Safety and Efficacy of 1550nm Fractional Laser Treatment for Acne Scars in Fitzpatrick Type IV-VI Skin
NCT ID: NCT00641420
Last Updated: 2022-03-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
15 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2007-09-30
2008-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Acne Scarring in Skin of Color: Laser vs Microneedling
NCT03395678
Comparison of 1550nm Fractional Laser Alone Versus in Combination With Microneedling for the Treatment of Acne Scars
NCT03901417
Comparison of 1,550-nm Laser and Fractional Radiofrequency Microneedle for the Treatment of Acne Scars in Ethnic Skin
NCT03380845
Laser Treatment of Acne Scars in Fitzpatrick Skin Types III-VI
NCT01221922
Fractional Resurfacing Device for Treatment of Acne Scarring
NCT00585286
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Objective: To determine the efficacy and safety of an erbium 1,550-nm fractional laser in the treatment of facial acne scars in Fitzpatrick skin types IV to VI.
Methods: We conducted a prospective, single-blind, randomized trial in patients with acne scars (n=15), skin type IV to VI, with a 1,550-nm erbium fractionated laser. Patients were divided into two groups; one was treated with 10 mJ and the other with 40 mJ. Five monthly laser sessions were performed. A patient questionnaire was distributed.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Fractional Laser 10mJ
Patients receive fractional laser resurfacing to 17% of the face five times one month apart at 10mJ.
Fractionated Laser Resurfacing
Fractional Laser 40mJ
Patients receive fractional laser resurfacing to 17% of the face five times one month apart at 40mJ.
Fractionated Laser Resurfacing
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Fractionated Laser Resurfacing
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients with clinical diagnosis of ice pick, rolling, or boxcar type ane scarring
* Patients able to follow instructions
* If patient has a history of cold sores (herpes labialis) they must be willing to take prophylactic valtrex
* Written informed consent from the patients (Appendix II)
Exclusion Criteria
* Pregnant or lactating women
* Personal history of keloids or hypertrophic scarring
* Active acne requiring topical or oral therapy
* Accutane or other oral retinoid in past year
* Patients with a known allergy to lidocaine
* Allergy to valacyclovir in a patient that needs prophylaxis
* Patients with an unstable or non controlled underlying medical problem
* Patients who are not able to follow instructions
* Patients who have participated in a study within the 3 months prior to study entry
* Patients who refuse to give written informed consent
* Patients with a history of a pigmentary abnormality
18 Years
59 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Henry Ford Health System
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
David M. Ozog
Senior Staff
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
David M Ozog, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Henry Ford Health System
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Henry Ford Health System
Detroit, Michigan, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HenryFord4447
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.