Trial Outcomes & Findings for Efficacy vs Placebo as Initial Combination Therapy With Pioglitazone (NCT NCT00641043)
NCT ID: NCT00641043
Last Updated: 2014-02-17
Results Overview
HbA1c is measured as a percentage. Thus, this change from baseline reflects the Week 24 HbA1c percent minus the baseline HbA1c percent. Means are treatment adjusted for baseline HbA1c and previous anti-diabetic medication.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
389 participants
Baseline and week 24
2014-02-17
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Placebo + Pioglitazone
Patients randomized to receive treatment with matching placebo (to Linagliptin 5 mg) and Pioglitazone 30 mg
|
Linagliptin + Pioglitazone
Patients randomized to receive treatment with Linagliptin 5 mg and Pioglitazone 30 mg
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
130
|
259
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
111
|
244
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
19
|
15
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Placebo + Pioglitazone
Patients randomized to receive treatment with matching placebo (to Linagliptin 5 mg) and Pioglitazone 30 mg
|
Linagliptin + Pioglitazone
Patients randomized to receive treatment with Linagliptin 5 mg and Pioglitazone 30 mg
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
6
|
4
|
|
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
|
2
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
3
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
4
|
4
|
|
Overall Study
Other incl. lack of efficacy
|
4
|
2
|
Baseline Characteristics
Efficacy vs Placebo as Initial Combination Therapy With Pioglitazone
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Placebo + Pioglitazone
n=130 Participants
Patients randomized to receive treatment with matching placebo (to Linagliptin 5 mg) and Pioglitazone 30 mg
|
Linagliptin + Pioglitazone
n=259 Participants
Patients randomized to receive treatment with Linagliptin 5 mg and Pioglitazone 30 mg
|
Total
n=389 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
57.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.1 • n=93 Participants
|
57.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.6 • n=4 Participants
|
57.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.8 • n=27 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
45 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
107 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
152 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
85 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
152 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
237 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Body mass index continuous
|
29.72 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.84 • n=93 Participants
|
28.68 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.82 • n=4 Participants
|
29.02 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.85 • n=27 Participants
|
|
Glycosylated haemoglobin A1 (HbA1c)
|
8.58 Percent
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.87 • n=93 Participants
|
8.60 Percent
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.79 • n=4 Participants
|
8.59 Percent
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.82 • n=27 Participants
|
|
Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)
|
190.3 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 43.8 • n=93 Participants
|
189.8 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 42.7 • n=4 Participants
|
189.9 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 43.0 • n=27 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and week 24Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all treated and randomised patients with a baseline and at least one on treatment HbA1c measurement available. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) was used as the imputation rule.
HbA1c is measured as a percentage. Thus, this change from baseline reflects the Week 24 HbA1c percent minus the baseline HbA1c percent. Means are treatment adjusted for baseline HbA1c and previous anti-diabetic medication.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo + Pioglitazone
n=128 Participants
Patients randomized to receive treatment with matching placebo (to Linagliptin 5 mg) and Pioglitazone 30 mg
|
Linagliptin + Pioglitazone
n=252 Participants
Patients randomized to receive treatment with Linagliptin 5 mg and Pioglitazone 30 mg
|
|---|---|---|
|
HbA1c Change From Baseline to Week 24
|
-0.56 Percent
Standard Error 0.09
|
-1.06 Percent
Standard Error 0.06
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and week 6Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all randomised and treated patients with a baseline and at least one on treatment HbA1c measurement available. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) was used as the imputation rule.
HbA1c is measured as a percentage. Thus, this change from baseline reflects the Week 6 HbA1c percent minus the baseline HbA1c percent. Means are treatment adjusted for baseline HbA1c and previous anti-diabetic medication.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo + Pioglitazone
n=128 Participants
Patients randomized to receive treatment with matching placebo (to Linagliptin 5 mg) and Pioglitazone 30 mg
|
Linagliptin + Pioglitazone
n=252 Participants
Patients randomized to receive treatment with Linagliptin 5 mg and Pioglitazone 30 mg
|
|---|---|---|
|
HbA1c Change From Baseline to Week 6
|
-0.03 Percent
Standard Error 0.06
|
-0.41 Percent
Standard Error 0.04
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and week 12Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all randomised and treated patients with a baseline and at least one on treatment HbA1c measurement available. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) was used as the imputation rule.
HbA1c is measured as a percentage. Thus, this change from baseline reflects the Week 12 HbA1c percent minus the baseline HbA1c percent. Means are treatment adjusted for baseline HbA1c and previous anti-diabetic medication.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo + Pioglitazone
n=128 Participants
Patients randomized to receive treatment with matching placebo (to Linagliptin 5 mg) and Pioglitazone 30 mg
|
Linagliptin + Pioglitazone
n=252 Participants
Patients randomized to receive treatment with Linagliptin 5 mg and Pioglitazone 30 mg
|
|---|---|---|
|
HbA1c Change From Baseline to Week 12
|
-0.35 Percent
Standard Error 0.07
|
-0.85 Percent
Standard Error 0.05
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and week 18Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all treated and randomised patients with a baseline and at least one on treatment HbA1c measurement available. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) was used as the imputation rule.
HbA1c is measured as a percentage. Thus, this change from baseline reflects the Week 18 HbA1c percent minus the baseline HbA1c percent. Means are treatment adjusted for baseline HbA1c and previous anti-diabetic medication.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo + Pioglitazone
n=128 Participants
Patients randomized to receive treatment with matching placebo (to Linagliptin 5 mg) and Pioglitazone 30 mg
|
Linagliptin + Pioglitazone
n=252 Participants
Patients randomized to receive treatment with Linagliptin 5 mg and Pioglitazone 30 mg
|
|---|---|---|
|
HbA1c Change From Baseline to Week 18
|
-0.55 Percent
Standard Error 0.08
|
-1.06 Percent
Standard Error 0.06
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and week 24Population: This population includes the FAS using the LOCF imputation, with the further restriction of patients with a baseline and post-baseline FPG value.
This change from baseline reflects the Week 24 FPG minus the baseline FPG. Means are treatment adjusted for baseline HbA1c, baseline FPG and previous anti-diabetic medication.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo + Pioglitazone
n=122 Participants
Patients randomized to receive treatment with matching placebo (to Linagliptin 5 mg) and Pioglitazone 30 mg
|
Linagliptin + Pioglitazone
n=243 Participants
Patients randomized to receive treatment with Linagliptin 5 mg and Pioglitazone 30 mg
|
|---|---|---|
|
FPG Change From Baseline to Week 24
|
-18.4 mg/dL
Standard Error 3.0
|
-32.6 mg/dL
Standard Error 2.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and week 6Population: This population includes the FAS using the LOCF imputation, with the further restriction of patients with a baseline and post-baseline FPG value.
This change from baseline reflects the Week 6 FPG minus the baseline FPG. Means are treatment adjusted for baseline HbA1c, baseline FPG and previous anti-diabetic medication.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo + Pioglitazone
n=122 Participants
Patients randomized to receive treatment with matching placebo (to Linagliptin 5 mg) and Pioglitazone 30 mg
|
Linagliptin + Pioglitazone
n=243 Participants
Patients randomized to receive treatment with Linagliptin 5 mg and Pioglitazone 30 mg
|
|---|---|---|
|
FPG Change From Baseline to Week 6
|
-17.0 mg/dL
Standard Error 2.5
|
-33.3 mg/dL
Standard Error 1.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and week 12Population: This population includes the FAS using the LOCF imputation, with the further restriction of patients with a baseline and post-baseline FPG value.
This change from baseline reflects the Week 12 FPG minus the baseline FPG. Means are treatment adjusted for baseline HbA1c, baseline FPG and previous anti-diabetic medication.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo + Pioglitazone
n=122 Participants
Patients randomized to receive treatment with matching placebo (to Linagliptin 5 mg) and Pioglitazone 30 mg
|
Linagliptin + Pioglitazone
n=243 Participants
Patients randomized to receive treatment with Linagliptin 5 mg and Pioglitazone 30 mg
|
|---|---|---|
|
FPG Change From Baseline to Week 12
|
-20.5 mg/dL
Standard Error 2.7
|
-33.8 mg/dL
Standard Error 2.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and week 18Population: This population includes the FAS using the LOCF imputation, with the further restriction of patients with a baseline and post-baseline FPG value.
This change from baseline reflects the Week 18 FPG minus the baseline FPG. Means are treatment adjusted for baseline HbA1c, baseline FPG and previous anti-diabetes medication.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo + Pioglitazone
n=122 Participants
Patients randomized to receive treatment with matching placebo (to Linagliptin 5 mg) and Pioglitazone 30 mg
|
Linagliptin + Pioglitazone
n=243 Participants
Patients randomized to receive treatment with Linagliptin 5 mg and Pioglitazone 30 mg
|
|---|---|---|
|
FPG Change From Baseline to Week 18
|
-19.3 mg/dL
Standard Error 2.9
|
-33.2 mg/dL
Standard Error 2.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24Population: This population includes the FAS with baseline HbA1c \>= 7.0%. Non-completers were considered as failure imputation (NCF).
The percentage of patients with an HbA1c value below 7% at week 24 was calculated for each treatment arm. If a patient did not have an HbA1c value at week 24 they were considered a failure, so HbA1c above 7%. Only patients with baseline HbA1c \>= 7%
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo + Pioglitazone
n=128 Participants
Patients randomized to receive treatment with matching placebo (to Linagliptin 5 mg) and Pioglitazone 30 mg
|
Linagliptin + Pioglitazone
n=252 Participants
Patients randomized to receive treatment with Linagliptin 5 mg and Pioglitazone 30 mg
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Patients With HbA1c <7.0% at Week 24
|
30.5 percentage of patients
0
|
42.9 percentage of patients
0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24Population: This population includes the Full Analysis Set (FAS). Non-completers were considered as failure imputation (NCF).
The percentage of patients with an HbA1c value below 7% at week 24 was calculated for each treatment arm. If a patient did not have an HbA1c value at week 24 they were considered a failure, so HbA1c above 7%.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo + Pioglitazone
n=128 Participants
Patients randomized to receive treatment with matching placebo (to Linagliptin 5 mg) and Pioglitazone 30 mg
|
Linagliptin + Pioglitazone
n=252 Participants
Patients randomized to receive treatment with Linagliptin 5 mg and Pioglitazone 30 mg
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Patients With HbA1c<7.0 at Week 24
|
30.5 percentage of patients
|
42.9 percentage of patients
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24Population: This population includes the FAS with baseline HbA1c \>= 6.5%. Non-completers were considered as failure imputation (NCF).
The percentage of patients with an HbA1c value below 6.5% at week 24 was calculated for each treatment arm. If a patient did not have an HbA1c value at week 24 they were considered a failure, so HbA1c above 6.5%. Only patients with baseline HbA1c \>= 6.5%
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo + Pioglitazone
n=128 Participants
Patients randomized to receive treatment with matching placebo (to Linagliptin 5 mg) and Pioglitazone 30 mg
|
Linagliptin + Pioglitazone
n=252 Participants
Patients randomized to receive treatment with Linagliptin 5 mg and Pioglitazone 30 mg
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Patients With HbA1c <6.5% at Week 24
|
14.1 percentage of patients
0
|
17.5 percentage of patients
0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and week 24Population: This population includes the Full Analysis Set (FAS). Non-completers were considered as failure imputation (NCF).
The percentage of patients with an HbA1c value below 6.5% at week 24 was calculated for each treatment arm. If a patient did not have an HbA1c value at week 24 they were considered a failure, so HbA1c above 6.5%
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo + Pioglitazone
n=128 Participants
Patients randomized to receive treatment with matching placebo (to Linagliptin 5 mg) and Pioglitazone 30 mg
|
Linagliptin + Pioglitazone
n=252 Participants
Patients randomized to receive treatment with Linagliptin 5 mg and Pioglitazone 30 mg
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Patients With HbA1c<6.5% at Week 24
|
14.1 percentage of patients
|
17.5 percentage of patients
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all patients with a baseline and at least one on treatment HbA1c measurement available. Non-completers were considered as failure imputation (NCF).
The percentage of patients with an HbA1c reduction from baseline greater than 0.5% at week 24 was calculated for each treatment arm. If a patient did not have an HbA1c value at week 24 they were considered a failure, so HbA1c reduction less than 0.5%.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo + Pioglitazone
n=128 Participants
Patients randomized to receive treatment with matching placebo (to Linagliptin 5 mg) and Pioglitazone 30 mg
|
Linagliptin + Pioglitazone
n=252 Participants
Patients randomized to receive treatment with Linagliptin 5 mg and Pioglitazone 30 mg
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Patients Who Have an HbA1c Lowering by 0.5% at Week 24
|
50.8 percentage of patients
0
|
75.0 percentage of patients
0
|
Adverse Events
Placebo + Pioglitazone
Linagliptin + Pioglitazone
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo + Pioglitazone
n=130 participants at risk
Patients randomized to receive treatment with matching placebo (to Linagliptin 5 mg) and Pioglitazone 30 mg
|
Linagliptin + Pioglitazone
n=259 participants at risk
Patients randomized to receive treatment with Linagliptin 5 mg and Pioglitazone 30 mg
|
|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Acute coronary syndrome
|
0.00%
0/130 • From day of first dose until 7 days after last dose, up to 202 days
|
0.39%
1/259 • From day of first dose until 7 days after last dose, up to 202 days
|
|
Eye disorders
Glaucoma
|
0.77%
1/130 • From day of first dose until 7 days after last dose, up to 202 days
|
0.00%
0/259 • From day of first dose until 7 days after last dose, up to 202 days
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
0.00%
0/130 • From day of first dose until 7 days after last dose, up to 202 days
|
0.39%
1/259 • From day of first dose until 7 days after last dose, up to 202 days
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Colonic polyp
|
0.00%
0/130 • From day of first dose until 7 days after last dose, up to 202 days
|
0.39%
1/259 • From day of first dose until 7 days after last dose, up to 202 days
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
0.00%
0/130 • From day of first dose until 7 days after last dose, up to 202 days
|
0.39%
1/259 • From day of first dose until 7 days after last dose, up to 202 days
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystitis acute
|
0.77%
1/130 • From day of first dose until 7 days after last dose, up to 202 days
|
0.00%
0/259 • From day of first dose until 7 days after last dose, up to 202 days
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholelithiasis
|
0.77%
1/130 • From day of first dose until 7 days after last dose, up to 202 days
|
0.39%
1/259 • From day of first dose until 7 days after last dose, up to 202 days
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Tendonitis
|
0.77%
1/130 • From day of first dose until 7 days after last dose, up to 202 days
|
0.00%
0/259 • From day of first dose until 7 days after last dose, up to 202 days
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Carotid artery stenosis
|
0.00%
0/130 • From day of first dose until 7 days after last dose, up to 202 days
|
0.39%
1/259 • From day of first dose until 7 days after last dose, up to 202 days
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Hypoaesthesia
|
0.00%
0/130 • From day of first dose until 7 days after last dose, up to 202 days
|
0.39%
1/259 • From day of first dose until 7 days after last dose, up to 202 days
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Meniscus removal
|
0.00%
0/130 • From day of first dose until 7 days after last dose, up to 202 days
|
0.39%
1/259 • From day of first dose until 7 days after last dose, up to 202 days
|
|
Vascular disorders
Varicose vein
|
0.00%
0/130 • From day of first dose until 7 days after last dose, up to 202 days
|
0.39%
1/259 • From day of first dose until 7 days after last dose, up to 202 days
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo + Pioglitazone
n=130 participants at risk
Patients randomized to receive treatment with matching placebo (to Linagliptin 5 mg) and Pioglitazone 30 mg
|
Linagliptin + Pioglitazone
n=259 participants at risk
Patients randomized to receive treatment with Linagliptin 5 mg and Pioglitazone 30 mg
|
|---|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
8.5%
11/130 • From day of first dose until 7 days after last dose, up to 202 days
|
9.3%
24/259 • From day of first dose until 7 days after last dose, up to 202 days
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
7.7%
10/130 • From day of first dose until 7 days after last dose, up to 202 days
|
3.5%
9/259 • From day of first dose until 7 days after last dose, up to 202 days
|
Additional Information
Boehringer Ingelheim Call Center
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Any publication of the result of this trial must be consistent with the Boehringer Ingelheim publication policy. The rights of the investigator and of the sponsor with regard to publication of the results of this trial are described in the investigator contract.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER