Trial Outcomes & Findings for Reflux Esophagitis Phase III Study (Initial Treatment) (NCT NCT00633932)
NCT ID: NCT00633932
Last Updated: 2010-12-20
Results Overview
Los Angeles classification consists of 5 grades (Grade O, Grade A, Grade B, Grade C, Grade D). The subjects who were definitely diagnosed to have RE classified into LA classification Grade A, B, C or D based on the EGD on Visit 1 were randomised. A subject classified into LA classification Grade O was considered no reflux esophagitis. The definitions of each grade are: Grade A (Mucosal break \< 5 mm in length), Grade B (Mucosal break \> 5mm), Grade C (Mucosal break continuous between \> 2 mucosal folds) and Grade D (Mucosal break \>75% of esophageal circumference).
COMPLETED
PHASE3
602 participants
8 weeks
2010-12-20
Participant Flow
First subject enrolled on 11 December 2007. Last subject completed on 12 December 2008.
Out of 602 enrolled subjects, 572 subjects were randomised and 30 subjects were not randomised. The reasons of no randomisation were 'Incorrect enrollment' (25 subjects) and 'Voluntary discontinuation by Subject' (5 subjects).
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Experimental: Esomeprazole 40mg
Esomeprazole 40mg once daily
|
Experimental: Esomeprazole 20mg
Esomeprazole 20mg once daily
|
Comparator: Omeprazole 20mg
Omeprazole 20mg once daily
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
191
|
190
|
191
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
179
|
176
|
180
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
12
|
14
|
11
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Experimental: Esomeprazole 40mg
Esomeprazole 40mg once daily
|
Experimental: Esomeprazole 20mg
Esomeprazole 20mg once daily
|
Comparator: Omeprazole 20mg
Omeprazole 20mg once daily
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
1
|
3
|
4
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
3
|
9
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
1
|
0
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
|
5
|
2
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Physician Decision
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Doctor's judgement
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Moved Away
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Reflux Esophagitis Phase III Study (Initial Treatment)
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Experimental: Esomeprazole 40mg
n=191 Participants
Esomeprazole 40mg once daily
|
Experimental: Esomeprazole 20mg
n=190 Participants
Esomeprazole 20mg once daily
|
Comparator: Omeprazole 20mg
n=191 Participants
Omeprazole 20mg once daily
|
Total
n=572 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Customized
< 65 years
|
127 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
135 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
126 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
388 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
65 - 74 years
|
47 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
36 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
44 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
127 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
>= 75 years
|
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
54 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
Missing
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Male
|
139 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
137 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
134 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
410 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female
|
51 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
52 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
56 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
159 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Missing
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 8 weeksPopulation: One participant for each treatment group did not take any investigational product. These 3 participants were excluded (1 for each treatment group) from all the efficacy and safety analyses.
Los Angeles classification consists of 5 grades (Grade O, Grade A, Grade B, Grade C, Grade D). The subjects who were definitely diagnosed to have RE classified into LA classification Grade A, B, C or D based on the EGD on Visit 1 were randomised. A subject classified into LA classification Grade O was considered no reflux esophagitis. The definitions of each grade are: Grade A (Mucosal break \< 5 mm in length), Grade B (Mucosal break \> 5mm), Grade C (Mucosal break continuous between \> 2 mucosal folds) and Grade D (Mucosal break \>75% of esophageal circumference).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Experimental: Esomeprazole 40mg
n=190 Participants
Esomeprazole 40mg once daily
|
Experimental: Esomeprazole 20mg
n=189 Participants
Esomeprazole 20mg once daily
|
Comparator: Omeprazole 20mg
n=190 Participants
Omeprazole 20mg once daily
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Healing of Reflux Esophagitis (RE) Who Were Graded "O" at Week 8 Out of Patients Who Were Graded "A, B, C or D" at Baseline According to Los Angeles Classification".
|
171 participants
|
165 participants
|
166 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 4 weeksPopulation: One participant for each treatment group did not take any investigational product. These 3 participants were excluded (1 for each treatment group) from all the efficacy and safety analyses.
Los Angeles classification consists of 5 grades (Grade O, Grade A, Grade B, Grade C and Grade D). The subjects who were definitely diagnosed to have RE classified into LA classification Grade A, B, C or D based on the EGD on Visit 1 were randomised. A subject classified into LA classification Grade O was considered no reflux esophagitis. The definitions of each grade are: Grade A (Mucosal break \< 5 mm in length), Grade B (Mucosal break \> 5mm), Grade C (Mucosal break continuous between \> 2 mucosal folds) and Grade D (Mucosal break \>75% of esophageal circumference).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Experimental: Esomeprazole 40mg
n=190 Participants
Esomeprazole 40mg once daily
|
Experimental: Esomeprazole 20mg
n=189 Participants
Esomeprazole 20mg once daily
|
Comparator: Omeprazole 20mg
n=190 Participants
Omeprazole 20mg once daily
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Healing of Reflux Esophagitis (RE) Who Were Graded "O" at Week 4 Out of Patients Who Were Graded "A, B, C or D" at Baseline According to Los Angeles Classification
|
141 participants
|
147 participants
|
143 participants
|
Adverse Events
Experimental: Esomeprazole 40mg
Experimental: Esomeprazole 20mg
Comparator: Omeprazole 20mg
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Experimental: Esomeprazole 40mg
n=190 participants at risk
Esomeprazole 40mg once daily
|
Experimental: Esomeprazole 20mg
n=189 participants at risk
Esomeprazole 20mg once daily
|
Comparator: Omeprazole 20mg
n=190 participants at risk
Omeprazole 20mg once daily
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchopneumonia
|
0.00%
0/190
One patient for each treatment group did not take any investigational product.
|
0.53%
1/189
One patient for each treatment group did not take any investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/190
One patient for each treatment group did not take any investigational product.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
0.00%
0/190
One patient for each treatment group did not take any investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/189
One patient for each treatment group did not take any investigational product.
|
0.53%
1/190
One patient for each treatment group did not take any investigational product.
|
|
General disorders
Influenza Like Illness
|
0.00%
0/190
One patient for each treatment group did not take any investigational product.
|
0.53%
1/189
One patient for each treatment group did not take any investigational product.
|
0.00%
0/190
One patient for each treatment group did not take any investigational product.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Experimental: Esomeprazole 40mg
n=190 participants at risk
Esomeprazole 40mg once daily
|
Experimental: Esomeprazole 20mg
n=189 participants at risk
Esomeprazole 20mg once daily
|
Comparator: Omeprazole 20mg
n=190 participants at risk
Omeprazole 20mg once daily
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
1.1%
2/190
One patient for each treatment group did not take any investigational product.
|
1.6%
3/189
One patient for each treatment group did not take any investigational product.
|
3.2%
6/190
One patient for each treatment group did not take any investigational product.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
5.3%
10/190
One patient for each treatment group did not take any investigational product.
|
3.2%
6/189
One patient for each treatment group did not take any investigational product.
|
5.3%
10/190
One patient for each treatment group did not take any investigational product.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee All PIs were prohibited to disclose all information related to this study withiout AZ approval before this study was completed.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER