Evaluation of MRI and SPECT Fusion Software to Localize Parathyroid Adenomas
NCT ID: NCT00639405
Last Updated: 2011-04-27
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
12 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2005-09-30
2008-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
FArial NErf MRI in the Preoperative Assessment of PArotide Tumors
NCT04613349
Using X-Ray Dye to Locate Hidden Parathyroid Tumors
NCT00001394
Feasibility of Using Real-time Cine-MRI for Treating Moving & Deforming Tumors
NCT01071434
Prediction of Sphenoid Septation in MRI Compared With CT and Intraoperative Findings During Endoscopic Pituitary Adenoma Surgery
NCT03624114
Endocrine Outcome of Surgery for Pituitary Adenoma
NCT03515603
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Several modalities have been employed for localization such as ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The sensitivity of ultrasound for the preoperative detection of parathyroid adenomas has been reported to be 65-90% (1). There are however, limitations to US. Because of the sonolucent appearance of parathyroid adenomas, it is impossible to distinguish an ectopic cervical parathyroid adenoma from a pathologic lymph node. Furthermore, mediastinal parathyroid adenomas are difficult, if not impossible to visualize due to acoustic shadowing from the sternum and clavicles (2). Also, this method is very operator-dependent. MRI has a slightly higher sensitivity of 62.5-94% while CT has a poor sensitivity of only 40-44% (1).
We are using dual-phase single photon emission tomography (SPECT) imaging with technetium 99m sestamibi and visual thyroid subtraction with technetium 99m as pertechnetate. This method can achieve sensitivities of 68-95% and specificities of 75-100% (1). SPECT imaging is dependent on the differential washout of sestamibi between normal thyroid tissue and abnormal parathyroid tissue. Theoretically, sestamibi will washout of normal thyroid tissue much more quickly than it will from abnormal parathyroid tissue. Therefore, SPECT imaging is usually performed immediately and then at 90 and 180 minutes after sestamibi injection. SPECT imaging, however, has several limitations, not the least of which is its inability to provide discrete anatomic detail.
In addition, we will use a control group of patients who have parathyroid adenomas but who have not yet had surgery to test the efficacy of our fusion software.
Our goal is to acquire MRI and SPECT imaging with fiducial markers and utilize fusion software to create a detailed anatomic map of the neck for more accurate localization of the lesion.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1
subjects who are diagnosed with parathyroid adenomas. There will be 6 subjects who have not had surgery and 25 subjects who have had surgery.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* subjects who have had a failed parathyroidectomy and now presents with persistent hyperparathyroidism or recurrent hyperparathyroidism
* 6 control patients with parathyroid adenomas who have not yet had surgery will be selected to test the efficacy of the software.
Exclusion Criteria
* Any potential subject who has an implanted metallic device, stent or staples
* any subject weighing 300lb
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
State University of New York - Upstate Medical University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
SUNY Upstate Medical University
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Michele Lisi, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
State University of New York - Upstate Medical University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
SUNY Upstate Medical University
Syracuse, New York, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SUNYUMU 5260
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.