Carbidopa/Levodopa/Entacapone Versus Immediate Release (IR) Carbidopa/Levodopa on Non-motor Symptoms in Patients With Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease and Demonstrating Non-motor Symptoms of Wearing Off

NCT ID: NCT00642356

Last Updated: 2011-02-18

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

14 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-03-31

Study Completion Date

2009-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to test the effects of carbidopa/levodopa/entacapone compared to the effects of immediate-release carbidopa/levodopa on non-motor symptoms of end-of-dose wearing off in persons who have Parkinson's disease.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Parkinson's Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Carbidopa/levodopa/entacapone

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Carbidopa/levodopa/entacapone

Intervention Type DRUG

Carbidopa/levodopa/entacapone 25/100/200 mg tablets plus placebo immediate release carbidopa/levodopa capsules, administered orally for 8 weeks. Total daily dosage and frequency of dosing for each patient was determined by the investigator and stabilized upon entry into the study.

Immediate release carbidopa/levodopa

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Immediate release carbidopa/levodopa

Intervention Type DRUG

Immediate release carbidopa/levodopa 25/100 mg capsules plus placebo carbidopa/levodopa/entacapone tablets, administered orally for 8 weeks. The maximum daily dose is 800 mg. Total daily dosage and frequency of dosing for each patient was determined by the investigator.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Carbidopa/levodopa/entacapone

Carbidopa/levodopa/entacapone 25/100/200 mg tablets plus placebo immediate release carbidopa/levodopa capsules, administered orally for 8 weeks. Total daily dosage and frequency of dosing for each patient was determined by the investigator and stabilized upon entry into the study.

Intervention Type DRUG

Immediate release carbidopa/levodopa

Immediate release carbidopa/levodopa 25/100 mg capsules plus placebo carbidopa/levodopa/entacapone tablets, administered orally for 8 weeks. The maximum daily dose is 800 mg. Total daily dosage and frequency of dosing for each patient was determined by the investigator.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Stalevo®

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Be aged 30 to 85 years.
* Be male or female - female patients must be either not of childbearing potential (defined as post menopausal for at least one year or surgically incapable of bearing children), or must be practicing contraceptive methods as outlined in the protocol.
* Have a clinical diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's Disease, exhibiting at least 2 of 3 symptoms (rigidity, resting tremor, bradykinesia)
* Have non-motor symptoms of end of dose wearing off i.e., the presence of at least one non-motor symptom of Parkinson's Disease which improves with the next immediate release (IR) carbidopa/levodopa dose as determined by the Quantitative Wearing-Off Questionnaire 9 and investigator's assessment. At least one non-motor item has to show a severity of at least 2 points (of a maximum of 4) and show an improvement of at least 1 one hour after immediate release (IR) carbidopa/levodopa administration. Also there should not have been a deterioration of 1 point or more in another non-motor item.(all criteria must be fulfilled)
* Be taking a stable dose of immediate release (IR) carbidopa/levodopa for at least 21 days prior to randomization at an equivalent total daily dose of immediate release (IR) carbidopa/levodopa between 300 to 800 mg. Dosing should be either 3 to 6 times per day.

Exclusion Criteria

* Have a previous history of being non-responsive to entacapone or tolcapone treatment or having experienced a serious or severe adverse event(s) which resulted in the discontinuation of treatment from the previous use of entacapone or tolcapone; current treatment with entacapone or tolcapone or discontinued treatment with either therapy or discontinued less than 60 days before randomization;
* Have a history, signs, or symptoms suggesting a diagnosis of secondary or atypical parkinsonism;
* Have unstable Parkinson's Disease requiring frequent booster doses;
* Disabling dyskinesias, indicated by a score of greater than 1 on Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale question #32, or a score of greater than 1 on Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale question #33;
* Have a history or current diagnosis of psychotic features according to the investigator;
Minimum Eligible Age

30 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Novartis

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Novartis

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Xenoscience, Inc

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

South Coast Health Center

Aliso Viejo, California, United States

Site Status

University of California

Irvine, California, United States

Site Status

Coastal Neurological Medical Group, Inc

La Jolla, California, United States

Site Status

Georgetown University Hospital

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

Sunrise Clinical Research, Inc

Hollywood, Florida, United States

Site Status

Charlotte Neurological Services

Port Charlotte, Florida, United States

Site Status

Cotton O'Neil Clinic

Topeka, Kansas, United States

Site Status

University of Maryland School of Medicine

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Neurology, Inc

Columbia, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Dr. John's Mercy Medical Center

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Creighton U Medical Center, Dept of Neurology

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Parkinson's Disease & Movement Disorders

Commack, New York, United States

Site Status

Central New York Research Corporation

Syracuse, New York, United States

Site Status

Neurological Care of Central NY

Syracuse, New York, United States

Site Status

Duke University

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Neurology Associates

Monroeville, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

University of Pittsburg

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

University of Texas Southwestern

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

University of Texas Medical School

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Scott & White Hospital

Temple, Texas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CELC200AUS14

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.