants
Two 600 mg ER GEn tablets and one 600 mg GEn placebo tablet taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
GEn 3600 mg/Day
n=116 Participants
Three 600 mg ER GEn tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
PGB 300 mg/Day
n=66 Participants
Three 600 mg GEn placebo tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Mean Day-time Average Pain Intensity (API) Score at EOMT Using LOCF Data
|
-2.07 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.195
|
-2.35 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.272
|
-2.06 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.286
|
-2.54 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.200
|
-1.50 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.264
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)Population: ITT Population. There were two participants in the GEn 3600 mg/day group who did not complete enough post-baseline morning diaries to calculate an average night-time pain intensity score for the EOMT timepoint.
Night-time is defined as the time between going to bed at night and rising in the morning. Participants recorded night-time API on a daily basis in the morning upon awakening using an 11-point PI-NRS (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine). Baseline and EOMT are as defined for the primary endpoint. Change from baseline was calculated as the EOMT score minus the baseline score. An ANCOVA model with baseline value, BMI, grouped center as covariates was used.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=120 Participants
Three 600 milligram (mg) gabapentin enacarbil (XP13512/GSK1838262), hereafter referred to as GEn, placebo tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg pregabalin (PGB) placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
GEn 1200 mg/Day
n=62 Participants
One 600 mg extended release (ER) GEn tablet and two 600 mg GEn placebo tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
GEn 2400 mg/Day
n=56 Participants
Two 600 mg ER GEn tablets and one 600 mg GEn placebo tablet taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
GEn 3600 mg/Day
n=114 Participants
Three 600 mg ER GEn tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
PGB 300 mg/Day
n=66 Participants
Three 600 mg GEn placebo tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Mean Night-time Average Pain Intensity (API) Score at EOMT Using LOCF Data
|
-1.99 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.203
|
-2.15 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.282
|
-2.04 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.298
|
-2.71 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.210
|
-1.83 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.274
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)Population: ITT Population. There were two participants in the GEn 3600 mg/day group who did not complete enough post-baseline morning diaries to calculate a current (morning) pain intensity score for the EOMT timepoint.
Current pain is defined as the participant's assessment of pain intensity "right now." Participants recorded their current morning pain intensity in the morning upon wakening using an 11-point PI-NRS (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine). Baseline and EOMT are as defined for the primary endpoint. Change from baseline was calculated as the EOMT score minus the baseline score. An ANCOVA model with baseline value, BMI, grouped center as covariates was used.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=120 Participants
Three 600 milligram (mg) gabapentin enacarbil (XP13512/GSK1838262), hereafter referred to as GEn, placebo tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg pregabalin (PGB) placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
GEn 1200 mg/Day
n=62 Participants
One 600 mg extended release (ER) GEn tablet and two 600 mg GEn placebo tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
GEn 2400 mg/Day
n=56 Participants
Two 600 mg ER GEn tablets and one 600 mg GEn placebo tablet taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
GEn 3600 mg/Day
n=114 Participants
Three 600 mg ER GEn tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
PGB 300 mg/Day
n=66 Participants
Three 600 mg GEn placebo tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Mean Current (Morning) Pain Intensity Score at EOMT Using LOCF Data
|
-1.90 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.192
|
-2.08 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.268
|
-1.95 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.282
|
-2.40 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.199
|
-1.50 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.260
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)Population: ITT Population
Current pain is defined as the participant's assessment of pain intensity "right now." Participants recorded their current evening pain intensity in the evening before bedtime using an 11-point PI-NRS (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine). Baseline and EOMT are as defined for the primary endpoint. Change from baseline was calculated as the EOMT score minus the baseline score. An ANCOVA model with baseline value, BMI, grouped center as covariates was used.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=120 Participants
Three 600 milligram (mg) gabapentin enacarbil (XP13512/GSK1838262), hereafter referred to as GEn, placebo tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg pregabalin (PGB) placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
GEn 1200 mg/Day
n=62 Participants
One 600 mg extended release (ER) GEn tablet and two 600 mg GEn placebo tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
GEn 2400 mg/Day
n=56 Participants
Two 600 mg ER GEn tablets and one 600 mg GEn placebo tablet taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
GEn 3600 mg/Day
n=116 Participants
Three 600 mg ER GEn tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
PGB 300 mg/Day
n=66 Participants
Three 600 mg GEn placebo tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Mean Current (Evening) Pain Intensity Score at EOMT Using LOCF Data
|
-2.19 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.194
|
-2.24 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.271
|
-2.10 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.285
|
-2.66 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.200
|
-1.65 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.264
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)Population: ITT Population
Day-time worst pain is defined as the partipant's assessment of their worst pain between rising in the morning and going to bed at night. Participants recorded day-time worst pain in the evening before bedtime using an 11-point PI-NRS (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine). Baseline and EOMT are as defined for the primary endpoint. Change from baseline was calculated as the EOMT score minus the baseline score. An ANCOVA model with baseline value, BMI, grouped center as covariates was used.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=120 Participants
Three 600 milligram (mg) gabapentin enacarbil (XP13512/GSK1838262), hereafter referred to as GEn, placebo tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg pregabalin (PGB) placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
GEn 1200 mg/Day
n=62 Participants
One 600 mg extended release (ER) GEn tablet and two 600 mg GEn placebo tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
GEn 2400 mg/Day
n=56 Participants
Two 600 mg ER GEn tablets and one 600 mg GEn placebo tablet taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
GEn 3600 mg/Day
n=116 Participants
Three 600 mg ER GEn tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
PGB 300 mg/Day
n=66 Participants
Three 600 mg GEn placebo tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Mean Day-time Worst Pain Intensity Score at EOMT Using LOCF Data
|
-2.33 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.210
|
-2.35 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.292
|
-2.25 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.307
|
-2.88 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.215
|
-1.62 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.284
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)Population: ITT Population. There were two participants in the GEn 3600 mg/day group who did not complete enough post-baseline morning diaries to calculate a night-time worst pain intensity score for the EOMT timepoint.
Night-time worst pain is defined as the partipant's assessment of their worst pain between going to bed at night and rising in the morning. Participants recorded night-time worst pain in the morning upon awakening using an 11-point PI-NRS (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine). Baseline and EOMT are as defined for the primary endpoint. Change from baseline was calculated as the EOMT score minus the baseline score. An ANCOVA model with baseline value, BMI, grouped center as covariates was used.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=120 Participants
Three 600 milligram (mg) gabapentin enacarbil (XP13512/GSK1838262), hereafter referred to as GEn, placebo tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg pregabalin (PGB) placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
GEn 1200 mg/Day
n=62 Participants
One 600 mg extended release (ER) GEn tablet and two 600 mg GEn placebo tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
GEn 2400 mg/Day
n=56 Participants
Two 600 mg ER GEn tablets and one 600 mg GEn placebo tablet taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
GEn 3600 mg/Day
n=114 Participants
Three 600 mg ER GEn tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
PGB 300 mg/Day
n=66 Participants
Three 600 mg GEn placebo tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Mean Night-time Worst Pain Intensity Score at EOMT Using LOCF Data
|
-2.25 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.213
|
-2.24 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.297
|
-2.25 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.313
|
-3.00 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.221
|
-1.86 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.289
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)Population: ITT Population. There were two participants in the GEn 3600 mg/day group who did not complete enough post-baseline morning diaries to calculate a night-time worst pain intensity score for the EOMT timepoint.
Participants assessed sleep interference due to pain on a daily basis in the morning upon awakening using an 11-point NRS (0=pain does not interfere with sleep, 10=pain completely interferes with sleep). Baseline and EOMT are as defined for the primary endpoint. Change from baseline was calculated as the EOMT score minus the baseline score. An ANCOVA model with baseline value, BMI, grouped center as covariates was used.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=120 Participants
Three 600 milligram (mg) gabapentin enacarbil (XP13512/GSK1838262), hereafter referred to as GEn, placebo tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg pregabalin (PGB) placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
GEn 1200 mg/Day
n=62 Participants
One 600 mg extended release (ER) GEn tablet and two 600 mg GEn placebo tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
GEn 2400 mg/Day
n=56 Participants
Two 600 mg ER GEn tablets and one 600 mg GEn placebo tablet taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
GEn 3600 mg/Day
n=114 Participants
Three 600 mg ER GEn tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
PGB 300 mg/Day
n=66 Participants
Three 600 mg GEn placebo tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Mean Sleep Interference Score at EOMT Using LOCF Data
|
-2.35 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.214
|
-2.54 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.298
|
-2.45 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.313
|
-3.01 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.221
|
-2.24 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.289
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)Population: ITT Population
Mean daily use of rescue medication (milligrams of acetaminophen) was calculated by determining the average number of tablets taken per day of rescue medication (Commerical Tylenol) during treatment and multiplying that by 500 mg. Baseline and EOMT are as defined for the primary endpoint. Change from baseline was calculated as the EOMT score minus the baseline score. An ANCOVA model with baseline value, BMI, grouped center as covariates was used.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=120 Participants
Three 600 milligram (mg) gabapentin enacarbil (XP13512/GSK1838262), hereafter referred to as GEn, placebo tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg pregabalin (PGB) placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
GEn 1200 mg/Day
n=62 Participants
One 600 mg extended release (ER) GEn tablet and two 600 mg GEn placebo tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
GEn 2400 mg/Day
n=56 Participants
Two 600 mg ER GEn tablets and one 600 mg GEn placebo tablet taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
GEn 3600 mg/Day
n=116 Participants
Three 600 mg ER GEn tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
PGB 300 mg/Day
n=66 Participants
Three 600 mg GEn placebo tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Mean Daily Dose of Rescue Medication at EOMT Using LOCF Data
|
-261.99 milligrams
Standard Error 73.630
|
-171.64 milligrams
Standard Error 102.482
|
-102.51 milligrams
Standard Error 107.918
|
-228.54 milligrams
Standard Error 76.139
|
-246.07 milligrams
Standard Error 99.758
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)Population: ITT Population. Not all participants completed an NPS assessment at both Baseline and Week 13/Withdrawal; as such, the number analyzed is different from the full ITT Population counts.
The NPS assesses pain qualities and consists of 11-items, 10 assessed on an 11-point NRS (0=no impact to 10=greatest impact); and 1 open-ended question not used in score calculation. 4 summary scores are calculated: NPS 10 (items 1-7, 9-11), NPS 8 (8 pain descriptor items), NPS Non-Allodynic (NA) (8 NA items), and NPS 4 (4 pain quality items); and range from 0 to 100 (0=no impact and 100=greatest impact). The analysis is based on the change from baseline (BL) (EOMT score minus the BL score) using an ANCOVA model with BL value, BMI, grouped center as covariates.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=112 Participants
Three 600 milligram (mg) gabapentin enacarbil (XP13512/GSK1838262), hereafter referred to as GEn, placebo tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg pregabalin (PGB) placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
GEn 1200 mg/Day
n=58 Participants
One 600 mg extended release (ER) GEn tablet and two 600 mg GEn placebo tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
GEn 2400 mg/Day
n=45 Participants
Two 600 mg ER GEn tablets and one 600 mg GEn placebo tablet taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
GEn 3600 mg/Day
n=108 Participants
Three 600 mg ER GEn tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
PGB 300 mg/Day
n=62 Participants
Three 600 mg GEn placebo tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Pain Quality as Assessed by the Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS) Summary Scores at EOMT Using LOCF Data
NPS 10 Score
|
-18.92 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.914
|
-18.43 scores on a scale
Standard Error 2.658
|
-22.24 scores on a scale
Standard Error 3.027
|
-25.49 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.970
|
-16.16 scores on a scale
Standard Error 2.576
|
|
Change From Baseline in Pain Quality as Assessed by the Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS) Summary Scores at EOMT Using LOCF Data
NPS 4 Score
|
-20.54 scores on a scale
Standard Error 2.120
|
-20.90 scores on a scale
Standard Error 2.944
|
-25.15 scores on a scale
Standard Error 3.352
|
-27.84 scores on a scale
Standard Error 2.182
|
-16.06 scores on a scale
Standard Error 2.853
|
|
Change From Baseline in Pain Quality as Assessed by the Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS) Summary Scores at EOMT Using LOCF Data
NPS 8 Score
|
-18.73 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.898
|
-17.83 scores on a scale
Standard Error 2.637
|
-21.84 scores on a scale
Standard Error 3.003
|
-25.14 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.954
|
-16.19 scores on a scale
Standard Error 2.555
|
|
Change From Baseline in Pain Quality as Assessed by the Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS) Summary Scores at EOMT Using LOCF Data
NPS Non-Allodynic Score
|
-19.37 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.998
|
-18.89 scores on a scale
Standard Error 2.776
|
-22.86 scores on a scale
Standard Error 3.160
|
-26.35 scores on a scale
Standard Error 2.057
|
-15.63 scores on a scale
Standard Error 2.690
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)Population: ITT Population. Not all participants completed an SF-MPQ assessment at both Baseline and Week 13/Withdrawal; as such, the number analyzed is different from the full ITT Population counts.
The SF-MPQ, a general pain instrument, assesses the characteristics and intensity of pain and consists of 15-items assessed on a 4-point scale (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, and 3=severe). 3 summary scores are calculated: sensory score (sum of items 1-11, range 0-33), affective score (sum of items 12-15, range 0-12), total score (sum of items 1-15, range 0-45), where lower scores = lower pain/impact. Analysis is based on the change from baseline (BL) (EOMT score minus the BL score) using an ANCOVA model with BL value, BMI, grouped center as covariates.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=112 Participants
Three 600 milligram (mg) gabapentin enacarbil (XP13512/GSK1838262), hereafter referred to as GEn, placebo tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg pregabalin (PGB) placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
GEn 1200 mg/Day
n=57 Participants
One 600 mg extended release (ER) GEn tablet and two 600 mg GEn placebo tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
GEn 2400 mg/Day
n=44 Participants
Two 600 mg ER GEn tablets and one 600 mg GEn placebo tablet taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
GEn 3600 mg/Day
n=108 Participants
Three 600 mg ER GEn tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
PGB 300 mg/Day
n=62 Participants
Three 600 mg GEn placebo tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Pain Characteristics and Intensity as Assessed by the Short Form-McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) at EOMT Using LOCF Data
SF-MPQ Total Score
|
-5.85 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.865
|
-6.55 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.214
|
-6.75 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.381
|
-7.56 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.888
|
-4.01 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.161
|
|
Change From Baseline in Pain Characteristics and Intensity as Assessed by the Short Form-McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) at EOMT Using LOCF Data
SF-MPQ Sensory Score
|
-4.25 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.674
|
-4.83 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.946
|
-5.31 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.077
|
-5.50 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.692
|
-2.73 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.906
|
|
Change From Baseline in Pain Characteristics and Intensity as Assessed by the Short Form-McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) at EOMT Using LOCF Data
SF-MPQ Affective Score
|
-1.63 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.247
|
-1.65 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.348
|
-1.45 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.395
|
-2.07 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.254
|
-1.26 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.332
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)Population: ITT Population. Not all participants completed a 50-foot walk at both Baseline and Week 13/Withdrawal; as such, the number analyzed is different from the full ITT Population counts.
Baseline and EOMT scores are the pain scores each participant reported after taking a 50-foot walk at the randomization and Week 13/Withdrawal visits, respectively, using an 11-point PI-NRS (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine). Change from baseline was calculated as the EOMT score minus the baseline score. An ANCOVA model with BMI, baseline pain intensity after 50-foot walk, pain intensity prior to 50-foot walk at the visit being assessed, and grouped center as covariates was used.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=111 Participants
Three 600 milligram (mg) gabapentin enacarbil (XP13512/GSK1838262), hereafter referred to as GEn, placebo tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg pregabalin (PGB) placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
GEn 1200 mg/Day
n=57 Participants
One 600 mg extended release (ER) GEn tablet and two 600 mg GEn placebo tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
GEn 2400 mg/Day
n=44 Participants
Two 600 mg ER GEn tablets and one 600 mg GEn placebo tablet taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
GEn 3600 mg/Day
n=107 Participants
Three 600 mg ER GEn tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
PGB 300 mg/Day
n=59 Participants
Three 600 mg GEn placebo tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Pain Score After Taking a 50-foot Walk at EOMT
|
-2.38 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.077
|
-2.32 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.107
|
-2.36 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.122
|
-2.52 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.080
|
-2.17 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.106
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)Population: ITT Population. Not all participants completed a PGIC assessment at Week 13/Withdrawal; as such, the number analyzed is different from the full ITT Population counts.
The PGIC is a single-item questionnaire designed to provide an overall assessment of treatment from the participant's perspective since the start of the study. It is measured on a 7-point scale, where 1=very much improved and 7=very much worse. A participant is considered a responder if they have a response of "very much improved" or "much improved." EOMT response is defined as the score recorded at the Week 13/Withdrawal visit.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=112 Participants
Three 600 milligram (mg) gabapentin enacarbil (XP13512/GSK1838262), hereafter referred to as GEn, placebo tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg pregabalin (PGB) placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
GEn 1200 mg/Day
n=58 Participants
One 600 mg extended release (ER) GEn tablet and two 600 mg GEn placebo tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
GEn 2400 mg/Day
n=46 Participants
Two 600 mg ER GEn tablets and one 600 mg GEn placebo tablet taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
GEn 3600 mg/Day
n=108 Participants
Three 600 mg ER GEn tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
PGB 300 mg/Day
n=62 Participants
Three 600 mg GEn placebo tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Are Responders on the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Questionnaire at EOMT Using LOCF Data
|
46 participants
|
22 participants
|
24 participants
|
53 participants
|
62 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)Population: ITT Population. Not all participants had a CGIC assessment at Week 13/Withdrawal; as such, the number analyzed is different from the full ITT Population counts.
The CGIC is a single-item questionnaire designed to provide an overall assessment of treatment from the clinician's perspective since the start of the study. It is measured on a 7-point scale, where 1=very much improved and 7=very much worse. A participant is considered a responder if they have a response of "very much improved" or "much improved." EOMT response is defined as the score recorded at the Week 13/Withdrawal visit.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=98 Participants
Three 600 milligram (mg) gabapentin enacarbil (XP13512/GSK1838262), hereafter referred to as GEn, placebo tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg pregabalin (PGB) placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
GEn 1200 mg/Day
n=52 Participants
One 600 mg extended release (ER) GEn tablet and two 600 mg GEn placebo tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
GEn 2400 mg/Day
n=40 Participants
Two 600 mg ER GEn tablets and one 600 mg GEn placebo tablet taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
GEn 3600 mg/Day
n=89 Participants
Three 600 mg ER GEn tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
PGB 300 mg/Day
n=54 Participants
Three 600 mg GEn placebo tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Are Responders on the Clinician Global Impression of Change (CGIC) Questionnaire at EOMT Using LOCF Data
|
39 participants
|
20 participants
|
22 participants
|
50 participants
|
17 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)Population: ITT Population
Baseline and EOMT scores are the calculated means of the 24-hour average pain scores for each participant during the last 7 days prior to randomization and EOMT, respectively. Percent reduction from baseline was calculated as the \[(EOMT score minus the baseline score)divided by the baseline score\], multiplied by 100. The PI-NRS is an 11-point scale (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine) by which a participant assesses their 24-hour average pain intensity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=120 Participants
Three 600 milligram (mg) gabapentin enacarbil (XP13512/GSK1838262), hereafter referred to as GEn, placebo tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg pregabalin (PGB) placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
GEn 1200 mg/Day
n=62 Participants
One 600 mg extended release (ER) GEn tablet and two 600 mg GEn placebo tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
GEn 2400 mg/Day
n=56 Participants
Two 600 mg ER GEn tablets and one 600 mg GEn placebo tablet taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
GEn 3600 mg/Day
n=116 Participants
Three 600 mg ER GEn tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
PGB 300 mg/Day
n=66 Participants
Three 600 mg GEn placebo tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Achieving Various Levels of Percent Reduction From Baseline in the Mean 24-hour Average Pain Intensity Score at EOMT Using LOCF Data
>= 30% reduction from baseline
|
57 participants
|
31 participants
|
25 participants
|
66 participants
|
28 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving Various Levels of Percent Reduction From Baseline in the Mean 24-hour Average Pain Intensity Score at EOMT Using LOCF Data
>= 60% reduction from baseline
|
26 participants
|
21 participants
|
11 participants
|
41 participants
|
9 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving Various Levels of Percent Reduction From Baseline in the Mean 24-hour Average Pain Intensity Score at EOMT Using LOCF Data
>= 70% reduction from baseline
|
15 participants
|
17 participants
|
6 participants
|
25 participants
|
5 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving Various Levels of Percent Reduction From Baseline in the Mean 24-hour Average Pain Intensity Score at EOMT Using LOCF Data
>= 90% reduction from baseline
|
4 participants
|
5 participants
|
2 participants
|
8 participants
|
3 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving Various Levels of Percent Reduction From Baseline in the Mean 24-hour Average Pain Intensity Score at EOMT Using LOCF Data
>= 0% reduction from baseline
|
103 participants
|
55 participants
|
50 participants
|
101 participants
|
55 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving Various Levels of Percent Reduction From Baseline in the Mean 24-hour Average Pain Intensity Score at EOMT Using LOCF Data
>= 10% reduction from baseline
|
86 participants
|
43 participants
|
42 participants
|
91 participants
|
42 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving Various Levels of Percent Reduction From Baseline in the Mean 24-hour Average Pain Intensity Score at EOMT Using LOCF Data
>= 20% reduction from baseline
|
73 participants
|
36 participants
|
34 participants
|
78 participants
|
36 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving Various Levels of Percent Reduction From Baseline in the Mean 24-hour Average Pain Intensity Score at EOMT Using LOCF Data
>= 40% reduction from baseline
|
46 participants
|
28 participants
|
19 participants
|
55 participants
|
20 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving Various Levels of Percent Reduction From Baseline in the Mean 24-hour Average Pain Intensity Score at EOMT Using LOCF Data
>= 50% reduction from baseline
|
35 participants
|
26 participants
|
15 participants
|
46 participants
|
14 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving Various Levels of Percent Reduction From Baseline in the Mean 24-hour Average Pain Intensity Score at EOMT Using LOCF Data
>= 80% reduction from baseline
|
11 participants
|
11 participants
|
5 participants
|
17 participants
|
4 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving Various Levels of Percent Reduction From Baseline in the Mean 24-hour Average Pain Intensity Score at EOMT Using LOCF Data
100% reduction from baseline
|
3 participants
|
4 participants
|
1 participants
|
5 participants
|
3 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Any time post-baseline until date of last dose of study medication (up to Week 13)Population: ITT Population
Sustained improvement in the 24-hour average pain intensity score is defined as at least 2 consecutive days on which the 24-hour average pain intensity score is \>=2 points less than the mean 24-hour average pain intensity score at baseline. Time to onset is measured from baseline and was calculated as first day of event minus last day of baseline and is expressed in days. Baseline score is the calculated mean of the 24-hour average pain score for each participant during the last 7 days prior to randomization.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=120 Participants
Three 600 milligram (mg) gabapentin enacarbil (XP13512/GSK1838262), hereafter referred to as GEn, placebo tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg pregabalin (PGB) placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
GEn 1200 mg/Day
n=62 Participants
One 600 mg extended release (ER) GEn tablet and two 600 mg GEn placebo tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
GEn 2400 mg/Day
n=56 Participants
Two 600 mg ER GEn tablets and one 600 mg GEn placebo tablet taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
GEn 3600 mg/Day
n=116 Participants
Three 600 mg ER GEn tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
PGB 300 mg/Day
n=66 Participants
Three 600 mg GEn placebo tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Time to Onset of Sustained Improvement in the 24-hour Average Pain Intensity Score
|
24 days
Interval 2.0 to 97.0
|
25 days
Interval 2.0 to 76.0
|
22 days
Interval 2.0 to 62.0
|
15 days
Interval 1.0 to 87.0
|
29 days
Interval 2.0 to 93.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and EOMTPopulation: ITT Population. Not all participants completed a BPI assessment at both Baseline and Week 13/Withdrawal; as such, the number analyzed is different from the full ITT Population counts.
The BPI, a general pain instrument, assesses the severity and interference of pain; and consists of 6 items assessed on an 11-point NRS (0=no impact and 10=greatest impact). 2 summary scores are calculated: BPI Severity Score (average of first 4 items) and BPI Interference Score (average of 7 responses to item 6); where each summary score ranges from 0 to 10 (0=no impact and 10=greatest impact). Analysis of this endpoint is based on the change from baseline (BL) (EOMT score minus the BL score) using an ANCOVA model with BL value, BMI, grouped center as covariates.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=112 Participants
Three 600 milligram (mg) gabapentin enacarbil (XP13512/GSK1838262), hereafter referred to as GEn, placebo tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg pregabalin (PGB) placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
GEn 1200 mg/Day
n=57 Participants
One 600 mg extended release (ER) GEn tablet and two 600 mg GEn placebo tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
GEn 2400 mg/Day
n=44 Participants
Two 600 mg ER GEn tablets and one 600 mg GEn placebo tablet taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
GEn 3600 mg/Day
n=107 Participants
Three 600 mg ER GEn tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
PGB 300 mg/Day
n=62 Participants
Three 600 mg GEn placebo tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Severity of Pain and the Impact of Pain as Assessed by the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) at EOMT Using LOCF Data
Brief Pain Inventory Severity of Pain
|
-2.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.21
|
-2.3 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.29
|
-2.4 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.33
|
-2.8 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.21
|
-1.7 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.28
|
|
Change From Baseline in Severity of Pain and the Impact of Pain as Assessed by the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) at EOMT Using LOCF Data
Brief Pain Inventory Interference of Pain
|
-2.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.21
|
-2.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.30
|
-2.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.34
|
-2.5 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.22
|
-1.9 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.29
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)Population: ITT Population. Not all participants completed an SF-36 at both Baseline and Week 13/Withdrawal; as such, the number analyzed is different from the full ITT Population counts.
The SF-36 is a general health-related quality of life instrument consisting of 36 items with various response options (Yes/No, 5- to 6-point Likert scale). Summary scores are calculated for 8 domains and 2 components (physical and mental); where scores range from 0 to 100 (higher scores = better quality of life). Analysis of this endpoint is based on the change from baseline (BL) (EOMT score minus the BL score) using an ANCOVA model with BL value, BMI, grouped center as covariates.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=112 Participants
Three 600 milligram (mg) gabapentin enacarbil (XP13512/GSK1838262), hereafter referred to as GEn, placebo tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg pregabalin (PGB) placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
GEn 1200 mg/Day
n=57 Participants
One 600 mg extended release (ER) GEn tablet and two 600 mg GEn placebo tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
GEn 2400 mg/Day
n=44 Participants
Two 600 mg ER GEn tablets and one 600 mg GEn placebo tablet taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
GEn 3600 mg/Day
n=107 Participants
Three 600 mg ER GEn tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
PGB 300 mg/Day
n=61 Participants
Three 600 mg GEn placebo tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Quality of Life as Assessed by the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) at EOMT Using LOCF Data
SF-36 Mental Component Summary Score
|
2.5 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.88
|
0.4 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.24
|
1.5 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.41
|
1.6 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.91
|
0.7 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.20
|
|
Change From Baseline in Quality of Life as Assessed by the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) at EOMT Using LOCF Data
SF-36 Physical Component Summary Score
|
3.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.67
|
3.5 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.93
|
3.7 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.06
|
4.6 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.69
|
3.7 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.90
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)Population: ITT Population. Not all participants completed a POMS-B at both Baseline and Week 13/Withdrawal; as such, the number analyzed is different from the full ITT Population counts.
The POMS-B, an emotional functioning instrument, assesses mood, tension, and other psychological symptoms and consists of 30-items assessed on a 5-point scale (0=not at all to 4=extremely). 6 summary scores are calculated: Tension/Anxiety, Depression/Rejection, Anger/Hostility, Vigor/Activity, Fatigue/Inertia, and Confusion/Bewilderment; and range from 0-20 (higher scores = more negative mood state). Analysis of this endpoint is based on the change from baseline (BL) (EOMT score minus the BL score) using an ANCOVA model with BL value, BMI, grouped center as covariates.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=112 Participants
Three 600 milligram (mg) gabapentin enacarbil (XP13512/GSK1838262), hereafter referred to as GEn, placebo tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg pregabalin (PGB) placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
GEn 1200 mg/Day
n=57 Participants
One 600 mg extended release (ER) GEn tablet and two 600 mg GEn placebo tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
GEn 2400 mg/Day
n=44 Participants
Two 600 mg ER GEn tablets and one 600 mg GEn placebo tablet taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
GEn 3600 mg/Day
n=107 Participants
Three 600 mg ER GEn tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
PGB 300 mg/Day
n=61 Participants
Three 600 mg GEn placebo tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Emotional Functioning as Assessed by the Profile of Mood States-Brief Form (POMS-B) at EOMT Using LOCF Data
Tension/Anxiety Domain Score
|
-1.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.29
|
-0.6 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.41
|
-0.7 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.47
|
-0.9 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.30
|
-0.3 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.40
|
|
Change From Baseline in Emotional Functioning as Assessed by the Profile of Mood States-Brief Form (POMS-B) at EOMT Using LOCF Data
Anger/Hostility Domain Score
|
-0.5 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.32
|
-0.8 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.45
|
-0.5 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.51
|
-0.3 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.33
|
-0.3 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.44
|
|
Change From Baseline in Emotional Functioning as Assessed by the Profile of Mood States-Brief Form (POMS-B) at EOMT Using LOCF Data
Vigor/Activity Domain Score
|
0.6 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.32
|
-0.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.45
|
0.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.51
|
0.7 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.33
|
-0.4 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.44
|
|
Change From Baseline in Emotional Functioning as Assessed by the Profile of Mood States-Brief Form (POMS-B) at EOMT Using LOCF Data
Fatigue/Inertia Domain Score
|
-0.8 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.37
|
-0.5 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.52
|
-1.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.59
|
-1.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.38
|
-0.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.50
|
|
Change From Baseline in Emotional Functioning as Assessed by the Profile of Mood States-Brief Form (POMS-B) at EOMT Using LOCF Data
Confusion/Bewilderment Domain Score
|
-0.3 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.21
|
0.2 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.29
|
-0.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.33
|
0.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.22
|
-0.2 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.28
|
|
Change From Baseline in Emotional Functioning as Assessed by the Profile of Mood States-Brief Form (POMS-B) at EOMT Using LOCF Data
Depression/Rejection Domain Score
|
-0.5 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.30
|
-0.2 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.43
|
-0.6 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.49
|
-0.3 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.32
|
0.4 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.41
|
Adverse Events
Placebo
GEn 1200 mg/Day
GEn 2400 mg/Day
GEn 3600 mg/Day
PGB 300 mg/Day
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo
n=120 participants at risk
Three 600 milligram (mg) gabapentin enacarbil (XP13512/GSK1838262), hereafter referred to as GEn, placebo tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg pregabalin (PGB) placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
GEn 1200 mg/Day
n=62 participants at risk
One 600 mg extended release (ER) GEn tablet and two 600 mg GEn placebo tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
GEn 2400 mg/Day
n=56 participants at risk
Two 600 mg ER GEn tablets and one 600 mg GEn placebo tablet taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
GEn 3600 mg/Day
n=116 participants at risk
Three 600 mg ER GEn tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
PGB 300 mg/Day
n=66 participants at risk
Three 600 mg GEn placebo tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperkalaemia
|
0.00%
0/120
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/62
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
1.8%
1/56
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/116
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/66
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoglycaemia
|
0.00%
0/120
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/62
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/56
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.86%
1/116
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/66
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
|
General disorders
Chest pain
|
0.83%
1/120
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/62
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/56
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/116
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/66
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
|
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
|
0.00%
0/120
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/62
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/56
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.86%
1/116
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/66
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
|
0.00%
0/120
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
1.6%
1/62
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/56
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/116
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/66
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Infected skin ulcer
|
0.00%
0/120
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
1.6%
1/62
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/56
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/116
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/66
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystitis
|
0.00%
0/120
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/62
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/56
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/116
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
1.5%
1/66
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Ankle fracture
|
0.00%
0/120
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/62
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
1.8%
1/56
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/116
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/66
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Rhabdomyolysis
|
0.00%
0/120
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/62
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/56
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.86%
1/116
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/66
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia
|
0.83%
1/120
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/62
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/56
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/116
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/66
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Affective disorder
|
0.00%
0/120
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/62
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/56
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/116
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
1.5%
1/66
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure
|
0.00%
0/120
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/62
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
1.8%
1/56
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/116
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/66
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Benign prostatic hyperplasia
|
0.00%
0/120
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
1.6%
1/62
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/56
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/116
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/66
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory failure
|
0.00%
0/120
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/62
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
1.8%
1/56
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/116
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/66
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin ulcer
|
0.00%
0/120
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
1.6%
1/62
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/56
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/116
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/66
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Angina pectoris
|
0.00%
0/120
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/62
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/56
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.86%
1/116
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/66
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery stenosis
|
0.00%
0/120
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/62
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/56
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.86%
1/116
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/66
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Sinus tachycardia
|
0.83%
1/120
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/62
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/56
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/116
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/66
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Supraventricular tachycardia
|
0.83%
1/120
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/62
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/56
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/116
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/66
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Ataxia
|
0.00%
0/120
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/62
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/56
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.86%
1/116
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/66
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
0.83%
1/120
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/62
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/56
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/116
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/66
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Partial seizures
|
0.00%
0/120
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/62
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
1.8%
1/56
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/116
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/66
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Syncope
|
0.83%
1/120
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/62
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/56
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/116
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/66
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Diabetic ketoacidosis
|
0.00%
0/120
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/62
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
1.8%
1/56
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/116
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/66
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo
n=120 participants at risk
Three 600 milligram (mg) gabapentin enacarbil (XP13512/GSK1838262), hereafter referred to as GEn, placebo tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg pregabalin (PGB) placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
GEn 1200 mg/Day
n=62 participants at risk
One 600 mg extended release (ER) GEn tablet and two 600 mg GEn placebo tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
GEn 2400 mg/Day
n=56 participants at risk
Two 600 mg ER GEn tablets and one 600 mg GEn placebo tablet taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
GEn 3600 mg/Day
n=116 participants at risk
Three 600 mg ER GEn tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB placebo capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
PGB 300 mg/Day
n=66 participants at risk
Three 600 mg GEn placebo tablets taken orally twice daily (morning and evening); one 100 mg PGB capsule taken orally three times daily (morning, midday, and evening).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
7.5%
9/120
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
4.8%
3/62
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
7.1%
4/56
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
3.4%
4/116
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
9.1%
6/66
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle spasms
|
3.3%
4/120
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
9.7%
6/62
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/56
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
9.5%
11/116
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
4.5%
3/66
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
5.0%
6/120
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
4.8%
3/62
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
3.6%
2/56
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
5.2%
6/116
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
7.6%
5/66
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
4.2%
5/120
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
4.8%
3/62
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
7.1%
4/56
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
5.2%
6/116
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
6.1%
4/66
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
5.0%
6/120
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
14.5%
9/62
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
14.3%
8/56
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
13.8%
16/116
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
13.6%
9/66
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Somnolence
|
4.2%
5/120
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
3.2%
2/62
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
12.5%
7/56
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
12.1%
14/116
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
13.6%
9/66
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
7.5%
9/120
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
11.3%
7/62
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
7.1%
4/56
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
6.0%
7/116
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
4.5%
3/66
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
|
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
|
4.2%
5/120
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
3.2%
2/62
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/56
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
8.6%
10/116
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
16.7%
11/66
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
3.3%
4/120
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
4.8%
3/62
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
7.1%
4/56
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
3.4%
4/116
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
9.1%
6/66
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
2.5%
3/120
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
4.8%
3/62
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
5.4%
3/56
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
4.3%
5/116
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
6.1%
4/66
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
4.2%
5/120
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
1.6%
1/62
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
3.6%
2/56
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
4.3%
5/116
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
4.5%
3/66
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
4.2%
5/120
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
1.6%
1/62
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
3.6%
2/56
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
3.4%
4/116
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
4.5%
3/66
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
1.7%
2/120
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
1.6%
1/62
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
7.1%
4/56
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
5.2%
6/116
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
3.0%
2/66
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
|
Eye disorders
Vision blurred
|
4.2%
5/120
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/62
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
5.4%
3/56
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
1.7%
2/116
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
4.5%
3/66
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
|
Investigations
Weight increased
|
0.83%
1/120
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/62
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
3.6%
2/56
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
4.3%
5/116
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
7.6%
5/66
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
2.5%
3/120
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
1.6%
1/62
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
1.8%
1/56
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
2.6%
3/116
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
4.5%
3/66
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Increased appetite
|
3.3%
4/120
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/62
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
5.4%
3/56
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.86%
1/116
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
4.5%
3/66
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dry mouth
|
3.3%
4/120
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/62
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
7.1%
4/56
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.86%
1/116
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
1.5%
1/66
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Disturbance in attention
|
1.7%
2/120
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
3.2%
2/62
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/56
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
1.7%
2/116
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
4.5%
3/66
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
2.5%
3/120
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
4.8%
3/62
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
1.8%
1/56
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
1.7%
2/116
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/66
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
0.83%
1/120
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
4.8%
3/62
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
1.8%
1/56
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.86%
1/116
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
1.5%
1/66
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Excoriation
|
0.00%
0/120
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
1.6%
1/62
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
1.8%
1/56
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.86%
1/116
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
4.5%
3/66
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Hypoaesthesia
|
0.83%
1/120
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
1.6%
1/62
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
1.8%
1/56
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/116
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
4.5%
3/66
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Paraesthesia
|
0.00%
0/120
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
3.2%
2/62
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
1.8%
1/56
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/116
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
4.5%
3/66
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fall
|
0.00%
0/120
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
4.8%
3/62
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
1.8%
1/56
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.86%
1/116
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/66
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured for all participants in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product.
|
Additional Information
XenoPort Call Center
XenoPort, Inc.
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee GSK agreements may vary with individual investigators, but will not prohibit any investigator from publishing. GSK supports the publication of results from all centers of a multi-center trial but requests that reports based on single-site data not precede the primary publication of the entire clinical trial.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER