Trial to Evaluate Genomic Expression Profiles to Direct Preoperative Chemotherapy in Early Stage Breast Cancer
NCT ID: NCT00636441
Last Updated: 2015-12-11
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE2
56 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2008-04-30
2013-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Secondary objectives included: to determine the 60% cutoff for the genomic profiles resulted in a larger pathologic CR rate for the guided arm than for the unguided arm; to compare the pathologic CR rates of patients whose genomic predictive probabilities indicated that they were resistant to both chemotherapy regimens with the pathologic CR rates of patients whose genomic predictive probabilities indicated that they were sensitive to only one treatment and who were then randomly assigned to a treatment for which they were resistant (combining AC and TC subgroups); Secondary Objective 3 in patients with T2 and T3 tumors classified as requiring mastectomy at baseline, compare the guided and non-guided treatment arms on rates of breast conserving surgery with negative final margins; Secondary Objective in patients with T2 tumors classified as potential candidates for breast conservation, compare the guided and non-guided arms on rates of breast conserving surgery at first attempt; Secondary Objectives 5, 6, 7 and 8 to correlate genomic profiles (i.e., genomic predictive probabilities) with clinical response, disease-free survival, sites of recurrence, and overall survival; Secondary Objective 9:to compare the mean cost of guided versus non-guided treatment; and Secondary Objective 10 to assess patient perceptions of participating in a clinical trial that evaluated cancer genomics for preoperative systemic therapy of early-stage breast cancer.
Objective 10 details: Due to space limitations in the Outcome Measure Description field, details are supplied here:
To assess patient motivation and participation for study participation in a clinical trial evaluating cancer genomics for treatment patients provided responses for the following questions at both baseline (the day of chemotherapy start) and following post-surgical medical oncology evaluation:
One of the goals of this study is to tailor your cancer treatments for you based upon a genomic analysis of your tumor. How much did the knowledge that the treatment is potentially tailored specifically for your tumor influence your decision to participate in this study? (Select One)
Response 1: I did not know that the treatment was tailored.
Response 2: I do not understand what "tailored treatment based upon genomic analysis of "my tumor" means.
Response 3: The information that this was a tailored treatment based upon genomic analysis of my tumor decreased my willingness to participate in this study.
Response 4: The information that this was a tailored treatment based upon genomic analysis of my tumor was of neutral value in the decision making process to participate in this study and did not influence my decision to participate.
Response 5: The information that this was a tailored treatment based upon genomic analysis of my tumor played a minor role in helping me decide to participate in the study.
Response 6: The information that this was a tailored treatment based upon genomic analysis of my tumor played a major role in helping me decide to participate in the study.
Response 7: The information that this was a tailored treatment based upon genomic analysis of my tumor was the primary reason that I decided to participate in the study.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Guided Arm
Genomically-guided treatment allocation.
This arm has the following cohorts:
* AC sensitive patients \[\>60% probability of response to AC\]
* TC sensitive patients \[\>60% probability of response to TC\]
* Patients sensitive to neither AC nor TC; randomized to AC or TC
Doxorubicin/Cyclophosphamide (AC) or Docetaxel/Cyclophosphamide (TC)
Doxorubicin 60 mg/m² and Cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m² (AC) or Docetaxel 75 mg/m² and Cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m² (TC) every 3 weeks for 4 cycles as neoadjuvant therapy
Non-Guided Arm
Non-genomically-guided treatment allocation.
This arm has the following cohorts:
* In patients randomly assigned to AC:
* Patients sensitive to AC
* Patients sensitive to TC
* Patients sensitive to neither AC nor TC
* In patients randomly assigned to TC:
* Patients sensitive to AC
* Patients sensitive to TC
* Patients sensitive to neither AC nor TC
Doxorubicin/Cyclophosphamide (AC) or Docetaxel/Cyclophosphamide (TC)
Doxorubicin 60 mg/m² and Cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m² (AC) or Docetaxel 75 mg/m² and Cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m² (TC) every 3 weeks for 4 cycles as neoadjuvant therapy
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Doxorubicin/Cyclophosphamide (AC) or Docetaxel/Cyclophosphamide (TC)
Doxorubicin 60 mg/m² and Cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m² (AC) or Docetaxel 75 mg/m² and Cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m² (TC) every 3 weeks for 4 cycles as neoadjuvant therapy
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Stage: Any patient with a clinical T1c (\>1.5 cm) to T3 invasive breast cancer by the revised TNM staging system (AJCC 6th edition) will be eligible. Any N stage disease is allowed. No distant metastases allowed.
3. Tumor Site: Patients must have invasive cancer in the breast. Multifocal disease (i.e. confined to a single quadrant in the same breast) is allowed. Multicentric disease (i.e. disease in multiple breast quadrants) is not allowed. Determination of multifocal and multicentric disease status will be made by the evaluating surgeon; ambiguous cases will be reviewed by the principal investigator. Patients with synchronous contralateral invasive breast cancers are not eligible; prior contralateral breast cancer allowed as long as patient has not received prior chemotherapy or radiation therapy in the past 5 years.
4. Measurable Disease: Patients must have measurable disease in the breast by imaging studies (mammogram, ultrasound, or MRI), and must be greater than 1.5 cm in at least one dimension by one or more of the imaging assessments.
5. Conventional Biomarker Status: Standard clinical biomarkers for ER, PR, and HER2 must be obtained on the initial diagnostic core biopsy. The invasive cancer must be HER2 negative (i.e. immunohistochemistry score 1-2+ and/or FISH non-amplified). Any ER/PR status is allowed. Patients who are HER2 2+ on initial immunohistochemistry assessment will be further assessed by FISH. In this instance, patient will be consented and further screened for eligibility and have tissue acquired for genomic profiling. If the standard of care additional FISH testing is positive for HER2 gene amplification, the patient will not be randomized and will be treated in the same manner as screen failures.
6. Must be deemed a surgical candidate.
7. Fresh tissue biopsy material must be available for genomics analysis.
8. No prior chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or biologic/targeted therapy for the currently diagnosed breast cancer, or any other malignancy in the past 5 years, is allowed. No prior anthracycline or taxane therapy.
9. Prior malignancies are allowed if the patient is considered to be disease-free for 5 or more years and is deemed to be at low risk for recurrence. Patients with any prior diagnosis of in situ malignancies (melanoma, bladder, colon, cervical, basal cell, or squamous carcinoma) are eligible regardless of time from diagnosis.
10. Aged at least 18 years.
11. ECOG Performance Status 0-1.
12. Adequate Organ Function:
1. Total bilirubin ≤1.0 x the institutional ULN
2. Hepatic enzymes (AST (SGOT), ALT (SGPT)) ≤1.5x the institutional ULN
3. Alkaline Phosphatase ≤2.5 x ULN
4. Serum creatinine ≤2.0 mg/dl
5. Neutrophil count (ANC or AGC) ≥1000/ μL
6. Platelets ≥100,000/ μL
7. Cardiac Ejection Fraction ≥50% by MUGA, Echo or MRI.
13. Significant cardiac disease that would preclude the use of anthracyclines: No myocardial infarction in the last 6 months; history of congestive heart failure, serious cardiac arrhythmia requiring medication, active coronary artery disease/angina pectoris requiring therapy, uncontrolled hypertension defined as BP \>150/90 despite medication; any other unstable cardiac condition as perceived by treating physician or study PI.
14. No other serious medical or psychiatric illness.
15. Pregnancy: Patients may not be pregnant or nursing at the time of enrollment and other restrictions apply.
16. Signed written informed consent including HIPAA.
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
United States Department of Defense
FED
Duke University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Paul K Marcom, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Duke Cancer Institute
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Potti A, Dressman HK, Bild A, Riedel RF, Chan G, Sayer R, Cragun J, Cottrill H, Kelley MJ, Petersen R, Harpole D, Marks J, Berchuck A, Ginsburg GS, Febbo P, Lancaster J, Nevins JR. Genomic signatures to guide the use of chemotherapeutics. Nat Med. 2006 Nov;12(11):1294-300. doi: 10.1038/nm1491. Epub 2006 Oct 22.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
W81XWH-07-1-0394
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
BC060228-W81XWH-07-1-0394
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
Pro00001345
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id