Combination Chemotherapy and Cetuximab as First-Line Therapy in Treating Patients With Advanced and/or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
NCT ID: NCT00640081
Last Updated: 2021-09-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
169 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2007-07-31
2015-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase II trial is studying giving combination chemotherapy together with intermittent cetuximab to see how well it works compared to combination chemotherapy given together with continuous cetuximab as first-line therapy in treating patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Combination Chemotherapy With or Without Cetuximab as First-Line Therapy in Treating Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
NCT00182715
Cetuximab and Bevacizumab as First-Line Therapy Followed By Combination Chemotherapy and Bevacizumab With or Without Cetuximab as Second-Line Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage IV Colorectal Cancer
NCT00571740
Cetuximab and Combination Chemotherapy as First-Line Therapy in Treating Patients With Colorectal Cancer That Has Spread to the Liver and/or Lung
NCT00557102
Pertuzumab and Cetuximab in Treating Patients With Previously Treated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
NCT00551421
Cetuximab and Capecitabine in Treating Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer That Failed Irinotecan Treatment
NCT00538291
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Primary
* To compare the activity, in terms of failure-free survival, of patients with K-ras-normal (wild type) advanced and/or metastatic colorectal cancer treated with intermittent combination chemotherapy comprising oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, and fluorouracil (OxMdG) or oxaliplatin and capecitabine (XELOX) and intermittent vs continuous cetuximab as first-line therapy.
* To compare the safety and feasibility of these regimens in these patients.
Secondary
* To compare the safety of cetuximab reintroduction, in terms of frequency of grade 3-4 allergic reactions in these patients.
* To compare improvement in disease control (i.e., complete response plus partial response plus stable disease) at 24 weeks in patients treated with these regimens.
* To compare overall and progression-free survival of patients treated with these regimens.
* To compare response rates at 12, 24, and 36 weeks in patients treated with these regimens.
* To compare toxicity of these regimens in these patients.
OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are randomised to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
* Arm I (intermittent chemotherapy and intermittent cetuximab): Patients receive 1 of the following combination chemotherapy and cetuximab regimens:
* OxMdG: Patients receive oxaliplatin IV over 2 hours and leucovorin calcium IV over 2 hours on day 1 and fluorouracil IV continuously over 46 hours on days 1 and 2. Patients also receive cetuximab IV over 1-2 hours on days 1 and 8. Treatment repeats every 14 days for up to 6 courses (12 weeks) in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
* XELOX (for patients with line-related problems): Patients receive oxaliplatin IV over 2 hours on day 1 and oral capecitabine twice daily on days 1-15 (28 doses). Patients also receive cetuximab IV over 1-2 hours on days 1, 8, and 15. Treatment repeats every 21 days for up to 4 courses (12 weeks) in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
After completion of 12 weeks of study therapy, patients with disease progression are removed from study. Patients with stable or responding disease stop treatment with OxMdG or XELOX and cetuximab and undergo clinical evaluation at least every 6 weeks until disease progression or clinical deterioration. Upon evidence of disease progression or clinical deterioration, patients restart treatment with OxMdG or XELOX and cetuximab as before and continue to alternate 12 weeks of treatment with treatment breaks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients with disease progression during study therapy stop treatment and proceed to second-line therapy or best supportive care.
* Arm II (intermittent chemotherapy and continuous cetuximab): Patients receive OxMdG or XELOX and cetuximab for 12 weeks as in arm I. Patients with disease progression after 12 weeks of study therapy are removed from study. Patients with stable or responding disease\* after 12 weeks of study therapy stop treatment with OxMdG or XELOX and continue treatment with cetuximab weekly as monotherapy in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients undergo clinical evaluation as in arm I. Upon progression, patients restart treatment with OxMdG or XELOX and continue cetuximab, as before, alternating 12 weeks of combined OxMdG or XELOX and cetuximab therapy with cetuximab monotherapy. Patients with disease progression during study therapy stop treatment and proceed to second-line therapy as in arm I.
Previously collected tumor tissue samples are obtained at baseline and analyzed by IHC for EGFR status of tumor.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed every 12 weeks.
Peer Reviewed and Funded or Endorsed by Cancer Research UK.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
D
Intermittent chemotherapy plus intermittent cetuximab treatment comprising 12 weeks of chemotherapy plus cetuximab followed by a period off all therapy, with reintroduction of the same chemotherapy and cetuximab regimen for a further 12 weeks after initial progression off treatment
cetuximab
capecitabine
fluorouracil
leucovorin calcium
oxaliplatin
immunohistochemistry staining method
laboratory biomarker analysis
E
Intermittent chemotherapy plus continuous cetuximab treatment comprising 12 weeks of chemotherapy plus cetuximab followed by a period of withdrawal of the chemotherapy, but continued weekly cetuximab monotherapy (maintenance cetuximab), with reintroduction of the same chemotherapy regimen to the cetuximab for a further 12 weeks after initial progression off chemotherapy treatment
cetuximab
capecitabine
fluorouracil
leucovorin calcium
oxaliplatin
immunohistochemistry staining method
laboratory biomarker analysis
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
cetuximab
capecitabine
fluorouracil
leucovorin calcium
oxaliplatin
immunohistochemistry staining method
laboratory biomarker analysis
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Diagnosis of colorectal adenocarcinoma, defined by 1 of the following:
* Prior or current histologically confirmed primary adenocarcinoma of colon or rectum with clinical or radiological evidence of advanced and/or metastatic disease
* Histologically and cytologically confirmed metastatic adenocarcinoma with clinical and/or radiological evidence of colorectal primary tumor
* Unidimensionally measurable disease by RECIST criteria
* Inoperable metastatic or locoregional disease
* Potentially resectable liver metastases allowed provided the following criteria are met:
* Fewer than 4 unilobar liver metastases, each \< 4 cm in size and without major vascular involvement
* No combination chemotherapy allowed prior to the planned resection of operable liver metastases
* No confirmed K-ras mutation of tumor after screening
* No brain metastases
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
* WHO performance status 0-2
* Must be considered fit to undergo combination chemotherapy
* ANC ≥ 1,500/mm³
* Platelet count ≥ 100,000/mm³
* Serum bilirubin ≤ 1.25 times upper limit of normal (ULN)
* Alkaline phosphatase ≤ 5 times ULN
* AST or ALT ≤ 2.5 times ULN
* Creatinine clearance ≥ 50mL/min OR glomerular filtration rate ≥ 50 mL/min
* Not pregnant or nursing
* Negative pregnancy test
* Fertile patients must use effective contraception
* No severe uncontrolled concurrent medical illness (including poorly controlled angina or myocardial infarction within the past 12 weeks) likely to interfere with protocol treatments
* No psychiatric or neurological condition that would preclude study compliance with oral medication or giving informed consent
* No partial or complete bowel obstruction
* No preexisting neuropathy \> grade 1
* No prior or current malignant disease which, in the judgement of the treating investigator, is likely to interfere with COIN-B treatment or assessment of response
* No patients with known hypersensitivity reactions to any of the components of the study treatments
* No proven dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency (DPD) or personal or family history of DPD
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
* See Disease Characteristics
* No prior systemic palliative chemotherapy for metastatic disease
* No prior oxaliplatin
* More than 1 month since prior adjuvant chemotherapy comprising fluorouracil (with or without leucovorin calcium), capecitabine, or irinotecan hydrochloride
* More than 1 month since prior chemoradiotherapy comprising fluorouracil (with or without leucovorin calcium) or capecitabine for rectal cancer
* No ongoing requirement for contraindicated concurrent medication
* No concurrent enrollment in any type of study other than observational studies
18 Years
100 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cheryl Pugh
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Cheryl Pugh
Clinical Project manager for COINB for Sponsor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Harpreet S. Wasan
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hammersmith Hospitals NHS Trust
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Bank of Cyprus Oncology Centre
Nicosia, , Cyprus
Bradford Royal Infirmary
Bradford, England, United Kingdom
Gloucestershire Oncology Centre at Cheltenham General Hospital
Cheltenham, England, United Kingdom
Essex County Hospital
Colchester, England, United Kingdom
Dorset County Hospital
Dorchester, England, United Kingdom
St. Luke's Cancer Centre at Royal Surrey County Hospital
Guildford, England, United Kingdom
Hammersmith Hospital
London, England, United Kingdom
St. Mary's Hospital
London, England, United Kingdom
Churchill Hospital
Oxford, England, United Kingdom
Peterborough Hospitals Trust
Peterborough, England, United Kingdom
University Hospital of North Staffordshire
Stoke-on-Trent, England, United Kingdom
Singleton Hospital
Swansea, Wales, United Kingdom
Royal United Hospital
Bath, , United Kingdom
Royal Bournemouth Hospital
Bournemouth, , United Kingdom
Addenbrookes Hospital
Cambridge, , United Kingdom
Darent Valley Hospital
Dartford, , United Kingdom
Hereford County Hospital
Hereford, , United Kingdom
Charing Cross Hospital
London, , United Kingdom
Guys and St Thomas' hospitals
London, , United Kingdom
Dorset Cancer Centre, Poole Hospital
Poole, , United Kingdom
Weston Park
Sheffield, , United Kingdom
Southport and Ormskirk
Southport, , United Kingdom
St Helens and Whiston hospitals
St Helens, , United Kingdom
Warrington and Halton Hospitals
Warrington, , United Kingdom
Worcestershire Royal Hospital
Worcester, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Study Documents
Access uploaded study-related documents such as protocols, statistical analysis plans, or lay summaries.
Document Type: Clinical Study Report
View DocumentRelated Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Trial Summary on Sponsor's Website with trial citations
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MRC-CTU-COIN-B/CR11
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
EUDRACT:2006-003049-17
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
ISRCTN38375681
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
EU-20828
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
MERCK-MRC-CTU-COIN-B/CR11
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
CDR0000589635
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.