Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study of Avastin (Bevacizumab) in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy in Children and Adolescents With Sarcoma. (NCT NCT00643565)
NCT ID: NCT00643565
Last Updated: 2019-10-22
Results Overview
EFS events included tumor progression (IRC assessed), no evidence of response after 3 cycles of induction (derived from IRC assessment), second primary cancer, or death due to any cause. Data for participants who had not experienced an event by the time of clinical cut-off were censored at the date of the last disease assessment prior to the clinical cut-off date. Data for participants who did not have any post-baseline disease assessments were censored at the time of randomization. Tumor progression was defined using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.0 (RECIST v1.0) as at least a 20% increase in the disease measurement, taking as reference the smallest disease measurement recorded since the start of treatment, or the appearance of one or more new lesions, or evidence of clinical progression and unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
154 participants
Screening up to approximately 6.75 years (assessed at screening, Cycles 4, 7 of induction phase, Cycles 1, 4, 7, 10 of maintenance, then every 3 months for 1.5 years and thereafter every 6 months for 2.5 years)
2019-10-22
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Chemotherapy
Participants received 9 cycles of induction chemotherapy (4 cycles of IVADo-containing chemotherapy followed by 5 cycles of IVA-containing chemotherapy administered every 3 weeks as per institutional practice. As per the investigator evaluation, participants had option to undergo local therapy (radiotherapy and /or surgery) during last 3 cycles of IVA (i.e. from Cycle 6 to Cycle 9). During maintenance treatment phase, participants received vinorelbine- and cyclophosphamide-containing chemotherapy (as per institutional practice) on Day 1 and 15 of 4-week cycles for a total of 12 cycles.
|
Bevacizumab + Chemotherapy
Participants received continuous IV infusion of bevacizumab (7.5 mg/kg every 3 weeks) on Day 1 of 3-week cycles followed by induction chemotherapy (4 cycles of IVADo-containing chemotherapy followed by 5 cycles of IVA-containing chemotherapy) as per institutional practice for a total of 9 cycles during induction treatment phase. As per the investigator decision, local therapy (radiotherapy and /or surgery) was expected to start after 4 weeks of the last bevacizumab administration in the induction phase and resumed to bevacizumab in the maintenance phase at least 4 weeks after the last dose of local therapy. During maintenance treatment phase, participants received IV infusion of bevacizumab (5 mg/kg every 2 weeks) followed by vinorelbine- and cyclophosphamide-containing chemotherapy (as per institutional practice) on Days 1 and 15 of 4-week cycles for a total of 12 cycles.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
80
|
74
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
7
|
7
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
73
|
67
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Chemotherapy
Participants received 9 cycles of induction chemotherapy (4 cycles of IVADo-containing chemotherapy followed by 5 cycles of IVA-containing chemotherapy administered every 3 weeks as per institutional practice. As per the investigator evaluation, participants had option to undergo local therapy (radiotherapy and /or surgery) during last 3 cycles of IVA (i.e. from Cycle 6 to Cycle 9). During maintenance treatment phase, participants received vinorelbine- and cyclophosphamide-containing chemotherapy (as per institutional practice) on Day 1 and 15 of 4-week cycles for a total of 12 cycles.
|
Bevacizumab + Chemotherapy
Participants received continuous IV infusion of bevacizumab (7.5 mg/kg every 3 weeks) on Day 1 of 3-week cycles followed by induction chemotherapy (4 cycles of IVADo-containing chemotherapy followed by 5 cycles of IVA-containing chemotherapy) as per institutional practice for a total of 9 cycles during induction treatment phase. As per the investigator decision, local therapy (radiotherapy and /or surgery) was expected to start after 4 weeks of the last bevacizumab administration in the induction phase and resumed to bevacizumab in the maintenance phase at least 4 weeks after the last dose of local therapy. During maintenance treatment phase, participants received IV infusion of bevacizumab (5 mg/kg every 2 weeks) followed by vinorelbine- and cyclophosphamide-containing chemotherapy (as per institutional practice) on Days 1 and 15 of 4-week cycles for a total of 12 cycles.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
12
|
11
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
4
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
0
|
6
|
|
Overall Study
Other
|
7
|
8
|
|
Overall Study
Refused Treatment / Did Not Cooperate
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Recurrence of Disease
|
2
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Progression of Disease
|
18
|
14
|
|
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
|
3
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Did Not Cooperate
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Administrative
|
22
|
16
|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
5
|
8
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Study of Avastin (Bevacizumab) in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy in Children and Adolescents With Sarcoma.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Chemotherapy
n=80 Participants
Participants received 9 cycles of induction chemotherapy (4 cycles of IVADo-containing chemotherapy followed by 5 cycles of IVA-containing chemotherapy administered every 3 weeks as per institutional practice. As per the investigator evaluation, participants had option to undergo local therapy (radiotherapy and /or surgery) during last 3 cycles of IVA (i.e. from Cycle 6 to Cycle 9). During maintenance treatment phase, participants received vinorelbine- and cyclophosphamide-containing chemotherapy (as per institutional practice) on Day 1 and 15 of 4-week cycles for a total of 12 cycles.
|
Bevacizumab + Chemotherapy
n=74 Participants
Participants received continuous IV infusion of bevacizumab (7.5 mg/kg every 3 weeks) on Day 1 of 3-week cycles followed by induction chemotherapy (4 cycles of IVADo-containing chemotherapy followed by 5 cycles of IVA-containing chemotherapy) as per institutional practice for a total of 9 cycles during induction treatment phase. As per the investigator decision, local therapy (radiotherapy and /or surgery) was expected to start after 4 weeks of the last bevacizumab administration in the induction phase and resumed to bevacizumab in the maintenance phase at least 4 weeks after the last dose of local therapy. During maintenance treatment phase, participants received IV infusion of bevacizumab (5 mg/kg every 2 weeks) followed by vinorelbine- and cyclophosphamide-containing chemotherapy (as per institutional practice) on Days 1 and 15 of 4-week cycles for a total of 12 cycles.
|
Total
n=154 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
10.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.8 • n=5 Participants
|
10.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.9 • n=7 Participants
|
10.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.9 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
40 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
29 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
69 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
40 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
45 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
85 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Screening up to approximately 6.75 years (assessed at screening, Cycles 4, 7 of induction phase, Cycles 1, 4, 7, 10 of maintenance, then every 3 months for 1.5 years and thereafter every 6 months for 2.5 years)Population: ITT population.
EFS events included tumor progression (IRC assessed), no evidence of response after 3 cycles of induction (derived from IRC assessment), second primary cancer, or death due to any cause. Data for participants who had not experienced an event by the time of clinical cut-off were censored at the date of the last disease assessment prior to the clinical cut-off date. Data for participants who did not have any post-baseline disease assessments were censored at the time of randomization. Tumor progression was defined using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.0 (RECIST v1.0) as at least a 20% increase in the disease measurement, taking as reference the smallest disease measurement recorded since the start of treatment, or the appearance of one or more new lesions, or evidence of clinical progression and unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Chemotherapy
n=80 Participants
Participants received 9 cycles of induction chemotherapy (4 cycles of IVADo-containing chemotherapy followed by 5 cycles of IVA-containing chemotherapy administered every 3 weeks as per institutional practice. As per the investigator evaluation, participants had option to undergo local therapy (radiotherapy and /or surgery) during last 3 cycles of IVA (i.e. from Cycle 6 to Cycle 9). During maintenance treatment phase, participants received vinorelbine- and cyclophosphamide-containing chemotherapy (as per institutional practice) on Day 1 and 15 of 4-week cycles for a total of 12 cycles.
|
Bevacizumab + Chemotherapy
n=74 Participants
Participants received continuous IV infusion of bevacizumab (7.5 mg/kg every 3 weeks) on Day 1 of 3-week cycles followed by induction chemotherapy (4 cycles of IVADo-containing chemotherapy followed by 5 cycles of IVA-containing chemotherapy) as per institutional practice for a total of 9 cycles during induction treatment phase. As per the investigator decision, local therapy (radiotherapy and /or surgery) was expected to start after 4 weeks of the last bevacizumab administration in the induction phase and resumed to bevacizumab in the maintenance phase at least 4 weeks after the last dose of local therapy. During maintenance treatment phase, participants received IV infusion of bevacizumab (5 mg/kg every 2 weeks) followed by vinorelbine- and cyclophosphamide-containing chemotherapy (as per institutional practice) on Days 1 and 15 of 4-week cycles for a total of 12 cycles.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Event-Free Survival (EFS) Events as Per Independent Review Committee (IRC) Assessment
|
52.5 percentage of participants
|
68.9 percentage of participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Screening up to approximately 6.75 years (assessed at screening, Cycles 4, 7 of induction phase, Cycles 1, 4, 7, 10 of maintenance, then every 3 months for 1.5 years and thereafter every 6 months for 2.5 years)Population: ITT population.
EFS was defined as the time between randomization and occurrence of EFS event. EFS events are described in Outcome Measure 1. Median EFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for median was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Chemotherapy
n=80 Participants
Participants received 9 cycles of induction chemotherapy (4 cycles of IVADo-containing chemotherapy followed by 5 cycles of IVA-containing chemotherapy administered every 3 weeks as per institutional practice. As per the investigator evaluation, participants had option to undergo local therapy (radiotherapy and /or surgery) during last 3 cycles of IVA (i.e. from Cycle 6 to Cycle 9). During maintenance treatment phase, participants received vinorelbine- and cyclophosphamide-containing chemotherapy (as per institutional practice) on Day 1 and 15 of 4-week cycles for a total of 12 cycles.
|
Bevacizumab + Chemotherapy
n=74 Participants
Participants received continuous IV infusion of bevacizumab (7.5 mg/kg every 3 weeks) on Day 1 of 3-week cycles followed by induction chemotherapy (4 cycles of IVADo-containing chemotherapy followed by 5 cycles of IVA-containing chemotherapy) as per institutional practice for a total of 9 cycles during induction treatment phase. As per the investigator decision, local therapy (radiotherapy and /or surgery) was expected to start after 4 weeks of the last bevacizumab administration in the induction phase and resumed to bevacizumab in the maintenance phase at least 4 weeks after the last dose of local therapy. During maintenance treatment phase, participants received IV infusion of bevacizumab (5 mg/kg every 2 weeks) followed by vinorelbine- and cyclophosphamide-containing chemotherapy (as per institutional practice) on Days 1 and 15 of 4-week cycles for a total of 12 cycles.
|
|---|---|---|
|
EFS Duration as Per IRC Assessment
|
14.85 months
Interval 10.84 to 35.88
|
20.63 months
Interval 15.15 to 24.87
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Screening up to approximately 6.75 yearsPopulation: ITT population.
Objective response prior to first local therapy (surgery and/or radiotherapy) was defined as complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) determined on two consecutive occasions \>/=4 weeks apart. Tumor response was assessed as per IRC using RECIST v1.0. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. If immunocytology was available, no disease was to be detected by that methodology. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the disease measurement, taking as reference the disease measurement done to confirm measurable disease at study entry.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Chemotherapy
n=80 Participants
Participants received 9 cycles of induction chemotherapy (4 cycles of IVADo-containing chemotherapy followed by 5 cycles of IVA-containing chemotherapy administered every 3 weeks as per institutional practice. As per the investigator evaluation, participants had option to undergo local therapy (radiotherapy and /or surgery) during last 3 cycles of IVA (i.e. from Cycle 6 to Cycle 9). During maintenance treatment phase, participants received vinorelbine- and cyclophosphamide-containing chemotherapy (as per institutional practice) on Day 1 and 15 of 4-week cycles for a total of 12 cycles.
|
Bevacizumab + Chemotherapy
n=74 Participants
Participants received continuous IV infusion of bevacizumab (7.5 mg/kg every 3 weeks) on Day 1 of 3-week cycles followed by induction chemotherapy (4 cycles of IVADo-containing chemotherapy followed by 5 cycles of IVA-containing chemotherapy) as per institutional practice for a total of 9 cycles during induction treatment phase. As per the investigator decision, local therapy (radiotherapy and /or surgery) was expected to start after 4 weeks of the last bevacizumab administration in the induction phase and resumed to bevacizumab in the maintenance phase at least 4 weeks after the last dose of local therapy. During maintenance treatment phase, participants received IV infusion of bevacizumab (5 mg/kg every 2 weeks) followed by vinorelbine- and cyclophosphamide-containing chemotherapy (as per institutional practice) on Days 1 and 15 of 4-week cycles for a total of 12 cycles.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response Prior to First Local Therapy Assessed by RECIST v1.0 Criteria
|
36.0 percentage of participants
Interval 25.23 to 47.91
|
54.0 percentage of participants
Interval 40.94 to 66.61
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Screening up to approximately 6.75 yearsPopulation: ITT population. Here number of participants analyzed = participants available for the analysis of this outcome measure.
EFS events was described in Outcome Measure 1 and Outcome Measure 3.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Chemotherapy
n=27 Participants
Participants received 9 cycles of induction chemotherapy (4 cycles of IVADo-containing chemotherapy followed by 5 cycles of IVA-containing chemotherapy administered every 3 weeks as per institutional practice. As per the investigator evaluation, participants had option to undergo local therapy (radiotherapy and /or surgery) during last 3 cycles of IVA (i.e. from Cycle 6 to Cycle 9). During maintenance treatment phase, participants received vinorelbine- and cyclophosphamide-containing chemotherapy (as per institutional practice) on Day 1 and 15 of 4-week cycles for a total of 12 cycles.
|
Bevacizumab + Chemotherapy
n=34 Participants
Participants received continuous IV infusion of bevacizumab (7.5 mg/kg every 3 weeks) on Day 1 of 3-week cycles followed by induction chemotherapy (4 cycles of IVADo-containing chemotherapy followed by 5 cycles of IVA-containing chemotherapy) as per institutional practice for a total of 9 cycles during induction treatment phase. As per the investigator decision, local therapy (radiotherapy and /or surgery) was expected to start after 4 weeks of the last bevacizumab administration in the induction phase and resumed to bevacizumab in the maintenance phase at least 4 weeks after the last dose of local therapy. During maintenance treatment phase, participants received IV infusion of bevacizumab (5 mg/kg every 2 weeks) followed by vinorelbine- and cyclophosphamide-containing chemotherapy (as per institutional practice) on Days 1 and 15 of 4-week cycles for a total of 12 cycles.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Experienced EFS Events Among Participants Who Had Objective Response
|
40.7 percentage of participants
|
76.5 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Screening up to approximately 6.75 yearsPopulation: ITT population. Here, number of participants analyzed = participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Duration of Response was defined as time between first objective response and the occurrence of an EFS event (described in Outcome Measure 1). Objective response was defined in Outcome Measure 3. Median duration of response was estimated using Kaplan-Meier estimates and 95% CI for median was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Chemotherapy
n=27 Participants
Participants received 9 cycles of induction chemotherapy (4 cycles of IVADo-containing chemotherapy followed by 5 cycles of IVA-containing chemotherapy administered every 3 weeks as per institutional practice. As per the investigator evaluation, participants had option to undergo local therapy (radiotherapy and /or surgery) during last 3 cycles of IVA (i.e. from Cycle 6 to Cycle 9). During maintenance treatment phase, participants received vinorelbine- and cyclophosphamide-containing chemotherapy (as per institutional practice) on Day 1 and 15 of 4-week cycles for a total of 12 cycles.
|
Bevacizumab + Chemotherapy
n=34 Participants
Participants received continuous IV infusion of bevacizumab (7.5 mg/kg every 3 weeks) on Day 1 of 3-week cycles followed by induction chemotherapy (4 cycles of IVADo-containing chemotherapy followed by 5 cycles of IVA-containing chemotherapy) as per institutional practice for a total of 9 cycles during induction treatment phase. As per the investigator decision, local therapy (radiotherapy and /or surgery) was expected to start after 4 weeks of the last bevacizumab administration in the induction phase and resumed to bevacizumab in the maintenance phase at least 4 weeks after the last dose of local therapy. During maintenance treatment phase, participants received IV infusion of bevacizumab (5 mg/kg every 2 weeks) followed by vinorelbine- and cyclophosphamide-containing chemotherapy (as per institutional practice) on Days 1 and 15 of 4-week cycles for a total of 12 cycles.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Duration of Response
|
NA months
Interval 10.18 to
Data was not estimable because of higher number (more than 50%) of censored participants in this arm group.
|
17.48 months
Interval 12.29 to 25.23
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Screening up to approximately 10.75 years (assessed at screening, Cycles 4, 7 of induction phase, Cycles 1, 4, 7, 10 of maintenance, then every 3 months for 1.5 years and thereafter every 6 months for 2.5 years.Population: ITT population.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Chemotherapy
n=80 Participants
Participants received 9 cycles of induction chemotherapy (4 cycles of IVADo-containing chemotherapy followed by 5 cycles of IVA-containing chemotherapy administered every 3 weeks as per institutional practice. As per the investigator evaluation, participants had option to undergo local therapy (radiotherapy and /or surgery) during last 3 cycles of IVA (i.e. from Cycle 6 to Cycle 9). During maintenance treatment phase, participants received vinorelbine- and cyclophosphamide-containing chemotherapy (as per institutional practice) on Day 1 and 15 of 4-week cycles for a total of 12 cycles.
|
Bevacizumab + Chemotherapy
n=74 Participants
Participants received continuous IV infusion of bevacizumab (7.5 mg/kg every 3 weeks) on Day 1 of 3-week cycles followed by induction chemotherapy (4 cycles of IVADo-containing chemotherapy followed by 5 cycles of IVA-containing chemotherapy) as per institutional practice for a total of 9 cycles during induction treatment phase. As per the investigator decision, local therapy (radiotherapy and /or surgery) was expected to start after 4 weeks of the last bevacizumab administration in the induction phase and resumed to bevacizumab in the maintenance phase at least 4 weeks after the last dose of local therapy. During maintenance treatment phase, participants received IV infusion of bevacizumab (5 mg/kg every 2 weeks) followed by vinorelbine- and cyclophosphamide-containing chemotherapy (as per institutional practice) on Days 1 and 15 of 4-week cycles for a total of 12 cycles.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Died
|
50 percentage of participants
|
51.4 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Screening up to approximately 10.75 years (assessed at screening, Cycles 4, 7 of induction phase, Cycles 1, 4, 7, 10 of maintenance, then every 3 months for 1.5 years and thereafter every 6 months for 2.5 years)Population: ITT population. Here number of participants analyzed = participants available for the analysis of this outcome measure.
Overall survival was defined as the time between randomization and death due to any cause. Participants without an event were censored at the last time they were known to be alive. Median overall survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier estimates and 95% CI for median was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Chemotherapy
n=80 Participants
Participants received 9 cycles of induction chemotherapy (4 cycles of IVADo-containing chemotherapy followed by 5 cycles of IVA-containing chemotherapy administered every 3 weeks as per institutional practice. As per the investigator evaluation, participants had option to undergo local therapy (radiotherapy and /or surgery) during last 3 cycles of IVA (i.e. from Cycle 6 to Cycle 9). During maintenance treatment phase, participants received vinorelbine- and cyclophosphamide-containing chemotherapy (as per institutional practice) on Day 1 and 15 of 4-week cycles for a total of 12 cycles.
|
Bevacizumab + Chemotherapy
n=74 Participants
Participants received continuous IV infusion of bevacizumab (7.5 mg/kg every 3 weeks) on Day 1 of 3-week cycles followed by induction chemotherapy (4 cycles of IVADo-containing chemotherapy followed by 5 cycles of IVA-containing chemotherapy) as per institutional practice for a total of 9 cycles during induction treatment phase. As per the investigator decision, local therapy (radiotherapy and /or surgery) was expected to start after 4 weeks of the last bevacizumab administration in the induction phase and resumed to bevacizumab in the maintenance phase at least 4 weeks after the last dose of local therapy. During maintenance treatment phase, participants received IV infusion of bevacizumab (5 mg/kg every 2 weeks) followed by vinorelbine- and cyclophosphamide-containing chemotherapy (as per institutional practice) on Days 1 and 15 of 4-week cycles for a total of 12 cycles.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Survival Duration
|
24.02 months
Interval 17.97 to
Upper limit of 95% CI was not estimable because of the high number (approximately 50%) of censored participants in this arm group
|
32.79 months
Interval 25.33 to
Upper limit of 95% CI was not estimable because of the high number (approximately 50%) of censored participants in this arm group
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre- and within 3 hours post-dose on Days 1, 8, and 15 of Cycle 1, Day 1 of Cycle 2-4 of induction phasePopulation: Pharmacokinetic (PK)-evaluable population included all randomized participants for whom at least one blood sample was taken for PK assessment following bevacizumab administration. Here, number of participants analyzed = participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
AUC is a measure of the serum concentration of the drug over time. It is used to characterize drug absorption. AUCss is expressed in milligrams times days per milliliter (mg\*day/mL).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Chemotherapy
n=70 Participants
Participants received 9 cycles of induction chemotherapy (4 cycles of IVADo-containing chemotherapy followed by 5 cycles of IVA-containing chemotherapy administered every 3 weeks as per institutional practice. As per the investigator evaluation, participants had option to undergo local therapy (radiotherapy and /or surgery) during last 3 cycles of IVA (i.e. from Cycle 6 to Cycle 9). During maintenance treatment phase, participants received vinorelbine- and cyclophosphamide-containing chemotherapy (as per institutional practice) on Day 1 and 15 of 4-week cycles for a total of 12 cycles.
|
Bevacizumab + Chemotherapy
Participants received continuous IV infusion of bevacizumab (7.5 mg/kg every 3 weeks) on Day 1 of 3-week cycles followed by induction chemotherapy (4 cycles of IVADo-containing chemotherapy followed by 5 cycles of IVA-containing chemotherapy) as per institutional practice for a total of 9 cycles during induction treatment phase. As per the investigator decision, local therapy (radiotherapy and /or surgery) was expected to start after 4 weeks of the last bevacizumab administration in the induction phase and resumed to bevacizumab in the maintenance phase at least 4 weeks after the last dose of local therapy. During maintenance treatment phase, participants received IV infusion of bevacizumab (5 mg/kg every 2 weeks) followed by vinorelbine- and cyclophosphamide-containing chemotherapy (as per institutional practice) on Days 1 and 15 of 4-week cycles for a total of 12 cycles.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Area Under the Curve at Steady State (AUCss) of Bevacizumab
|
1010 mg*day/mL
Standard Deviation 256
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre- and within 3 hours post-dose on Days 1, 8, and 15 of Cycle 1, Day 1 of Cycle 2-4 of induction phase (1 cycle = 3 weeks)Population: PK-evaluable population. Only participants who received bevacizumab were to be analyzed for PK assessment.
Volume of distribution is defined as the theoretical volume in which the total amount of drug would need to be uniformly distributed to produce the desired blood concentration of a drug. Steady state volume of distribution (Vss) is the apparent volume of distribution at steady-state.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Chemotherapy
n=70 Participants
Participants received 9 cycles of induction chemotherapy (4 cycles of IVADo-containing chemotherapy followed by 5 cycles of IVA-containing chemotherapy administered every 3 weeks as per institutional practice. As per the investigator evaluation, participants had option to undergo local therapy (radiotherapy and /or surgery) during last 3 cycles of IVA (i.e. from Cycle 6 to Cycle 9). During maintenance treatment phase, participants received vinorelbine- and cyclophosphamide-containing chemotherapy (as per institutional practice) on Day 1 and 15 of 4-week cycles for a total of 12 cycles.
|
Bevacizumab + Chemotherapy
Participants received continuous IV infusion of bevacizumab (7.5 mg/kg every 3 weeks) on Day 1 of 3-week cycles followed by induction chemotherapy (4 cycles of IVADo-containing chemotherapy followed by 5 cycles of IVA-containing chemotherapy) as per institutional practice for a total of 9 cycles during induction treatment phase. As per the investigator decision, local therapy (radiotherapy and /or surgery) was expected to start after 4 weeks of the last bevacizumab administration in the induction phase and resumed to bevacizumab in the maintenance phase at least 4 weeks after the last dose of local therapy. During maintenance treatment phase, participants received IV infusion of bevacizumab (5 mg/kg every 2 weeks) followed by vinorelbine- and cyclophosphamide-containing chemotherapy (as per institutional practice) on Days 1 and 15 of 4-week cycles for a total of 12 cycles.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Volume of Distribution of Bevacizumab
|
2070 mL
Standard Deviation 891
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre- and within 3 hours post-dose on Days 1, 8, and 15 of Cycle 1, Day 1 of Cycle 2-4 of induction phase (1 cycle = 3 weeks)Population: PK-evaluable population. Only participants who received bevacizumab were to be analyzed for PK assessment.
Half-life is the time measured for the plasma concentration to decrease by one half.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Chemotherapy
n=70 Participants
Participants received 9 cycles of induction chemotherapy (4 cycles of IVADo-containing chemotherapy followed by 5 cycles of IVA-containing chemotherapy administered every 3 weeks as per institutional practice. As per the investigator evaluation, participants had option to undergo local therapy (radiotherapy and /or surgery) during last 3 cycles of IVA (i.e. from Cycle 6 to Cycle 9). During maintenance treatment phase, participants received vinorelbine- and cyclophosphamide-containing chemotherapy (as per institutional practice) on Day 1 and 15 of 4-week cycles for a total of 12 cycles.
|
Bevacizumab + Chemotherapy
Participants received continuous IV infusion of bevacizumab (7.5 mg/kg every 3 weeks) on Day 1 of 3-week cycles followed by induction chemotherapy (4 cycles of IVADo-containing chemotherapy followed by 5 cycles of IVA-containing chemotherapy) as per institutional practice for a total of 9 cycles during induction treatment phase. As per the investigator decision, local therapy (radiotherapy and /or surgery) was expected to start after 4 weeks of the last bevacizumab administration in the induction phase and resumed to bevacizumab in the maintenance phase at least 4 weeks after the last dose of local therapy. During maintenance treatment phase, participants received IV infusion of bevacizumab (5 mg/kg every 2 weeks) followed by vinorelbine- and cyclophosphamide-containing chemotherapy (as per institutional practice) on Days 1 and 15 of 4-week cycles for a total of 12 cycles.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Half-Life of Bevacizumab
|
20.8 days
Standard Deviation 8.58
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre- and within 3 hours post-dose on Days 1, 8, and 15 of Cycle 1, Day 1 of Cycle 2-4 of induction phase (1 cycle = 3 weeks)Population: PK-evaluable population. Only participants who received bevacizumab were to be analyzed for PK assessment.
CL is a quantitative measure of the rate at which a drug substance is removed from the body. CL is expressed in milliliters per day (mL/day).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Chemotherapy
n=70 Participants
Participants received 9 cycles of induction chemotherapy (4 cycles of IVADo-containing chemotherapy followed by 5 cycles of IVA-containing chemotherapy administered every 3 weeks as per institutional practice. As per the investigator evaluation, participants had option to undergo local therapy (radiotherapy and /or surgery) during last 3 cycles of IVA (i.e. from Cycle 6 to Cycle 9). During maintenance treatment phase, participants received vinorelbine- and cyclophosphamide-containing chemotherapy (as per institutional practice) on Day 1 and 15 of 4-week cycles for a total of 12 cycles.
|
Bevacizumab + Chemotherapy
Participants received continuous IV infusion of bevacizumab (7.5 mg/kg every 3 weeks) on Day 1 of 3-week cycles followed by induction chemotherapy (4 cycles of IVADo-containing chemotherapy followed by 5 cycles of IVA-containing chemotherapy) as per institutional practice for a total of 9 cycles during induction treatment phase. As per the investigator decision, local therapy (radiotherapy and /or surgery) was expected to start after 4 weeks of the last bevacizumab administration in the induction phase and resumed to bevacizumab in the maintenance phase at least 4 weeks after the last dose of local therapy. During maintenance treatment phase, participants received IV infusion of bevacizumab (5 mg/kg every 2 weeks) followed by vinorelbine- and cyclophosphamide-containing chemotherapy (as per institutional practice) on Days 1 and 15 of 4-week cycles for a total of 12 cycles.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Clearance of Bevacizumab
|
167 mL/day
Standard Deviation 76.4
|
—
|
Adverse Events
Chemotherapy
Bevacizumab + Chemotherapy
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Chemotherapy
n=79 participants at risk
Participants received 9 cycles of induction chemotherapy (4 cycles of IVADo-containing chemotherapy followed by 5 cycles of IVA-containing chemotherapy administered every 3 weeks as per institutional practice. As per the investigator evaluation, participants had option to undergo local therapy (radiotherapy and /or surgery) during last 3 cycles of IVA (i.e. from Cycle 6 to Cycle 9). During maintenance treatment phase, participants received vinorelbine- and cyclophosphamide-containing chemotherapy (as per institutional practice) on Day 1 and 15 of 4-week cycles for a total of 12 cycles.
|
Bevacizumab + Chemotherapy
n=71 participants at risk
Participants received continuous IV infusion of bevacizumab (7.5 mg/kg every 3 weeks) on Day 1 of 3-week cycles followed by induction chemotherapy (4 cycles of IVADo-containing chemotherapy followed by 5 cycles of IVA-containing chemotherapy) as per institutional practice for a total of 9 cycles during induction treatment phase. As per the investigator decision, local therapy (radiotherapy and /or surgery) was expected to start after 4 weeks of the last bevacizumab administration in the induction phase and resumed to bevacizumab in the maintenance phase at least 4 weeks after the last dose of local therapy. During maintenance treatment phase, participants received IV infusion of bevacizumab (5 mg/kg every 2 weeks) followed by vinorelbine- and cyclophosphamide-containing chemotherapy (as per institutional practice) on Days 1 and 15 of 4-week cycles for a total of 12 cycles.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Metabolic acidosis
|
1.3%
1/79 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Tumour necrosis
|
0.00%
0/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebral haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Encephalopathy
|
2.5%
2/79 • Number of events 3 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Facial nerve disorder
|
1.3%
1/79 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Neuralgia
|
0.00%
0/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
2.8%
2/71 • Number of events 2 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Neuropathy peripheral
|
0.00%
0/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Neurotoxicity
|
0.00%
0/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Peripheral sensorimotor neuropathy
|
0.00%
0/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Presyncope
|
1.3%
1/79 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Seizure
|
2.5%
2/79 • Number of events 2 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
5.6%
4/71 • Number of events 4 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Spinal cord compression
|
1.3%
1/79 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Toxic encephalopathy
|
2.5%
2/79 • Number of events 2 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Vocal cord paresis
|
0.00%
0/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Acute kidney injury
|
2.5%
2/79 • Number of events 2 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Bladder necrosis
|
0.00%
0/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Dysuria
|
0.00%
0/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Haematuria
|
5.1%
4/79 • Number of events 5 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Proteinuria
|
0.00%
0/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal impairment
|
1.3%
1/79 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Urinary retention
|
1.3%
1/79 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Erectile dysfunction
|
0.00%
0/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Acute respiratory distress syndrome
|
1.3%
1/79 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Asthma
|
0.00%
0/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
0.00%
0/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
2.5%
2/79 • Number of events 2 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Epistaxis
|
1.3%
1/79 • Number of events 5 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Hypoventilation
|
0.00%
0/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Hypoxia
|
1.3%
1/79 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleural effusion
|
1.3%
1/79 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumothorax
|
1.3%
1/79 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
2.8%
2/71 • Number of events 2 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Erythema multiforme
|
0.00%
0/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash papular
|
1.3%
1/79 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin disorder
|
1.3%
1/79 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin exfoliation
|
0.00%
0/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Central venous catheter removal
|
0.00%
0/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
|
2.5%
2/79 • Number of events 2 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Jugular vein thrombosis
|
1.3%
1/79 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Microangiopathy
|
0.00%
0/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Venoocclusive disease
|
1.3%
1/79 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Vascular device infection
|
1.3%
1/79 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Product Issues
Device Malfunction
|
1.3%
1/79 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Product Issues
Device Dislocation
|
0.00%
0/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
3.8%
3/79 • Number of events 8 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
5.6%
4/71 • Number of events 7 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Febrile bone marrow aplasia
|
11.4%
9/79 • Number of events 24 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
26.8%
19/71 • Number of events 49 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Febrile neutropenia
|
59.5%
47/79 • Number of events 135 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
64.8%
46/71 • Number of events 120 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutropenia
|
3.8%
3/79 • Number of events 4 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
2.8%
2/71 • Number of events 4 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombocytopenia
|
1.3%
1/79 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial thrombosis
|
1.3%
1/79 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Bradycardia
|
1.3%
1/79 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure
|
0.00%
0/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiotoxicity
|
1.3%
1/79 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Left ventricular dysfunction
|
0.00%
0/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Ventricular arrhythmia
|
0.00%
0/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Congenital, familial and genetic disorders
Fanconi syndrome
|
1.3%
1/79 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Eye disorders
Eyelid oedema
|
0.00%
0/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
2.5%
2/79 • Number of events 2 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
2.8%
2/71 • Number of events 2 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Anal fissure
|
0.00%
0/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Anal inflammation
|
1.3%
1/79 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Colitis
|
0.00%
0/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
1.3%
1/79 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
2.8%
2/71 • Number of events 2 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
3.8%
3/79 • Number of events 3 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
5.6%
4/71 • Number of events 4 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal inflammation
|
2.5%
2/79 • Number of events 2 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal obstruction
|
1.3%
1/79 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Ileus
|
0.00%
0/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Ileus paralytic
|
3.8%
3/79 • Number of events 3 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Pancreatitis
|
1.3%
1/79 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Pancreatitis acute
|
1.3%
1/79 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Stomatitis
|
5.1%
4/79 • Number of events 5 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
4.2%
3/71 • Number of events 5 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
8.9%
7/79 • Number of events 8 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
11.3%
8/71 • Number of events 10 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
General disorders
Device related thrombosis
|
1.3%
1/79 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
General disorders
Face oedema
|
1.3%
1/79 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
General disorders
General physical health deterioration
|
1.3%
1/79 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
General disorders
Impaired healing
|
0.00%
0/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
General disorders
Mucosal inflammation
|
8.9%
7/79 • Number of events 14 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
14.1%
10/71 • Number of events 18 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
General disorders
Performance status decreased
|
0.00%
0/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
19.0%
15/79 • Number of events 26 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
19.7%
14/71 • Number of events 14 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Abdominal abscess
|
0.00%
0/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bacteriaemia
|
1.3%
1/79 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
2.8%
2/71 • Number of events 3 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bacterial sepsis
|
1.3%
1/79 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
0.00%
0/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
2.8%
2/71 • Number of events 2 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Candida sepsis
|
0.00%
0/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
|
1.3%
1/79 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Clostridium difficile colitis
|
0.00%
0/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cystitis
|
0.00%
0/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Device related infection
|
2.5%
2/79 • Number of events 2 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Escherichia bacteraemia
|
1.3%
1/79 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis bacterial
|
1.3%
1/79 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Herpes zoster
|
1.3%
1/79 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
4.2%
3/71 • Number of events 3 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Infection
|
6.3%
5/79 • Number of events 8 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
4.2%
3/71 • Number of events 6 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Localised infection
|
0.00%
0/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Neutropenic infection
|
3.8%
3/79 • Number of events 4 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
5.6%
4/71 • Number of events 7 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Oral candidiasis
|
0.00%
0/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
1.3%
1/79 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pseudomonas infection
|
0.00%
0/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pyelonephritis acute
|
0.00%
0/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Salmonellosis
|
0.00%
0/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sepsis
|
3.8%
3/79 • Number of events 4 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Skin infection
|
0.00%
0/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Soft tissue infection
|
0.00%
0/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Staphylococcal bacteraemia
|
1.3%
1/79 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Staphylococcal infection
|
1.3%
1/79 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Streptococcal bacteraemia
|
1.3%
1/79 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
1.3%
1/79 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
2.8%
2/71 • Number of events 2 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Varicella
|
0.00%
0/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
2.8%
2/71 • Number of events 2 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Vulvitis
|
0.00%
0/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Foot fracture
|
0.00%
0/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Lower limb fracture
|
1.3%
1/79 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Vascular procedure complication
|
1.3%
1/79 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Post procedural haematoma
|
0.00%
0/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Procedural pneumothorax
|
1.3%
1/79 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Recall phenomenon
|
1.3%
1/79 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Torus fracture
|
0.00%
0/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Tracheostomy malfunction
|
0.00%
0/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Vascular access complication
|
1.3%
1/79 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Wound dehiscence
|
0.00%
0/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Investigations
Candida test positive
|
0.00%
0/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Investigations
Haemoglobin decreased
|
1.3%
1/79 • Number of events 3 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Investigations
Neutrophil toxic granulation present
|
1.3%
1/79 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Investigations
Weight decreased
|
3.8%
3/79 • Number of events 3 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
7.0%
5/71 • Number of events 5 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased appetite
|
1.3%
1/79 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
5.6%
4/71 • Number of events 4 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Electrolyte imbalance
|
2.5%
2/79 • Number of events 2 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypercalcaemia
|
1.3%
1/79 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalaemia
|
2.5%
2/79 • Number of events 2 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyponatraemia
|
2.5%
2/79 • Number of events 2 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypophagia
|
1.3%
1/79 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
2.8%
2/71 • Number of events 2 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypophosphataemia
|
1.3%
1/79 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Malnutrition
|
1.3%
1/79 • Number of events 1 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
2.8%
2/71 • Number of events 2 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Chemotherapy
n=79 participants at risk
Participants received 9 cycles of induction chemotherapy (4 cycles of IVADo-containing chemotherapy followed by 5 cycles of IVA-containing chemotherapy administered every 3 weeks as per institutional practice. As per the investigator evaluation, participants had option to undergo local therapy (radiotherapy and /or surgery) during last 3 cycles of IVA (i.e. from Cycle 6 to Cycle 9). During maintenance treatment phase, participants received vinorelbine- and cyclophosphamide-containing chemotherapy (as per institutional practice) on Day 1 and 15 of 4-week cycles for a total of 12 cycles.
|
Bevacizumab + Chemotherapy
n=71 participants at risk
Participants received continuous IV infusion of bevacizumab (7.5 mg/kg every 3 weeks) on Day 1 of 3-week cycles followed by induction chemotherapy (4 cycles of IVADo-containing chemotherapy followed by 5 cycles of IVA-containing chemotherapy) as per institutional practice for a total of 9 cycles during induction treatment phase. As per the investigator decision, local therapy (radiotherapy and /or surgery) was expected to start after 4 weeks of the last bevacizumab administration in the induction phase and resumed to bevacizumab in the maintenance phase at least 4 weeks after the last dose of local therapy. During maintenance treatment phase, participants received IV infusion of bevacizumab (5 mg/kg every 2 weeks) followed by vinorelbine- and cyclophosphamide-containing chemotherapy (as per institutional practice) on Days 1 and 15 of 4-week cycles for a total of 12 cycles.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
63.3%
50/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
77.5%
55/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Febrile neutropenia
|
17.7%
14/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
16.9%
12/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukopenia
|
13.9%
11/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
18.3%
13/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutropenia
|
67.1%
53/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
78.9%
56/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombocytopenia
|
46.8%
37/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
43.7%
31/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Left ventricular dysfunction
|
5.1%
4/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
7.0%
5/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Tachycardia
|
5.1%
4/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
1.4%
1/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Ear pain
|
5.1%
4/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
7.0%
5/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
34.2%
27/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
43.7%
31/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
10.1%
8/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
11.3%
8/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Anal fissure
|
6.3%
5/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
18.3%
13/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Anal inflammation
|
5.1%
4/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
8.5%
6/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
50.6%
40/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
67.6%
48/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
34.2%
27/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
42.3%
30/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dyspepsia
|
6.3%
5/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
5.6%
4/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Mouth ulceration
|
5.1%
4/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
4.2%
3/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
53.2%
42/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
62.0%
44/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Oral pain
|
5.1%
4/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
2.8%
2/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Stomatitis
|
29.1%
23/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
21.1%
15/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
77.2%
61/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
90.1%
64/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
General disorders
Asthenia
|
12.7%
10/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
23.9%
17/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
General disorders
Chest pain
|
7.6%
6/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
5.6%
4/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
20.3%
16/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
25.4%
18/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
General disorders
Mucosal inflammation
|
48.1%
38/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
59.2%
42/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
General disorders
Pain
|
12.7%
10/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
7.0%
5/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
41.8%
33/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
38.0%
27/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatocellular injury
|
1.3%
1/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
5.6%
4/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Hypersensitivity
|
1.3%
1/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
5.6%
4/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Candida infection
|
6.3%
5/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Conjunctivitis
|
6.3%
5/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
9.9%
7/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Ear infection
|
3.8%
3/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
8.5%
6/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Herpes zoster
|
5.1%
4/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
4.2%
3/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Infection
|
3.8%
3/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
7.0%
5/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
6.3%
5/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
14.1%
10/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Oral candidiasis
|
8.9%
7/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
7.0%
5/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Paronychia
|
0.00%
0/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
7.0%
5/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pharyngitis
|
0.00%
0/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
5.6%
4/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Rhinitis
|
7.6%
6/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
16.9%
12/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
8.9%
7/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
12.7%
9/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
2.5%
2/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
11.3%
8/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Procedural pain
|
1.3%
1/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
9.9%
7/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Radiation skin injury
|
15.2%
12/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
11.3%
8/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
|
2.5%
2/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
8.5%
6/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Investigations
Gamma-glutamyltransferase increased
|
3.8%
3/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
5.6%
4/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Investigations
Haemoglobin decreased
|
16.5%
13/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
9.9%
7/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Investigations
Neutrophil count decreased
|
5.1%
4/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
4.2%
3/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Investigations
Platelet count decreased
|
6.3%
5/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
5.6%
4/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Investigations
Weight decreased
|
34.2%
27/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
31.0%
22/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Investigations
White blood cell count decreased
|
2.5%
2/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
5.6%
4/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased appetite
|
22.8%
18/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
29.6%
21/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalaemia
|
22.8%
18/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
11.3%
8/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypomagnesaemia
|
6.3%
5/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
2.8%
2/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyponatraemia
|
2.5%
2/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
5.6%
4/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypophosphataemia
|
5.1%
4/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
7.0%
5/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
10.1%
8/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
14.1%
10/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
7.6%
6/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
21.1%
15/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Bone pain
|
2.5%
2/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
5.6%
4/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
|
5.1%
4/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
8.5%
6/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
20.3%
16/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
28.2%
20/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in jaw
|
15.2%
12/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
7.0%
5/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
7.6%
6/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
9.9%
7/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
20.3%
16/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
45.1%
32/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Neuralgia
|
6.3%
5/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
2.8%
2/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Neuropathy peripheral
|
2.5%
2/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
12.7%
9/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Paraesthesia
|
3.8%
3/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
8.5%
6/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Peripheral sensory neuropathy
|
2.5%
2/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
7.0%
5/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Polyneuropathy
|
1.3%
1/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
5.6%
4/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
|
8.9%
7/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
12.7%
9/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
2.5%
2/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
7.0%
5/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Dysuria
|
3.8%
3/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
9.9%
7/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Haematuria
|
2.5%
2/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
11.3%
8/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Proteinuria
|
5.1%
4/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
5.6%
4/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
16.5%
13/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
26.8%
19/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Epistaxis
|
10.1%
8/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
32.4%
23/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
|
8.9%
7/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
12.7%
9/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Rhinorrhoea
|
7.6%
6/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
5.6%
4/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Alopecia
|
27.8%
22/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
23.9%
17/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dry skin
|
2.5%
2/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
7.0%
5/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Erythema
|
7.6%
6/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
16.9%
12/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
|
7.6%
6/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
14.1%
10/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
12.7%
10/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
7.0%
5/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
|
3.8%
3/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
5.6%
4/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Radiation Injury
|
1.3%
1/79 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
5.6%
4/71 • Screening up to approximately 10.75 years.
The safety-evaluable population included all randomized patients who received any dose of study treatment.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The Study being conducted under this Agreement is part of the Overall Study. Investigator is free to publish in reputable journals or to present at professional conferences the results of the Study, but only after the first publication or presentation that involves the Overall Study. The Sponsor may request that Confidential Information be deleted and/or the publication be postponed in order to protect the Sponsor's intellectual property rights.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER