Trial Outcomes & Findings for Safety and Efficacy Study of Autologous Fibroblasts in the Treatment of Severe Facial Acne Scarring (NCT NCT00642642)
NCT ID: NCT00642642
Last Updated: 2013-08-21
Results Overview
Subjects who improved by 1 point or more on the Evaluator Live Acne Scarring Assessment (ELASA), as assessed by the evaluating Investigator, are counted as responders. On the ELASA scale, a score of 0 (Clear) is best and a score of 4 (Severe) is worst.
COMPLETED
PHASE2/PHASE3
122 participants
Baseline (prior to first treatment) and four months after last treatment
2013-08-21
Participant Flow
Patients were recruited between 7 Nov 2007 and 6 March 2008
Patients were enrolled and biopsied for manufacture of study product. Patients for whom study product could not be manufactured were excluded from the Intent to Treat (ITT) population.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Autologous Fibroblasts and Placebo
Patients were treated with autologous fibroblasts on one cheek, and placebo on the opposite cheek
|
|---|---|
|
Biopsy & Product Manufacture
STARTED
|
122
|
|
Biopsy & Product Manufacture
COMPLETED
|
109
|
|
Biopsy & Product Manufacture
NOT COMPLETED
|
13
|
|
Treatment & Follow Up
STARTED
|
109
|
|
Treatment & Follow Up
COMPLETED
|
92
|
|
Treatment & Follow Up
NOT COMPLETED
|
17
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Autologous Fibroblasts and Placebo
Patients were treated with autologous fibroblasts on one cheek, and placebo on the opposite cheek
|
|---|---|
|
Treatment & Follow Up
Adverse Event
|
2
|
|
Treatment & Follow Up
Withdrawal by Subject
|
5
|
|
Treatment & Follow Up
Lost to Follow-up
|
10
|
Baseline Characteristics
Safety and Efficacy Study of Autologous Fibroblasts in the Treatment of Severe Facial Acne Scarring
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Autologous Fibroblasts and Placebo
n=109 Participants
Patients were treated with autologous fibroblasts on one cheek, and placebo on the opposite cheek
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
109 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Age Continuous
|
41.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.57 • n=93 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
62 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
47 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
27 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
82 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
1 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
5 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
8 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
78 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
17 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (prior to first treatment) and four months after last treatmentPopulation: Analysis population was the ITT population, defined as subjects for whom product could be produced and who were randomized to study treatment, whether or not all study treatments are actually received.
Subjects who improved by 1 point or more on the Evaluator Live Acne Scarring Assessment (ELASA), as assessed by the evaluating Investigator, are counted as responders. On the ELASA scale, a score of 0 (Clear) is best and a score of 4 (Severe) is worst.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Autologous Fibroblasts Cheeks
n=109 Participants
Cheeks treated with autologous fibroblasts (azficel-T)
|
Placebo Cheeks
n=109 Participants
Cheeks treated with placebo solution
|
|---|---|---|
|
Evaluator Live Acne Scarring Assessment Responders
|
64 Participants
|
46 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (prior to first treatment) and four months after last treatmentPopulation: Analysis was performed on the ITT population
Cheeks that improved by at least two points on the Subject Live Acne Scarring Assessment (SLASA) as scored by the subject were considered responders. On the SLASA scale, a score of -2 (Very Dissatisfied) was worst and a score of 2 (Very Satisfied) was best.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Autologous Fibroblasts Cheeks
n=109 Participants
Cheeks treated with autologous fibroblasts (azficel-T)
|
Placebo Cheeks
n=109 Participants
Cheeks treated with placebo solution
|
|---|---|---|
|
Subject Live Acne Scarring Assessment Responders
|
47 Cheeks
|
20 Cheeks
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (prior to first treatment) compared to one, two, and three months after last treatmentPopulation: Number of cheeks for analysis was the ITT population
Subjects who improved by 1 point or more on the Evaluator Live Acne Scarring Assessment (ELASA), as assessed by the evaluating Investigator, are counted as responders. On the ELASA scale, a score of 0 (Clear) is best and a score of 4 (Severe) is worst.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Autologous Fibroblasts Cheeks
n=109 Participants
Cheeks treated with autologous fibroblasts (azficel-T)
|
Placebo Cheeks
n=109 Participants
Cheeks treated with placebo solution
|
|---|---|---|
|
Evaluator Live Acne Scarring Assessment Responders
1 Month Post Treatment
|
54 Participants
|
32 Participants
|
|
Evaluator Live Acne Scarring Assessment Responders
2 Months Post Treatment
|
56 Participants
|
41 Participants
|
|
Evaluator Live Acne Scarring Assessment Responders
3 Months Post Treatment
|
57 Participants
|
47 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (prior to first treatment) compared to one, two, and three months after last treatmentPopulation: Analysis was performed on the ITT population
Cheeks that improved by at least two points on the Subject Live Acne Scarring Assessment (SLASA) as scored by the subject were considered responders. On the SLASA scale, a score of -2 (Very Dissatisfied) was worst and a score of 2 (Very Satisfied) was best.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Autologous Fibroblasts Cheeks
n=109 Participants
Cheeks treated with autologous fibroblasts (azficel-T)
|
Placebo Cheeks
n=109 Participants
Cheeks treated with placebo solution
|
|---|---|---|
|
Subject Live Acne Scarring Assessment Responders
1 Month Post Treatment
|
34 Cheeks
|
10 Cheeks
|
|
Subject Live Acne Scarring Assessment Responders
2 Months Post Treatment
|
41 Cheeks
|
15 Cheeks
|
|
Subject Live Acne Scarring Assessment Responders
3 Months Post Treatment
|
43 Cheeks
|
20 Cheeks
|
Adverse Events
Autologous Fibroblast Cheeks
Placebo Cheeks
Non-treatment Area Adverse Events
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Autologous Fibroblast Cheeks
n=122 participants at risk
Cheeks randomized to receive autologous fibroblast treatment
|
Placebo Cheeks
n=122 participants at risk
Cheeks randomized to receive placebo treatment
|
Non-treatment Area Adverse Events
n=122 participants at risk
Systemic adverse events and adverse events that occured outside of the study treatment area will be reported in this group
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Intentional overdose
|
0.00%
0/122 • Adverse events were collected from the time of patient biopsy through the final study visit, four months after final study treatment (five months after first study treatment).
|
0.00%
0/122 • Adverse events were collected from the time of patient biopsy through the final study visit, four months after final study treatment (five months after first study treatment).
|
0.82%
1/122 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from the time of patient biopsy through the final study visit, four months after final study treatment (five months after first study treatment).
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Autologous Fibroblast Cheeks
n=122 participants at risk
Cheeks randomized to receive autologous fibroblast treatment
|
Placebo Cheeks
n=122 participants at risk
Cheeks randomized to receive placebo treatment
|
Non-treatment Area Adverse Events
n=122 participants at risk
Systemic adverse events and adverse events that occured outside of the study treatment area will be reported in this group
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Erythema
|
9.0%
11/122 • Number of events 33 • Adverse events were collected from the time of patient biopsy through the final study visit, four months after final study treatment (five months after first study treatment).
|
8.2%
10/122 • Number of events 29 • Adverse events were collected from the time of patient biopsy through the final study visit, four months after final study treatment (five months after first study treatment).
|
0.82%
1/122 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from the time of patient biopsy through the final study visit, four months after final study treatment (five months after first study treatment).
|
|
General disorders
Swelling
|
8.2%
10/122 • Number of events 29 • Adverse events were collected from the time of patient biopsy through the final study visit, four months after final study treatment (five months after first study treatment).
|
8.2%
10/122 • Number of events 29 • Adverse events were collected from the time of patient biopsy through the final study visit, four months after final study treatment (five months after first study treatment).
|
0.82%
1/122 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from the time of patient biopsy through the final study visit, four months after final study treatment (five months after first study treatment).
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Publications or presentations by the Investigator or his associates, were required to be submitted to the sponsor for review and approval prior to publication or presentation in any form.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER